User talk:Grutman
Welcome!
Hello, Wormke-Grutman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Joaquin008 (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- I also noticed your recent contributions. First, many thanks for creating Hagere Selam (Degua Tembien); there are hundreds of Ethiopian towns & villages which need articles. However, I have two questions about your recent edits: (1) Since the Hagere Selam in the south of the country is (relatively speaking) the best known town of that name, do we really need a disambiguation page pointing to both, rather than a "For" template at the article for the larger town to the smaller? (2) I haven't encountered "Kilte Awulaelo" in my work on Ethiopia for Wikipedia, let alone as an alternative name for Wukro; can you provide some cites that attest to it? Thanks. -- llywrch (talk) 17:07, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- (1) I see the population of both towns is quite comparable. I think 'best known' is very dependant on who're you're asking. Asking someone from the south he will know the one in Sidama zone, asking one in the northern part of the country, he will not know about Hagere Selam towns other than the one in the Tembien. There are many other areas which are called Hagere Selam too, but none of them are towns, so for now I only mentioned these two in the disambiguation list. I think it's comparable to a La Bastide in France for example. By the way the population number was extracted from the results of the 2007 census. These aren't published yet officially. For I know, in Degua Tembien they were conducted on the kebele level. This is in contrast to the numbers of the CSA of 2005, which are (for I know), extrapolation of the 1994 census using the woreda growth rates. The yearly growth number was calculated from the numbers of 1994 and 2007.
- (2) While I was working in Tigray in 2009, "Kilte Awulaelo" was not used for the Wukro tabia. I found it while browsing through the census data of 2007 where the tabias of the Wukro tabia where summarized under the "Kilte Awulaelo" woreda. I googled it and apparently it is used as a woreda name. As it is used in official census data tables, I think as Wukro grew to become a large town, people started using Wukro to name the district. I'm not sure if "Kilte Awulaelo" is still officially used, but I wouldn't certainly change the title of the page as the name Wukro is must more known. But if people read documents about a Kilte Awulaelo district, I think it's good they are referred to the right wiki, that's why I made a redirect page from Kilte Awulaelo to Wukro (woreda). Greets, Wormke-Grutman (talk) 18:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Where did you find the 2007 census data? So far all I've been able to find about that is the summary published by the CSA on their website, which omits figures for all towns which are not urban woredas. (It also doesn't help that the CSA website is not reachable at the moment. I don't know if it's because of server problems or because the Ethiopian government is throttling the country's Internet connection again.) -- llywrch (talk) 04:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Your addition of the AoE III template has been reverted by many editors on different articles.
[edit]See WP:MILPOP for the official explanation. This is not a fantasy encyclopedia, so the template is not suitable in most articles here. Imagine what would happen if stacked tons of those templates for every game in every article on tanks. Try gaming.wikia.com. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 14:40, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Template:Units in Age of Empires II has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Cambalachero (talk) 17:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Southern Nations, Nationalities and People's Region listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Southern Nations, Nationalities and People's Region. Since you had some involvement with the Southern Nations, Nationalities and People's Region redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). አቤል ዳዊት (Janweh) (talk) 22:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Arcadia (popular culture)
[edit]Hello Wormke-Grutman,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Arcadia (popular culture) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enderta Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tembien. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Agula may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- , it lies about 32 km northeast of [[Mek'ele]], just east of the Mek'ele - [[Addis Ababa]] highway ([[Ethiopian Highway 1]], and 25 km north of [[Qwiha]]. It has a latitude and longitude of {{coord|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Debre Sina, Ethiopia
- added links pointing to Amhara and Debre Sina
- Dela, Ethiopia
- added a link pointing to Tigray
- Ethiopian Highway 1
- added a link pointing to Tigray
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Orange Book vs. Conservatives
[edit]Hi, in response to your question on the Liberal Democrats talk page - there are many similarities between the Orange Book wing of the Lib Dems and the Conservatives, especially the one-nation faction which tends to dominate the Conservative leadership these days. The similarities are that both are broadly pro-free market and pro-free trade, Atlanticist and liberal interventionist on foreign policy, believe in global warming, support same-sex marriage and supported membership of the EU. This is what made the Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition agreement possible. The centrist and Blairite New Labour faction of the Labour Party would also find many areas of agreement with these two groups.
However, the biggest differences are that the Orange Book Liberal Democrats have a very liberal stance on immigration, while the Conservatives are somewhat more restrictive, and that the Conservatives are much stronger defenders of the traditional role of British institutions, such as the Church of England, the monarchy, First Past the Post, the House of Lords, the military and law and order (through the courts and the police), while the Liberal Democrats are more inclined to support reform in these areas, such as proportional representation and drug decriminalisation. On civil liberties issues such as detention without trial and warrantless surveillance, the Conservatives, like Labour, typically make libertarian arguments against such measures when in opposition, but emphasise national security in these areas when in government, while the Liberal Democrats have been fairly consistently liberal on these issues.
The Conservatives also have more eurosceptic influences (the Orange Bookers supported British membership of the euro and even European federalism, both of which the Tories overwhelmingly opposed), and the influence of Thatcherism has made the Tories more liberal than the Orange Bookers on economics - the Tories generally want greater cuts to spending and taxation. Among the Tory backbenchers, there is an even more substantial difference, as many of them opposed same-sex marriage and are critics of the global warming theory. Some such as Michael Gove are neoconservatives, which makes them more willing to intervene militarily than the Orange Bookers would be, while others such as John Baron are disinclined towards foreign military intervention from a nationalist "putting Britain first" perspective, ironically bringing them more in line with the left-leaning social liberal faction of the Liberal Democrats.
--Jay942942 (talk) 11:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Ways to improve Spatiomap
[edit]Hi, I'm Scope creep. Wormke-Grutman, thanks for creating Spatiomap!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. One of the references no longer works. No reference explain exactly why the subject is notable, or indeed what they are. Google Books are a good source. Thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Scope creep (talk) 23:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Wormke-Grutman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Wormke-Grutman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Grutman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Arcadia in the arts and popular culture for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcadia in the arts and popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)