User talk:Jay942942

Hello Jay942942! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jack Naven Rulez Talk 18:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Citing sources • Footnotes Image use policy • Copyrights • Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry What Wikipedia is not • Deletion policy The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article Perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

AfD nomination of Lego Star Wars II (DS version)

An editor has nominated Lego Star Wars II (DS version), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego Star Wars II (DS version) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Lego Star Wars II (DS version). The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. MER-C 09:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Gardening Greatness

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gardening Greatness, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Fabrictramp 23:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Sources

Hello Jay. Thank you for your contributions to coldwater fish. However, you have added a lot of examples, but you have not provided any citations. Can you provide a reliable source for the addition you made? For example, if you were copying the list from a book, you xan add the book as your reference. If on the other hand, you are an expert on coldwater fish, and were just adding fish from the top of your head, then you are presumably expert enough to know where these fish are listed in the literature. Without a source, your list has little encyclopaedic value, and is liable to be removed. Thanks. --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:12, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello Geronimo. I copied the majority of the freshwater aquarium list from a fishkeeping magazine with supplements from my own knowledge, the freshwater pond one was just a compilation of species I'd got from websites and books, and the marine aquarium one was purely from websites. However, I am a real newbie to Wikipedia, and I don't really know how to add a citation, I clicked the link in your comment, but I still don't understand. Thanks for the notification. Jay942942 (talk) 21:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

If the magazine is a well established magazine, it would be okay as a source. Likewise, the books are probably okay as well. The websites may be okay if they are, for example, university or government websites, such as NOAA, or websites belongiing to reputable NGO's, such as the Sea Around Us. However , blogs and personal or commercial websites usually don't count. Create a section called "References" just before the "External links" section, and just list the details of your main references there as best as you can (two or three will do, and say which section of fishes the reference belongs to). Then I will reformat them so you can see how it is done. Feel free to ask me about things. The article is on my watchlist, so I will know when you edit it. Be bold in your editing, and if you are unsure about what you have done, you can ask me to look at it. --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:23, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Naxalite-Maoist insurgency

Hey I have a quick question about why you added Khalistan movement as a supporter of the government in the naxalilite uprising. Can you give me a response here? thanks, nice job on the rest of it.--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 03:55, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Communisthukrebel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Communisthukrebel.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

re United States

Please do not put back in an edit that has been removed with reason, and especially not without offering your own reason. The cycle is Bold, Revert, Discuss. You were bold; I reverted; it is now upon you to discuss on the talk page. Please do not edit war. --Golbez (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Is there a reason you have something against communicating? --Golbez (talk) 16:16, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I reverted without realizing it wasn't another revert from you, and unlike you, I wanted to offer a reason: Many languages are spoken in many places, so why single out French? There are probably more Chinese speakers in the U.S. than there are French. --Golbez (talk) 16:32, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Apologies for the reverts, it was accidental because I don't fully understand how to use Wikipedia. I singled out French as there are many French immersion schools in Louisiana, the French language has been in Louisiana for centuries, French has large cultural importance in the state, there is bilingual signage in many parts of the state and an act was passed by state legislature in 2011 meaning that the state government would try to identify employees proficient in French and take steps in providing services in French to Francophone locals and visitors.--Jay942942 (talk) 16:50, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for responding. Singling out French that way in the infobox, without giving a reason there (and indeed, without space to give a reason, because it's an infobox) would, I think, confuse readers. The nuance is best described in the text and the article on the languages of the country. --Golbez (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Subtropics

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Before large changes - discuss this on talk page of article. Subtropical-man (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

RE: European Council map

Hello, Jay942942. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Map workshop.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 20:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Republican National Convention, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

BJP

I dont know myself about this matter but we have to adhere a neutral policy,If you have a real command on these issues then please try to find a good source which makes you a good editor and dont think what previous editors had written.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 19:17, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

There might be nothing wrong but others don't know what you have written is correct or not.So, if i dont revert it, it may be reverted by someone else .---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 19:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Thats Ok!Try to mention your contribution in edit summary.Actually the aricle is already troubled with multiple issues as you see maintenance tags above.You seems to be on the positive side and i appreciate your knowledge,So try to find source and references.Thanx---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 19:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

enjoy! ---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:46, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm,thats a good idea.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 19:51, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Citing sources

Hello, I'm RJFF. I noticed that you made a change to an article, European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 19:01, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Left-wing politics, Green Party of England and Wales, Plaid Cymru and European Democratic Party. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 21:38, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tea Party movement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mike Lee

United States presidential election debates, 2012 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to ABC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

BJP

You seem to be pretty interested in that article and i think you have deep knowledge too about this party then why dont you try a little more and improve it to the extent so the maintenance tags will be removed.Thanks---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 17:40, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

German Greens

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Alliance '90/The Greens, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 16:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Young Britons' Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of US Congresspersons who support or oppose SOPA/PIPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mike Lee

Third-party members of state legislatures of the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Libertarian Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Democratic Movement (France) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Centre

People's Party – Movement for a Democratic Slovakia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Centre

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan Zahradil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Internal links to color words

Hello, Jay942942. You recently edited Liberal Democrats, adding internal links to the words "yellow" and "orange" in the infobox. The word orange has many meanings, and the page at that title is a disambiguation page.

In addition, everyday words that can be easily understood should in general not be linked, unless the pages so linked are on similar topics. Most English speakers can understand the words yellow and orange, and discussion of the colors is probably not of interest to encyclopedia users reading about the Liberal Democrats. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking for more discussion.

Thanks, and happy editing. Cnilep (talk) 03:49, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Libertarian Party (United States), it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Gold Standard 17:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Left–right politics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traditionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited European Alliance for Freedom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Dawn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

House Liberty Caucus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Jim Jordan, Jimmy Duncan, Mark Meadows and Jeff Duncan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberty Caucus (2012), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Civil conflict in the Philippines

The article Civil conflict in the Philippines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be original research, was created by a sock and the factual accuracy of this article is highly doubted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 12:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue Dog Coalition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Barrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Thank you for your edit to this page today. Could you convert the footnotes to the customary WP format, please? These notes should help.

Composing footnotes using the WP cite templates

(Summary of WP:FOOTNOTES section 3.1.)

Please note that bare URL footnotes – i.e. footnotes that contain only the website http address – are susceptible to link-rot, which means that if the website moves to a new domain with a new URL, the link will be broken and readers will be unable to read the citation.

1. First put the cursor at the point in the edit text where you want the footnote to go, then click "Cite" in the edit strip at the top of the Edit Page, then click "Templates" on the left, and a drop-down menu appears.
2. Choose "cite web" or "cite news" (for articles and websites), "cite book" or "cite journal", click and a box comes up.
3. Fill in the all details of the citation, then click "Preview" and "Show parsed preview" to see it looks right. (To correct anything, correct the box entries, then click the two "Previews" again.) In "cite book" remember to add the page number(s) of the book.
4. Click "Insert" and the citation automatically goes into the edit text. (It may not go in at the exact point where the cursor is if you use Firefox or Chrome.)

Thanks. --P123ct1 (talk) 16:28, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

ISIS

I note that you have put in yet another bare URL today. Would you please convert as per notice above. You have been in Wikipedia for many years; it should not be difficult for you to do this. --P123ct1 (talk) 20:46, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Congressional caucus

Template:Infobox Congressional caucus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Right-wing political parties, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Labour Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Flag of Al-Sabireen.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of Al-Sabireen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Pokemon forms listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon forms. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon forms redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Edit summaries at tenditious article

Proposed cabinet of Donald Trump is a highly visible, rapidly changing and sometimes tenditious article. It would be really helpful if you'd leave an edit summary of your changes there. Thanks. - Brianhe (talk) 16:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

How to create edit summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Brianhe (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jay942942. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Movement for a Europe of Liberties and Democracy logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Movement for a Europe of Liberties and Democracy logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You need reliable sources even to add categories.

Kautilya3 (talk) 20:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Republican Party (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Right-wing populism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Your recent editing history at Alex Jones (radio host) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You've been here over a decade, you know the drill: when your edit has been disputed by other editors, you either discuss it on the article's talk page in hopes of the restoration of your edit -- or you leave it as is. You don't edit war. My suggestion would be that you discuss your edit on the article's talk page. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

To clarify, the initial editor I reverted was someone who had the mistaken impression I deleted material on the page. This differs from the objections of the second editor I reverted, which was regarding the source itself. I understand and accept that a strict interpretation of the rules under WP:EW would mean this still constitutes edit warring. No one seems to be disputing the actual claim being made, but I will make a post on the talk page anyhow.--Jay942942 (talk) 13:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Lego Star Wars II (DS version) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lego Star Wars II (DS version). Since you had some involvement with the Lego Star Wars II (DS version) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BlueDoglogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BlueDoglogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BlueDoglogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BlueDoglogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Alt-Right template

I will have to request you undo the reversion of my deletion of Milo Yiannopolous. This is the second time my edit was reverted without a citation of why Milo should be considered a member of the Alt-Right. He personally disavows the Alt-Right, and the Alt-Right disavows him. Milo disavowing the Alt-Right Someone speaking for the Alt-Right stating their disagreement of what Milo does

If you can properly cite sources on what the Alt-Right is, and how that relates to how Milo is, despite his disagreements with the movement, and people within the movement not accepting him, then feel free to leave a note here with those citations and disregard my request to undo the reversion you have done. C.D. Random (talk) 09:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

I did not revert your deletion, according to the edit history. Please consult the individual who did instead.--Jay942942 (talk) 10:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

References

Jared Taylor, alt-right template footer

Taylor's article mentions "alt-right" exactly one time: "Taylor has often been described in media reports as associated with the alt-right". Given that we haven't even agreed upon a standard for inclusion in this template, relying on that one line seems way out of line. Rockypedia (talk) 22:36, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Considering there's only about 4 people that are actively involved in the editing of that footer box, I think a consensus on anything is unlikely to arise. As a result, I'd like to move to an RfC.--Jay942942 (talk) 13:51, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jay942942. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paleoconservatism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constitution Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

PiS Ideology Section

What do you have in mind? This ideology section has a long history of confusion. CopperPhoenix (talk) 03:35, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

• Made some changes to the ideology section. Condenses it - makes me happy. Keeps most citations - makes you and the rest of wikipedia happy. We good now? CopperPhoenix (talk) 03:50, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for keeping the well sourced material, this is a big improvement on before.--Jay942942 (talk) 08:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drmies (talk) 03:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Editing without logging in

You have been making many, many edits without being logged in. They are clearly intended to evade scrutiny and thus are considered abusive. I am not blocking you for your behavior, but consider this an only warning that if you persist in failing to log in when you edit Wikipedia, you risk being blocked for sock puppetry.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

The edits while not logged in were accidental. In future I will check I am logged in before editing.--Jay942942 (talk) 22:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Based on the number and juxtaposition of logged out edits, I don't believe they were accidental. However, as long as you stop doing it, I won't take any action.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Palmer Luckey, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages FEC and Steve Knight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please read WP:CATDEF and stop making category changes based on your own personal opinion. —MBL ^talk 00:21, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 18:21, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

ACT New Zealand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to David Seymour

Electoral alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to National Democratic Alliance

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Re:New Zealand parties edits

Thank you for your contributions. I hope I don't come across as combative/unhelpful. The issue of the National Party's ideology, and how exactly to describe the "liberal" element, has been contentious! --Hazhk (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ACT New Zealand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Seymour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great Indonesia Movement Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Right-wing populism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Ford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Forum for Democracy (Netherlands), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steve Bannon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tommy Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Peter Dutton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bloomberg

Right-wing populism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bloomberg

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australian House of Representatives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cathy McGowan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American nationalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bolton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Your reverts

Hello, I'm ObserverEU. You have reverted my edits in Law and Justice. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions. You seem to be an experienced user. I am a new enWP user but seasoned in real life. My understanding is that we strive for neutral point of view and balance based on verfified sources. Your revert to Law and Justice seemed not neutral to me, so I reverted it for now. You have provided some news articles for PiS being right-wing. Did you see on the talk page, that there are just over 4 thousand news describing PiS as "Conservative" centre-right? In addition I have provided there more than 30 exemplary sources from all types of media incl. governments/insitutions/science/public and private media/wikipedia articles describing PiS as conservative. Lets engage on Talk:Law_and_Justice to find a consenus on a balanced description. Kind regards --ObserverEU (talk) 16:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jay942942. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Likud. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. You seem to have an animus against nationalism and right-wing politics. I advise you stay away from such subjects for a while.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  07:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

I didn't add any personal view or original research, nor do I have such an animus - in fact, over the last few years on several articles regarding nationalist or right-wing politics I have advocated for removing or tempering the excessive "far right" labels that were present on Wikipedia a few years ago. All I did on the Likud article was remove a "majority" subheading after another editor removed a "minority" subheading - which is the reasonable thing to do in such a situation, and neither "majority" nor "minority" are mentioned in sources. Are you confusing me with another user, or did you undo the wrong edit?--Jay942942 (talk) 10:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China–Japan relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jacob Rees-Mogg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CasaPound, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

citation

Do you have a citation for them calling themselves "United Right"? ShimonChai (talk) 23:54, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 12:39, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neoconservatism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of United Opposition (India)

The article United Opposition (India) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS, no enduring notability as the attempt to create an alliance failed

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Gazoth (talk) 11:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freedom Caucus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The New Right (Denmark), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Endorsements in the 2019 Conservative Party (UK) leadership election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chardal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ya'akov Katz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catherine Blaiklock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Right-wing populism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Right (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Endorsements in the 2019 United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tommy Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Endorsements in the 2019 United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Woodcock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neo-nationalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Endorsements in the 2019 United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Longworth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:16, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice for post-1932 American politics and living or recently deceased people

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:NewDemocratCoalitionlogo.jpg

The file File:NewDemocratCoalitionlogo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Democracy (Greece), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National conservatism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatherland Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Patriots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ataka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Progress Party

As you see, a lot of the labels we discuss are just name-calling, kindergarden level. Cheers Heptor (talk) 00:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Question

Hi. I see you are keen on labelling disparate historical parties as "national conservative" in the infobox (WP:UNDUE at best, unsourced most of the time), even when it is clearly not the dominating label in sources providing a holistic treatment in depth about the political parties concerned. Is there a reason for it? I can only come to think about a dogwistle I am not yet able to hear or putting the overarching interest of a fictional "national conservatism" wikiproject ahead of the quality of the individual articles as possible rationales, but surely there needs to be another reason... Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 02:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Feeder shrimp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palaemon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

can you please update File:Right-wing populist parties in European national parliaments (October 2019).png

norway is no longer providing external support for government and in united kingdom is wrong, it is in no way Right-wing populists involved in the government it actually should be gray as there no Right-wing populists represented in the parliament Gooduserdude (talk) 06:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asia Pacific Democrat Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People Power Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring

please stop adding "right-wing" to infoboxes against consensus. I don't want to report you, talk it out rather than editwar, you are going against consensus. Cheers.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bacondrum (talk) 00:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

I didn't add that. I removed "right wing populist" because it is not a position. I don't care what else is in there, so long as it's a position.--Jay942942 (talk) 00:55, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alternative for Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-Islam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bharatiya Janata Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikkei.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

International reactions to the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol

added a link pointing to Michael McCormack

Matt Gaetz

added a link pointing to Vanity Fair

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Citation argument: page

I am currently cleaning up Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls, and I see citations with arguments like these: page=112|page=113 instead of pages=112{{ndash}}113. Are you aware of this? I wrote this talk message to notify you in case you are not. – Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 15:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

I was not aware, must have been accidental, I will fix.--Jay942942 (talk) 15:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

For your reference, the diffs I have found with this problem are Special:Diff/1000745895 and Special:Diff/1000747596. – Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 15:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice and Development Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:House Freedom Caucus logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:House Freedom Caucus logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Contentious topics alert - American politics

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on People's Alliance (Turkey)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page People's Alliance (Turkey), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on People's Alliance (Turkey)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page People's Alliance (Turkey), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Mohammed bin Salman

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mohammed bin Salman, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Israel–Russia relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mikhail Bogdanov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of European Party for Individual Liberty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Party for Individual Liberty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Party for Individual Liberty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grnrchst (talk) 21:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on New Right (Denmark)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page New Right (Denmark), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on New Right (Denmark)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page New Right (Denmark), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:European Party for Individual Liberty logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:European Party for Individual Liberty logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sweden Democrats, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordon sanitaire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)