User talk:ObscureReality
|
April 2010 - December 2010 |
|
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| For this edit, which help to make my headache go away because I've been looking long and hard trying to figure out how to reformat/reword since day 1 of the messy text dump by an ignorant but helpful (good faith, nonetheless) newbie. Good job~! Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 16:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC) |
Appreciated mate! TalkWoe90i 21:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Thanks for your message on my talk page, in the section Re: Edit warring. I have replied there. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:21, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Military history coordinator election
[edit]The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 10:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Page Curation newsletter
[edit]Hey ObscureReality. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 03:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
.
Editings of Blue-water navy
[edit]Thank you for your instruction in Blue-water navy. I made proposition at Talk:Blue-water navy#Korea, Russia, Japan? to add the JMSDF, so if you are OK, I would appreciate your opinions.--Panda 51 (talk) 03:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
UK great power status
[edit]I'm afraid some editors are now trying to get rid of the mention of great power status in the United Kingdom article, or at least water it down. Seems like a typical POV attack by these editors (though they pretend otherwise). Could you chip in? David (talk) 23:57, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:New BAE-Systems Type 26.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:New BAE-Systems Type 26.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
You and my talk page
[edit]Non-native english speakers don't know english? Are you a racist? It really does not make any difference if its Description or Characteristics. I have seen Description used in a lot of similar articles here. Please don't bring your observations to my talk page in future, or I will simply remove them. Thanks. --Anir1uph | talk | contrib 14:23, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
It really does make a difference, it really does. I would say just because you have seen it before doesn't necessarily make it right. No please, no need to thank me, it was my pleasure. Obscure Reality Ping me 14:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)It was not a personal attack, but rather a racist remark about Indians in general. No, I did not accuse Anir1uph of being unfamiliar with the English language because he is Indian, his nationality was irrelevant. Anir1uph showed failure to use the English language correctly, common practice among non-native English speakers. I am fed up with uneducated third world citizens who edit Wikipedia according to their own POV. Anir1uph is a pretentious editor and forms fart of a larger Indian demographic who subtly edit Wikipedia pushing their own POV, using weasel words and do not adhere to consensus. There is a growing concern among a considerable number of White Western editors that due to the increased availability of computers and the internet around the world - the number of uneducated third world citizens with a POV agenda to their edits is rising rapidly. Nationalism is a large factor in this and it isn't healthy for the Wikipedia community. There is an ongoing clash of culture and outlooks, Asians view the world differently than Europeans and North Americans. In my opinion the sooner editors are restricted to editing Wikipedia in their native tongue the better.
I will hold my hands up for my disliking of India and the Indian population, I have a ferocious and bitter attitude towards them, but not hatred. I pity India and its misfortune - 5,000 Children die every day in India under the age of 5, how sad.
I find it amazing that inept little brown people can even use computers.Obscure Reality Ping me 16:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
As a side note, when a router is reset a new IP is given... so even though I may not be able to edit from this user name, whats stopping me from editing Wikipedia if i create a new user? Even regional blocks don't work! Wikipedia needs to find real solutions to real problems.Obscure Reality Ping me 16:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
ObscureReality (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Because it is in violation of free speech, so what if it is a privately owned website? It is illegal for a privately owned business to violate freedom of speech. Why should a website that invites the public to make contributions be exempt from those rules? Racism is not a crime. Anyway, I request that my user page and user talk page be replaced with a blocked user template please. Ill be back on a different user I guess.Obscure Reality Ping me 16:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are not only making despicably racist comments about other editors; you are also trying to insert grossly tendentious personal opinion into articles [1]. Having the gall to then go accusing Indian editors of POV editing the next moment [2] marks you as not merely a despicable racist, but a very stupid and hypocritical racist. People like you are not welcome on this project. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:12, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Re: "It is illegal for a privately owned business to violate freedom of speech": No, it is not - your First Amendment applies to government only. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
ObscureReality (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I regret and offer apologies for my actions in early February. Up until this incident I had been active on Wikipedia for almost three years, all of which without incident and throughout this time, I have been genuinely seeking to do my best for the project. I know that the damage is now done, my three years of being a Wikipedian tarnished by my poor show of behavior, and trust in me lost - but I understand my actions were totally unacceptable and humbly request that I may be allowed to prove my words true. Anir1uph I hope you accept this sincere apology and it finds you in good health. Apologies and thank you. ObscureReality.194.46.226.154 (talk) 14:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
We cannot accept unblock requests placed by anonymous IP addresses as there is no proof whatsoever that they are who they claim to be. Editors whose talkpages are locked have only the ability to appeal to the Ban Appeals Subcommittee. This block applies to you, the person - formally, if it's honestly you using an IP, you are violating WP:EVADE which normally makes it necessary to block the IP as well. Please do not force me to further lock this talkpage from any additional comments - I'll WP:AGF that you'll follow the proper process. On a more personal note: there's no way in hell that you should be requesting unblock for a minimum of 6 months after the block, based on the principles of WP:OFFER. Based on your previous unblock request, you seem to claim you had rights that you most definitely do not - you have no rights here whatsoever. Guide yourself, your research, and your future accordingly (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Just for information, Anir1uph is not the only user you must apologize.There are many other users whom you have accused of POV pushing(that includes me too).Morever, if you feel that little brown people are not eligible to use computers, please find some other place for your ideology. TheStrikeΣagle 14:46, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- I have not forgotten my actions and my apologies are intended for all those affected. I only placed more emphasis on my apology towards Anir1uph as my injustice towards him was greater. Please Strike Eagle, accept my apologies towards you too. Furthermore I put no weight behind my malicious behavior and despite my words - as represent above in early February - maintain no racist ideology. I will accept any decision made by the Administrators regarding my request. But I do hope they will exercise a measure of kindness in acknowledgement that my recent actions are disproportionate to my otherwise good history of behavior on Wikipedia. ObscureReality. 194.46.226.154 (talk) 15:48, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- The february event is just one of the many controversies you were involved in. You previously made many racist comments [3] [4], abused Rollback right and reverted edits by established editors, made a 4RR vio and stopped only after I warned you in your talk [5].I would not like to comment about the block.It's none of my business.But this behavior would take you nowhere. TheStrikeΣagle 16:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- I have not forgotten my actions and my apologies are intended for all those affected. I only placed more emphasis on my apology towards Anir1uph as my injustice towards him was greater. Please Strike Eagle, accept my apologies towards you too. Furthermore I put no weight behind my malicious behavior and despite my words - as represent above in early February - maintain no racist ideology. I will accept any decision made by the Administrators regarding my request. But I do hope they will exercise a measure of kindness in acknowledgement that my recent actions are disproportionate to my otherwise good history of behavior on Wikipedia. ObscureReality. 194.46.226.154 (talk) 15:48, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:08, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Turkish military info box
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Template:Turkish military info box requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. eh bien mon prince (talk) 13:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:03, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:40, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Type 26 frigate post sdsr.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading File:Type 26 frigate post sdsr.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
[edit]Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 16:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Table showing the decline of the Russian Navy
[edit]
Template:Table showing the decline of the Russian Navy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Project 17 class frigate weapon fit
[edit]Template:Project 17 class frigate weapon fit has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bae systems official gcs release.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Bae systems official gcs release.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Type 45 weapon fit
[edit]Template:Type 45 weapon fit has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Type 23 frigate weapon fit
[edit]Template:Type 23 frigate weapon fit has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Astute class weaponry
[edit]Template:Astute class weaponry has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:45, 4 November 2024 (UTC)