User talk:Wllmlos

Hello Wllmlos, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

We hope you enjoy the collaborative nature of our encyclopedia and want to stay.

As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

We value all of our editors higly and believe that Editors Matter!

You can ask questions at the New Contributor's Help Page or even at the Village Pump.

Alternatively, you can feel free to ask any questions on my talk page; I'm always happy to help.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

A Few Personal Recommendations:

About Wikipedia and Contributing:

Wikipedia's 5 Pillars — Wikipedia's foundation
The Simplified Ruleset — Wikipedia's "rules" summary
Contributing to Wikipedia — How you can help guide
Questions — Where to ask questions
Cheatsheet — Wikipedia mark-up coding guide
Referencing — How to use the citation tags
Table of Contents — Searching and Browsing
Department Directory — Wikipedia by Department

Introduction
Our notability guidelines
The need for reliable sources
Verifiability is the key to WikiSuccess
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Wikipedia's Manual of Style
Vandalism and Civility

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (username and date stamp).

If you would like to practice your new Wiki skills, the Sandbox is the place for you to do it.
Be civil, but have fun. That's what it's all about.

If you'd like any recommendations for a few random articles to take a look at just for fun, go ahead and check out this eclectic list:

Capybara — Lantana — Medic — Laurel McGoff — Moolack Beach — Oozlefinch — Oozlefinch — Polar fleece — Pom-pon — Ariana Richards

Good luck, and have fun. We're glad to have you here!

— Your friendly neighborhood WikiDragon, VigilancePrime (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glen Este, Ohio

I got your message regarding the article you created at Glen Este, Ohio. Ordinarily I would only reply on my talk page, but to make sure you see this, I'm copying it here as well.

I did a little bit of Wikification for the article, including adding section headings. I don't see any problem as far as impending deletion discusions; ordinarily all geographical features, towns, and townships warrant their own article.

Feel free to contact me if you have other questions, need an outside opinion, or some other issue. I'm here to help and happy to have you on Wikipedia! • VigilancePrime • • • 04:35 (UTC) 21 Feb '08

Speedy deletion of "Dayton Hobbs"

A page you created, Dayton Hobbs, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 01:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dayton Hobbs

I have nominated Dayton Hobbs, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayton Hobbs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Leonard^(Bloom) 23:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarasponda

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Airplaneman ✈ 05:39, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Susan Sennett

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Susan Sennett, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 23:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barbi Losh

The article Barbi Losh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Touch Of Light (talk) 04:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC) [[[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barbi Losh

The article Barbi Losh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Andrew Kurish (talk) 22:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Barbi Losh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbi Losh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbi Losh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:06, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Barbi and Nicole.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Barbi and Nicole.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Williams

Good morning Wllmlos,

Thank you for your editing on the Andy Williams article last night. I have copy-edited your revision – added an hyperlink to multitracking – and a template asking for a citation. I have to warn you that the statement regarding his brothers must be referenced, otherwise it will have to be be removed.

Cheers!

-- Gareth Griffith-Jones/GG-J's Talk 08:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Susan Sennet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Susan Sennet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AutomaticStrikeout 03:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Five Fine Fillies

Hello Wllmlos,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Five Fine Fillies for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:10, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material

Hello, I'm Vanjagenije. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Coney Island hot dog, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I'm talking about this: [1], [2], [3], [4], and much more. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Fine Five Fillies

Hello, Wllmlos. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Fine Five Fillies, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ColonelHenry (talk) 04:50, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Five Fine Fillies

The article Five Fine Fillies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional band.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 23:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about V. Stiviano

Hello, Wllmlos,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether V. Stiviano should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V. Stiviano .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of V. Stiviano

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on V. Stiviano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Two kinds of pork (talk) 04:47, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vanessa Perez

Hello Wllmlos,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vanessa Perez for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 04:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of V Stiviano

The article V Stiviano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be a notable model. Being involved in the Clippers racism controversy is not a good claim to notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll note that there was previously an attempt to create the article V. Stiviano (note period), which was taken to AfD where it was decided to redirect to the Sterling article per this discussion. I've taken the liberty of redirecting your article to Donald Sterling as per that precedent. --Finngall ^talk 03:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jenny Scordamaglia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jenny Scordamaglia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://jennyscordamaglia.com/bio.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Iaritmioawp (talk) 14:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jenny Scordamaglia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jenny Scordamaglia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Penny (The Big Bang Theory)

Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to Penny (The Big Bang Theory), as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Jessie J, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. You've been here long enough you should know how the edit cycle goes and be avoiding an edit-war DMacks (talk) 07:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adam

Apart from not citing, your edits don't add anything to the article. It is already mentioned in the article that 'According to the Genealogies of Genesis, Adam died at the age of 930' (see the section named Post-expulsion). I have now informed you why people are reverting your edits on Adam. Please do not ignore the requests mentioned in the template above. 143.176.62.228 (talk) 16:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cincinnati, Georgetown and Portsmouth Railroad

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cincinnati, Georgetown and Portsmouth Railroad, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://clermont-county-history.org/historical-articles/batavia-railroad-cgp.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:04, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paige Hemmis

Your recent editing history at Paige Hemmis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

I noticed that you have continuously added the same, unsourced, information to Paige Hemmis's page lately regarding her usage of pink equipment and the resulting economical impact. While I don't doubt the information, as a biography of a living person, "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation." Please consider adding a reliable, secondary source to this information as proof, otherwise it is subject to removal as has been previously done. Thanks in advance. GauchoDude (talk) 13:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have, again, continuously added the same, unsourced, information to Paige Hemmis's page lately regarding her usage of pink equipment and the resulting economical impact. While I don't doubt the information, as a biography of a living person, "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation." Please consider adding a reliable, secondary source to this information as proof, otherwise it is subject to removal as has been previously done. Thanks in advance. GauchoDude (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit to Toilet

Your addition to Toilet is fascinating, but please provide a relable source, or it will most likely be reverted soon. Bishonen | talk 18:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Rachel Gusman.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Rachel Gusman.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Fat Liar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sparkle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sparkle (actress)

The article Sparkle (actress) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seemingly not notable. Unreferenced. The article states "very little is known about Glusman as there is no credit of her work on the movies where she played extras and background until she started playing 'old lady characters' in a few contemporary movies."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 21:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wllmlos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Saint Joseph, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 15:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at North Pole, Alaska. Favonian (talk) 16:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at North Pole, Alaska. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 17:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm Dhtwiki. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Johnny Marzetti, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dhtwiki (talk) 04:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sparkle (actress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sparkle (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparkle (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Dhtwiki. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Johnny Marzetti, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dhtwiki (talk) 23:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wllmlos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jennifer Scordamaglia (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Your formatting is a big mess; did you copy and paste this from somewhere else? When you copied it, you copied the visible text, not the code which is why this is displaying all messed up, with "[3]" instead of the actual footnotes, etc. Where did you copy this from? Can you go into Edit mode and copy it with the code so it displays okay?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer Scordamaglia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jennifer Scordamaglia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wllmlos! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jennifer Scordamaglia (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvements made so it remains unsourced, with no notability and very poorly formatted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer Scordamaglia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jennifer Scordamaglia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 05:43, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wllmlos. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Johnny Marzetti. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dhtwiki (talk) 23:44, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that you made a change to an article, George Wiedemann, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17 March 2019 - St Patrick

Hello. You made several edits to the Saint Patrick article; chiefly adding unsourced specific dates and one of his supposed personal names despite neither being established with any certainty. Additionally you replaced his birthplace with the supposed personal names. Because the information is speculative and unsourced, I and another editor have removed the information for now. If you need help with verification or citations of sources, you might want to consult WP:Verifiability and WP:Citing Sources. Twistlethrop (talk) 20:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Saint Patrick, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 02:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 02:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dotty Mack moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dotty Mack, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dotty Mack (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dotty Mack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dotty Mack, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GeneralPoxter (talk) 15:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't give up

I am sorry for the negative experience I gave you during the Articles for Creation process. Please see your response on my talk page for my full response. GeneralPoxter (talk) 04:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dotty Mack (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO/WP:NACTOR, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dotty Mack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dotty Mack, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dotty Mack

Its live - try wikiproject Women in Red who will support articles like this Victuallers (talk) 19:25, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Andy Griffith, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 03:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Waterproof Tinkertoy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Waterproof Tinkertoy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). In particular, I can't verify that any of their songs reached the Billboard Hot 100, or find any significant coverage about this band, though I can verify that they existed. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waterproof Tinkertoy (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waterproof Tinkertoy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Waterproof Tinkertoy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 04:49, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waterproof Tinkertoy (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement; no changes made at all since previous decline. Please do not submit again without addressing the issues.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waterproof Tinkertoy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Waterproof Tinkertoy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 03:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Griffith. Sundayclose (talk) 00:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bambi Woods, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 21:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. My source was from IMDB.....I'm sorry that you considered that as poorly sourced!

January 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at North Pole, Alaska, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Penny (The Big Bang Theory), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rockchalk7 17 16:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If my Sourced information from Chuck Lorre or Sherwood Scwartz as well as other sites are not good enough for you, than I don't know what else to say. Then go ahead and delete it. I've been a writer, researcher and journalist for 50 years and every time I add an interesting tid bit which would help the article NOT vandalize it you guys will just cut it.. It could be one word and it would be deleted because of no source. I've been responsibly contributing to the site since 2008 and lately you younger guys have to fart around with it. I won't be signing on again. There are too many other places that I can use my vast information of knowledge. (I can't believe that something I wrote in 2008 was just deleted) I'm done !!!!!!)

Even if you were an actual writer on the show, anything like a supposed last name for a character who never is given a last name on the show until they marry another character on the show needs a reliable source. There’s three people I personally know with an article on here but I still have to find sources if I edit their pages. If you can find a reliable source that gives her name as Penelope Barrinton, which you have yet to provide, you are welcome to include it. Until then, it has no business in the article.--Rockchalk7 17 20:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Rockchalk. Well, I might need to agree with you concerning the top line (nee Barrington). I realize that we can't give her a last name if it was never mentioned in the show...so agreed there. However, in one episode she quoted her mother calling her Penelope, so that is a fact and Even though Chuck Lorre told an interviewer her last name, even he said it can only be antidotal at this point. That particular paragraph is worth saving. but then again, it's up yo you.

Yeah if he said it could be just anecdotal, it should be left out, unless by some chance Penny is in episode of Young Sheldon or gets mentioned in the narration with her maiden name. Which episode? I literally just finished watching the entire series from start to finish and don’t recall this episode. Not necessarily doubting it happened because I don’t have the greatest memory in the world, I just don’t recall that happening.--Rockchalk7 17 22:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't had a chance to look up this particular episode, but check out season 2..."the Barbarian Sublimation". I think she is crying about her life and quotes her mother calling her Penelope. In that same episode, she get addicted to video games and her user name is Queen Penelope. Check it out.

I did just go back through the episode and the only mention of Penelope was in her user name. I’m not sure if that would be enough by itself because someone not familiar with the show could say Penelope could be her middle name, because some people do go by their middle name, even if people like you and I that are familiar with show are certain it’s her name (as I now am). Unless we can find which episode you’re referring to, I’m not sure we have enough to include that as her name. I tried a google search to find the episode and it didn’t turn anything up except the episode you referred to. If you can remember the exact episode, we could source the quote from both episodes to verify Penelope is her actual first name. This is just speaking strictly on Wikipedia policies and another editor being able to challenge the meaning of her gamertag being “Queen Penelope“, as a fan of the show, I’m pretty certain it’s her name now, but sadly it’s not enough.--Rockchalk7 17 17:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings again. I just found a new insight on Penny's name. Evidently there was some mail with her name on it....and someone super zoomed in on it to see the name Penny Teller ! Well....that really threw me off !

Concern regarding Draft:Waterproof Tinkertoy

Hello, Wllmlos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Waterproof Tinkertoy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings FireFlyBot. I was told to edit it it more to be accepted by Wikipedia. I did about three or so edits for approval but each was not approved and I have nothing else to add. So that is why it's just sitting there. So if it is still unacceptable, there is nothing more than I can do. So delete it if necessary.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Wllmlos/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Wllmlos/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 16:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Wllmlos/sandbox

Hello, Wllmlos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Wllmlos/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Wllmlos/sandbox

Hello, Wllmlos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:08, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Orbisculate

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Orbisculate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Louie (talk) 23:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Orbisculate for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orbisculate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orbisculate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Orbisculate

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Orbisculate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.orbisculate.com/definition-petition. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (t · c) buidhe 10:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a plagiarized article. It's simply a definition of a word that was describe over several internet sites, not just one. How can someone plagiarize a definition? Mirram Webster is honestly considering this word. WJL

Speedy deletion of Susan sennet

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Susan sennet has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0784410/bio. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. DanCherek (talk) 18:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greeting DanCherek

I am a writer and normally use my own words when writing articles and even commercials, however I will have to agree with you that this article was a little too close to another site and with that said I apologize and will be more diligent next time. I am familiar with Sue Sennett's work and was surprised when I saw that she wasn't included on Wikipedia and I hastily put this on here to get it going. Please allow me to edit my work and try again. Thank you, Will Wllmlos (talk) 20:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at See the USA in Your Chevrolet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pbritti (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism? I've been contributing to Wikipedia for 15 years. I do not consider any of my contributions as vandalism. I also contribute to your annual fund every year. I have extensive knowledge of a lot of the entertainment business that I love to share on Wikipedia. 2603:6010:E907:8500:E93D:2232:29A5:B68C (talk) 22:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Pbritti (talk) 17:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edits can't be changed if one is not logged in. I always make my changes while logged in. If I did by mistake, my apologies.

BTW: All of my contributions are true and factual. What should I do to prove contributions? I know the entertainment business! 2603:6010:E907:8500:89AA:D90D:5F6D:57AA (talk) 23:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are currently not logged in (I can see the IP address). You need to cite your sources. Knowing something is nice, but it doesn't mean you can add it to a Wikipedia article sans source. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently logged in. Can I make my edits now? Wllmlos (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly! Just remember to cite your sources. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Willowville, Ohio

The article Willowville, Ohio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Fails WP:GEOLAND as an unincorporated community

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 15:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings.

I received your message about the community of Willowville and I'm not exactly sure what you want me to change. I believe I added this quite a few years ago and was curious why it's just now being looked at. I'm from that area and granted, there is not a whole lot to say about it. I just thought that it should be recognized, that's all. If you feel you need to delete it, than you do what you have to. If you look up the area in Clermont county publications it will in fact say it's an unincorporated area named after the abundance of willow trees. That's all I have to say. Wllmlos (talk) 01:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sloppy Jane—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Brisebois edit

I have reverted your addition of an unsourced date of birth to Danielle Brisebois. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published, non-primary source. Eddie Blick (talk) 03:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB -Danielle Brisebois was born on 28 June 1969 in Brooklyn, New York City, New York, USA. She is an actress and composer, known for Begin Again (2013), All in the Family (1971) and Archie Bunker's Place (1979). She has been married to Nick Lashley since 2 August 2008. They have two children. Wllmlos (talk) 02:41, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]