User talk:Willy2000

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Willy2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 23:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Public holidays in the European Union page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jalaluddin Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at TANS Perú Flight 204, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lyla (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lyla (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 09:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

On the 2015 United States Grand Prix page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the 2015 Mexican Grand Prix page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Australian Motorcycle Grand Prix

Hi, is there some convention that "motorcycle" in these article names is lowercase? They are proper names and are capitalised on the MotoGP web site. --pmj (talk) 04:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign names to toponyms

I have noticed that you have added foreign names to quite a number of more or less random toponyms like Finnish name to the lede of Saint Petersburg or Finnish name to Murmansk Oblast or Estonian and Latvian name to Pskov Oblast, etc. I cannot see any logic in those changes, neither of those cities or administrative regions were historically parts of correspondent states, nor there any significant language minority living there, nor to the best of my knowledge those foreign names are frequently used in English. So what is the logic there? Please before continuing to add similar names discuss the issue somewhere - people are usually quite suspicious and vigilant than they see foreign names added to their countries toponyms without valid reasons, almost as if there was a territorial claim to their countries. Alex Bakharev (talk) 07:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Germanwings Flight 9525

Hello, I noticed you added factual information to the Germanwings Flight 9525 good article. Would you also add your source of this information, such as newspaper article or web page? On Wikipedia, we can't just add what we know, it all must come from reliable sources. Let me know if you have any questions below or on my talk page. Thanks. Prhartcom (talk) 12:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles on CONMEBOL FIFA World Cup Quals

These articles are great, keep working and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Ueutyi (talk) 02:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 1998 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Final Round

Hi, I'm Ironholds. Willy2000, thanks for creating 1998 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Final Round!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hey; I note you've been creating a load of articles on world cup rounds, and that's great to see (they're wonderfully formatted!). I don't see any references in them, though; could you include some? Feel free to reach out to me if you'd like help.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ironholds (talk) 22:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm AdventurousSquirrel. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 1982 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC and OFC) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 01:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 1982 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC and OFC), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 01:18, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Disco Polo Music

The article Disco Polo Music has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (television) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TVN Meteo Active

The article TVN Meteo Active has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (television) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heikki Suhonen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TPS Turku. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 11:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Qed237 (talk) 00:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA World Cup qualification

Please see Talk:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round#KUW Matches Scheduled 24 and 29 March and stop with your unsourced edits saying that the matches wont be played. Qed237 (talk) 00:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying Group A. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Qed237 (talk) 00:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vitālijs Teplovs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group G table. Qed237 (talk) 02:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

András Telek

added a link pointing to Jilin Aodong

Petteri Kaijasilta

added a link pointing to TPS Turku

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles

Why you are creating so many obviously incomplete articles like these: Serghei Belous, Oleg Fistican, János Bánfi, Zoltán Jagodics, András Telek, Petteri Kaijasilta, and so on...? Why are not adding goals and caps for each player? Who should to complete them for you? --XXN, 14:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Attendance at Grands Prix

Dear Willy, I saw that you added attendance numbers to many of 2015's F1 race report articles. Can you please also provide sources for those numbers? Otherwise, I'll have to take them out again. Thanks! Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2000 United States Grand Prix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Standard Time. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Random changes 23/24

Please stop making random changes to articles or you will be banned this time. Britmax (talk) 13:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

F1 records

Please stop introducing erroneous changes into the F1 records page. Your changes are inconsistent with established definitions of retirements, non-finishers, etc. and bring the article into contradiction with itself.

UPDATE: Your error has been reverted again. The issue has now been described on the article's talk page. If you damage the article again without explanation, I'll have to report your account for repeated vandalism.

May 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at EgyptAir Flight 804, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 02:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of The Voice winners

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of The Voice winners. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Voice (TV series)#Versions. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Voice (TV series)#Versions – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 15:32, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joox (music streaming) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joox (music streaming) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joox (music streaming) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kamran Mackey (talk) 04:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Build Your Baby's Brain Through The Power of Music!

The article Build Your Baby's Brain Through The Power of Music! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable compilation album

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Joox (music streaming). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:45, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Joox (music streaming). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joox (music streaming)

A tag has been placed on Joox (music streaming) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Creator of the article Special:Contributions/Willy2000 repeatedly deleted AfD template from article while AfD was in progress

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joox (music streaming) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joox (music streaming) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joox (music streaming) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Build Your Baby's Brain Through The Power of Music! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Build Your Baby's Brain Through The Power of Music! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Build Your Baby's Brain Through The Power of Music! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 13:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2017 Moto2 season

added a link pointing to Mugello

2017 Moto3 season

added a link pointing to Mugello

2017 MotoGP season

added a link pointing to Mugello

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Willy2000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Koala Kumal (film)

Hello, Willy2000,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Koala Kumal (film) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koala Kumal (film) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Robert McClenon (talk) 04:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Koala Kumal (film), you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:31, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Licence to Kill

Stop adding "Spanish" to the language section of the Licence to Kill infobox. A couple of spoken words does not a language make. Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Koala Kumal (film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Koala Kumal (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Koala Kumal (film), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Koala Kumal (film). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned many times about interfering with deletion processes. The latest recreation of Koala Kumal (film) necessitated this block and creation protection on the article. You appear to be a productive editor at most times, so please don't sour that with continued attempts to recreate articles that the community has discussed and resolved to delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joanna Gunadi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Willy2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Main project of sport

Decline reason:

Incoherent unblock request which does not address the claims of sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 23:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Willy2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked with no apparent reason. My only intention was to keep editing the page according to wikipedia policy and contribute this page to the community. I sincerely do not understand why my user was blocked and request to appeal this decision so that I can further edit pages on wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. For example, you created User:David Guti immediately after making your previous unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Father, I'll Take Care of You for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Father, I'll Take Care of You is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Father, I'll Take Care of You until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nördic Nightfury 10:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rising Star Indonesia (season 2)

The article Rising Star Indonesia (season 2) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Aside the fact that this article does not make any claim of significance or cite any credible/reliable sources to deem this it's content encyclopedic, it does in it's current state resemble WP:NOTEVERYTHING

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TopCipher (talk) 19:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]