User talk:Wikiuser8787

This is Wikiuser8787's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decreek (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Decreek and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decreek (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Decreek and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 10:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikiuser8787! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 10:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Shaw

Can you show me the differences in this article from Decreek? Wikiuser8787 (talk) 19:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See other crap articles exist that article should probably be deleted it has been tagged for problems for years. Theroadislong (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What about this one than? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krysle_Lip Wikiuser8787 (talk) 19:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She has less references than Decreek and even has the same reference from audiofuzz.com Wikiuser8787 (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that's another poor quality article. You seem to be suggesting that because other poor quality articles exist, we should add more? Theroadislong (talk) 19:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And you seem a little biased from some reason for my article

Do you want me to find more articles with the same references that you declined? Because there is tons of them and none of them looks so carp or poor as you said. Wikiuser8787 (talk) 19:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you made the comment unreliable source on the reference "Kill the music"?

Do you want to explain me why in this article it wasnt tagged as an unreliable source?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vattica

Let me guess? another "Poor" Quality article that should be taken off from Wikipedia ? Wikiuser8787 (talk) 19:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And another one

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_Swan_(musician)

Wait this is only on "Kill The Music"

Let me see what else i can find on "Vents Magazine" that you also tagged unreliable Wikiuser8787 (talk) 19:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's blog and blogs are not usually considered to be reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But it does seems very much reliable on the articles i just sent you.

So it looks like to me its only a matter of the user who is reviewing those articles

Theroadislong Says that this blog is unreliable but still many articles out there has the same citation and considered reliable to other users at the moment they reviewed those articles

Unreliable Users are maybe the deal here Wikiuser8787 (talk) 19:48, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is my Reference from Kill The Music was tagged unreliable source and in this article it was it accepted?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Somatic_Defilement Wikiuser8787 (talk) 19:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Decreek has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Decreek. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media,

I think subject did prove that its published works was in variety of notable music magazines such as New Noise Magazine Wikiuser8787 (talk) 18:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decreek (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Charsaddian was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Decreek and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Charsaddian (talk) 21:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decreek (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Decreek and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt you even had the chance to review all the 14 sources i provided from them time i posted it for review an the time you declined the article.

You are also the one that already declined my article the third time.

Im going to file a dispute on that Wikiuser8787 (talk) 19:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to dispute my decline, but as far as I'm aware I have only declined it once? The draft doesn't indicate how they passWP:NSINGER. Theroadislong (talk) 19:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries

MAGAZINE ARTICLES. Published work in magazines are also indicate how an article passes WP:NSINGER.

The article also had a source from the magazine New Noise Magazine

i really dont understand how you doing judgments before declining or approving an article Wikiuser8787 (talk) 19:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can get other opinions here Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk I could be wrong. Theroadislong (talk) 20:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decreek (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Decreek and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:42, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Theroadislong (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Im having a civil conversation with your elite reviewers. I dont see any attacking my words.

Thank you Wikiuser8787 (talk) 14:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your question on the Articles for creation/Help desk

Hello @Wikiuser8787, I have answered your question on the WP:Articles for creation/Help desk. Qcne (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Decreek7 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Decreek7. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]