Jump to content

User talk:WikiProject7384

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, WikiProject7384, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sudhu Tomari, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sudhu Tomari

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sudhu Tomari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhu Tomari. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rocky Rupkumar Patra

[edit]

Hello WikiProject7384,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rocky Rupkumar Patra for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Rocky Rupkumar Patra to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

jlwoodwa (talk) 19:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me what to to do for not get delete the article.? WikiProject7384 (talk) 05:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello WikiProject7384! Your additions to Rocky Rupkumar Patra have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rocky Rupkumar Patra, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. This especially includes {{copyvio-revdel}} and {{copyvio}}. Please do not remove them and let an administrator do so. Sennecaster (Chat) 03:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, WikiProject7384, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Amansharma111 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Understood. I sometimes forget that. Will remember that next time. Actually I am still learning wiki edits. Thanks. WikiProject7384 (talk) 13:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But your userpage suggest that you have an experience of 5 years in editing Wikipedia? Just asking. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amansharma111. Thank you. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You have some misunderstood. i am not the user which you mention. or any of his related account or he or she useing me as puppet. Their is nothing. Pls work as reunion guys. Tell me what i need to show you for getting unblock? WikiProject7384 (talk) 15:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oye Bhootni Ke moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Oye Bhootni Ke. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Per WP:NFF: "...films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines." Work on the article in Draft space until it has been released.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Amansharma111 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amansharma111. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 01:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is you indefinitely that i am amansharma111? Some a hoax reason why can you damage my contributions? Show me a proof that I am amansharma111 ? You can not judge by yourself. Administrator should check this.. this unlawful. All you guys doing without any avidance that I am doing any shockputting like this.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiProject7384 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not running any kind of amansharma111 account. This is a vogas. Please unblock me or show me hard evidence that I am amansharma111? WikiProject7384 (talk) 05:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's certainly possible that this is your only account, but that would only make this meat puppetry. When you do things that others are blocked for, you will be blocked yourself. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why my account block

[edit]

Hey. Wht did I do? Why my all articles are delete? Those have all significance coverages. you have some misunderstood. I am not any Amansharma111. I'm not run multiaccounts. How I can prove this? This not good in Wikipedia to attack to new contributor. I didn't do any wrong edits and not make any violence. I'm not amansharma111 I reapet. You have not any proof. This is not judgement in Wikipedia to delete articles and block without knowing the reality. And about my pages which the reviewer delete without any reason. This is not a valid reason to block me without particular any proof. Administration should answer thi??? WikiProject7384 (talk) 05:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the guide to appealing. You'll need to explain the situation according to WP:SOCK, WP:COI, and/or WP:UPE and simply denying any connection with the sockmaster may not be sufficient. Please be honest in addressing the issue. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey guys.. you may very much misunderstanding me. What and how to proof? I really not know. For ur kind info I making my edits from List of hindi film 2024. Please check my updates. I am not amansharma111. Im from india but not that guy which you thinking. I just made pages from the list that's all. And I don't get any payments from any clients for contributions. I just want to be a good contributor. WikiProject7384 (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiProject7384 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not useing many others account. This only i have. Its possible they accused me wrong attempt cause my edit are similar to the block guy amaarsharma111. How idiotic. For ur kind i only made edits from the list of hindi films 2024.and i hv read wiki policy my articles should be keep cause all I researched very hard. Its not had any policy in wikipedia to deleted. I say louder i am not doing shock puppting. You guys are false accused me, attack me.😢 And delete my hard work😭 let administer to see.WikiProject7384 (talk) 08:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is almost incoherent and raises serious concerns about your ability to effectively edit en.wikipedia.org. I think you'd be better off sticking to your own native language version of the project. This does not address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amansharma111. Yamla (talk) 10:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Need proper investigation

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiProject7384 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not amansharma111. It's a False accused. I have no other accounts. My all wikipedia creation i do from the List of hindi movies 2024. Check it. Need proper investigation. WikiProject7384 (talk) 12:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request does not assuage concerns about your English proficiency. Also, you don't address the evidence in the sock puppet investigation. PhilKnight (talk) 15:21, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WikiProject7384 (talk) 12:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lzno and their team make a plan and block me

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiProject7384 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That's a wonderful whole setup by Lzno group. I think its a Master plan for blocking me to nothing to showing a unreliable reason. In just 8 hrs. They reviewed and delete and block without any significant reason also the page is review already from one months ago. Which they deleted without no reason. I think wikipeda is running by some child's. So there no trust here. Any reviewed page can be deleted any time. So no one should be trust on Wikipedia. Their is no reliability in Wikipedia. Its a chaild game now. I Need proper investigation. Thats not a reason i make pages which the same pages created by previous some block user. I make only articles from list of hindi movies 2024.WikiProject7384 (talk) 15:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WikiProject7384 (talk) 15:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I need to provide for evidence?

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiProject7384 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administer. Its a whole setup by Lzno group. I think its a plan for blocking me to nothing to showing a unreliable reason. In just 8 hrs. They reviewed and delete and block without any significant reason also the page is review already from one months ago. Which they deleted without no reason. So no one should be trust on Wikipedia. Their is no reliability in Wikipedia. Its a chaild game now. I Need proper investigation. I am not puppet of any amansharma111. I make pages which the same pages created by previous some block user which mention. Could be a coincidence. I make only articles which have sourced and from list of hindi movies 2024. So request for unblock me. And tell me what evidence i show to get unblocked?WikiProject7384 (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

With the article overlap from previous W:UPE sock accounts, I have little doubt that this account is also being used against Wikimedia's Terms of Use. Noting as well that this appeal was very difficult to parse due to the poor proficiency in English. Note that any future appeals will need to be made via WP:UTRS.Ponyobons mots 17:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User attempted further block evasion as multiply- Confirmed abusive sockpuppet, Imwordqueen. --Yamla (talk) 20:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WikiProject7384&oldid=1255407137"