Jump to content

User talk:Wetrorave

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Your submission at Articles for creation: We, So Tired of All the Darkness in Our Lives has been accepted

[edit]
We, So Tired of All the Darkness in Our Lives, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 13:01, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everywhere at the End of Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves

[edit]

Cut and paste moves, like what you did with Persistent Repetition of Phrases and Take Care. It's a Desert Out There... aren't really desirable for a number of reasons. I'll just link Template:Uw-c&pmove here since it does a good job of explaining why this shouldn't be done. I understand that the AfC process can be frustrating with how long it takes. Just don't do it again, and you'll probably be fine. InvalidOStalk 12:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see, InvalidOS. I'll probably not use AfC again anyway since it seems as if that tool is more for IP users rather than autoconfirmed ones, though the page history of most pages only had my edits. But yeah, I understand.
At least now I know that I can move pages–for some reason, in my mind that seemed like a tool limited for admins only, like rollback or deletion rights–. ~ Wetrorave (talk) 13:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently there wasn't really an issue with your moves since you were the sole contributor. The history merge requests I made were declined on that basis. Sorry if I disturbed you. InvalidOStalk 13:44, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't really disturb me, in fact I have a lot of free time at this point in my life. You would only disturb be if you had created Stages 4 and 5 of EATEOT yourself, which you didn't, so we're cool :). ~ Wetrorave (talk) 13:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks. :) Also, as a correction to my previous comment: that was only on Persistent Repetition of Phrases. Take Care. It's a Desert Out There... still had a history merge occur, probably because I'm pretty sure I also edited it. InvalidOStalk 13:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Cuellar

[edit]

Changes addressed; thanks for the review! I thought you did a great job reviewing the article, in spite of the fact you say you don't know much about baseball! Let me know if anything more is needed! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 11:51, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sanfranciscogiants17, I don't know anything about baseball though, so it's impressive that I have apparently done a good review :). Now here is my conclusion. Wetrorave (talk) 13:45, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Everywhere at the End of Time

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Everywhere at the End of Time you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Artem.G -- Artem.G (talk) 10:21, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Everywhere at the End of Time

[edit]

The article Everywhere at the End of Time you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Everywhere at the End of Time for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Artem.G -- Artem.G (talk) 07:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Everywhere at the End of Time

[edit]

On 1 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Everywhere at the End of Time, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the album series Everywhere at the End of Time (2016–2019) by the Caretaker uses ballroom records to depict the stages of Alzheimer's disease? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Everywhere at the End of Time. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Everywhere at the End of Time), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review - Everywhere at the End of Time

[edit]

If I am holding up the peer review, then you can close it and I'll post further comments on the talk page or FAC – I do think the article is in a state ready for the rigor of FAC. This is all per your discretion. If you keep it open, I'll try to get my comments done in a timely manner. DMT Biscuit (talk) 22:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will close this PR then DMT snack (lol), and put it up to FAC the next day. From the opinions of others it seems that this article is generally (or even "astoundingly") well written, and I've many times checked the images for NFCC and the text for OR.
In summary, wish me luck :). Le six-hour dementia album will gain a new position. Wetrorave (talk) 02:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:URFA/2020

[edit]

I saw your question at the FAR for Alzheimer's disease which asked, "Is it just me or does it seem that most articles promoted before the 2010s now don't meet FACR anymore?" There's a task force at WP:URFA/2020 which is reviewing articles promoted before 2015 to determine if they meet the FA criteria, and we could use more help in identifying articles that need to be reviewed. I hope you will join us. Z1720 (talk) 16:51, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll strongly consider that, however I am away from my desktop at the moment so I'll check out that page later. Wetrorave (talk) 17:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Birth of a New Day - opening track sample.ogg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Birth of a New Day - opening track sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He-Man

[edit]

I just wanted to thank you for your comments in the peer review, and to apologize for not answering back earlier. This is quite embarassing, but I must have completely missed getting a notification that someone had commented on it. Regardless, I made a few changes based on your comments and wanted to thank your for your suggestions. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For your valued work in the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive, which, in a single month, helped to reduce the backlog by nearly 50%. --Usernameunique (talk) 05:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:00, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sometimes, Good Things Happen

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wetrorave. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sometimes, Good Things Happen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:HelpAphexTwin

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wetrorave. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:HelpAphexTwin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sometimes, Good Things Happen

[edit]

Hello, Wetrorave. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sometimes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:"Telepathy" from Birth of a New Day by 2814.ogg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:"Telepathy" from Birth of a New Day by 2814.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:We Drink to Forget the Coming Storm

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wetrorave. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:We Drink to Forget the Coming Storm, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EATEOT

[edit]

@Wetrorave: Greetings! I'm not sure if you're there, but I think you could easily get the vital Everywhere at the End of Time to FA. Just make sure images are properly licensed, and perhaps copyedit will be needed which I can help you with. If you consider doing so, reply and I'll happily copyedit and help you with the FAC. Wretchskull (talk) 14:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wretchskull: Your use of the word "vital" really made me rethink this. It is indeed a vital article/album, and I've always wanted to see it on the front of the Main Page. And like you said, it's pretty damn close to WP:FAC as well; writing's a bit rough around the edges but the images are properly licensed, and if there's reliable sources talking about people using "Heartaches" on memes like Trollge and Uncanny Mr Incredible, that'll be a nice addition as well.
I've just copyedited it, actually. I'll see what more info I can find online, and check if everything's properly referenced (again). Wetrorave (talk) 16:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if you'd like something similar to EATEOT (that feeling of things spiraling out of control), I'd recommend some game of The Backrooms as well as Don Hertzfeldt's films The Meaning of Life and It's Such a Beautiful Day. I plan to edit these articles as well. Wetrorave (talk) 16:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wetrorave: Thank you for your suggestions! I found some results of EATEOT on the Wikipedia library; perhaps something to consider? Wretchskull (talk) 18:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wretchskull: Yes. This might seem a bit unprecedented but I've just set everything up for EATEOT's FAC. I'll see what I can see on the library. Wetrorave (talk) 19:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Wretchskull, I'm wondering whether you could leave your opinion on EATEOT's FAC page? It isn't obligatory though (obviously). Wetrorave (talk) 16:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure! I'll take a look tomorrow - Wretchskull (talk) 23:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of redirected draft

[edit]

There already exists a draft for The Backrooms here on Wikipedia. Improvements should be made there instead. Thank you for understanding. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:07, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Backrooms (February 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Wetrorave! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jalen Folf (talk) 05:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research, use of non-reliable sources

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:50, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of Everywhere at the End of Time

[edit]
Congratulations, Wetrorave! The article you nominated, Everywhere at the End of Time, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Buidhe (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
YOO WE GOT FA BOIS LETS GOOOO HAHAHA
But seriously now, this is amazing. Wetrorave (talk) 00:53, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yo congrats broski!! Always hoped to see that star in that article, really deserves it. One day this too shall just be a burning memory, but that's better than vacuum. Well, now time to show the world about this! :)) GeraldWL 01:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well done! Cheers, Ovinus (talk) 04:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats! By the way, I'm glad you changed your mind there! ;) Wretchskull (talk) 07:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerald Waldo Luis: Here. Wetrorave (talk) 16:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also forgot to ping @Wretchskull and Ovinus: go check out the TFAR page. Wetrorave (talk) 21:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wretchskull and Ovinus: Not sure if the ping reached y'all, since it only goes through if it is added in the same edit as the signature is, so I'm invoking this template again. Sorry if you have been notified twice. Wetrorave (talk) 22:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

[edit]

I put a few more things on Everywhere 's talk page. I'm sorry for suddenly throwing down more comments on a recently closed review; I typically read through articles several times across several days, but I was really worried (for some reason) that the FA would be archived, so I squished my review into two less-than-careful readings. Because I supported the article I'm totally fine with making the changes myself if you're burnt out. (I definitely would be, that was an incredible amount of work.) Sincerely, Ovinus (talk) 00:24, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ovinus: Bruh it's fine. I get 8 hours of doing nothing every night, which is more than enough for me to rest. Will respond soon. Wetrorave (talk) 16:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your thorough work on Everywhere at the End of Time and The Caretaker's other works. Thank you! Warmly, Ovinus (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) — Wetrorave (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

[edit]
  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

William Utermohlen FAC

[edit]

Hi Wetrorave. Given your work on Everywhere at the End of Time, you might be interested in this article and review William Utermohlen, which has failed its nom twice due to lack of feedback. It could do with expansion here and there, but the editor needs guidance. Ceoil (talk) 12:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ceoil: I had no idea this article had gone through FAC two times. I'll look into the situation with great expectations. Wetrorave please don't 4 April 2022 13:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delighted. I think there is great potential for a fascinating article, and that it can succeed at this nom. Ceoil (talk) 13:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Everywhere at the End of Time scheduled for TFA

[edit]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 29 May 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 29, 2022, or to make more comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article "about a series of six albums where each album depicts a stage of dementia. It starts off normal but with each album, it gets increasingly distorted and unrecognizable, eventually leading up to Stage 6, which sounds like it ends... how Alzheimer's usually ends. It then went on to be known for being extremely long."! - I have Kyiv Symphony Orchestra on the same page, DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

[edit]

Caretaker

Thank you for quality articles around music by Caretaker, such as Everywhere at the End of Time, We, So Tired of All the Darkness in Our Lives and Take Care. It's a Desert Out There..., for Cat System Corp., for uploading cover art and for GA reviewing, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2743 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Friday Night Funkin mod notability

[edit]

Hi,

The notability of the everywhere at the end of time FNF mod is questionable.

  • The source you supplied [[1]] gives a passing mention of the mod
  • I was unable to find any other WP:SIGCOV of the mod from anything resembling a WP:RS
  • Even if it was notable enough to warrant a mention, a spot in the lede is unwarranted. Its popularity on TikTok and in memes received significant coverage as evidenced by the multiple sources cited. The only source was the Romero article, which as mentioned earlier, was but a passing mention, unlike the multiple dedicated articles to the TikTok/Internet notoriety.

These are the reasons I opted to remove it from the wikipedia article, since you asked me to elaborate in the edit summaries.

If you could explain why it is notable that would be nice.

I have also left a similar message at the article talk page.

Cheers, (JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 01:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Wetrorave

Thank you for creating Cat System Corp..

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:12, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Telepath (musician)

[edit]

I reviewed this article as part of the WP:NPP process and had to clean up that mess of an article you left. Wikipedia isn't a music magazine. Do you understand it, nor is it is social media site, a blog, a forum or substack article. Bandcamp, which you seem to be attached is an non-rs source, don't use it again. I think there is a competency issue here. scope_creepTalk 07:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has got certain rules over what social media links can be used in an article, bandcamp isn't one of them. Building an articles based on it is unacceptable. Only one social media site per article is the rule. I intend to check your work over the next six months. If I see more of this, I'm going to have to take you up to Ani and try and get you blocked. It soaks a huge amount of editor time and adds a burden to other editor that simply not needed. scope_creepTalk 07:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Scope creep: I don't know if you've noticed the "daily" before the "bandcamp" on those links. Do you know what Bandcamp Daily is? It is Bandcamp's recognized music news website, which has been accepted before as a reliable source here on Wikipedia. I even used lots of them in one article I got to featured status, Everywhere at the End of Time! There was an extensive process for that page to get that good, and not a single editor suggested that Bandcamp Daily (not Bandcamp, that's the difference!) nor Fact were ever unreliable. Therefore, my Wikipedian partner, I shall kindly ask you to revert those edits. This is no reasonable motive for blocking another good-faith user, so please pay attention to the links you read in your screen before coming with this authoritarian attitude to my talk page.
-- Wetrorave is dead 7 September 2024 06:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, what do I have to do with the Death's Dynamic Shroud Page? Their music is fire and all, but I genuinely don't remember making a single edit to that page. I might be wrong on this, though. I'm just disappointed that you think I have no familiarity with the concept of reliable sources at all, or that you didn't even bother to read my user page at all. Shame, real shame.
Wetrorave is dead 7 September 2024 06:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wetrorave: Apologies for that misplaced message. I've removed it. I get tired seeing these types of fan constructed articles and I thought this was one of them, for which I apologise. Both the Bandcamp Daily and Bandcamp are both being tagged as unreliable sources. The entry of the reliable source noticeboard states that bandcamp daily while its not user generated content, it is created by journalists, -- is promotional and is considered primary and/or an WP:SPS source. It is also considered marketing content and is not independent. It really doesn't add up to a rock solid secondary source. That is the reason the software tagged both of the bandcamp and bandcamp daily as unreliable. It tends to be conservative in its approach. It is up to you if you decide to use it, but the extensive use of this source to construct the whole framework is probably problematic and you will get continued attention from NPP reviewers while you use it, not just me. I don't think it is necessarily authoritarian to try and address it, particularly when the article is in the review process. The point of that review is to try and drive up quality. So I can't revert in all in good conscience at the moment. I don't know why the FA article passed. Great achievement though. I'll ask around to try and determine why. Hope that helps. scope_creepTalk 09:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of TimedText:It's just a burning memory - sample.ogg.en.srt

[edit]

TimedText:It's just a burning memory - sample.ogg.en.srt, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/TimedText:It's just a burning memory - sample.ogg.en.srt and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of TimedText:It's just a burning memory - sample.ogg.en.srt during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:44, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wetrorave&oldid=1258293234"