User talk:Webplanet12345

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mesothelioma, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Tiwa Savage, D'banj, and Omotola Article articles

Greetings, I checked your contributions to Wikipedia and realized that you try your best updating Wikipedia with current information on African acts. While that's good, I must add that you're not applying the proper citation template to your edits. You shouldn't be doing this (Information you're adding). This is not a proper citation format. Instead of doing that, you can use this template {{cite web}}: Empty citation (help)</ref> or click on the "cite" tab (when in edit mode) at the top of of the edit box. After clicking the cite tab, look to the left of the page and click on the pull down "templates" menu. Next, click cite web. An external box will appear. You can fill out the information manually and click insert when you're done. I had problems with using proper citation template when I started editing Wikipedia (everybody do). If you need help with doing anything on Wikipedia, don't bother to ask. If I can't help, I'll get someone who can. This link should help you out. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_web versace1608 (talk) 21:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Attractiveness. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 13:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm Versace1608. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to [[:Tiwa Savage Davido]] because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. You need to stop replacing reliable sources with blog sources. I have warned you before. The next time you do this, I will take this to an administrative noticeboard. Versace1608 (Talk) 15:07, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WP. Why you no dey add summary?

Hi User:Webplanet12345, I'm Daniel and I'll love to cheerfully share something with you.

It is considered good practice to provide a summary for every edit, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors or deleting existing text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit.

Wikipedia is a team work and we need each other. We value your contributions. It's good you leave a summary so we can all know what you are contributing.

Accurate summaries help other contributors decide whether it is worthwhile for them to review an edit, and to understand the change should they choose to review it. When a major edit (e.g. deletion of a substantial amount of text, a significant addition, or a substantial rewrite) doesn't have an edit summary, there are fewer reasons you get many of the editors confused. Summaries are less important for minor changes (which means generally unchallengeable changes such as spelling or grammar corrections), but a brief note like "fixed spelling" is helpful even then.

To avoid accidentally leaving edit summaries blank, you can select "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" on the Editing tab of your user preferences

See Help:Edit_summary for more.

You are doing a great job. Danidamiobi (talk) 17:32, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Webplanet12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked, which is against the community policy of creating or editing a project that serves as an advertisement than information to the community. I Admit that I will not do something wrong and that it won't happen again..

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, I see no block on this account. If you are unable to edit, please tell the exact message that appears when you attempt to edit. 331dot (talk) 20:37, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

David J. Maloney moved to draftspace

Hello Webplanet12345. I have moved an article you created, David J. Maloney, to a draft at Draft:David J. Maloney to give you more time to work on it before publishing it. When you are sure that it belongs on Wikipedia and satisfies our inclusion criteria, please submit your draft for review by following the instructions at the top of the draft. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:15, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David J. Maloney (May 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Bkissin were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Bkissin (talk) 20:12, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Webplanet12345! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 20:12, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David J. Maloney

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David J. Maloney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Scio c (talk) 22:43, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 16:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Funke Akindele. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Princess of Ara 20:12, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maduebibisi Iwe, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 06:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Maduebibisi Iwe, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 12:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Olusegun Johnson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olusegun Johnson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olusegun Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reading Beans^{Talk to the Beans} 18:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]