User talk:Scio c
Hello, Scio c, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 05:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Great :)
[edit]Thank you so much I’m trying, I know its nowhere near what you can do but I’m trying to get the hang of it lol. Once again I really appreciate you taking time out of your day to help me with this. Is it possible if you could help me actually get it up on Wikipedia and out of the draft status :)? Hoopconnoisseur (talk) 04:50, 10 May 2019 (UTC) Daveburstein (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2019 (UTC) I reduced the Huawei article from 6,000 words to 3.500 in a neutral manner which erased your changes resolving a conflict since we both edited at the same time. Please glance at the talk page and freely enter <whatever you choose> to the article.
New evidence regarding the notability of ADSR_Online_Midi_Editor_and_Player
[edit]I am respectfully requesting that you change your "Delete" vote regarding ADSR_Online_Midi_Editor_and_Player, in consideration of the following new information that has just surfaced:
I just discovered that Classical_Archives (the largest classical music site in the world), has endorsed the product that this article describes, for the past two years. The following website contains the statement "MidiPro.org is the ONLY Online Midi Editor": https://www.classicalarchives.com/midi.html
Considering the following facts, I can't imagine a stronger indication of notability:
- Classicalarchives.com does not accept any advertising or user-entered editorial .
- Their website does not mention any other Midi Editors, so they are not a "Midi Directory" website.
- I have no relationship whatsoever with Classicalarchives.com
The following webpage shows that this endorsement has been prominently displayed on their website since at least April 26 2017 https://web.archive.org/web/20170426053227/https://www.classicalarchives.com/midi.html.
The reason you gave for your Delete vote was "Not notable". I hope you agree that that reason no longer stands.
Thank you for your consideration. MySonLikesTrump (talk) 23:54, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Barnstar!!
[edit]The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 14:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC) |
Pending changes reviewer granted
[edit]Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Beeblebrox (talk) 00:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
[edit]I see you recently accepted a pending change to January 26 that did not include a direct source.
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the edit notice on that page, the content guideline and/or the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. All new additions without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. I've gone ahead and un-accepted this edit and backed it out.
All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Toddst1: Sorry about that, thanks for letting me know. Scio c (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Masih Alinejad
[edit]Done, not a problem. GiantSnowman 19:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)