User talk:WMartin74

hi there!

I've edited the Embassy of The Republic of Serbia, Canberra, ACT, you'll see that now categories have been added.(My perspective (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC))[reply]

thank you

for the useful comment on my newly created page (which I tried to start after reading carfeully the instructon on how to get started) I do find the company interesting due to the historical content on the German wikipedia page, which I basically tried to reduce to the historical part and start translating (and failed to safe the first step as a draft) Antertainer (talk) 09:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi!

Hello! WMartin74, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! --Rosiestep (talk) 00:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WMartin - thank you for editing help - I am just at a confernce so dont have much time to clean it up, but I will try to do better job in the evening!

Hi again - I did citation clean-up - could you please take a look if it good enough? Billon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awatral (talk • contribs) 16:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Hi Awatral - This looks much better now great job, i have removed the tag from the page. It would also be great if you could built on these references to gather more sources to show the credibility of the information on the page.(WMartin74 (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for the barnstar you gave me - much appreciated, good sir! Aardvark112 (talk) 13:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-- No problem! Keep up the good work! WMartin74 (talk) 13:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nell Lake

You can remove the deletion tag, the article was being created and had just one sentence when you tagged it. As you can see, I have added the work experience, published worked, jobs and career of Ms. Lake as well as links and references. She is a published author presently appearing on TV and radio and in Press concerning her recently written book, which was written in an area of her expertise. - Thanks, GustavM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nell_Lake

-- Great work! Thanks for the update. WMartin74 (talk) 16:58, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm Psychonaut. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Tom Roberts (journalist). Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Psychonaut (talk) 16:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SGE Loans.

"This content is non-factual and does not pass the notability criteria of Wikipedia."

I fail to understand how any of your two deletions could be called non-factual. They refer to published reports and not opinion.

Your edits will now expose more people to practises by this company that are in contravention of trading standards.

I can only wonder at your motives. --Really madman (talk) 15:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014 - Welfare

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Welfare: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.

These notifications really help to block persistent vandals so it's handy to use them whenever you have to do this kind of revert. Keep up the good work. SPACKlick (talk) 14:34, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harris Hip Score

Thank you for adding a citation to Harris Hip Score. Great minds think alike. Whoisjohngalt (talk) 13:48, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yuan Shuxun

Thank you, WMartin74, for adding Yuan Shuxun to Category:Stubs. However, next time, you should try to look for the most appropriate stub category to place articles in.

Thanks!

Clone200 (talk) 20:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

École Gratuite de Dessin

You have nominated École Gratuite de Dessin for speedy deletion, on the reasonable basis that it does not have any content.

As I explain in talk:École Gratuite de Dessin, I created it as a redirect to École nationale supérieure des arts décoratifs. But then I realised that I did not have enough knowledge to decide whether this redirection was appropriate, so I deleted the content and reverted the wikilinks that I had set up to it. I didn't know how to delete the page.

However, École Gratuite de Dessin is mentioned in several articles on French artists, and it would be good to have at least a stub or a redirect for it. I don't feel qualified to do this. Should I set up unresolved wikilinks on the potentially-referring pages, and hope that someone will pick it up? Verbcatcher (talk) 16:30, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a meagre stub. This has no references, and perhaps does not merit its place. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:18, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Wgolf. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kaja Kallas, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are wondering it does have refs but not inline-I am keeping a eye on it. (Also it is a BLP) Wgolf (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Vista Outdoor Inc., and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on offensive edit

Thank you for reverting the offensive edit on my talk page by 2605:e000:6254:b200:807d:1198:fb:9912. -- Pemilligan (talk) 01:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WMartin74, The person with user ID:107.72.162.15 is being involved with defamation of living person BISHNUJEE SINGH.So there is issue with same and we cannot allow same.If Wikipedia believes in defamation of living person by disruptive elements like 107.72.162.15 then there is serious problem with articles posted on this site.The action amounts to personal defamation and is not permissible. I have authored Article:Bishnujee Singh and seems this gentleman has been posting offensive defamatory comments about living person.Please help and resolve,otherwise I will have to remove the article.

February 2015

Hi WMartin74. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Blow Up the Moon, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. I removed the speedy because Blues Traveler has a page; not saying it isn't eligible for a full AFD Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! 331dot (talk) 10:13, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for speedy deletion

Hi Martin

Thank you. I am sorry the content you viewed is not complete ant his may look like a promotional page, but indeed The article is a personality page that I will complete creation soon. I have noted your advice on the tag. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrjacobisaac (talk • contribs) 11:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MrDJSilva

what if i use my real name on the MrDJSilva Page as im gonna be doing a bio for it soon to complete my page for Alienated Network — Preceding unsigned comment added by DylanJSC (talk • contribs) 09:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DylanJSC,

Unfortunately I dont see this passing the notability criteria for BLP pages (See WP:SPIP). In addition to this you are writing an article about yourself ("what if i use my real name on the MrDJSilva Page") which gives you a direct relation to the page being created with causes conflict of interest issues (See: WP:EXTERNALREL). I hope this helps. WMartin74 (talk) 09:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I keep getting notices of the deletion of my page...including "copyright violation" notices stemming from 2 years ago..but the only contributions to the page were made by me...about me...and from my own personal sources. Rtotoj (talk) 16:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hamilton King Management Limited

Hello WMartin74,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hamilton King Management Limited for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this in patrolling speedy deletions, and I'm a little surprised that you should have created this article. Ditto for Wescot Credit Services Limited , SGE Loans, and SGE Group . Normally, I would simply delete articles like these, but considering your excellent work in nomination a great many promotional and non-notable articles for deletion, I wonder if there might be some explanation. Feel free to email me if you prefer. DGG ( talk ) 03:32, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton King

Hi. I've moved it into your user space as I don't think it passes WP:CORP and also doesn't pass WP:RS. To me, it doesn't look like the sort of business that would attract much in the way of reliable independent coverage - but you might be able to dig up something. Companycheck isn't really much use as it is more of a directory listing than real independent coverage. Peridon (talk) 09:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hamilton King Management Limited

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hamilton King Management Limited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ...See above comments. This company seems to be in no way notable, going on both article content and sources given. TheLongTone (talk) 14:18, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton King Management Limited

I have moved Hamilton King Management Limited to Draft:Hamilton King Management Limited. As it stood, it was subject to deletion under WP:CSD#A7. but it might well be developed into a valid article, and you stated you were working on it. This is precisely what the Draft: namespace is suppsoed to be for. DES ^(talk) 14:38, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Bray Gallery speedy deletion

thank you for your very quick attention to the article Peter Bray Gallery which you nominated for speedy deletion. I have outlined my reasons for the article be worthy of retention on its talk page. I had only just created the article and will attend to wikilinking from the very significant Australian artists featured at the gallery during its short career. There were very few art galleries showing contemporary modernist art during this early period.sinarau (talk) 14:08, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Buto Enterprise Video Platform

Hi

The Buto platform is significant not least because it delivers all of England's national Rugby video content that doesn't make it to mainstream television as just one example. I had not included this as I didn't want the page removed as a promotional page. Could you advise on a good way forward on this please? Would really appreciate any assistance or advice you might be able to provide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEntry109 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re Basically blogging

I think "The New Trilogy" is a reference to Star Wars: The Force Awakens and the two films after that; they are attempting to add information from the films to articles, but not providing a source. 331dot (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		1,647 pages patrolled in the last 12 months! Very good! Keep up the good work.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm OluwaCurtis. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dec64, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 16:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Niranjan parthasarathy, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. - Mr X 12:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi WMartin74,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, WMartin74. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SGE Loans

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SGE Loans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — kashmiri ^TALK 10:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harri Johannesdahl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tekes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hamilton King Management Limited concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hamilton King Management Limited, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hamilton King Management Limited

Hello, WMartin74. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hamilton King Management Limited".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 13:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, WMartin74. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, WMartin74. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Wade (Trafalgar Park) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Wade (Trafalgar Park) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Wade (Trafalgar Park) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPinkerton (talk) 18:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]