User talk:Verddieta

Welcome!

Hello, Verddieta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Julen Lopetegui did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Kosack (talk) 12:29, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Qetaifan Islands

A tag has been placed on Qetaifan Islands, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:A0:75C2:D883:E9C8:B89B:E2FE (talk) 05:20, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This complex is the largest man-made island in the Middle East and consists of the world's largest companies. There is no reason to target it for delete. Verddieta (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kempinski Marsa Malaz moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kempinski Marsa Malaz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 05:28, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. How can I improve this article?!! Verddieta (talk) 05:38, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Al Maha Island

A tag has been placed on Al Maha Island, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:A0:75C2:D883:E9C8:B89B:E2FE (talk) 05:32, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Verddieta. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:A0:75C2:D883:E9C8:B89B:E2FE (talk) 05:33, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mr. You have made a big mistake. I am not the UAE government to compete with Qatar!! I am a user born in the Philippines with an interest in creating articles. This is against the rules of removing articles with important sources.Verddieta (talk) 05:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The existence of these articles, like the articles of Marsa Al Arab and Dubai Maritime City, was empty and I created this Al Maha Island and Qetaifan Islands and of course this is a common thing.Verddieta (talk) 05:42, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How did you come to choose these commercial properties to write about? What led you to pick these subjects? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:39, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. They are not commercial properties. They are famous centers like other reputable centers. The reason is the completion of the building project in the Middle East such as the UAE and Qatar. If it is to be removed, all centers such as Al Reem Island should be removed and Al Maryah Island be deleted as well. Verddieta (talk) 08:44, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the case specifically of Qetaifan Islands, the article was absolutely full of puffery, including entirely unnecessary adjectives, e.g. "abundance of natural beaches", "multitude of docks", "charming residential properties", "family friendly beach club", and the whole thing goes on and on like that. Leave editorializing and puffery like that out. An article should just describe, in a strictly neutral tone, the facts confirmed by reliable and independent sources, and in no way "talk up" or promote its subject. Before you attempt to create another article, please ensure that you thoroughly understand the policies I've linked here in this comment. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:40, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't given me a clear answer. Verddieta (talk) 10:35, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But If the problem with puffery was in the details, you would have corrected the details instead of questioning the entire article and including a quick deletion. I am not responsible and voice for promoting any organization or place. This is a normal procedure like the ones mentioned, I making articles about famous places. Is it a crime to mention the tallest slide in the world in an article?!!! Verddieta (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisements get deleted, as per the G11 criteria (and the issues I noted were examples of the problems, not by any means an exhaustive listing of them.) I suspect it's likely that the island itself probably is notable and we should have an article about it, but it should describe facts about it, not be written like a real estate brochure. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 11:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok return the article or make this up yourself and I will try to complete. Verddieta (talk) 19:58, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz and Seraphimblade: I think a better explanation is that entire sentences were copied and pasted from tourism sites. I can see this on Al Maha Island. --Rs chen 7754 17:29, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Kempinski Marsa Malaz. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:50, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of forcing it with me, state the reason. You asked me to correct the article and I did so. Verddieta (talk) 10:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed inappropriate material from another article you wrote. You attempted to put it back. So, apparently, the "provide advice" approach didn't take too well. If you continue writing promotional material, you will get yourself blocked, and I meant to make that entirely clear. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 10:26, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are bullying, labeling and insulting to me. The name of this is not counseling and guidance. You are repeating advertisements in every message when it is not. Removing content with a source is far from Wikipedia's rules. The management label does not exempt you from error. Verddieta (talk) 10:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luiz Lady, You to the behavior of this person Seraphimblade, Look, behavior full of violence, insults and labeling. I hope your behavior is accompanied by justice and the desire to participation everyone on Wikipedia and far from being a colleague with this person. thank you. Verddieta (talk) 10:39, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sheep (talk • he/him) 23:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Al Mana Tower

Hello Verddieta,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Al Mana Tower for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 08:58, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have repeated many times that this page is not an advertisement like other pages. I am not an advertiser. This is an article in a series of articles supplementing prestigious buildings in Qatar and the UAE. Verddieta (talk) 09:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Qatar Finance and Business Academy, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 14:51, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tukoh Taka, you may be blocked from editing. CodeTalker (talk) 23:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The content does not have a summary. No documents have been provided for it. It was written Arab community, who is the Arab world community? This survey was done from all the millions of people from the Arab Community Union?!! Is this Wikipedia or is it exclusive to a particular group and theory?! Verddieta (talk) 23:53, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you are not allowed to vandalize pages like Lusail. you repeat, I will report. Verddieta (talk) 23:56, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Msheireb Tram has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:21, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Lagoona Mall

Hello, Verddieta,

Thank you for creating Lagoona Mall.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 19:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mirqab Mall

Hello, Verddieta,

Thank you for creating Mirqab Mall.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 19:47, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gulf Mall

Hello, Verddieta,

Thank you for creating Gulf Mall.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 19:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lagoona Mall

A tag has been placed on Lagoona Mall, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Paul W (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page was deleted without any reason. Because it is famous according to the criteria of Wikipedia. Please do not attach your personal opinion to the general policies of Wikipedia. Please interact with all users. thank you. Verddieta (talk) 14:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. As noted above, the page was deleted for a reason - G11 for unambiguous advertising. The article was not written in the required neutral tone, and was heavily dependent upon promotional/marketing sources.

2. "Famous" is your judgement. The critical test in Wikipedia is 'notability' (read WP:N) - not my personal opinion.

3. I have repeatedly interacted with you - see the three previous messages on your Talk page as well as editorial summaries in previous edits to this and other articles.

Paul W (talk) 21:33, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained reversion of edits

Hi, Verddieta. During New Page Patrol work, I made edits to pages including the addition of tags/templates to articles you recently created, including Lagoona Mall, Mirqab Mall and Gulf Mall (this also generated messages to your Talk page above). You reverted those article changes without explanation in your edit summaries - something that previous editors of this Talk page (for example: User:Sheep8144402, User:Dl2000; also pinging User:Seraphimblade) have warned you about.

Some of the content you are creating or editing appears to be unduly promotional - please read: "Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion" (WP:Promotion); this is why other editors are changing the articles concerned or, in some cases, proposing their deletion. You can avoid such responses by writing in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. Thank you. Paul W (talk) 12:48, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your personal opinion. Wikipedia is not going according to your standards. I am not a preacher or administrator, but I create pages that should have been created earlier. Pages related to famous and important places in the Middle East, especially Qatar and the UAE. I accept criticism, but not insults and labels. Verddieta (talk) 14:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. I have applied my interpretation of Wikipedia guidelines.

2. "Famous" or "important" are your value judgements. The critical test in Wikipedia is 'notability' - please read WP:N. You might also consider 'neutral Point of View' (WP:NPOV). This is a non-negotiable standard that all Wikipedians should apply

3. I have not insulted or labelled you.

Paul W (talk) 21:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doha Expressway

Please read WP:SPS. While I do not doubt that the topic is notable, you are citing it to corporate websites which are not considered reliable sources for the purposes that you are using them for. Rs chen 7754 17:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I read. Corporate resources for details. Several news sources have also been added. Verddieta (talk) 17:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's great because upon looking further I noticed that you copied and pasted entire sentences and thus I had to delete the article for copyvio. Please read through our policies before contributing further and listen to what people tell you rather than taking a stubborn attitude. --Rs chen 7754 17:51, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment has nothing to do with Wikipedia's rules. I have said many times that if there is a problem with the details, correct it and not question the whole article. You still do not understand him?!. Your work is questioning the time, effort and making of other users. Interact instead of destroy please. Verddieta (talk) 12:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Doha Expressway

The page Doha Expressway has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.roadtraffic-technology.com/projects/doha-expressway/, https://www.parsons.com/project/doha-expressway/, and https://www.egis-group.com/projects/doha-expressways-road-improvements-for-qatar-s-growth. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Rs chen 7754 17:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now return the article. If you don't return it, I will create a duplicate. You are officially destroying, insulting and mocking my work. Wikipedia is not your personal homework book. If the article has problems, remove the specific part rather than deleting the entire article. You have avoided the right policies. Verddieta (talk) 19:55, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Katara Beach

A tag has been placed on Katara Beach, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Paul W (talk) 17:55, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have a personal problem while I don't know you. All your links are fake and all your work is destroying my clear and healthy activities. Why did you delete it?!! I will report your work. stop insulting me. Verddieta (talk) 19:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. I have no problem with you.

2. Please clarify which of my links are fake and how I am "destroying" your "clear and healthy activities".

3. I proposed the article for deletion as it was "unambiguous advertising". It was deleted by an administrator in accordance with Wikipedia policies.

4. Once again, I have not insulted you. In fact, your responses seem unnecessarily aggressive.

Paul W (talk) 21:49, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Beaches of Qatar

A tag has been placed on Category:Beaches of Qatar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Qatar National Bank Tower moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Qatar National Bank Tower, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of City Center Mall Doha

A tag has been placed on City Center Mall Doha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.regencyholidays.com/blog/city-center-mall-doha/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:11, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Pearl Qatar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Pearl Qatar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pearl Qatar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— The Anome (talk) 13:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Palm Towers moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Palm Towers, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JW Marriott Tower Hotel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, JW Marriott Tower Hotel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Four Seasons Hotel Doha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Four Seasons Hotel Doha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

InterContinental Doha The City moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, InterContinental Doha The City, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MIA Park for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MIA Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIA Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kempinski Marsa Malaz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kempinski Marsa Malaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kempinski Marsa Malaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation Tower moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Navigation Tower, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Gulf Mall

Hello, Verddieta, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Shushugah, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Gulf Mall, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulf Mall.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Shushugah}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 19:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gulf Mall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gulf Mall, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulf Mall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Al Mana Tower moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Al Mana Tower, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21 High Street Doha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 21 High Street Doha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Al Mana Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al Mana Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Mana Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Navigation Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Navigation Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navigation Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kempinski Marsa Malaz. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with MIA Park. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Gulf Mall, you may be blocked from editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Al Mana Tower, you may be blocked from editing. AllyD (talk) 11:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of InterContinental Doha The City for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InterContinental Doha The City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InterContinental Doha The City until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of JW Marriott Tower Hotel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JW Marriott Tower Hotel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JW Marriott Tower Hotel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Palm Towers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Palm Towers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palm Towers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Qatar National Bank Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qatar National Bank Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qatar National Bank Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 21 High Street Doha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 21 High Street Doha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21 High Street Doha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MIA Park

Hi Verddieta, I noticed you reverted the redirect of MIA Park to Museum of Islamic Art, Doha. The recent AfD closed as merge and the article was tagged with {{Afd-merge to}}, meaning there is standing consensus for the redirect. If you disagree, the appropriate venue would be WP:DRV or to create a new draft article that addresses the concerns from the AfD and submit it via the WP:Articles for creation process. Jfire (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted 21 High Street Doha to a redirect for similar reasons. Please do not remove redirects that resulted from AfD outcomes without addressing the issues raised in the AfD. Jfire (talk) 16:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Palm Towers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Palm Towers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palm Towers (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jfire (talk) 16:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gulf Mall

A tag has been placed on Gulf Mall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulf Mall. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jfire (talk) 03:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Khalifeh Soltan, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 00:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Al Mana Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al Mana Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Mana Tower (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to al-Tabari, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, interpretation, ideas, and personal experiences— which have not been published by reliable, secondary sources. Please do not base your contributions on primary sources, but be prepared to cite a reliable, secondary source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 15:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Al Mana Tower

Hello, Verddieta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Al Mana Tower, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Al Mana Tower

Hello, Verddieta. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Al Mana Tower".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Navigation Tower

Hello Verddieta, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Navigation Tower, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navigation Tower (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Actualcpscm}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 14:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MIA Park

A tag has been placed on MIA Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[1]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fermiboson (talk) 14:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of City Center Doha

A tag has been placed on City Center Doha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fermiboson (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 13:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gulf Mall Qatar

A tag has been placed on Gulf Mall Qatar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lakwat (talk) 14:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Navigation Tower. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 17:23, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of City Center Doha

A tag has been placed on City Center Doha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:27, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb Per previous archived AN/I thread: the article creation has resumed. Fermiboson (talk) 13:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- @Fermiboson and @Deb - This user has not created any articles or contributed anything since his November 26, 2023 punishment. KatoKungLee (talk) 16:57, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  He created the above article, which you can't see in the history because of its deletion. Otherwise, yes, he has not. Fermiboson (talk) 16:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]