User talk:Venkatraman.blr
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Kalyan Varma
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kalyan Varma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zpeopleheart (talk) 09:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Kalyan Varma
[edit]Hey, Venkatraman.blr,
If you would like to continue to work on this article, I can move it to User:Venkatraman.blr/Sandbox where you can work on improving it. The references were outdated and additional reliable sources are need and any promotional language removed. Since this an subject which was gone through two deletion discussions, the bar is set quite high for an article to survive and must be substantially different from previous versions. Liz Read! Talk! 14:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
The article Nature inFocus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article is promotional text with too many missing sources for claims and achievements
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)