User talk:Tushir0001

November 2022

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Chandelas of Jejakabhukti, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 09:56, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harsha. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 16:02, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 10:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 16:22, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bharatpur State into History of Rajasthan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it wont be repeated Tushir0001 (talk) 23:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nawab Bahawal Khan IV moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Nawab Bahawal Khan IV. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Janti Kalan

Hello, Tushir0001,

Thank you for creating Janti Kalan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

There cvertainly isn't anything here except a statement that the village exists

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BoyTheKingCanDance}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

George Custer's Sabre (talk) 02:26, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but please don't delete this page Tushir0001 (talk) 02:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Janti Kalan

Hello, Tushir0001,

Thank you for creating Janti Kalan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add relevant categories

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BoyTheKingCanDance}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

George Custer's Sabre (talk) 02:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nawab Bahawal Khan IV

Hello Tushir0001,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nawab Bahawal Khan IV for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Nawab Bahawal Khan IV to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tushir moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Tushir. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 06:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not keep re-creating this article without adding reliable sources that make it compliant with the notability guidelines. Please improve the article at Draft:Tushir instead. Jat writers such as Bhim Singh Dahiya and Ram Sarup Joon are not acceptable sources, as discussed several times on Wikipedia: they are not peer-reviewed scholars, and their aim is to glorify their caste. utcursch | talk 23:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amar Singh Majithia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Packer&Tracker (talk ♀) 06:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Battle of Eastern and Southern Delhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, first place {{AfC submission|T}} atop the article, publish, then click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please ensure articles conforming to WP:TONE and that they have a WP:NPOV. Thanks. Silikonz💬 00:46, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can change the name but please don't remove it. Tushir0001 (talk) 00:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My concerns are pertaining to the article's tone. In the main section, The courageous warrior Nahar Singh withdrew overnight to his stronghold the fort of Ballabhgarh... uttered these prophetic words on the occasion and so many self sacrificing sons and daughters come forward to carry on the mission of freedom of the country, who made the sustenance and continuance of the British empire impossible and forced them to go lock stock and barrel. Such men are the salt of the earth as well as the final sentence carry a tone that is more akin to storytelling than an encyclopedia article. After an overhaul on how the article flows you are welcome to put it through AfC or to move it to mainspace. WP:TONE is key here. Silikonz💬 01:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sadiq I

Hello, Tushir0001

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sadiq I for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 18:20, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sadiq I moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sadiq I, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BangJan1999 18:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Antil (Jat clan) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Antil (Jat clan), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:17, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Antil (Jat clan)

Hello Tushir0001,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username BoyTheKingCanDance, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Antil (Jat clan), for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Draft:Antil (Jat clan). Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BoyTheKingCanDance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 12:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Tushir0001! Your additions to Bhim Singh Rana Jat have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bhim Singh Rana Jat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhim Singh Rana Jat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhim Singh Rana Jat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pls don't delete it Tushir0001 (talk) 14:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jat-Mughal Wars moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jat-Mughal Wars. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is not written in an encyclopaedic tone or format. Please, use Article for Creation. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 16:49, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antil (Jat clan) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antil (Jat clan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antil (Jat clan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Kalhora dynasty ‎, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kharal. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tushir0001, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Tushir Aryan (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:63:A8F0:6CFB:23FF:FE90:4580 (talk) 07:26, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@2A01:4C8:63:A8F0:6CFB:23FF:FE90:4580 what's the problem to use two accounts ? you guys block me everytime even though I edit reasonable Tushir0001 (talk) 09:03, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the guidelines that I linked to above? You are continuing to edit using both accounts. Please stop. 2A01:4C8:63:A8F0:6CFB:23FF:FE90:4580 (talk) 10:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@2A01:4C8:63:A8F0:6CFB:23FF:FE90:4580 tell which acc should i use ? coz u block me every time ,atleast 6 ids u people banned and I do only reasonable edits only with sources... dont know whats ur people . I am very frustrated now Tushir0001 (talk) 10:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which six IDs were those? Perhaps I can help by discussing it with an administrator. 2A01:4C8:63:A8F0:6CFB:23FF:FE90:4580 (talk) 10:53, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@2A01:4C8:63:A8F0:6CFB:23FF:FE90:4580 I can't name all but u latestly blocked Tushir0001 for sometime earlier u blocked prerit tushir and jat raj and others.. this isnt fair.. this is serious how can write jassa singh ahluwalia a bhatti rajput and there are not records of bhatti rajput constant rule on kapurthala they were crushed by jat sikh kings of patiala ... pls do logical debates , u guyz do ur monopoly and locks the pages ... Yashodharman, Aulikaras, Samma (mentioned in Chachnama 13th cen) ,Kalhoras and Soomras have been mistaken to be rajputs by tod who isnt valid nowadays and wasnt valid earlier too. see my sources and debate with me dont directly removes... contemporary proves of rai ahmed khan kharal and kharals being jats are there but u guyz just stick with rajputs ... i m sure that rajputs are also controling wiki like quora.. this isnt fair... lohanas were jats acc. to chachnama but u guyz dont listen... pls do some logical debates ,i edit with sources only trust me 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 Tushir0001 (talk) 13:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amar Singh Patiala

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amar Singh Patiala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://jatchiefs.com/raja-amar-singh/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 2A01:4C8:63:A8F0:6CFB:23FF:FE90:4580 (talk) 06:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Naseeb2468 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naseeb2468. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ST47 (talk) 21:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]