Jump to content

User talk:TuluveRai123/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! DanCherek (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

I have restored the disambiguation page at Tulu — if you would like to improve the Tulu language, feel free to do so at that article, but please don't copy and paste from Tulu language into Tulu. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Krithi Shetty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

 Just search Telugu Titles Translation Krithi Shetty on YouTube you will find the source TuluveRai123 (talk) 14:18, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

You must provide the source with the edit. Also, youtube is not a reliable source. The current prose is already reliably sourced to a large newspaper. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:33, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Krithi Shetty, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC) https://www.andhrajyothy.com/telugunews/kruthi-shetty-fans-did-not-expect-20210210121731 have a look at this TuluveRai123 (talk) 15:09, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Can you please say using which source you had mentioned her mother tongue as Kannada TuluveRai123 (talk) 15:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Shetty is a sub-caste of Bunt(Community). Shetty's born in Tulunad have their mother tongue as Tulu. I hailing from bunt Community accurately know that Krithi Shetty is born in Tulu Family. TuluveRai123 (talk) 15:25, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Pooja Hegde, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please cite sources for Tulu and Bunt. Ab207 (talk) 07:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rakshit Shetty. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- DaxServer (talk) 08:27, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

https://m.republicworld.com/entertainment-news/regional-indian-cinema/pooja-hegde-lesser-known-facts.html I have done the changes with a reliable source @Ab207 TuluveRai123 (talk) 09:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Re this edit, please note that the WP:BURDEN is on you to add them back *with reliable sources* per WP:BLP. Also please do not add people without their aritlces per WP:WTAF. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 11:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Karishma Amin moved to draftspace

 An article you recently created, Karishma Amin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 06:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karishma Amin (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karishma Amin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karishma Amin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 06:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

 

Teahouse logo
Hello, TuluveRai123! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 06:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
@TuluveRai123: I'd recommend that you complete Wikipedia:WIKIADVENTURE before continuing on the Karishma Amin article. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karishma Amin (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The 2 references are not considered reliable and cannot be used to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karishma Amin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karishma Amin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 06:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karishma Amin (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karishma Amin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karishma Amin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Karishma Amin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Karishma Amin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.filmifeed.com/celebrity/karishma-amin/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 19:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gamjaal

Notice

The article Gamjaal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

I have sourced all the articles stating that Gamjaal is a movie,so I guess this message can be removed TuluveRai123 (talk) 19:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Gamjaal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gamjaal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamjaal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 21:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Despite several discussions, you seem to be hell bent on adding Tulu language origins on articles without providing any kind of reliable of sources, like this edit. Please read about the discretionary sanctions in the box above. — DaxServer (talk to me) 15:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing, addition of unsourced and poorly sourced content, WP:ARBIND violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

May I know on which I had edited wrongly/added UNSOURCED content TuluveRai123 (talk) 16:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TuluveRai123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

This is not correct, a reason was given. Yamla (talk) 17:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TuluveRai123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have edited with providing proper source till date. There might be some edits which I have done without knowing the proper information on that article it got reverted and I know my mistakes. After that edits I have been doing the edits carefully and properly by providing trusted sources. I have done editing on Arjun Kapikad by knowing proper information. This block has been given since the administrator doesn't know about Arjun Kapikad. I know him very well that's why I have edited his article. TuluveRai123 (talk) 05:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This request does not convince me that you understand the reason for the block, or that you will edit differently going forward. 331dot (talk) 07:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is the reason for the block? I haven't done any editing that violates any rule. TuluveRai123 (talk) 08:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TuluveRai123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer needed I understand my mistake and I won't repeat this in the future TuluveRai123 (talk) 03:54, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

In the line directly above this one, you state that you don't understand why you're blocked. And now you say that you do? In fact, this looks to just be a minor rephrase of what the last admin said. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TuluveRai123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now know the reason now why I am blocked, I promise I won't do any edits like the same in future and I hereby state that I won't repeat this and the block can be uplifted TuluveRai123 (talk) 10:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"I know him very well"

That being the case, you have a conflict of interest and should not edit that article directly. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Content cannot be sourced to personal knowledge. "All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 50592

User requests unblocking at UTRS appeal #50592 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Niriksha Shetty moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Niriksha Shetty, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dial911 (talk) 07:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians with red-linked categories on their user page

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians with red-linked categories on their user page requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:43, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, TuluveRai123,
It's a little hard to explain but Category:Wikipedians with red-linked categories on their user page needs to stay red. It, and Category:Wikipedians with red-linked categories on their user talk page, are the two exceptions to the WP:REDNO rule. Loud discussions have broken out from editors who want to keep these links on their user pages red links. Thank you very much for thinking to create this category but this debate has gone on longer than you or I have been editors on Wikipedia.
There are other, needed categories you can create by looking over the Special:WantedCategories list. Be careful when you look at the list, some wanted categories are just category misspellings that need correction or categories that people have put on a page that Wikipedia actually doesn't use. But there are some needed categories, often ones involving annual events or elections that no one has gotten around to creating. This list gets updated every 3 days so feel free to check back if all of the categories have either been created or eliminated from the list. Oh, and if you ever see categories on Draft pages, feel free to disable them by adding a colon (like [[:Category example]]) or remove them from the page.
If you ever have questions about Wikipedia policy or the exceptions to policy, please bring them to the Teahouse and hopefully an old-timer is around to explain. Thanks again. Liz Read! Talk! 20:54, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bengali Film

A tag has been placed on Category:Bengali Film indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 07:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

Information icon

Hello TuluveRai123. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TuluveRai123. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TuluveRai123|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. If you are being paid by Jai Tulunad organization, you need to disclose it. Also are you related to User:Prithvi Tuluve? If so, how? — DaxServer (talk) 12:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

I am not getting paid by any anyone for editing or promoting a content on Wikipedia. I am not related to User:Prithvi Tuluve in any way. I had created Jai Tulunad page because since the organization is working well I thought it would be better if there will be a Wikipedia page for it. TuluveRai123 (talk) 05:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. May I also ask why you made this edit: Special:Diff/1064455988 ? — DaxServer (talk) 09:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

I came across his profile and found that he mentioned the page Jai Tulunad and he did not link that. So I thought if I link it would be helpful for him. TuluveRai123 (talk) 11:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Happy editing! — DaxServer (talk) 11:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

If you don't mind,may I know how do we find when was our autoconfirmed and extended confirmed TuluveRai123 (talk) 16:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

This is a useful tool [1] — DaxServer (talk) 17:18, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Add recent language census data to Tulunadu page

Add 2011 language census data along with the good old data you have put in Add kannada as one of the language spoken Deltakannada (talk) 03:20, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Masala Dosa

Please provide the link which says Masala Dosa belongs to Tuluva cuisine. Please mention the line/para which says that Kataariveera (talk) 15:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Ashrita Shetty

Discuss in the talk page and gain consensus please. The source has her interview in which she says she is a Kannadiga. You cannot POV push over the subject of the article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

If she is a kannadiga how can she speak Tulu perfectly and why is her first movie in Tulu??? Anyone who is from or born in Karnataka are called as kannadiga. The editor of that source meant the same way!! Please stop hiding our identity!!!! TuluveRai123 (talk) 09:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Instead of anecdotal baseless evidences like "how can she speak Tulu perfectly and why is her first movie in Tulu", provide an interview in which she says she is a Tulu. Anybody can be perfect in a language, doesn;t necessarily have to belong to that ethnicity. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Ashrita Shetty shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Do not edit war in the middle of a discussion. I'll report you next time. Can't you wait to get a consensus? I've requested editors for their inputs.. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Use {{ping|Fylindfotberserk}} to notify me in the talk page discussion. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Niriksha Shetty

Information icon Hello, TuluveRai123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Niriksha Shetty, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Nandalike (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needed more reliable and independent sources and the sources present at the moment was only of the Daijiworld and other two where he has been working.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fade258 (talk) 07:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, TuluveRai123! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 07:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Costal Karnataka

Hello TuluveRai123. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Costal Karnataka, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: File this under WP:A10 and specify the article that is being duplicated here. Thank you. BangJan1999 14:15, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Information icon Hi TuluveRai123! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Masala dosa . Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 17:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

TuluveRai123, this is your official warning from an admin that you're over WP:3RR on that page. I'm not blocking you this time, but don't do that again. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

I won't be doing 3RR in my future edits. I apologize for my mistake. TuluveRai123 (talk) 17:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Dosa

I talked with page & added proper reference & citation you the only newly adding new information without proper evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC) I talked with page & editors provided source you can check talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 16:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC) Only dosa origin is from coastal Karnataka, For Masala dosa it's matter of Conjecture.

@User:Laks883 Please drop your replies over here [[2]] not in my talk page!! GAL!!TuluveRai123 (talk) 16:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

I talked with editors during editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 26 July 2022 (UTC) Provide article about origin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC) You are not talking & answering at talk page. Just removing contents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC) @User:Laks883 Please drop your replies over here [[3]] TuluveRai123 (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

You can request to block or provide proof or article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC) Abe c****** Don't you understand that don't drop your replies over here. TuluveRai123 (talk) 16:52, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

I made changes in other pages but nobody has complained which redirects my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 26 July 2022 (UTC) You are changing only Masala dosa page content I made changes in other page like Kannada people & dosa but I didn't get complaints & disagreements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC) TuluveRai123 (talk) 10:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Archive 1
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TuluveRai123/Archive_1&oldid=1190013512"