User talk:Tsans2

Welcome!

Hi Tsans2! I noticed your contributions to Battle of Kyiv (2022) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 16:58, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! and pray for Ukraine User talk:Dunutubble

Nomination of Russian fascism (ideology) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russian fascism (ideology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian fascism (ideology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Endwise (talk) 10:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Veverve. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Russian fascism (ideology), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Stop adding blogs, FICTREFs, and non-RS, as well as any claim which relies on those; also stop adding unsourced material. Thanks. Veverve (talk) 19:46, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Veverve you didn't notice I add a lot of sources for each sentence. reliable sources, not blogs as you can think. I reverted your vandalism again. Tsans2 (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You added back the blogs and all I had reproached in details in my multiple separate edits, and you then added more FICTREF or sources unrelated to the topic. I have reverted your undoing. Sources used on Wikipedia must be WP:RS. Veverve (talk) 22:26, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I double checked and added some basic info with iron reliable sources Tsans2 (talk) 22:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Russian fascism (ideology), you may be blocked from editing. Veverve (talk) 09:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kyiv vs Kiev in historical articles

Please see this Request for Comment for the discussion where this consensus was achieved: Talk:Kyiv/Archive 9#RfC: Kyiv/Kiev in other articles. Until the consensus changes, the articles such as Kievan Rus continue to use the "Kiev" spelling. Please let me know if you have any questions. --K.e.coffman (talk) 20:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

so, in historical articles I cannot use Kyiv? Tsans2 (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The new name can be briefly mentioned such as: Oleg of Novgorod arrived at Kiev (today [[Kyiv]], [[Ukraine]])..., but then continue with the "Kiev" name. Separately, subjects like Kievan Rus', Olga of Kiev, etc. have their own established common English names in the preponderance of sources, and should not be changed.

In general, historical names are in continued use in Wikipedia and do not need to be changed, because of redirects. See for example: Lwów / Lemberg / Lvov which all point to Lviv. Hope this is helpful. --K.e.coffman (talk) 21:08, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@K.e.coffman thanks. not a problem. Tsans2 (talk) 22:50, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Tsans2 adding back FICTREFs, non-RS, BLOGs, and OR regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 10:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Russian fascism (ideology)) for a period of 1 week for eidtwaRRING. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.

Points to ponder:

Edit warring is wrong even if one is right.

Any arguments in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal.

Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RenatUK. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Marina Ovsyannikova, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Renat 11:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Lebedyn moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Lebedyn, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 02:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion (2)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Tsans2 adding FICTREFs, refusing to BRD, implies I have an AGENDA regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 04:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

El_C 20:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice: You Have Been Topic Banned

This message is to advise you that you have been topic banned, and are therefore prohibited from editing or commenting on all articles, pages and discussion related to Eastern Europe and the Balkans broadly construed. This includes, but is not limited to, culture, religion, geography, history, politics and current events. This topic ban shall remain in force for a period of one year from this date unless lifted by myself or another competent entity. This measure is taken in response to the concerns raised by numerous experienced editors at this ANI discussion and is in lieu of an indefinite block. You may remove this notice at any time from your talk page. However, this will have no effect on the ban. Any violation of the ban may result in additional sanctions, not excluding an indefinite block, which may be imposed by any uninvolved administrator without further warning. Please be aware that I am taking this measure reluctantly and in the hopes that you may take the necessary time to improve your editing skills, manage any prejudices or WP:POV issues you may have, and become a productive editor. Once the ban expires (April 2, 2023) you are free to resume editing. However, be advised that given your history of problematic editing in this subject area, that there is unlikely to be much tolerance for a resumption of your bad habits. This admin action is being logged at WP:ACDSLOG. If you have any questions please drop me a line on my talk or ping me to this page. Yours V/r -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:UNBAN#Arbitration_enforcement_bans for your appeal options. Again, I recommend it be filed no less than 3 months (of productive editing elsewhere) from now for best chance of success. Regards, El_C 15:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem how to appeal this ban? I didn't find any reason for my ban. In general, which exactly my edits are so bad, that I was banned? Tsans2 (talk) 16:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem second. I have no deleted edits, and have 4 public thanks on my credit. it's strange. looks like a punishment for my following of this rule: Wikipedia:Be bold Tsans2 (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Out of an abundance of caution I have requested a review of your T Ban at WP:AN. I have also pinged you to that conversation. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem I'm grateful. Hope justice will prevail Tsans2 (talk) 17:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning Your comment here is a violation of your topic ban. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you did not read the ban notice carefully. You may not edit any page or participate in any discussion relating to the covered subject matter broadly construed. Put in the plainest language, this subject is entirely off limits to you anywhere on Wikipedia for the duration of the topic ban. This should be understood as a formal warning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem I cannot comment other users' talk pages? Tsans2 (talk) 17:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. You are free to edit or discuss any subject not covered by the topic ban. But Eastern Europe and the Balkans are off limits. If you feel that you have sufficiently improved your editing skills and grasp of WP:PAG, you may drop me a line in six months and I will review the topic ban. No promises on the outcome, but we can discuss it. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oki. Tsans2 (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem dropped you a line on you Talk Page Tsans2 (talk) 09:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note Following a review it appears that you have adhered to the terms of your above TBan. With its expiration now less than two months away and in response your request on my talk page, I am pleased to inform you that I am lifting the TBan with immediate effect. Please be mindful of the concerns and issues that necessitated the ban and exercise great care when editing in this subject area which remains under Discretionary Sanctions. Any future problematic editing will likely result in a swift restoration of the TBan, which would more than likely be indefinite. I will note the removal of your ban at WP:ACDSLOG. Thank you for your contributions to the project and happy editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ad Orientem, the TBAN might need to be re-imposed. See my Warning at the bottom of the page. Btw, I forgot that I've dealt with this user in the past (I still don't remember any details). El_C 17:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tsans2

Thank you for creating Pivdennyi Port.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tsans2

Thank you for creating Mykhailo Zhyznevskyi.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tsans2

Thank you for creating Battle of Krasnyi Lyman.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:25, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Pony Boy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles O'Donnell. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vitaliy Parkhomuk

Hi Tsans2, you created articles for three Ukrainian soldiers (Serhiy Vasich, Oleh Svynchuk and Vitaliy Parkhomuk) who died in Makariv and were given the Hero of Ukraine title. The first two still have their articles but Parkhomuk's page was shorter than the other two and it was unfortunately drafted into Draft:Vitaliy Parkhomuk. Do you think you could try to expand the article and move it back to mainspace? I recently expanded the page on the battle of Makariv and I think it is a shame that Parkhomuk remains as a red link while his two colleagues have their own pages. Thanks, Super Ψ Dro 21:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Super Dromaeosaurus thanks for you help! I was topic banned because of heavy discussins at Rashism article. So I will come back to Ukraine topics next year I see. Tsans2 (talk) 06:43, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that, my apologies. Hopefully you will get unbanned in the future. Super Ψ Dro 08:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Super Dromaeosaurus yes, half the year has passed. Another half is ahead. But I'm patiently waiting and slightly focused on Europe and USA topics Tsans2 (talk) 13:58, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maropost for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maropost is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maropost (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 05:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Brasil Kirin

added a link pointing to Indian

CTEEP

added a link pointing to MVA

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, Tsans2. I noticed that your recent edit to Mykhailo Nesolonyy added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 00:39, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hi again. Please be advised that if you re-add the poorly-formatted thief in law version ([1][2]) even once more, you will be sanctioned. Thanks. El_C 16:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tsans2 Tread carefully. If I had seen that first, I'd have probably blocked you. Ping @El C -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sure, thanks for warning! my sincere apologies Tsans2 (talk) 12:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Euryalus (talk) 14:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warned not to re-add your "thieves-in-law" material to this article, but restored some of it anyway. Blocked for repeated BLP violations. If required, appeal options are in the template above. -- Euryalus (talk) 14:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Euryalus I did not use. In this version https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamaz_Somkhishvili&oldid=1161408669 there is no thief in law. If you mean this "Somkhishvili was first associated with one of the main thieves in law in CIS — Ded Khasan (aka Aslan Usoyan)" - it does not refer to Somkhishvili but to Aslan Usoyan. If needed it will be removed. Tsans2 (talk) 14:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tsans2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Upon receiving a warning for utilizing the phrase "thief in law", I have abstained from its usage. Therefore, the recent block on my account was unexpected. I would appreciate any clarification about any additional infractions I may have committed. I am committed to abiding by Wikipedia's guidelines, and I am more than willing to rectify any mistakes I may have made. @Euryalus Tsans2 (talk) 14:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per the diff, which you seem to be unable to even correctly link to, thief in law was in fact repeated, as you yourself acknowledge above. Even if that criminal designation was now only directed at Aslan Usoyan, who is not a living person, it still lacked a citation. Unless it is the citation at the end of the entire paragraph, but since it isn't translated into English, not even its title, who really knows what it's actually about. Either way, this isn't acceptable for the English Wikipedia (EN). The more I look at your contributions, the more it seems you are operating too incompetently (WP:CIR), without regard for or an understanding of EN's policies and guidelines. Whatever the reason for this, be it a language barrier or any other factor, you've proven to be WP:NOTCOMPATIBLE with an English-language collaborative project. And it all becomes further compounded by your focus on the highly-contentious topic area (WP:CTOP) of EE. El_C 14:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi, and thanks for the ping. The block review is a matter for the next passing admin so I'll leave it with them. However for the benefit of that discussion see [3],[4], [5], which were all made subsequent to the above warning and allege a "connection with crime" between the article subject and purported "thieves in law" in Russia. The only source for these claims is an unlinked reference to something called "comments.ua." These edits are fairly obvious breaches of WP:BLP. Given the age of this account it seems unlikely that you are unaware of the requirements of that policy or how strictly it is applied. -- Euryalus (talk) 14:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tsans2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Firstly, I acknowledge that I can make mistakes and that I need to be cautious. But after an attentive analysis of my block and chatting with the admin who blocked me, it appears (per admin Euryalus who blocked me), that I was blocked because I reverted the spam and the previous version of the page contained such phrase: According to Comments.ua Somkhishvili was first associated with one of the main thieves in law in CIS — Ded Khasan (aka Aslan Usoyan). So, I was blocked for restoring this version with the aforementioned statement. However, Aslan Usoyan is indeed a thief in law, and that phrase is correct, and I believe did not violate the guidelines by reinstating the version containing that phrase. Additionally, this information was sourced from Comments.ua, a reputable Ukrainian media. The statement was not baseless and had been present on the wiki page for several months. And such version was live for many months. I can only guess, when I restored the page and removed the spam, that “thief-in-law”-phrase triggered the admin that led to my blocking. I think, I was banned with a good faith and I think the conflict is resolved. I will also take a careful look at all BLPs on Wikipedia. *Regarding other potential BLP violations, the blocking admin has accused me here on my Talk page, but in my 18 months on the platform, during which I've created over 30 biographies on English Wikipedia, I have not received a single warning. This specific block is confined to the potential misuse of the term "thief in law," which was not used in relation to a BLP, but to provide context for the known thief in law, Aslan Usoyan. *To sum up: 1) I did not intentionally put any “thief in law’ combinations after a warning on my talk page. I merely restored a version that had been compromised by spam and whitewashing. 2) The term "thief in law" was appropriately used in the restored version, as it refers to the known thief in law, Aslan Usoyan, a fact also mentioned in his preamble.

Decline reason:

Per discussion below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think it's a mistake for you to have drafted another unblock request so quickly. One would think you'd take your time to compose it, especially after reviewing WP:GAB, which I wager you have not reviewed. As well, it's a mistake for you to reduce this block to a single mistake. Because it isn't a single mistake, even if that was the impetus. After all, not long ago you were topic banned from this very topic area. Incidentally, Aslan Usoyan was a thief in law — the citation is in his bio, so it'd have been simple to copy. But that was your responsibility. I'm sorry to say, but your recent activity on the Tamaz Somkhishvili page has been concerning. And taken with the prior problems you've exhibited with this topic area (topic ban, etc.), it seems rather untenable. El_C 15:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

El_C Regarding this: "I'm sorry to say, but your recent activity on the Tamaz Somkhishvili page has been concerning" - I was reverting spam and blatant promo edits as Wikipedia guidelines ask to do. Please check the current version of the page. It has almost no reliable sources and all controversies are gone. WP PROMO is there. --Tsans2 (talk) 16:14, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the above: I don't support an unblock for the reasons already stated. Sorry to have to say this, but if you're not applying the guidelines on verifiability, reliable sourcing, BLP and NPOV after 18 months of editing, a topic ban and multiple warnings then it's hard to believe this will suddenly change now. Either way I don't intend to keep responding as we're just going over the same ground. Unblock requests are best determined by someone other than the blocking admin, so I'll leave it with them. All the best. -- Euryalus (talk) 15:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Euryalus last reply to you and last question:)

I read the guides and I narrowed the topic as I was blocked because of nothing more than "thief in law" and the appealing guide says to be precise and answer directly and not generally. So I identified my mistake and appealed the block again. Regarding Aslan Usoyan - he was thief in law - and that what I used in the version on wikipedia page of Tamaz "Somkhishvili was first associated with one of the main thieves in law in CIS — Ded Khasan (aka Aslan Usoyan)...". Literally I did not text it, I just reverted the spam added by another user.

Can you please clarify, was my mistake the fact that I did not cite that Aslan was thief in law? If the block for that reason - than I think you can unblock me, as the reason is that I used a phrase " one of the main thieves in law in CIS — Ded Khasan (aka Aslan Usoyan)" - which is correct and not false. If you see my topic ban you will notice that I was right and I was defending from deletion the page about Ruscism. Some pro-Russian fellows wanted to delete it and of course I did reverts and explains. Tsans2 (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Your "mistake" was repeatedly creating content in a BLP accusing someone of criminality without anything approaching proper sourcing. And for doing so despite multiple warnings. And then edit-warring to keep your poorly sourced BLP-violating material in the article. Really, see WP:BLP as a whole for why this is not appropriate. It's not about the use of any one single phrase; it's about not using Wikipedia articles to make poorly sourced attacks on living people. -- Euryalus (talk) 20:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]