User talk:Troopersho

Welcome!

Hello, Troopersho, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Template:User Presbyterian, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome (Troopersho (talk) 18:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Go ahead and delete the template. Thank you. - Troopersho (talk) 17:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gloom... 2! moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gloom... 2!, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Os ari us 16:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

haha -- Troopersho (talk) 16:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 17:12, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No clue -- Troopersho (talk) 17:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This. Largoplazo (talk) 17:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ah, very good. revert it, I having not an one clue -- Troopersho (talk) 17:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Quokka have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 07:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It just didn't work for some reason :( -- Troopersho (talk) 15:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It didn't work because the "file" tag requires an actual file, with a file extension. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 01:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Chiswick Chap. An edit that you recently made to Eukaryote seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did reverted myself WDYM. Troopersho (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He am not did on they. The is out not thing. Troopersho (talk) 16:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hayes School of Music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical performance. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. -- Troopersho (talk) 12:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I

i CourtneyGabrielleSnowdon (talk) 10:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JKLMNOP -- Troopersho (talk) 12:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:User Presbyteriannew has been accepted

Template:User Presbyteriannew, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 21:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:User Presbyterianold has been accepted

Template:User Presbyterianold, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 21:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 03:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I never made any edits to that article, just the talk page, and I'm not going to edit any other stuff on that topic either. You shall have no worry of anything I may do to any LGBTQ+ related articles. Just to let you know, if you were indeed concerned about it. --Troopersho (talk) 12:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ummm, yeah... true -- Troopersho (talk) 04:50, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Starforce (film) (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Starforce (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Troopersho! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gloom... 2!

Hello, Troopersho. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gloom... 2!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gloom... 2!

Hello, Troopersho. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gloom... 2!".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Starforce (film)

Hello, Troopersho. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Starforce (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there Troopersho (talk) 01:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Audience scores

I have reverted one of your recent changes.(diff)

Please note WP:UGC user voted scores are not allowed, that means user votes from IMDB and audience scores from Rotten Tomatoes should not be added to Wikipedia film articles. If you think an exception to the rule WP:UGC should be made in this case then please start a discussion on the article talk page. -- 109.76.198.112 (talk) 16:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright thanks lol. I might think about that exception thing in the very distant future Troopersho (talk) 17:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

exceptions are rare. e.g. Star Wars: The Last Jedi or Captain_Marvel_(film)#Audience_response and such exceptions are generally only made if a lot of extra sources report on and discuss the audience response (more reliable sources such as Cinemascore and Postrak are preferred for film aritcles, or for TV articles Nielsen ratings). Even when exceptions are made it generally is not about the score specifically but more about there being a discussion that there is a significant difference of opinions between the critics and the audiences. -- 109.76.198.112 (talk) 05:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]