User talk:Tpbradbury/Archive 1

Assessment on William Rawson

Hi. I was actually surprised to see the article classed Start initially - it's short (at the moment) so it's obviously Stub - correct call in the end. Thanks for your efforts. Best wishes. Ref ^(chew)(do) 01:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thanks for finding time to assess Atif Aslam. Appreciate it. Anshuk (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guidance on assessing

Hi. I have been assessing articles for a little while now. I have always refrained from uprating very poorly sourced articles, as I believe it is a core issue. I have been discussing this with another editor, who believes that addition of information, sourced or otherwise, means he should rate upward from, say, stub to start. I won't budge an unreferenced article from stub, as I don't trust the integrity of the information without sources. What are your thoughts?

Also, is there a nailed-down guideline or decent essay related to assessment, particularly BLPs? I would be grateful for guidance to ensure I do the correct thing within the assessment department. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 19:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Tom. I have since had a good look at some Project talk page postings regarding this issue, and have to agree that my parameters are somewhat restrictive. I will happily loosen off up to Start, but I would expect to see some decent verification after that. Best wishes. Ref ^(chew)(do) 13:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token b05a8e540a322c012e5b4fec0729ab76

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington

I have noticed your large amount of work on the article and thought I would let you now I'm going to be doing some major editing to the article, most importantly adding references! I would welcome your edits and opinions on any of my additions in the coming weeks. Thank you. LordHarris 20:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Thatcher

Sorry about that link! I must of been using the template and forgot to copy the correct web address. Silly mistake, thank you for spotting and correcting it. What would we wikidragons do without the wikignomes and wikifairys ;-). As far as the article goes I keep meaning to resume adding references as I only got to her early political career. I will make another go once I'm finished with Wellington. Happy editing and Best regards, LordHarris 18:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback given

I have 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Napoleon peer review

It is no problem - I do not watch peer reviews I do as there are a lot of them. I do go through the PR list every few days and try and respond to comments or questions, but my comments look unchanged now, so I doubt I would have even noticed the changes. I am not an expert on Napoleon by any means, but I have been to Les Invalides and seen his tomb, and know a little about him and was surprised there was not more his tomb or on his meeting and marrying Josephine. I was trying to say there will be a lot of people who might pop up at FAC and say "But what about the crucial role of Napoleon at X?", so get it as good as possible before FAC and be ready there. Hope this helps, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prepping for Napoleon FAC

I suspect that the frequent use of "whilst" and "though" might get the attention of Tony1 who would ask what is wrong with "while" and "although". So, you might wish to get a copyeditor to go over the article first. I can suggest EyeSerene, AnnaFrance, Dabomb87, GrahamColm among several that volunteer for such work. Note that with an article this big, they would need quite some time and may not individually catch every issue that could warrant attention at FAC. Jappalang (talk) 20:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is fantastic! I'm just curious, was it for realism you choose Bonaparte Crossing the Alps over Napoleon Crossing the Alps? Another image inquiry I must make is whether you felt Image:16 Napoleons exole St Helena June1970.jpg was out of place in an article full of paintings. I reckon this photo really makes history come alive for the reader, but I do like the image in the Saint Helena section of a man clearly withering away. Alientraveller (talk) 17:08, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image of him looking like he's stumbled out of bed will need a new home though, so it could be uploaded to Commons under a better name. If we need to cut down on images, the Death section could benefit from this spectacular painting replacing the ship. The sarcophogus image is better than the one currently in Les Invalides so it could be moved there, unless you want to keep it and move it to the left. Alientraveller (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, what alternative would we have to this? Should the ship image move to the left? Or considering it was the tomb image that was recommended, shall the ship go? Alientraveller (talk) 21:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to encourage you to keep up the quality work. People like you are the reason people like me get involved with Wikipedia! You clearly have a better command of both wiki-policies and the English language than I, but I'd be glad to assist in any way I can in the future. (Starting with reading the rest of Napoleon, of course.) Natural Cut (talk) 18:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Show FA

Sorry for not responding to you sooner; I've only just finished with exams and they've been taking up a fair bit of my time lately. Thanks so much for the advice, though, and for your corrections in the article. I'm going to try to and give it a thorough going-over tonight and over the next few days to make sure everything's up to scratch. If you've got any more suggestions, I'd love to hear them. :) Cheers, -Shoemoney2night (talk) 04:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

IP block exemption granted. User is a good contributor and was unfortunately caught in an autoblock of a spam/advertising-only account.

Request handled by: Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 17:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Corunna - Thank you

You've done some really nice work tidying up Battle of Corunna; it looks a great deal better, quite attractive in fact. Thanks, Maglone (talk) 20:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Layout

Thank you for giving me that link. I was unsure of the ordering and was only attempting to remove ref list errors. I will attempt to correct my previous actions. --Chrismiceli (talk) 20:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for reassessing Biddy Early. I appreciate the time you took to do it. Have a great weekend! -- edi(talk) 17:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Edgar

Thank you for taking the time to rate the article David Edgar, that I have been working on. I will admit to being disappointed that it didn't merit more than a Start, but I note that you are much more experienced at this than I so I wondered if you would care sharing with me your thoughts on how to improve the article. Clearly the section, A Professional Playwright needs to be completed, and we need some critical response, either as a section or interwoven in to what we have. Anything else? What about style, prose, POV? Anything constructive would be welcome. Cottonshirt τ 18:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

I just wanted to say thanks for all the fine work you're doing at Wikipedia:Featured articles/Cleanup listing. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, Sandy beat me to it, by weeks! Just came here to thank you for the same thing. Really appreciate the cleanup! Maralia (talk) 20:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Napoleon article

Thanks for your comment. From my (limited) experience with Napoleonic scholarly literature, Bainville's Napoléon isn't seen particularly as an ideologically coloured or motivated monograph (by Action Française standards or even by 1920s standards) — frankly, I'd say Victor Davis Hanson has a much poorer reputation among historians than Jacques Bainville. While Bainville was ... selectively Germanophobic, as a traditionalist monarchist he was also ambivalent (not to say hostile) to the legacy of Napoleonic period and certainly not interested in whitewashing or rehabilitating Napoleon. I suppose "drawing on research by" is problematic, though, because while Bainville was the first (to my knowledge) to make the argument, I imagine it's been more or less independently confirmed. To put it this way, the previous version specified no one; I figured it was at least a start to plug a name. Maybe we ought to revert until we find a citation outright. I have no doubt it's the commonly accepted version.

All the same, I think you're being unfair in the first paragraph. "There are those who admire his accomplishments" is the kind of carefully-guarded phrase one might use for Stalin, Hitler, Pinochet, or Saddam Hussein. I think it's reasonably fair to say that "many" — from a Hungarian philosopher like Tomas Molnar to a French prime minister like Dominique de Villepin to Oxbridge academicians to the seemingly endless market for Ludwig's biography and his scores of imitators — admire Napoleon. (Having said that, his critics include names commanding far more respect than Victor Davis Hanson — Georges Bernanos, A.J.P. Taylor, John Ralston Saul, etc. I think it's imperative over the long term to develop this section into a sub-article.) Albrecht (talk) 16:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. on the 'many' point, I agree that many do admire his accomplishments, though using many and some appears to be generally frowned on as vague terms. people could accurately use the term many in relation to Stalin and Hitler. 'there are those' does sound guarded, it maybe better to simply remove it. Tom B (talk) 17:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kaelan Joyce

Thank you for sorting out the Kaelan Joyce article. Very much appreciated!

We tried but could not get the exteranl links part sorted!

Once again Thank you for your time and effort. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.166.200.76 (talk) 00:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stateless (band)

Hello, I saw you assesed the Stateless (band) article from Stub class to Start class. I am aware of the criteria being used to asses certain articles, but I would like to know what in particular made you choose for Start class for this article. I actually want to know where I should work on harder or if I'm doing something wrong, or what is needed for this to be a better article. I read all the wikipedia guides and all, but you know, it's not always that easy. My only goal is to contribute to the article and try to only use verifiable sources and facts. I just need to know a little better how to improve this, to let's say a C-class article (1 step at the time!). Thanks! Hans (talk) 16:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(in response to your answer on my talk) Ok, thanks alot. I'll try to add more content, and when their new album will be released I'm sure lots of new sources to cite will pop up. I'll try to add how they formed (found an article about that) and make a "musical style" section, which seems common for most band articles. And I'm thinking of asking a native English speaker to rewrite most of the text, my English is too average to really make this a better article. But I'll do my best the next couple of months and I'll ask for a new assessment when I think it might be ready for a C-class article. But having a good base structure and already having all the facts (verifiably) sourced is a good start for a better article, I believe. Thanks for your time! Hans (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Layout of Neanderthal references

Mr. Bradbury, I see that you have just done a major cleanup of the markup structures in the Neanderthal article. The Neanderthal article is the kind of article that I love to read in Wikipedia, and so I really appreciate your work. I have a question regarding the ordering of the References section citations. In all other wikipedia articles I have read (maybe 50), references (as opposed to notes) are sorted in alphabetical order. I find no rhyme or reason in the current References order in the article. What am I missing? (I am a new editor, and seeing that your work displays mastery of wikipedia rules and processes, I feel good about asking you.) Thanks in advance for your answer.Middle Fork (talk) 22:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Got your note, checked the Neanderthal article. Great!! Thanks. Had I been more secure, I would have done it myself when I first noticed the problem. I will be more bold in the future. By the way, I wish the initial editors had not embedded the vast majority of full references in the notes field. Makes it very difficult to quickly scan to make sure the key players in various sub-controversies are being recognized in the article. But when I made that suggestion, it was rejected by someone who, I felt, had developed uncomfortable "ownership" vibes.Middle Fork (talk) 04:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shama's quote in French Revolution

Tom, the flame of Reason quote you give from Shama's book Citizens (I presume) is on p. 778 in my 1989 publ. book: yours is on p. 658. Cordialement, Frania W. (talk) 23:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You mean that 1989 & 2004 editions have that much page difference, my 778 is your 658? Total pages in my book, incl. sources/bibliography/index, is 950. FW/ Frania W. (talk) 00:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Well my (counted) 950 page book is the one given as 948: the 1989 edition. So everything's in order. I was just reading what had been done to the French Revolution today & am glad you do not make mistakes! Cordialement, Frania W. (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment of David Berkeley

Hi Tom. Thank you for your assessment on the David Berkeley article and for the formatting of the reflist. If you have time, do you have any advice on how I could further improve the article? Thank you. McMarcoP (talk) 08:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tom, thank you for your suggestions. The point is, I am not able to find any negative review of Berkeley's work, at least online. I am sure that there are some, though, and I will keep looking. Also - I will try to add some image, maybe a scan of an album cover. I am constantly expanding it, every time that there is some update anyway (the ATL group is yesterday's news - literally) and will keep doing so. Thank you very much! McMarcoP (talk) 10:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Kay Penman

Hi. Yesterday you rated the Sharon Kay Penman article that I took from a stub. Today the rating was changed to a C because of the skimpy lead. I've reworked the lead. If you get a chance, do you mind swinging by and having a look? Thanks. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the very speedy reaction and the extra set of eyes to fix the mistakes. I'm fairly certain it is Richard the Lionheart but will spend some time verifying. Thanks again. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 23:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Mayall FAC

Hello Tpbradbury,

I'd love to get your copy edit help on the FAC for the astronomer Nicholas Mayall. If you have some time, please come take a look and make any improvements you can.

WilliamKF (talk) 01:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you support. WilliamKF (talk) 02:08, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ho ho

Ϣere SpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec09}} to your friends' talk pages.

Hi Tom, see you at the Oak in Jan? Ϣere SpielChequers 18:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arius article assessment

Thanks so much for taking the time to assess the Arius article; I appreciate your imput on it. Just out of curiosity, what kept it from gaining a "B" classification? I've been working trying to improve it of late, and would appreciate hearing your thoughts. Thanks again! - Ecjmartin (talk) 00:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback! I'm going to see what I can do about that, and then maybe nominate it for GA, once we resolve a couple of issues brought up recently by another editor. Thanks again for your imput! - Ecjmartin (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for your edit on 2010 Toronto Blue Jays season fixing up refrences. Youre help is noticed and much appriciated. BLUEJAYSFAN32 ^(TALK|JAYS) 15:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reflinks

Hi there. Since Reflinks is working for you and you know how to run it, can you please have a look at

I just put in rawlinks on these FA/FAR renovations as I heard reflinks was instant, botlike. Many thanks YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 07:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I wanted to say thanks for always assessing bio articles when they are requested – you help out much more than I do, so:

Hekerui (talk) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hekerui (talk) 16:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KimChee (talk) has baked you even more WikiCakes! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully these have made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I noticed this too and second the motion. KimChee (talk) 00:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessments Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 10th Earl of Shaftesbury and Elaine Hamilton-O'Neal

Thank you for the recent assessments of Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 10th Earl of Shaftesbury and Elaine Hamilton-O'Neal. I appreciate the work that you are doing. For my future reference, could you direct me to the MOS regarding image sizing and formatting of references or citations in articles? I'm finding a bit of inconsistency between individuals assessing articles. I would really like to improve my editing and alignment with the MOS. Could you also provide a link that will let me know how to format the references in the manner that you revised? I haven't the foggiest idea how to do that and I cringe to think that I added work on your part. Any information you could provide that would improve the article is greatly appreciated. Thanks again! ;) Cindamuse (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elaine Hamilton-O'Neal

Thanks for the feedback on the assessments of Anthony Ashley-Cooper and Elaine Hamilton-O'Neal at my talk page. Images, refs, what not. I'm definitely going to start using the reflinks bot for citations. I agree with the assessments. Although, I didn't expect the B assessment on AAC. I guess it was better than I thought. I had the biggest trouble finding any photos of Hamilton or her work that I could use. Doesn't lend much to an interesting article of an artist, in my opinion, but I did what I could. Thanks again. I appreciate the work that you are doing. Cindamuse (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Tpbradbury's Day!

Tpbradbury has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
so I've officially declared today as Tpbradbury's Day!
For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian,
enjoy being the star of the day, Tpbradbury!

Signed, Neutralhomer

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day...Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:36, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Tom, thanks for taking the time to assess Tim Christensen and Dizzy Mizz Lizzy, and making a few useful improvements. I'm happy Wikipedia has such good volunteers like yourself! Best wishes, Eddyspeeder (talk) 21:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And obviously, it's about time you got another cake! Eddyspeeder (talk) 21:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eddyspeeder (talk) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Archpoet's assessment and edits

Thanks a bunch for rating the article Archpoet and making most-welcome fixes! If you have some time, I'd love to hear your thoughts and suggestions on how to make it even better. I really want it to reach B, A, and even GA status soon enough, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers!
• H☼ωdΘesI†fl∉∈ ^{KLAT} • 09:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Danke schön for the suggestions. I'll get working a little harder!
• H☼ωdΘesI†fl∉∈ ^{KLAT} • 18:13, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnie Lee Gardner

Thank you for helping out. This is my first FA nomination, so I am admittedly a bit intimidated. KimChee (talk) 04:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		For your assistance in improving Ronnie Lee Gardner from its humble roots. KimChee (talk) 03:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token a2377dcd08797d8c1b3fa41349ea011a

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Happy 10th Anniversary of Wikipedia!

Dear Tom, Frania de Lutèce, who can't stand whisky but adores champagne, would like to know what exactly you mean by the sources needed for the image Napoléon adieux à la garde impériale à Fontainebleau.[1]

File:Verre de whisky.jpg

Happy 10th anniversary of Wikipedia!

--Frania W. (talk) 18:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy![reply]

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{subst:User:HJ Mitchell/WikiScotch}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Bzuk (talk) 15:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

		The Citation Barnstar
		For following behind us amateurs and giving Wikipedia a polished look with good-looking footnotes, I award you this Citation Barnstar. HuskyHuskie (talk) 04:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I want you to know how much I appreciate edits like this. I don't understand how to do that sort of stuff, and I don't have any interest in learning how, either, but I sure am glad there's people like you who add the professional look to this encyclopedia. Thank you! HuskyHuskie (talk) 04:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tpbradbury (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

212.137.36.228 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Qualitytea". The reason given for Qualitytea's block is: "Block evasion".

Blocking administrator: Rettetast (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: Done. You weren't the block target. :P Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review for Ludwig Wittgenstein

Hello! I have reviewed this article; you can see the review at Talk:Ludwig Wittgenstein/GA1. Please don't be offended that I closed the review without allowing time for improvements - I only did that because, once improvements are made, I would like to redo the review from scratch in order to make sure that this excellent article gets all the attention it deserves. Thank you for working on it, and happy editing! --Cerebellum (talk) 11:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, good job! Thank you for your prompt response. I still think it would be nice to have a "Reception" or "Legacy" section though - what do you think? --Cerebellum (talk) 09:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Thanks...

Just to drop you a quick note of thanks for clearing up my ref error on the hawking page, I was interrupted at home and didn't realised the mistake - blushing now... Failedwizard (talk) 20:45, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some falafel for you!

Mmm... falafel... :D Thanks for your help on Philosophy and for previous contributions you've made! Matt (talk) 01:01, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award

In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.2.142 (talk) 15:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! - ur contribs 2 WP...

hv bn noticed @ Yahoo News: LINK (in a bar graph showing the monikers of the users with the most edits during the U.S. Pres. Primaries so far to the Wiki blp pertaining to a Republican party candidate).--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 10:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

.....Lollol!!!

Hey, u think their graphic's set to update itself automatically, as more edits r made?--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 10:47, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah - spose not--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 11:01, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hi Tpbradbury, just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:TdF

I'll take the running man for it; after all, it was what Sagan did on stage 3 at the race...although that seems so long ago now. Haha. But many thanks! Craig (talk) 23:00, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely; he is nearly there...but it isn't over until that final lap in Paris. One little incident like the one on stage 6...on a straight bit of road...and then they could be on the back foot. Flat tyres in the time trial...and let's not mention any more tacks...but for team performances, Sky have absolutely nailed it, despite losing Sivtsov early on...one less hand in the mountains but they've blown the rest of the field out of France. No wonder that they have 34 victories, excluding national championships, this season. Dominance. Craig (talk) 23:40, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	A small token of our appreciation for you taking the time to respond to our questions about Wikipedia & SuggestBot, thanks so much! Nettrom (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MMA

Thanks for helping to make MMA articles on wikipedia better! In September 168 people made a total of 956 edits to MMA articles. I noticed you haven't listed yourself on the WikiProject Mixed martial arts Participants page. Take a look, sign up, and don't forget to say hi on the talk page. Kevlar (talk) 05:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Best wishes for the New Year!

Wishing you and yours a joyous, healthful, and productive 2013!

Please accept a belated thank you for the well wishes upon my retirement as FAC delegate, and apologies for the false alarm of my first—and hopefully last—retirement; the well wishes extended me were most kind, but I decided to return, re-committed, when another blocked sock was revealed as one of the factors aggravating the FA pages this year.

Maintaining standards in featured content requires vigilance, dedication and knowledge of people like you, who are needed; reviews are always welcome at FAC, FAR and TFA requests. Somehow, somehow we never ever seem to do nothin' completely nice and easy, but here's hoping that 2013 will see a peaceful road ahead and a return to the quality and comaraderie that defines the FA process, with the help of many dedicated Wikipedians!

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision 531166099

What white space error are you talking about? I see none in the prior revision. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thx for your message. you can see harry reid and dick durbin are combined in one frame. however for the house of rep pictures, there was space to the right of the individual images rather than them being in pairs, the frames didn't seem to resize automatically Tom B (talk) 17:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Million Award

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Napoleon (estimated annual readership: 2,777,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:13, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Napoleon to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:13, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Invention

Hello, Tpbradbury. You are invited to join WikiProject Invention, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of inventions and invention-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mia Frye

On 20 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mia Frye, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mia Frye was the choreographer for the dance routine in the music video for the Los del Río hit song "Macarena"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mia Frye. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 16:05, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Tpbradbury!

Happy New Year!

Tpbradbury,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

The Beatles Invite

Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us.

Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet!

Todo list:

Hi, in response to your thanks your welcome. I'd also like to add that I can't wait to see your excellent and well-appreciated work used on Beatles articles. All the best wishes and kind regards Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 08:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Awarded to Tpbardbury. For his particularly fine contributions to Wikipedia, always remember that your hard work is seen and appreciated. Regards, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey, Tpbradbury thanks for your contributions to Alexander O'Neal, I may be asking as lot but could you please help me with the article Bruce Foxton. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleon

Hello I read one of your edits on Napoleon Bonaparte that convinced me that the article is to big and that it should be around 10,000 words not 17,000. I feel specially the battles are to much mentioned in details. Today I removed a lot of unnecessary repetitive information's only to see myself revert by one editor. I opened a debate on the talk page and I believe your input could be very important. I believe in consensus and collaboration and didn't want to make further changes until this issue is debated and decided by many editors.Thank you.Aubmn (talk) 22:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clint Boon

Could you please help me with the article, Clint Boon. Thanking you in advance Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 09:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also be grateful if you could help with the article, Tom Bailey. Once again, thanking you in advance Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't usually ask you to help with football biographies but could you please help me with the article, David Lucas. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to feel that I'm asking for too much, while giving so little (though I am). However, could you please give your undivided attention to the article, The Style Council. All the best, for being the best Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A lot more than a little help with the article Rochdale would sure be appreciated partner. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 18:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a lot more than a little help with the article Stockport County would sure be appreciated partner. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:35, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please me with the article Niall Hone. Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, maybe a little help with the article Philipp Tschauner. It seems to be poorly translated from German. Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the articles Every Sperm Is Sacred and Galaxy Song? Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:58, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Me again! (sigh), if you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the articles Mark Mothersbaugh and Devo. Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've ran out of conversation openers, so could you please help me with the article Josh Mancell, thanks. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you to help with this article (Josh Mancell), because I was talking to him not long ago and he seems like a real nice dude, he even said he'll post out his autograph out to me at the end of this week too! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the article Mim Grey. Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, if you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the article John Perry. And remember that I always highly appreciate your edits :) Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, if you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the article Andy Pratt. Blessings always :) Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:51, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me!!!! with the articles Peter Perrett and The Only Ones; you shall be knighted! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please help me with the articles Sam Brown and Pauline Murray. Cheers! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please help me with the article Rock Goddess? Many Thanks and Very Best Wishes, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	You know that you deserve this... So take it!. And with it know that someone out there, like myself, really do appreciate your fine edits. 'Stay Up' & Keep Rocking. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 08:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flydubai Flight 981

Thank you very much for the reassessment of this article. I noticed also that you marked the "Referencing and citation" in this article as not up to B-Class criteria requirements yet. How can I improve it? Daniel (talk) 00:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help.

Could you please help me with the article Sam Brown (singer) please? Thanking you in advance! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please help me with the article Guy Pratt? Thanking you in advance! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 06:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with the article Nik Kershaw. Cheers! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please help me with the article Miriam Stockley? Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please also help me with the article Mary-Jess Leaverland too please? Thank you and Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, No! It's Joe. Could you please help me with the article Emma Pollock? Thank you very much in advance! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tpbradbury, I hope that you're well. Could you please help me with the article Joan Jett? Special thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Once upon a time

Previously you were listed as one of the top editors at Jane Austen and I thought you might still be interested in literature and article improvement at Wikipedia past GA status. I have added two new sections to the article to move it towards further upgrade and was wondering if you might do a review to assess were it is now if you could give it a glance. Cheers. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 15:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Tpbradbury.

AS one of Wikipedia's most experienced editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. ~~~~

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, Tpbradbury.

AfC submissions
Random submission

~8 weeks

1,776 pending submissions

Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 01:49, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Françoise-Marie LeRoy

Hello, I was wondering if you could help with this article you created many years ago. It has been tagged for notability - I guess there is notability there though. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality reassessment of Angry Grandpa

Hey, just wanted to drop a quick thank you for reassessing the article. Throast (talk) 14:34, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article assessment

Hello, I noticed you recently assessed the article I requested to be assessed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment and I thank you for that. However, I was hoping it would get checked against B-class criteria. So, if you could assess it against B-class and give me some suggestions I'd be grateful. If you don't have time could you put it back to WP:BIOG requests for the assessment list. Best regards, OakMapping (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iymen Chehade: Rating

Hello and thank you for reviewing this bio. Could you share a couple of suggestions on what could improve this page? Still wrapping my head around all of this. Thank you so much for your time. TsunamiPrincess (talk) 21:01, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleon GAR

Napoleon, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Lennart97 (talk) 14:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Tpbradbury!

Happy New Year!

Tpbradbury,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:04, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:04, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]