User talk:Chrismiceli

Welcome!

Hello, Chrismiceli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Edcolins (talk) 20:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Layout

Hi there, I went to the Pakistan article and saw the reference section was incorrectly at the end. I noticed you've been moving reference sections to the end after external links probably to fix a red warning message about cite ref. External links section should go last per Wikipedia:Guide_to_layout#Notes.2C_Footnotes.2C_or_References with the reference section coming after see also section rather than at the end. To fix the cite error you need to instead remove ref tags <ref></ref> inserted after the reflist template, whilst leaving the cite templates. It would be good if you could go back and move the reference and external links sections back to the proper places, thanks Tom B (talk) 14:35, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Reflex Novel Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Reflex Novel Cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 16:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reflex Novel Cover.jpg

Is Image:Reflex Novel Cover.jpg safe to remove all non-fair-use rationale templates. Information has been updated to include rationale. There is still a tag in the infobox for the image here Reflex (novel). --Chrismiceli (talk) 00:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That seems fine to be removed. Stifle (talk) 08:09, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Chinese division table

I've decided to remove the Chinese division table wikitext from the soroban article. The main reason is that as it is mentioned in the article and as also brought up in its talk page, the Chinese division table is now rendered mostly obsolete in Japan, with the more preferred method of division put in practice there uses the multiplication table. I've instead included a link to the suanpan article because it is still in use in China. This is why the image the wikitable intends to replace was in the soroban article in the first place; just for illustration and not for actual use. But I respect your decision that the table should be better shown as an image. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 04:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BlackberryOS5.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BlackberryOS5.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 13:06, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BlackberryOS5.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BlackberryOS5.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't call my edits of HOTP advertisings. These are citations/references required by others.

These were just part of my edits which contained too detailed informatin from your point of view. Nobody (including me) has a reason to spend quite a lot of time to advertise overy single product of a given kind that can be found on the Internet; I was just adding requested references/citacions (most of them for the second time unfortunately, they already have been removed (instedad of fixed) for being a list/linkfarm when I tried to put the references in "External links" some time ago). Calling my edits "Advertising" is quite a bad reward as it damages the image of my IP. User:84.244.120.131 19:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I should have assumed good faith in your edits. I thought that the section was worded like an advertisement, not for any particular product. The features and prices made the section feel like an advertisement. I kept the products, but removed these qualities. I kept the references and I appreciate your edits.Chrismiceli (talk) 01:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have to say that except the a* word, your edit was one of the most precise wikicleaner's cuts I've ever seen. Those prices were remains of badly formatted page in the past - the prices had been a kind of misplaced citations/references, accompanied by external links, until those links were removed. Your wording is apparently

better than that. Feel free to remove this topic. 84.244.120.131 (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BlackberryOS5.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BlackberryOS5.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain your edit?

To the students editing [1], who may be surprised by this edit, could you go to the article's talk page and explain the rationale for your edit, and how they can rescue parts of their content? Thanks, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 15:38, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted here the reasoning behind my edit. --Chrismiceli (talk) 01:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Chrismiceli. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chrismiceli. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Chrismiceli! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:04, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chrismiceli. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]