User talk:Topsy4men

March 2022

It is not acceptable to move a page to another title by copying its content and pasting it into another page, as you did at Inikiri Umuezeoka. That is because doing so loses the editing history of the page, which must be kept to comply with Wikipedia's copyright licensing terms. I have put some time and effort into merging the relevant parts of the histories of the two pages, and removing ovrlapping edits. It would have been far easier to have just deleted the copy you made, and that may well happen if you do the same again, so be careful to avoid making the same mistake again.
Please don't use misleading edit summaries, such as "fixed typo" for an edit which did nothing of the kind, and added substantial content to the page in question.
Any Wikipedia article content which is not supported by citation to one or more reliable sources is liable to removal. In the case of an article which doesn't cite any sources, the whole article is likely to be deleted. To reduce the danger of deletion, I have moved Inikiri Umuezeoka to Draft:Inikiri Umuezeoka, to give a chance for it to be improved, and references to be added. I strongly recommend not moving it back to article space until it is in a state where deletion is not likely. JBW (talk) 19:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your assistance. I did those mistakes as a beginner though i decided to correct them as i realized the mistakes. i wish you can assist me to review Draft:Inikiri Umuezeoka and move it back to article space Inikiri Umuezeoka.

I will appreciate your quick response. Thanks. Topsy4men (talk) 11:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Help me to review these articles: Inikiri Umuezeoka and Inikiri Bernard market Topsy4men (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Inikiri Umuezeoka. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Inikiri Umuezeoka, you may be blocked from editing. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inikiri Bernard market for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inikiri Bernard market is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inikiri Bernard market until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I mistakenly removed maintenance templates from Inikiri Umuezeoka. Do help me to review the article. Thanks Topsy4men (talk) 22:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inikiri Umuezeoka (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia, Google Earth, Open Street Map, etc. are not reliable. See WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inikiri Umuezeoka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Inikiri Umuezeoka, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 05:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Topsy4men! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 05:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inikiri Umuezeoka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Inikiri Umuezeoka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this back into drafts, because the article is virtually unreferenced and cannot be therefore published. Please ensure that every material statement is supported by reliable sources. Please do not move back into the main space before that is done; use the AfC review process instead. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inikiri Umuezeoka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inikiri Umuezeoka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inikiri Umuezeoka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing can I still update the article for further review. Thanks Topsy4men (talk) 06:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, you cannot, given that it has been deleted (following this AfD discussion). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing what should I do to create an article with same title Topsy4men (talk) 07:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given the history of this, including but not only the AfD that closed as delete, I don't see much chance of it being published, TBH. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Inikiri Umuezeoka

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Inikiri Umuezeoka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Inikiri_Umuezeoka. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 08:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Effium, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Inikiri Umuezeoka

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Inikiri Umuezeoka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inikiri Umuezeoka. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:57, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 the article Inikiri Umuezeoka has been referenced and modified as the major reason for it's previous deletion. Topsy4men (talk) 11:05, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]