User talk:Tommygogd

Welcome!

Hello, Tommygogd, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Tommygogd, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — fortunavelut luna 09:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tommygogd

A tag has been placed on User:Tommygogd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — fortunavelut luna 09:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (i own the name and details in it , which make every content and information exclusive to my personal data, and i hope to use it for client who need to know about me, as i value the use and purpose of wikipedia and hope to get my articles placed on it also. thanks) --Tommygogd (talk) 10:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about your images

I have some reservations about your images and their provenance. Can you please clarify:

When you took the photos == it was taken just last month (April 2021)
What camera you used to take them == (Canon Mark111)
Whether you can upload the original files, or similar ones from the same photo shoots. ==== yes i can , i will get them from my drive and upload when i get home.

The sooner you answer these, the easier it'll be for getting the draft accepted. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 13:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd prefer a bit more anonymity, email the files to permission-commons@wikimedia.org instead of to Commons proper. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 21:19, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Tommygogd. Would you please be able to upload the original, non-compressed, high-quality photos? You might already know, the photos taken from Canon Mark have higher file size (not talking about RAW, but JPG exported) -- could you please upload *those* original files which have larger file size and contains the original EXIF data?
acagastya 05:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@acagastya , I have deleted the raw pictures , client chooses the ones he want then we edit those and delete the raw from the camera because of space and also after sending it to my client because of memory space on my camera and system, the ones I upload earlier i had to redownload it from my whatsapp log for the ones he choosed and i sent to him. this is really my picture as there is none of this picture anywhere online, but if there is no way to prove it what then can i do as i have already uploaded related picture of the same shoot?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommygogd (talk • contribs)

I am not asking for the RAW files. But when you exported *from* RAW files, it must have had a smaller file-size version containing metadata. Right? Even that would suffice. However, only two photos seems to be of the same shoot, not the rest.
acagastya 14:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@acagastya is this what you are asking for , this is the ones i exported from my system before sending to them on whatsapp , so please check this 3 picture i reuploaded here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommygogd (talk • contribs) 21:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These three images covered part of the talk page, so I have added a colon to the link – the images are still there, and visible if you click the link, but they are not displayed on this talk page.

Tommygogd, when you respond to talk page posts, please add your reply as a separate post below the one you're responding to, and don't add text inside the other editor's post, like you did here. --bonadea contributions talk 13:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Engr. Babalola Olatunji (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iflaq was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Engr. Babalola Olatunji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Engr. Babalola Olatunji, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_signed,Iflaq ^(talk) 14:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tommygogd! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! _signed,Iflaq ^(talk) 14:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Engr. Babalola Olatunji (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove all external links from the article text, and place inline citations instead. See Help:Referencing for beginners. The draft reads more like a curriculum vitae than an encyclopedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Engr. Babalola Olatunji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Engr. Babalola Olatunji, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Tommygogd. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 15:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Your edit to River Basin Authorities in Nigeria has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. bonadea contributions talk 15:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Tommygogd, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tommygogd|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Here you refer to your client, but that is not sufficient as a disclosure. bonadea contributions talk 13:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure

I am not compensated for this edits, I only contributed to the edit base on the recent update of event and the authorities, I do not in any way request any payment from any company for my edits. Every edit from my contribution is with non interest of payment as, I am a new contributor which I have no connection with any company or persons as such. my contributions are solely for updates for the public use. thanks

"I have no connection with any company or persons as such" ; I don't quite understand what you mean by that, since you refer to "my client" here and talk about how you have received pictures from him, so it is clearly not the case that you are not in contact with him. And one of the sources you have used in the draft is a website run by the company you say on your userpage that you are the CEO of. --bonadea contributions talk 17:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@bonadea , thanks , I never said I dont know him , but I was trying to clear the fact that I am not been paid for it neither did I collect any money from anyone to do this, "my client" I used herewas referring to all my customers as a procedure we usually do at the studio not for only him, he was my lecturer in the university and also my customer at my photo studio but I do not have any blood relationship with him which I think makes me to write about him without sentiment, so where do I declare that I know him if that is the case. I am a new editor with creating article which I have been willing to be contributing to pages for the benefit 0f the public so I am using his to start my first article and it is without sentiment. plus please, if I am required to declare that I know him, I will, but I am not paid a penny for this with all sincerity.

Hi again. There is some information about how a conflict of interest is defined at Wikipedia, and what to do if you have a conflict of interest, above (under "Managing a conflict of interest").

By the way, if you sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~) you make it easier to follow the conversation, and see who has said what. In addition, when you mention another user (like you did above), they won't get a notification unless you also sign the post. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 16:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Babalola Olatunji (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

From the individual's editing there would appear to be a conflict of interest here. Otherwise it fails WP:ANYBIO and is written like a resume or press release promoting the individual - a non=notable public servant.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Babalola Olatunji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Babalola Olatunji, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Babalola Olatunji has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Babalola Olatunji. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 10:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Babalola Olatunji (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Babalola Olatunji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Babalola Olatunji, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 13:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Babalola Olatunji (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

this reads more like a CV for a job application

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Babalola Olatunji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Babalola Olatunji, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:53, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Tommygogd

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:Tommygogd has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Randykitty (talk) 12:54, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Babalola Olatunji

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Babalola Olatunji, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 12:59, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Tommygogd, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:47, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]