Jump to content

User talk:TomCat4680/Awards

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPP Award for 2018

[edit]

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

For over 100 article reviews during 2018. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2018. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We have just caught up with giving out deserved barnstars. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


NPP Award for 2019

[edit]

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

For over 100 article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Lori Nelson

[edit]

On 25 August 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Lori Nelson, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 18:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

[edit]
COVID-19 Barnstar
Thanks for all your consistent work updating the Michigan article! Guettarda (talk) 00:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thanks. There isn't much to really say but just thank you! Carri796 (talk) 00:35, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter December 2019 (I made the top 100)

[edit]

A graph showing the number of articles in the page curation feed from 12/21/18 - 12/20/19

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 Rosguill (talk) 47,395 Patrol Page Curation
2 Onel5969 (talk) 41,883 Patrol Page Curation
3 JTtheOG (talk) 11,493 Patrol Page Curation
4 Arthistorian1977 (talk) 5,562 Patrol Page Curation
5 DannyS712 (talk) 4,866 Patrol Page Curation
6 CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 3,995 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 3,812 Patrol Page Curation
8 Boleyn (talk) 3,655 Patrol Page Curation
9 Ymblanter (talk) 3,553 Patrol Page Curation
10 Cwmhiraeth (talk) 3,522 Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
You're a great guy. You've been so helpful to our community. Thanks! -PRAHLADBalaji 00:55, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Your contributions to the Current Events page are thanked. Thank you for your time and effort to find and help the Current Events area. Elijahandskip (talk) 14:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
Many thanks for your assistance at December 2018 Time Warner Center bomb threats Tinton5 (talk) 13:48, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors in 2017!

[edit]
please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2017 Cure Award
In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For my work on Flint water crisis. TomCat4680 (talk) 07:21, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors in 2016!

[edit]
please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For my work on Flint water crisis. TomCat4680 (talk) 02:47, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK's

[edit]
Updated DYK query On March 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saginaw Trail, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.


Updated DYK query On April 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jim Brandstatter, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Barnstars

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar I am pleased to award you The Editor's Barnstar in recognition for your continued good work on Dan Miller (sportscaster) and Jim Brandstatter. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good Articles

[edit]