User talk:Thitojhapali

Welcome!

Hello, Thitojhapali, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Himshikhar Television. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dai Pritchard (talk) 10:31, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Himali english boarding school

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Himali english boarding school, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —teb728 t c 18:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thitojhapali, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Thitojhapali! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

The comment they left was:

This may have been submitted to AFC review by accident.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Thitojhapali/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment they left was:

Do not submit this again without real content. This may be a user page draft, but it is not an article draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Thitojhapali/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Himali English Boarding School

Hello Thitojhapali,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Himali English Boarding School for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Discussion

Hello! We can discuss here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:14, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your edit on my page because it overwrote something else on my talk page. In future, please put any new content at the bottom. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the reason the page was deleted was because the organisation in question did not seem to be notable. For an article to be on wikipedia, it should be notable. If you want to know if an article subject is notable, please read WP:NOTABLE. In addition, you need to add reliable sources to an article (see WP:CITE). I suggest you also read this Wikipedia:Your_first_article before creating an article. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Thitojhapali: Can we discuss here please? Your last edit [1] overwrote information on my talk page in addition to being a personal attack. Please read the links I have given above and let me know your concerns. Regarding page deletion, I did not delete your page since I am not an administrator. I am merely a regular editor like you and I just tagged it for deletion since I felt it did not satisfy the notability criteria. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Discussion

Hi, I understand you are a new user. We are talking here, so please reply "on this page" and not on my talk page. (Your edits on my talk page are overwriting existing information so I have to revert them). If you want to reply, use the "edit source" link above. Please type your reply below that. Do not modify any of the existing text. Hope it helps. Please also see WP:TPHELP. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

== Speedy deletion==

Which country are you from? and, can u say to restore the page again. It was alright yar!

No reply

Hey reply fast. I don't have more time!

Hi, I did not delete the article. Please ask your questions here Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions. People will answer it quicker. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which country are you from? Whats ur age? Thitojhapali (talk) 08:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Lapring Language.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lapring Language.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Laping Language Letters.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Laping Language Letters.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Thitojhapali. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 09:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

March 2016

Your recent editing history at User talk:Lemongirl942 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Stop removing content from User talk:Lemongirl942 when posting questions there. At the top of the page, there's a heading that says "New section", if you click on that, then other content on the page won't get deleted. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I was unknown about it. It will not happen from next time!

Nomination of Lapring language for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lapring language is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lapring language until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Thitojhapali. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 11:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion. I am a brave Gurkha. Thitojhapali (talk) 11:38, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thitojhapali, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:14, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Voting" in deletion discussions

You should know that the outcomes of deletion discussions aren't decided by simply counting the Keep votes and the Delete votes and going with the larger number. The decision is based on the quality of the votes—whether they are based on proper application of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. So you can't "win" by packing in a large number of Keep votes from new accounts that don't provide a convincing rationale. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thitojhapali. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can I suggest that if you return to editing after your block, you do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia in future? As has been demonstrated today, they get picked up on and deleted pretty quickly, and continuing this behaviour will likely get you blocked again, regardless of any sockpuppetry. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lapring language

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lapring language, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanielRigal (talk) 13:57, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lapring Language.jpg

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:Lapring Language.jpg, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanielRigal (talk) 13:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Laping Language Letters.jpg

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:Laping Language Letters.jpg, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanielRigal (talk) 13:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]