User talk:Theriazz123

September 2022

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Drishyam 2, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pathaan (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Pathaan (film), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is already a draft, Draft:Pathaan (film), which has been declined as WP:TOOSOON until the film is released.

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pathaan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theriazz123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Drishyam 2 poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Drishyam 2 poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Https---static.toiimg.com-photo-msid-94914126-94914126.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Https---static.toiimg.com-photo-msid-94914126-94914126.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Tiger-3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tiger-3.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Salman Khan-Tiger-3-new-poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Salman Khan-Tiger-3-new-poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dunki (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dunki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dunki (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON. Sources are standard announcements or interviews. Need to wait until there are reviews about the film by reputable critics. Please also see this guide for adding citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dunki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:19, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Drishyam 2 (2022) poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Drishyam 2 (2022) poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm Sam Sailor. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Drishyam 2 (2022 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sam Sailor 19:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:MV5BNzc1N2NkMDktNDBmNy00NDJmL.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:MV5BNzc1N2NkMDktNDBmNy00NDJmL.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Drishyam2 1920x500.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Drishyam2 1920x500.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dunki (October 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process, as too soon. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft, and do not resubmit this draft or a similar draft until the events have occurred to make the subject notable. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will probably result in advice as to what conditions need to be met for notability.

It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic will not be notable in the future. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. This draft will not become an article until the specified events occur for notability.

If this draft is resubmitted without discussion, or before notability has been satisfied, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Selfiee ( 2023 film ) (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Selfiee ( 2023 film ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Selfiee ( 2023 film ) and adding citations

Hi Theriazz123, citations should be added next to the content it is supporting. See my sandbox for a simple example. Currently, the citations are lumped underneath the References section. S0091 (talk) 19:26, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Selfiee ( 2023 film ) (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thatguy1987 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Selfiee ( 2023 film ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thatguy1987 (talk) 20:24, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Selfiee ( 2023 film ) has been accepted

Selfiee ( 2023 film ), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MaxnaCarta (talk) 04:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Drishyam-2-6.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Drishyam-2-6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:49, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop moving pages around and putting redirect tags on long-existing articles. You are headed towards a block if you do this again. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish with the various page moves at Selfiee, but you're behaving like a bull in a china shop. Once the block expires, I would strongly recommend that any further page moves be done through requests at WP:RM, rather than doing them yourself. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Selfiee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Selfiee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selfiee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:40, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:4x5 DIG EVIDENCE DRISHYAM.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:4x5 DIG EVIDENCE DRISHYAM.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 02:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Great Father, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CID. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MV5BZGE2NmE5MTctNTk1Yi00OTQ4LTlmNDAtMzU3Y2FhZjRkZjA1XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyOTI3MzI4MzA.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:MV5BZGE2NmE5MTctNTk1Yi00OTQ4LTlmNDAtMzU3Y2FhZjRkZjA1XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyOTI3MzI4MzA.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Non-free movie poster, already claimed non-free at File:Godfather Telugu poster.jpeg

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Godfather (2022 film) poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Godfather (2022 film) poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suniel Shetty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dhadkan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:MV5BNzc1N2NkMDktNDBmNy00NDJmLWIzZGEtOTgyMjc2ZmFmNWEwXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyOTI3MzI4Mz.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:MV5BNzc1N2NkMDktNDBmNy00NDJmLWIzZGEtOTgyMjc2ZmFmNWEwXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyOTI3MzI4Mz.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Your recent editing history at Drishyam 2 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the reason behind my constant reverting is due to the plot having multiple grammar issues. Theriazz123 (talk) 14:17, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tara Vs Bilal ( 2022 film ) (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LordVoldemort728 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add reception secton.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tara Vs Bilal ( 2022 film ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 08:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tara Vs Bilal ( 2022 film ) (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Tara Vs Bilal instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

film article already placed in mainspace, please edit that one

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tara Vs Bilal ( 2022 film ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lucifer (2019 Indian film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bala and Fazil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jail (2009 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rahul Singh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bro Daddy (2023 film)

Hello, Theriazz123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bro Daddy (2023 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Papanasam 2

Hello, Theriazz123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Papanasam 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drishyam (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bro Daddy (2023 film)

Hello, Theriazz123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bro Daddy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Papanasam 2

Hello, Theriazz123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Papanasam 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Myles Erlick, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. – Meena • 12:52, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Gotitbro (talk) 20:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tiger 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Opening paragraph of film articles

Please familiarise yourself with MOS:FILMLEAD which says, " first paragraph should identify other elements, such as (in no defined order) the director, the star(s), and any writers or producers who are well-known." Please understand that it says "in no defined order". Your repeated edit-warring to only mention directors first is not based on any existing policy. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple other film articles follow the same format where the directors name is presented first, following the name of the producer, then the cast and then other elements. Please can you not revert my edit Theriazz123 (talk) 20:16, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read what the MoS says. Failure to do so will only lead to blocks. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dunki

Hello, Theriazz123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dunki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 04:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vijay Maurya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neru (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siddique.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Drishyam 2 (2022) poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Drishyam 2 (2022) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Godfather (2022 film) poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Godfather (2022 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Jeraxmoira. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rakul Preet Singh filmography without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Herald. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Goat Life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benyamin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with adding "appearance" to "Cameo" in filmographies.

Hello @Theriazz123. I am @Archer1234. I noticed this edit where the word appearance was added to Cameo in a filmography table. Adding the word appearance adds no information, knowledge or value. Look at the "Acting roles" filmography table in Example #2 at WP:FILMOGRAPHY. See how they use only Cameo and not Cameo appearance. This is from the WikiProject for Actors and Filmmakers. Adding more words with no added information is not a constructive edit. This is especially true in elements like tables and infoboxes where space is often constrained. Please stop doing this. If you have a question for me about this, you can ask me here or on my talk page. Thank you and happy editing. — Archer1234 (t·c) 22:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Aparna Balamurali, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You continue your practice of adding "appearance" to "Cameo" in filmographies even though you know that another editor disagrees with this and you have not engaged in any discussion about the matter. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and communication is required. This is disruptive. This initial warning seeks to get your good-faith participation in a discussion about the matter. — Archer1234 (t·c) 11:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chiranjeevi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 19:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Megastar-Chiranjeevi-2.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Megastar-Chiranjeevi-2.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Dyk-suriyas-first-job-was-working-as-an-garment-factory-worker-001.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Dyk-suriyas-first-job-was-working-as-an-garment-factory-worker-001.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Aamir Khan graces the first look launch of ‘Secret Superstar.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Aamir Khan graces the first look launch of ‘Secret Superstar.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:63bfafd21abac1673506770.png

Thanks for uploading File:63bfafd21abac1673506770.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:DwQDVAzcjexg1HCDBeGEW0MoPth.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:DwQDVAzcjexg1HCDBeGEW0MoPth.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:John-Abraham-walks-out-of-Sajid-Khan-film-100-1280.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:John-Abraham-walks-out-of-Sajid-Khan-film-100-1280.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MV5BNGY5M2UxYTMtNWUxZi00MDBmLThlOTUtODZjOWQ3YWUxMzUzXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjkxNzQ1NDI.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MV5BNGY5M2UxYTMtNWUxZi00MDBmLThlOTUtODZjOWQ3YWUxMzUzXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjkxNzQ1NDI.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 08:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Aamir Khan (Berlin Film Festival 2011).jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Aamir Khan (Berlin Film Festival 2011).jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 08:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:IAOpZLfohCOGzyBn2zTmFqxis1y.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:IAOpZLfohCOGzyBn2zTmFqxis1y.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 08:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:War2poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:War2poster.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:War2poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:War2poster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: War 2 (2025 film) (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

There is conflicting information. Article says the film will release on 15 August, which has already passed. The current image on the article is a movie poster that says October 2025. When searching online, I could not find any box office information. Need to update the page with current information and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:War 2 (2025 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: War 2 (2025 film) (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Miminity was:

Please Update the information

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:War 2 (2025 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 07:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: War 2 (2025 film) (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also note there are three current drafts attempted to get through AfC, including a new SPA here. Have watchlisted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:War 2 (2025 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Draft:War 2 (2025 film). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Draft:War 2 (2025 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]