Jump to content

User talk:Thebiguglyalien/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8

Your GA nomination of Federalist No. 1

The article Federalist No. 1 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Federalist No. 1 for comments about the article, and Talk:Federalist No. 1/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 18:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Federalist No. 24

The article Federalist No. 24 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Federalist No. 24 for comments about the article, and Talk:Federalist No. 24/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 08:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Federalist No. 23

The article Federalist No. 23 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Federalist No. 23 for comments about the article, and Talk:Federalist No. 23/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 08:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Federalist No. 25

The article Federalist No. 25 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Federalist No. 25 for comments about the article, and Talk:Federalist No. 25/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 12:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Federalist No. 8

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Federalist No. 8 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Blue Rider -- The Blue Rider (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kgabo Commission

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kgabo Commission you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 22:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iron Man, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Rhodes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Death of Captain Marvel

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Death of Captain Marvel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

The Core Contest is halfway through!

Hello Core Contest participants, we've officially hit the halfway mark! With just over three weeks remaining until the May 31 deadline (23:59 UTC), it's time to ramp up our efforts. Remember, Wikipedia wants to be edited!

Now is a good time to set goals for your article: What section needs the most improvement? Which sources remain unused? How can you best spend your time? Good luck and happy editing! Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 02:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

Editor of the Week

Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Hey man im josh submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate Thebiguglyalien to be Editor of the Week for their exceptional content work. Particularly impressive is their work on the first ladies of the United States. They have worked to create 4 Featured Articles such as Barbara Bush, Frances Cleveland, and Lou Henry Hoover plus 65 Good Articles (69 GAs promoted) and 1 Featured List. Examples of their work are Dictatorship, Centre-left politics, and Iron Man, for which they received a Million Award. I believe we should recognize their significant contributions and efforts to improve Wikipedia. A wonderful writer, whether on content, in back-page discussions, or in satire. Seconded by AirshipJungleman29

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: 

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
thebiguglyalien
 
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning May 8, 2024
Does exceptional content work on many topics but particularly impressive is their work on the first ladies of the United States. Created 4 Featured Articles such as Barbara Bush, Frances Cleveland, and Lou Henry Hoover plus 65 Good Articles (69 GAs promoted) and 1 Featured List. Examples of their work are Dictatorship, Centre-left politics, and Iron Man, for which they received a Million Award. I believe we should recognize their significant contributions and efforts to improve Wikipedia.
Recognized for
being a wonderful writer on content, back-page discussions and in satire
Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 12:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

A well deserved honor. Thanks for everything you do, TBUA. I'd also shout out the ~100 high-quality reviews. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Samia Suluhu Hassan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Samia Suluhu Hassan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Firefangledfeathers -- Firefangledfeathers (talk) 17:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Samia Suluhu Hassan

The article Samia Suluhu Hassan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Samia Suluhu Hassan and Talk:Samia Suluhu Hassan/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Firefangledfeathers -- Firefangledfeathers (talk) 04:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Autocracy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Autocracy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PizzaKing13 -- PizzaKing13 (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Samia Suluhu Hassan

The article Samia Suluhu Hassan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Samia Suluhu Hassan for comments about the article, and Talk:Samia Suluhu Hassan/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Firefangledfeathers -- Firefangledfeathers (talk) 12:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Autocracy

The article Autocracy you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Autocracy for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PizzaKing13 -- PizzaKing13 (talk) 18:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Leucippus

Bro your article Leucippus is the featured article of the day 48JCL 00:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

So it is! I had completely forgotten that it was scheduled to be on the main page. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you today for the article, introduced: "Leucippus was the first person to propose that matter is made of microscopic particles called atoms. What makes this impressive is that he lived over 2,000 years before atoms were actually discovered. Of course, Leucippus's atoms were quite different from the ones we know to exist: he contended that they were totally indivisible, and that they came in infinitely many shapes and sizes. Using his concept of atoms, he developed explanations for the creation of the world and the existence of a physical soul. Despite his importance in the history of philosophy, almost all information about his life and his writings has been lost, and what we know comes from second-hand accounts. He has since been overshadowed by his more famous student, Democritus."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sebele II

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sebele II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Averageuntitleduser -- Averageuntitleduser (talk) 20:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Catherine Samba-Panza

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Catherine Samba-Panza you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 13:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Catherine Samba-Panza

The article Catherine Samba-Panza you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Catherine Samba-Panza for comments about the article, and Talk:Catherine Samba-Panza/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 10:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

2001 GA

Just noticed that 2001 has achieved the GA status a while ago! Fantastic work. I'm so glad that the work we initially did together paid off. Thanks for all your perseverance. BorgQueen (talk) 19:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

BorgQueen Yep! I think it turned out really well, though I'm still trying to figure out the exact format and sourcing style that works the best (especially for the events lists). I've got something similar in progress at 2002 and 2003. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Great to hear that. Do you still need Ein Engel in der Hölle von Auschwitz by the way? I can get a copy and scan the relevant chapters for you if you'd like. A secondhand copy is only about 10 euros from Amazon Germany. BorgQueen (talk) 12:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to get its main subject Maria Stromberger to FA. But I wouldn't ask you to go out of your way like that, especially since I'd need the whole book and, until there's an English translation, I'm limited in what I could do with it. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anna Harrison

The article Anna Harrison you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anna Harrison for comments about the article, and Talk:Anna Harrison/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dugan Murphy -- Dugan Murphy (talk) 22:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Don't Be a Sucker

The article Don't Be a Sucker you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Don't Be a Sucker for comments about the article, and Talk:Don't Be a Sucker/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 23:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

"DYK shouldn't feature anything contentious or charged."

Re your comment in Wikipedia talk:Did you know that "DYK shouldn't feature anything contentious or charged. That's just not appropriate for the main page.": this seems a little tone-deaf coming from someone who not that long ago successfully (and appropriately!) nominated LGBT representation in The Simpsons for DYK. The fact that it was nominated for deletion three months later (by someone later sanctioned for problematic views on gender-related topics) should make it obvious that there are plenty of people who will consider any visibility for LGBT representation as something that is contentious and charged. I am not one of those people, of course...just pointing out that they exist. What is unremarkable or worth highlighting to you and me may well be contentious or charged to others. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Politics of Botswana

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Politics of Botswana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Politics of Botswana

The article Politics of Botswana you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Politics of Botswana and Talk:Politics of Botswana/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Politics of Botswana

The article Politics of Botswana you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Politics of Botswana for comments about the article, and Talk:Politics of Botswana/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

The 2024 Core Contest has ended!

The Core Contest has now ended! Thank you for your interest and efforts. Make sure that you include both a "start" and "improvement diff" on the entries page. The judges will begin delibertaing shortly and annouce the winners within the next few weeks. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 00:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

Your GA nomination of Edith Roosevelt

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edith Roosevelt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of HistoryTheorist -- HistoryTheorist (talk) 00:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fear of bees

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fear of bees you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 16:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Thebiguglyalien. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. BorgQueen (talk) 03:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in WP:GARC

Hello Thebiguglyalien, I noticed you have an article listed at WP:GAN. I recently started a project, Good Article Review Circles, and thought you might be interested. This initiative helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you'll review others' articles and get your own reviewed in return. Check out the page for more details! — GMH Melbourne (talk) 09:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Amat-Mamu (daughter of Sin-ilum)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Amat-Mamu (daughter of Sin-ilum) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 21:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Amat-Mamu (daughter of Sin-ilum)

The article Amat-Mamu (daughter of Sin-ilum) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Amat-Mamu (daughter of Sin-ilum) and Talk:Amat-Mamu (daughter of Sin-ilum)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 02:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Amat-Mamu (daughter of Sin-ilum)

The article Amat-Mamu (daughter of Sin-ilum) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Amat-Mamu (daughter of Sin-ilum) for comments about the article, and Talk:Amat-Mamu (daughter of Sin-ilum)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 16:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Your GA nomination of Psi-Ops: The Mindgate Conspiracy

The article Psi-Ops: The Mindgate Conspiracy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Psi-Ops: The Mindgate Conspiracy for comments about the article, and Talk:Psi-Ops: The Mindgate Conspiracy/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vrxces -- Vrxces (talk) 07:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hugo's House of Horrors

The article Hugo's House of Horrors you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hugo's House of Horrors for comments about the article, and Talk:Hugo's House of Horrors/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vrxces -- Vrxces (talk) 08:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Iron Man FAC

Hey. Didn't have time to write this earlier. Sucks that the FAC wasn't allowed to continue and the article didn't pass. Irregardless, I saw that you made some edits on Iron Man's article and was wondering if you'd like me to continue my comments here? That way, when you renominate the article, I won't have all that many comments to make. PanagiotisZois (talk) 22:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

PanagiotisZois I was planning on taking one more look at it then nominating it tomorrow. But if you have any thoughts, then by all means. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Ah, that's great! I'm really glad to see you're keen on getting the article to FA. Since I still haven't looked over the whole article, I'm probably going to need some time to look over the final few sections. Which also means I probably will have more than just a few comments to make. So, go ahead and renominate the article, and I'll leave my initial comments then.
PS. I hope the changes I made to the image pages are adequate for the image review. Maybe you'll want to look over them yourself and put your own touch on them for the FAC. PanagiotisZois (talk) 23:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

On your GA nomination of Edith Roosevelt

Hey, sorry for being so slow reviewing the article. I really jumped into the deep end reviewing and I thought I would be able to review all the citations as I have done for the shorter GANs I've reviewed, but I got a bit burnt out in the process. I should be done by Wednesday after I've conducted one more prose check and have finished spot-checking sources for the sections I haven't got to yet The article is on track to pass, provided you respond to the suggestions listed, but I thought I would give you an update for your and my sake. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 04:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kahina Bahloul

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kahina Bahloul you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 13:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Broad tbans

Can't say I haven't had a similar thought every now and then looking at a contribution history, but there's no way it works for good reasons or bad. My bold fantasy is to have simply locked the leads of the high-level pages (ie. those not directly related to the war but about the topic, like the country articles) when the war started. A balance between diffusing heat (emotion combined with WP:LEADFIX) while leaving the actual articles accessible. CMD (talk) 03:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

For sure, "strongly believe" is very different from "expect to happen" or "ready to implement". But at the same time it does feel like more can be done than we're currently doing. It's not an area I really participate in, but it spills over so frequently into AfD, RS/N, and basically everywhere else that it becomes hard to miss that certain names always end up supporting the same side in what I'm sure is a total coincidence. I get why, but it's frustrating that WP:CPUSH is so toothless. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
I do not tend to edit in the area that much, but it's not an isolated issue. En.wiki struggles when WP:Systematic bias aligns with the bias of the majority of editors. I would boldly posit that it struggles even more so when those biases align with the 'right' position. Then again, I suppose that is normal confirmation bias. CMD (talk) 03:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kahina Bahloul

The article Kahina Bahloul you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kahina Bahloul for comments about the article, and Talk:Kahina Bahloul/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 09:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the DCWC!

See a    "developing" or    "least developed" country? Write about it to earn points!

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, Thebiguglyalien! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

  • Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
  • Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
  • Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
  • New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
  • Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Botswanan Politics

Separate to your note on my talkpage, I thought I'd congratulate you on Politics of Botswana. It joined the very small ranks of "Politics of X" GAs, and is a good model within that. I take an interest because I had what sounds like a similar experience, once completely rewriting Politics of the Philippines (which had a grand total of zero sources) due to frustration at the poor state of the main Philippines#Government and politics section. Comparing that article to yours, it is interesting to see how the very different political systems and context have shaped different articles around the same theme. A lot of variety in the world. CMD (talk) 15:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! That's actually the reason I wrote it. I noticed that most of the "Politics of" articles aren't great, and I figure that once there are a few good examples, it makes the rest of them a little easier to write. I had done the same thing with 2021 in Botswana to show how a smaller country might have a good "year" article, and after working on these two, I decided to keep going on Botswana-related articles so we could actually have a sub-Saharan country with good general coverage and make it a sort of "model country" for similar articles. It's ended up becoming one of my main focuses on Wikipedia, which I certainly wouldn't have expected when I started, but I have no regrets here! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
They do say Botswana is a model country. One-level-below country articles are generally quite poor, not sure we have a model anywhere, globally. As I mentioned do feel free to ping me regarding this goal, and if you ever get onto Demographics of Botswana and Culture of Botswana I'll be very curious about that progress. CMD (talk) 01:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

WiG Editathon Barnstar

Women in Green Editathon June '24
Thank you so much for contributing to Women in Green's sixth editathon, with your successful GA nominations of Amat-Mamu and Kahina Bahloul. Excellent work! Best wishes --Grnrchst (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thor (Marvel Comics)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thor (Marvel Comics) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cambalachero -- Cambalachero (talk) 17:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

A thank-you for speaking the truth

Feel like a barnstar might be inappropriate here, but your remarks at AE were a better summary of my feelings on the ARBPIA area and its frequent editors than I’ve ever been able to put into words myself (see User:The Kip#Screaming into the void). Points 2 and 5 in particular are brilliantly summarized.

Most attacks/defenses at AE on the issue are based on ideological alignment rather than actual policy, and I do agree that the area as a whole would be better off if most of the editors in the AE filing were TBANned indefinitely - unfortunately, their editing records and navigation of policy/Wikilawyering makes sure that’ll never happen. The Kip (contribs) 04:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate the thought. Your "screaming into the void" sums up my thoughts as well. That last sentence is too real, just in that AE discussion alone. I see the same issues in other discussions where it's always the same few names agreeing with each other regardless of the issue—it's especially funny for example when they're diehard deletionists if the articles hurt their cause but suddenly they're stalwart inclusionists if the articles help their cause. And of course I also appreciate that there's no barnstar, because I'd feel obligated to decline it for the same reason. I wasn't sure how the post would be received, but I'm grateful to the admins so far who have replied frankly instead of just saying something to the effect of "this is unsolvable and trying to solve it is unhelpful". Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
And right on cue, one of the editors covered by your statement has now attacked you, claiming that your call-out of POV-ridden editing is the actual disruptive editing.
As expected. The Kip (contribs) 04:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Astonishing Thor 5.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Astonishing Thor 5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

GAN assistance

Hello, if you have some time, could you took a look over my review at Talk:WYOU/GA1? Thank you. ForksForks (talk) 15:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Botswana Barnstar
For your amazing contributions at Politics of Botswana, I have hereby awarded you this barnstar. 48JCLTalk 17:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
good job as editor of the week BelowFlames (talk) 02:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

"Donald Trump's ear" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Donald Trump's ear has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Donald Trump's ear until a consensus is reached. Un assiolo (talk) 22:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kgari Sechele II

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kgari Sechele II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 15:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Melania Trump

The article Melania Trump you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Melania Trump for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 750h+ -- 750h+ (talk) 22:42, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

WP:GARC: Invitation to review Oat

Hello Thebiguglyalien, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Oat. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #5.

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 01:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Iron Man relaunch

Hello. I hope that my comments on the Iron Man FAC are not too annoying or cause any issues. I have a quick question for you about the future of Iron Man in the comics. Spencer Ackerman will be writing the next run for the character (according to here and here). Should that be mentioned in the Iron Man article? It may be best to wait until the issue actually comes out, but it seems like it will played as a big deal as it is a relaunch with a new armor. I did not want to distract too much from the ongoing discussions on the FAC page so I thought it may be more appropriate to raise this to your attention on your talk page instead. Best of luck with the FAC and I hope you are doing well. Aoba47 (talk) 01:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

No worries at all! Additional feedback is the most valuable part of FAC in my opinion. I went ahead and added the info, and I expect to keep the article updated over time. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 02:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the response. I am glad that I could help when and where I can. I have a lot of respect for you for working on an article about such a well-known character, and I think you have done a wonderful job with it. Aoba47 (talk) 02:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1978 Gilbertese Chief Minister election

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1978 Gilbertese Chief Minister election you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chipmunkdavis -- Chipmunkdavis (talk) 06:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

You might be interested (or maybe not) in these recent postings to various Wikiprojects

[1] Doug Weller talk 13:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Back-calculating vote figures

Hello. Just to say, you should never calculate vote figures yourself by back-calculating them based on valid votes and percentages. Because percentages are only to a certain number of decimal places, the numbers they equate to can be quite wide ranging. For example, the 48.7% of the vote that Tabai received in 1982 could equate to anything between 9,159 and 9,177. Vote figures should only be added when we have a source with the actual number. Cheers, Number 57 00:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

I meant to add a footnote saying they were approximations, but noted. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Interestingly this source puts his vote total at 9,145, which would be 48.6%, and Teannaki's at 5,365, which does match the 28.5% given in the Nohlen book. Unfortunately even with those two's vote figures, I cannot find a source with the figures for Teangana and Ratieta... Number 57 01:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1982 Kiribati presidential election

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1982 Kiribati presidential election you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 10:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Question

Hi there again! I just wanna ask if you're able to review my FAC. Many thanks! 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 11:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm willing to do reviews on request for articles related to countries I haven't reviewed before. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1982 Kiribati presidential election

The article 1982 Kiribati presidential election you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1982 Kiribati presidential election and Talk:1982 Kiribati presidential election/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 16:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1982 Kiribati presidential election

The article 1982 Kiribati presidential election you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1982 Kiribati presidential election for comments about the article, and Talk:1982 Kiribati presidential election/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 23:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikiproject merging discussions

Re: your comment on the Wikiproject Kamala Harris MfD, merging discussions have achieved some small momentum as part of wider thoughts about making Wikiprojects work at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council. CMD (talk) 02:38, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kgabo Commission

The article Kgabo Commission you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kgabo Commission and Talk:Kgabo Commission/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 16:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kgabo Commission

The article Kgabo Commission you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kgabo Commission for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 22:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Federalist No. 8

The article Federalist No. 8 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Federalist No. 8 for comments about the article, and Talk:Federalist No. 8/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Blue Rider -- The Blue Rider (talk) 20:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

WP:GARC: Invitation to review Underdark (band)

Hello Thebiguglyalien, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Underdark (band). At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #7.

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 13:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks

Project Editor Retention

This editor was willing to lend a helping hand!
Thanks for all you do to acknowledge others at the Editor of the Week Awards

Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 11:44, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

DCWC August update

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to Thebiguglyalien (submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thebiguglyalien/Archive_7&oldid=1254557668"