User talk:The Ronin

This user may have left Wikipedia. The Ronin has not edited Wikipedia since 1 September 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Feel free to leave a comment. Try not to bite too hard :). I've made 2 deletions to this page.

Ronin flags?

Hi, I'm a Spanish Wikipedian. I have a question for you: Have you ever heard of a Ronin flag or something like that? I've tried to search till I got bored, and I found nothing. I'm telling this because in the game Shogun: Total War, there is a faction called "Rebels & Ronin", with a 3-stripe white-black-white flag. Do you know what flag is it?

I encougage you to answer me in my Spanish Wikipedia Discussion, as I know you have 1 level of spanish, hehe.

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_Discusión:Damián_del_Valle

--Damián del Valle 07:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks anyway :o)

Don't worry for your spanish, it's better than my arab, at least :o)

I only wanted to thank you :o) I saw once (don't-ask-where hehe) those were the Rebel colours: white-black-white, but I wasn't sure they truly were...

Bye!

--Damián del Valle 22:13, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Club Music

hello, thank you for starting the article Club music, it was needed here. I am going to change a bit its definition and contribute to it widely in next incoming days. Actually, the genre that many people call today Electronic music , is just Club music.Brian W 12:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, .Kiand is vandalizing Club Music. Please read it and add any contribute you want. A copy is available at User:Brian G. Wilson/user/Club Music. Brian W 14:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Thanks

No problem. :-) Anonymous__Anonymous 08:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MTG

No probs mate! Its already listed for delition though. That was fast. If you want any cards made up for you, I'd be happy to do it. Cheers, Dfrg.msc 06:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here comes the Spider-Man!

(Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man)

I have threatened to climb the Reichstag, dressed up as and did so, became bollocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy against climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man, and then had it become an official policy on Wikipedia (and to be an official decree by the Supreme Cabal Regime of the English Wikipedia (SCREW)). Is Absolutley fantasitic!. This is so great!

"In extreme cases editors may be tempted to climb the Reichstag building dressed as Spider-Man in order to promote their cause. This is absolutely forbidden and can result in an indefinite block from editing Wikipedia."

File:ReichstagClimb.jpg

You may not do this.
Nor on Tower bridge either.

This single event is a great example of all the good qualities of our beloved Wikipedia! Horay!

Thats what I love about this Wonderful, wonderful website.

Next stop: The Kremlin!

Thankyou!

Yo, it's teh n00b 0wnz0r here

Yo, I just had a piece of information for you that you may want to think about. It is:

Chuck Norris's wife was cooking dinner on thanksgiving and accidently burned the turkey. Chuck Norris went out and ate a live turkey. 10 minutes later he barfed it up completely cooked with cranberry sauce and stuffing. His wife asked how he did it, Chuck Norris roundhouse kicked her in the face and said "Don't question Chuck Norris"

Enjoy...

Smile!!!

Destructo 087 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Challenge

I challenge you to find my hidden page. If you find it you will be rewarded. --Destructo 087 09:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fooled

Got fooled. Here you go for it. User:Destructo 087/Userboxes/Fooled {{User:Destructo 087/Userboxes/Fooled}}

Thanks

for the barnstar! Very much appreciated. Клоун 14:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I need help

I need help with editing the article for genetics. I think it needs some references to Monell. The Ronin 16:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox DnDMinisSet

A template you created, Template:Infobox DnDMinisSet, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 02:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RecycledPlastik.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RecycledPlastik.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tsunamialbum.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tsunamialbum.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 23:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sysf.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Sysf.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:De9.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:De9.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tsunami Records

A tag has been placed on Tsunami Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ЭLСОВВОLД _talk 03:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OutofTheBlue.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:OutofTheBlue.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Pirates of the Mysterious Islands

A tag has been placed on Pirates of the Mysterious Islands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — Dæ dαlus^Contribs /_Improve 09:11, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Yoyo Records

I have nominated Yoyo Records, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoyo Records. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Schuym1 (talk) 11:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC) Schuym1 (talk) 11:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nuxx

A tag has been placed on Nuxx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Victor Lopes (talk) 22:38, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please update your status with WP:VG

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello The Ronin! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

William Cousins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jan Siegel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robert Smit (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Yaniv Haviv - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Randy Katana - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jean Jennings - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Enzo Cosimi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ambient trance

I have nominated Ambient trance, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambient trance. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ridernyc (talk) 04:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

rk post

I am letting you know that an article you created, Randy Post, has been nominated for deletion as part of a series of AFDs based on the deletion nomination of List of Magic: The Gathering artists. If there is anything you can do to improve the article further, your efforts would be appreciated. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 12:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PsySex

The article PsySex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The complete lack of WP:V sources and numerous red links indicate article is a virtual smorgasbord of non-notability. How did it last this long?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Griseum (talk) 12:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier 3-d "porn"

Hi, Ronin. Just noticed your addition of that bit on 3-d porn. Actually it has a longer history than suspected. If you look at the article I put together on Perverted Criminal, you'll see what Allmovie claims to be the 1st (though, obviously, very softcore). The book Incredibly Strange Films mentions Paradisio (1962) as the first, but I don't have much info on that film other than this... The info is all cited at the article. Feel free to use it. I'm a little too worn out to contribute right now-- my work currently being the target of multiple-AfDs-- or I'd chip in there... Cheers! Dekkappai (talk) 15:29, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pirates of the Frozen North

The article Pirates of the Frozen North has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced after four years - apparently a non-notable game

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stepheng3 (talk) 20:33, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Cousins

The article William Cousins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tikiwont (talk) 19:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mercadia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mercadia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercadia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 06:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Out of the Blue (Ferry Corsten album)

The article Out of the Blue (Ferry Corsten album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable album per WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Out of the Blue (Ferry Corsten album) coverart.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Out of the Blue (Ferry Corsten album) coverart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ Jörg

A tag has been placed on DJ Jörg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

not notable enough--GonzSil (talk) 18:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Apocalypse (Magic: the Gathering

A tag has been placed on Apocalypse (Magic: the Gathering, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The disambiguator in the title is missing its right bracket, and similar titles exist.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.

Sixth Edition listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sixth Edition. Since you had some involvement with the Sixth Edition redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 07:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

8th Edition listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 8th Edition. Since you had some involvement with the 8th Edition redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 07:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pirates of Davy Jones' Curse

The article Pirates of Davy Jones' Curse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established. After many than 8 years - six and a half of which it has been tagged as non-notable and unreferenced - notability has still not been established.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 13:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Smit (musician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Smit (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Smit (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 18:39, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Friday Night Magic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Friday Night Magic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friday Night Magic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 03:02, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pirates of the South China Seas

The article Pirates of the South China Seas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of any importance of the subject of this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Dissident Aggressor 20:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Ronin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Ronin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Schmitz-Moormann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Schmitz-Moormann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Schmitz-Moormann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Flooded w/them 100s 14:23, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xia Li

The article Xia Li has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person, not referenced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:20, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vicious Delicious for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vicious Delicious is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicious Delicious until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IMVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IMVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Infected Mushies" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Infected Mushies. Since you had some involvement with the Infected Mushies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 04:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Morphem

The article Morphem has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ~riley (talk) 02:50, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Right of Way (allbum)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Right of Way (allbum). Since you had some involvement with the Right of Way (allbum) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 04:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tsunami (album)

The article Tsunami (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NMUSIC. No significant coverage or anything else to suggest notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lennart97 (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Perfecto Presents: Sandra Collins Part 2

The article Perfecto Presents: Sandra Collins Part 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article, did not found suitable coverage or reviews to prove the subject's notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:PiratesSets

Template:PiratesSets has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pirates Constructible Strategy Game has been nominated for deletion

Category:Pirates Constructible Strategy Game has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sora Ltd. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sora Ltd. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sora Ltd. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jalen Barks (Woof) 16:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]