User talk:Teresia Akinyi Achilo

October 2023

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Paul Lyngdoh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have added external links, not references. Please read the referencing guidance linked above. Tacyarg (talk) 21:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Safaee have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 21:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kayvo Kforce ‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:07, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teresia Akinyi Achilo, you had pasted a lot of draft article content here on your user talk page. Please keep the page available for discussion between you and other Wikipedians. You may want to use a sandbox page to draft content. Make sure you are not copying and pasting from other sources. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:07, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Volvexzshawa has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 06:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noted and also Upon reviewing the "Image" that seems to be the main issue because of mistakenly when uploading the image retrieved from Volvexzshawa Instagram posted on 11 February February I selected (Source; my own work) which have made changes on the image and do believe it as resolved the term "Conflict of interest has main agenda for the Article deletion thank you Teresia Akinyi Achilo (talk) 07:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's not conflict of interest that is the reason this article has been nominated for deletion. The issue is whether the person is notable - see WP:NMUSICIAN. Tacyarg (talk) 07:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The person Volvexzshawa is notable according to my research upon publication by Kenya National News Star (newspaper) and Thus prove to be on Wikipedia thank you Teresia Akinyi Achilo (talk) 12:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Volvexzshawa

Hello Teresia Akinyi Achilo, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Volvexzshawa, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volvexzshawa.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CNMall41}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CNMall41 (talk) 22:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Teresia Akinyi Achilo - to let you know, you have been commenting on the Talk page of the deletion discussion, rather than the discussion page itself. You may want to move your Keep comment over to the discussion itself, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volvexzshawa. Tacyarg (talk) 14:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

I see you uploaded this image for the Wikipedia page about Volvexzshawa. You marked it as your "own work" so I am curious what your relationship is with the subject. Please review WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable. CNMall41 (talk) 22:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes my mistake will review it and make changes possible thanks for the feedback Teresia Akinyi Achilo (talk) 22:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Upon reviewing the "Image" that seems to be the main issue because of mistakenly when uploading the image retrieved from Volvexzshawa Instagram posted on 11 February February I selected (Source; my own work) which have made changes on the image and do believe it as resolved the term "Conflict of interest has main agenda for the Article deletion thank you Teresia Akinyi Achilo (talk) 00:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. The reason the page has been recommended for deletion is because it does not meet notability guidelines in my opinion. The question regarding a potential COI is a secondary issue and not the reason for the nomination. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i do and according to National Newspaper publication of the Musician Volvexzshawa Star (newspaper) I request for review on the issue regarding the Musician Notability according to Wikipedia guidelines in my opinion. Thank you Teresia Akinyi Achilo (talk) 17:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You do have a COI with relation to the subject of the page?--CNMall41 (talk) 05:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Volvexzshawa

Hello, Teresia Akinyi Achilo,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Justiyaya and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Volvexzshawa, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Justiyaya}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Justi yaya 07:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Volvexzshawa

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Volvexzshawa, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:47, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volvexzshawa (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volvexzshawa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 06:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Teresia Akinyi Achilo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 06:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volvexzshawa (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NMUSIC.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volvexzshawa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 10:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Volvexzshawa

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:Volvexzshawa, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volvexzshawa. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volvexzshawa (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volvexzshawa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:29, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]