User talk:Teasn1987a

Welcome!

Hello, Teasn1987a, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 00:10, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Thanks for contributing to the article St. James's Place plc. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 18:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dormskirk,

I cited (or meant to cite unless I missed it) the info using a Financial Times article, does that not count as a reliable source? The article was this one: https://www.ft.com/content/8830c0aa-ea38-4f16-9292-855ab64a89e2

If the issue is that it's not a relevant enough piece of information then fair enough but just querying in terms of citations for future reference.

Thanks! Teasn1987a (talk) 09:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Please go ahead and use it as a citation. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 22:06, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pension Dashboards (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pension Dashboards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vanderwaalforces,

Thanks for the feedback - I will bear that in mind when submitting future articles. I have since found that there is a page called Dashboards which is inclusive of the Pension Dashboards so understandable that this topic doesn't meet the notability criteria for its own page. The feedback on sources that you've provided is particularly useful. Thanks again! Teasn1987a (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Teasn1987a! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YouGov article

Hi Teasn1987a,

I noticed you have previously edited the YouGov article, thank you for your interest and time.

My name is Andrew and I’m an employee at YouGov. I am currently looking to make some updates to the article and wanted to see if you would be up for reviewing my proposed changes and feeding back any advice. As someone employed by the company I am keen not to make the changes myself, but instead work with neutral editors.

All my proposed changes are located at Talk:YouGov – I’ll be very grateful for any advice you could share. Thank you

Asfarmer (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Retail Redistribution Review (2012)

Hello, Teasn1987a. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Retail Redistribution Review (2012), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pension Dashboards

Hello, Teasn1987a. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pension Dashboards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pension Dashboards

Hello, Teasn1987a. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pension Dashboards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr Abdulla Al-Humaidi (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The EU Reporter source is good, The Telegraph source is more about his project, rather than himself. Other sources are only trivial mentions. Please take a look at the basic notability guidelines for people and resubmit accordingly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr Abdulla Al-Humaidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 18:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdulla Al-Humaidi (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdulla Al-Humaidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ohio Apportionment Board

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ohio Apportionment Board, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]