User talk:TataofTata

Zazas

I wrote you the required answer. See the Zazas talk page. And for some reason I was blocked. I have been doing research on scientific data for years. It's not as simple as what you wrote.46.221.200.148 (talk) 07:54, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You said I wrote a "story", but right after you write a even longer story of your own. Unless to label what I said as being fictional, then that does not make it an answer. That's a ad hominem and they call that dodging. When you begin to expand on your "hundreds" of sources, it reveals more your misunderstandings. You dig up linguist interpretations from 1905 and use that to mix up linguistic analysis to concur that the source has said Zazas are not Kurds. This is what you seem to not understand. Another thing. To say Kirmanckî and Kurmanji are so far apart as much as Italian is to Spanish, well that just proves you don't know what you are talking about and the cherry picking shows you have an agenda. --TataofTata (talk) 14:23, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk page

Hi TataofTata, I appreciate your edits and interest to contribute to Wikipedia. So this should be just seen as a friendly advice as you often edit on talk pages, I have on my watchlist. It is usually better to be bold and just make the changes you want to do before explaining what you want to change. If then there is resistance to your improvements, you are welcome to explain them on the article talk page. And in that case, please keep the explanation short. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Paradise Chronicle: I am not sure what articles you are specifically referring to. Some articles are protected and I cannot edit them, maybe you are referring to those? --TataofTata (talk) 14:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Said Rebellion or Alevism for example. There you weren't reverted and at Alevism you brought a wall of text into the discussion. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well I explained the issues with regards to the whole Alevism article itself. I currently do not have time to comprehensively improve it, least I could do is highlight them for consensus. After what happened in regards to the Dersim genocide page, being bold doesn't work when the direction of the article is clearly a certain pov and outsiders think you're being disruptive. As for Sheikh Said rebellion I simply left a considerate note on the talk page referring to the constant unsourced content being written. --TataofTata (talk) 16:19, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion

Hi TataofTata, and thank you for seeking out a [[WP:3O|third opinion]. I declined your request related to Talk:Turkish occupation of northern Syria#Zero sources on self-governance & rewording of intervention to offensive, as the dispute currently involves more than two editors. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Firefangledfeathers: thanks for informing me, but I think you're mistaken as the discussion regarding the use of "intervention" term over "occupation" is just me and the other user. The third user responds to the other "self-governance" issue, unless I have mistaken and missed it. Either way I think it requires more people who know about what is going on in Syria to comment so may not have been the best request by me. Thanks again. --TataofTata (talk) 13:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I would be happy to restore your request if you’d like. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefangledfeathers: Thanks, well maybe RFC would be better? Would you be able to or can you recommend what best method to seek knowledgeable input? I am kind of a newbie on Wikipedia. --TataofTata (talk) 19:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm fairly sure that having over 500 edits puts you into the top 1% of all Wikipedia accounts, so newbie-ness is relative! I think your first instinct to seek out a 3O was a good one. If disagreement continues, an RfC would be a fine choice. I would highly recommend reading through the instructions at WP:RFC, as it's important an RfC statement be short and neutral (among other requirements). Firefangledfeathers (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kurdish YouTubers

A tag has been placed on Category:Kurdish YouTubers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Koma Wetan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Koma Wetan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:38, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leyla Göktürk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Leyla Göktürk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:BêjeBêje

Hello, TataofTata. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BêjeBêje, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:BêjeBêje

Hello, TataofTata. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BêjeBêje".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:IAmHaks

Hello, TataofTata. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:IAmHaks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Koma Wetan

Hello, TataofTata. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Koma Wetan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:IAmHaks

Hello, TataofTata. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "IAmHaks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Leyla Göktürk

Hello, TataofTata. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leyla Göktürk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Leyla Göktürk

Hello, TataofTata. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leyla Göktürk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, TataofTata!

Happy New Year!

TataofTata,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 12:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 12:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kurdish DJs has been nominated for discussion

Category:Kurdish DJs has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]