User talk:Tabuhart

Welcome!

Hello, Tabuhart, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Suzan Kerunen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Suzan Kerunen.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

image upload

Help me upload an image to article. Tabuhart (talk) 14:17, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:The-hostel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The-hostel.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Tabs Ug moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Tabs Ug, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. – Craig Davison (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Tabs Ug (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Tabs Ug and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Tabs Ug, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tabuhart! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to draft

Hello, I recently moved Afrie to Draft:Afrie. I have done this as the page indicates that it is an article that is intended to go through AfC.--SamHolt6 (talk) 13:57, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Afrie

Hello Tabuhart,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Afrie for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 14:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Muhangi has been accepted

Alex Muhangi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Tabs Ug has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Tabs Ug. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 15:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyenvu

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

41.210.159.63 (talk) 12:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wanjiku the Teacher has been accepted

Wanjiku the Teacher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MadeYourReadThis (talk) 11:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pearl Rhythm Festival has been accepted

Pearl Rhythm Festival, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 17:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Pearl Rhythm Festival) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Pearl Rhythm Festival, Tabuhart!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A useful addition to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:28, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Comedy Store Uganda poster.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:African comedians has been nominated for discussion

Category:African comedians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:33, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Comedy Store Uganda poster.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Comedy Store Uganda poster.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tabuhart. The above issue has been resolved, so I've stricken the template; however, I'm leaving it so that you are aware that you need to provide two things any time you uploaded a non-free file: (1) a copyright license, and (2) a separate, specific non-free use rationale non-free use rationale for each use. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Thank you. -- (talk) 08:13, 29 June 2018 (EAT)

Draft:Orange Justice

Hi, Tabuhart can you move this draft into the main article. thanks in advance. 49.145.246.5 (talk) 08:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tabuhart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I have been hacked by "Metropolitan international University" I use a home computer and not accessible to the public and no one has used it. "Metropolitan international University" must have hacked me.

Decline reason:

This account is not directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. If you think your account was compromised, please let us know. As per WP:COMPROMISED, this would require we permanently block your account. Yamla (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you a paid editor

Hi there Tabuhart. I'm a volunteer on conflict of interest related subjects and came across your contributions in relation to another editor. I have a simple question: are you paid for the things you write about on Wikipedia? If the answer is yes, it's not the end of the world, but there are some things you will have to do to continue editing here. You can just reply here, I'll be watching for an answer. Thanks. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bri, Yes I'm a paid editor (three articles; 1 finished , 2 still pending review). Please let me know what I have to do to continue editing here. What's the future of my aticles, my account? I hope it's not the end of the world for me! Thank you! Tabuhart (talk) 06:50, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. My reply below. Sorry if it is a bit lengthy but I think it is better than just spewing an alphabet soup of policy abbreviations and expecting you to figure it all out. You can keep this account and continue, but it is easy to get in trouble if not following policy and procedure here. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:09, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing at Wikipedia

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. We have a policy that requires disclosure of paid editing (WP:PAID) and further guidance in our conflict of interest guideline (WP:COI).

Indeed a January 2018 "supreme court" (our Arbcom) case stated as a principle:

2) Because Wikipedia is intended to be written from a neutral point of view, it is necessary that conflicts of interest are properly disclosed, and articles or edits by conflicted editors are reasonably available for review by others. Editors are expected to comply with both the purpose and intent of the applicable policies, as well as their literal wording.

Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

As in scientific publishing, conflict of interest is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review.

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. We do not ask anyone to disclose their real world identity, but relationships should be disclosed and for any edit where you have received or expect to receive compensation, you must disclose your employer, the client, and any other affiliation that is relevant.

There are various templates used for disclosure and there is specific guidance on how to use them, in the policy and guideline linked-to above. We generally look for the disclosure at your userpage and at any article talk page where you will be working under a COI. Please ask for help if you find anything confusing!

The form of "peer review" is the second step. This piece may seem a bit strange to you at first, but if you think about it, it will make sense. In Wikipedia, editors can immediately publish their work, with no intervening publisher or standard peer review -- you can just create an article, click save, and voilà there is a new article, and you can go into any article, make changes, click save, and done. No intermediary - no publisher, no "editors" as that term is used in the real world. So the bias that conflicted editors tend to have, can go right into the article. Conflicted editors are also really driven to try to make the article fit with their external interest. If they edit directly, this often leads to battles with other editors, which is not good and one of the key reasons we seek to manage COI.

What we ask editors who want to work on articles where their COI is relevant, or which they are paid to work on, is:

a) if you want to create an article relevant to a COI you have, create the article as a draft through the WP:AFC process, disclose your COI on the Talk page with the Template:Connected contributor (paid) or Template:Connected contributor tag, and then submit the draft article for review (the AfC process sets up a nice big button for you to click when it is ready) so it can be reviewed before it publishes; and

b) And if you want to change content in any existing article on a topic where you have a COI, we ask you to

(i) disclose at the Talk page of the article with the tags as mentioned above; and

(ii) propose content on the Talk page for others to review and implement before it goes live, instead of doing it directly yourself. Just open a new section, put the proposed content there, and just below the header (at the top of the editing window) place the {{request edit}} tag, to flag it for other editors to review. In general the proposed content should be relatively short so that it is not too much review at once. Sometimes editors propose complete rewrites, providing a link to their sandbox for example. This is OK to do but please be aware that it is lot more for volunteers to process and will probably take longer.

By following those "peer review" processes, editors with a COI can contribute where they have a COI, and the integrity of WP can be protected. We get some great contributions that way, when conflicted editors take the time to understand what kinds of proposals are OK under the content policies. (There are good faith paid editors here, who have signed and follow the Wikipedia:Statement on Wikipedia from participating communications firms, and there are "black hat" paid editors here who lie about what they do and really harm Wikipedia).

But understanding the mission, and the policies and guidelines through which we realize the mission, is very important! That is why I wrote the section at the top of this page. Learning and following these is very important, and takes time. Please be aware that you have created a Wikipedia account, and this makes you a Wikipedian - you are obligated to pursue Wikipedia's mission first and foremost when you work here, and you are obligated to edit according to the policies and guidelines. Editing Wikipedia is a privilege that is freely offered to all, but the community restricts or completely takes that privilege away from people who will not edit and behave as Wikipedians.

I want to add that per the WP:COI guideline, if you want to directly update simple, uncontroversial facts (for example, correcting the facts about where the company has offices) you can do that directly in the article, without making an edit request on the Talk page. Just be sure to always cite a reliable source for the information you change, and make sure it is simple, factual, uncontroversial content. If you are not sure if something is uncontroversial, please ask at the Talk page. Please err on the side of caution. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:11, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

In case you didn't see the ping, your editing came up at the conflict-of-interest notice board under WP:COIN#FFHypeTEAM sockring. You ought to reply as soon as possible. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:37, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tabuhart: In a similar vein, I have moved Brian Ahumuza to Draft:Brian Ahumuza; as a you have disclosed you are a paid editor, you must comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID, which mandates that article you create go through AfC and not be created directly.--SamHolt6 (talk) 00:42, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Bri. You've been really helpful. I have checked WP:COIN#FFHypeTEAM sockring and found articles I have created for no reward but just for providing information to Wikipedia. Do I still count as a paid contributor for those. And SamHolt6 thank you too. Let me try and follow the rules.

Speedy deletion nomination of NTV Uganda

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NTV Uganda, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tabuhart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for mostly abusing multiple accounts and COI and COI Paid, which I confess to, I am guilty and sorry. I have learned a lesson since the block and thanks to editor Bri, I have learned to respect the rules mostly on COI, Paid editing, and sock puppetry, most of which I had not known. I would also like to declare, that from 1st August 2018, I am no longer a paid editor as I have retired from editing for my client. And I promise to resist from COI editing. I am requesting that my account be unblocked and I promise never to abuse multiple accounts or engage in COI editing without declaration and or following the rules. Whenever I need information about anything I go to Wikipedia first and would like to keep editing so I can help other people who seek information on the platform, so they are able to find correct, well written unambiguous information.

Decline reason:

Given your lack of openness noted below and your desire to immediately return to exactly the topics you earlier edited for pay, I don't think unblocking you would be beneficial to the project. Huon (talk) 11:08, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you, Tabuhart (talk) 09:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please give a full list of all the accounts you have used. I know of several, and I will not be willing to consider unblocking until I am confident that you are no longer dishonestly hiding part of your history. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Manuela Pacutho

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Manuela Pacutho, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Brian Mulondo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Brian Mulondo, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Crystal Newman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crystal Newman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal Newman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep (talk) 07:35, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non COI Declaration

I am declaring that I am no longer a paid editor. I have stepped down from that and will be contributing as a non paid editor if my block is lifted. Tabuhart (talk) 07:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Brian Ahumuza

Draft:Brian Ahumuza was moved from Brian Ahumuza by SamHolt6 for not following COI rules. Since I am no longer a paid editor as earlier stated on my talk page, someone please see how to help with the draft and see if it should be moved back to article namespace or improved. I feel WP:BIO and WP:SOURCE are okay. Thank you! Tabuhart (talk) 07:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AFC is your recorse. You may no longer be a paid editor, but I cannot overlook that you conducted a undisclosed paid editing campaign and abused a sock puppet. In light of these actions, putting the article in question through afc and under the eyes of a neutral editor will end in a better result for the project. SamHolt6 (talk) 08:12, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for calling attention to that page. if you hadn't done so I wouldn't have investigated your editing history, wouldn't have discovered that this account is a sockpuppet of a previously blocked sockpuppeteer, and wouldn't have deleted the page. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Comedy Store Uganda poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Comedy Store Uganda poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sivan Talmor

Hello, Tabuhart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sivan Talmor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 06:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Comedy Store Uganda

Hello, Tabuhart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Comedy Store Uganda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 19:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Comedy Store Uganda has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Comedy Store Uganda. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 11:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abryanz Style and Fashion Awards (ASFAs) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abryanz Style and Fashion Awards (ASFAs) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abryanz Style and Fashion Awards (ASFAs) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]