Jump to content

User talk:Syphenix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Syphenix, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! South Nashua (talk) 22:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Köppen climate classification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Syphenix (talk) 09:58, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Köppen climate classification, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cuenca, Chachapoyas and Constanza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As Classification

[edit]

After finally getting the opportunity to review Koppen's definition of As climates, it turns out that you indeed are correct. The Summer/high sun season in Koppen's system runs from April through September. Thanks for your work on this. If you're up for it, feel free to make similar changes on the tropical climate page. G. Capo (talk) 20:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have now made those changes to the tropical climate page, and I'm going to do the same for the mediterranean climate, humid continental climate and subarctic climate pages. Syphenix (talk) 23:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Köppen climate classification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Thanks for your contributions to Australian suburbs! Bishal Shrestha (talk) 23:15, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's alright :) Syphenix (talk) 23:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Citations to Suburbs

[edit]

Firstly, many thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I have noticed that you have added wrong citations for the suburb articles. I have fixed in one instance (Benobble, Queensland. However, I noticed the same in another(Bunburra, Queensland) as well.

Please refer to Template:Cite QPN and Template:Census 2016 AUS on how to modify the parameters to cite properly. Feel free to reach me out at my talk page if you have any questions. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 00:11, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that. I am trying to drill the correct citations thing into my head. Syphenix (talk) 00:15, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Thanks for creating Burnett Creek, Queensland.

User:Bishal Shrestha while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Citations refer to wrong URL

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bishal Shrestha}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bishal Shrestha (talk) 01:36, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Thanks for creating Bunburra, Queensland.

User:Bishal Shrestha while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Citations refer to wrong URL. Informed author to fix it!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bishal Shrestha}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bishal Shrestha (talk) 01:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Thanks for creating Kents Pocket, Queensland.

User:Willsome429 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the page, much appreciated!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 01:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pamplona, Spain

[edit]

Apologies for the delay in response. In order for a climate to be considered a subtropical highland climate as opposed to oceanic, it would have to be a clear-cut case that a climate would be tropical or humid subtropical if it wasn't for the location's altitude. Pamplona could arguably still be Oceanic at sea-level because Pamplona's altitude is only 1500 feet. This is clearly the case for locations such as Bogota, Curitiba, Johannesburg and Kunming. It's not so clear-cut for a number of locations in Europe. G. Capo (talk) 00:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Syphenix (talk) 20:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Köppen climate classification, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Split and La Trinidad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bald and Bankrupt moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Bald and Bankrupt, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 06:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GeoWizard, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 14:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, go ahead. Syphenix (talk)

population centres and localities in Queensland

[edit]

When the Queensland Place Names database says something is a "population centre", then for Wikipedia purposes it means a "town" not a locality. Small towns exist within localities (often with the same name) but not always. Town articles go in the Category:Towns in Queensland not Category:Localities in Queensland (unless they are both a town and a locality article -- a common situation with small rural towns -- there is not enough to say about each of them separately to warrant separate articles, but for larger towns that span multiple localities/suburbs, we usually have a separate article for the town and its central suburb (which often but not always has the same name).

Towns are defined by a centre point, whereas a locality has a boundary (but the QPN only reports the centroid of that boundary). You need to use the Queensland Globe to see locality boundaries and hence what locality the town is in.

As far as Queensland goes, I believe all localities have a Wikipedia article already. So any missing topic is probably a small town within a locality of a different name e.g. Portland Road, Queensland.

Localities in Queensland are not considered "within" other localities by the Queensland Government so please don't say this; they are all distinct areas and collectively divide up all of the state's land. The Queensland Government defines our state's geography. What the Census does is entirely for their own statistical convenience. While the ABS do try to reflect the official boundaries published by the various state governments for census purposes, for towns or localities with tiny populations, the ABS often don't report them separately because of concerns about anonymity so they sometimes aggregate them for their purposes of providing privacy to the residents. Nothing the census does has any bearing on the official geography and therefore has no impact of what we say in Wikipedia (other than we cannot report a population figure in some cases).

I hope this explanation helps. Please don't hesitate to ask me if you have any questions. It takes a while to get one's head around how the QPN and the Qld Globe and the Census interact, what is authoritative and what it is not. Kerry (talk) 02:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for writing this, and it does help alot. I've already begun fixing my articles in accordance to what you have written here and I will continue to do so. Syphenix (talk) 02:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Syphenix. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 11:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Nomination of Paul Barbato for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Barbato is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Barbato (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kinu t/c 10:36, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bald and Bankrupt for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bald and Bankrupt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bald and Bankrupt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Nemov (talk) 15:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nomo Sapiens

[edit]

Template:Nomo Sapiens has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Homo Sapiens

[edit]

Template:Homo Sapiens has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFXtalk 20:34, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]