User talk:G. Capo

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, G. Capo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gary King (talk) 01:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{help me|I got a question. I have two medium-sized articles ready to be posted, but I don't know how to post it. There is a link for both of these posts but it leads only to a brief discussion of the subject with other subjects thrown in. My articles are more detailed. Could you help.}}

{{help me}}I've returned to find two articles I helped create deleted. Checking out the reasons, I'm hearing lack "real world notability" which I disagree with. I wasn't quite finished with the article. It looked like three or four people decided that it wasn't and not only deleted it but turned it into a redirect page so most people won't see the "discussion" behind why it was deleted. Could you help?}}

Your article wasn't deleted, you can find it here, if you think the article deserves an article for itself, be bold and revert the change that converted it into a redirect. If you have any further questions, please direct them to my talk page or alternatively, re-add the {{helpme}} template, regards —— RyanLupin • (talk) 09:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Your first article.

Ensure that you have an account and you are logged in. If you don't have an account, create one
Make sure the subject is notable enough to have their own article.
Find references
Make sure no article on the subject exists under a different title by typing the subject into the search box to the left (←) and clicking 'Search'
Type the page name in the search box to the left (←) and click 'Go'
Click 'Create this page'
Create the article, including all your references, making sure you adhere to the Manual of Style and our article layout guidelines
Be aware that Wikipedia deletes thousands of new articles for failing to adhere to our policies and guidelines. New articles by new users are at extra risk of deletion, due to new users' unfamiliarity with our rules. Consider gaining experience by editing existing articles before attempting to create new ones. See especially the how to create a page section at the bottom. -Optigan13 (talk) 07:00, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: References for Mai

Good references comply with WP:V and WP:R. Each type of article, ie. Video Games, historical, etc, each have a list of certain reliable sites. In the case of Mai, (anime/TV), you'd look at IGN TV, or Nick.com, and even arguable Avatar Spirit. However, for the article to comply with WP:N, it must have multiple references from a variety of different sources. Mai's references come from not only just one source, but they aren't even formatted properly per WP:CITE. I hope that helped. :) I haven't the time to clean up the article for you, though.--haha169 (talk) 00:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My bad - I was talking about Ty Lee. Mai needs references. It has none - so I put the tag there. --haha169 (talk) 00:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original research in Pittsburgh article

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Pittsburgh. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Countries/Regions with Subtropical Highland Climates: Antanarivo, Madagascar

Antanarivo, the capital of Madagascar, has like the rest of the vast plateau of Madagascar, a Subtropical Highland Climate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.214.146.63 (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

San Diego climate

Hello G.Capo, nice to meet you. San Diego is quite unique in that it straddles the two climatic zones CSa-BSh (look at the map referred here), but it really does lean towards the semi-arid (BS) if you use Koeppen's system. Because the Pacific ocean systems moderate the temperatures, making it very pleasant year-round, most people mistake it for a Mediterranean climate. Also, some issues regarding Koeppen's CS category... (1) SD's geographical area straddles these two zones along the coast. This is not the case, further up, in LA, where the shift to BSh occurs inland, away from the coast. Apart from perhaps Casablanca, San Diego is the only major coastal city at this transition zone. (2) Yes, a Mediterranean climate has relatively wet winters and relatively dry summers... but this is not the case with SD. While it receives MOST of its rain in the winter, it amounts to little (~10", which technically makes it almost "desert"). Med climates have significant winter rain. I'm sure there are zones with microclimates that lean either way. (2) The litmus test to determine the assignment of BS vs CS is the PET, which also indicates the agrarian potential of a site without irrigation. Using this, the SD area is BS. Moving inland it becomes BW. (3) The BS that starts at the coast in San Diego, extends down the Baja until it gives way to true desert (BW)... all along the coast, NOT the interior. This pattern of CS-BS-BW occurs at other coastal locations on the planet- most similarily in Morocco (same latitude and similar ocean systems exerting influence). (4) BH climates are NOT always hot, nor are they cold. Negative evaporation can occur without extreme heat.

I think the SD article needs to reflect San Diego's climatic uniqueness, and to say it has a "Mediterranean" climate, or even an "arid Med" climate, is incorrect. It's in an area of progression- a continuum from one zone to another- so it cannot be clear cut. I'd like to reword the section on climate to reflect this, if you concur... perhaps a little less biased to BS than I had it. What do you think? Koppenlady (talk) 22:11, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page changes

Please so not change the content on articles such as you did on Calgary and Edmonton with out cites or proper references. Cheers Kyle1278 20:28, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Government of Alberta the province has a continental climate and that part of the province is semiarid. Here and the areas outlined in white. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 21:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can it be sourced as well? Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 22:03, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For engaging in meaningful discussions and updating information on Koeppen climate classification articles. Keep up the good work! Cheers Koppenlady (talk) 19:15, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Climate categories for Mexican locations

Hi! I saw your comment on the Guadalajara article. I work mostly on Mexican geography articles. Many times I either do not find any climate categorization info or that info is in Spanish, and I have not found a way to translate this jargon. I would love to find a way to get the Köppen climate classification... either a detailed map for Mexico or a site that gives the classifications when you pop in the name of the locations. Are you aware of any sources that can help me?Thelmadatter (talk) 22:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Climate Description

Thanks for the feedback. I would like to clear this up: when I say "continental semi-arid climate", this is in contrast to places such as Argentine Patagonia, where a semi-arid climate prevails, but said climate is not continental, looking at the thermal regime and humidity levels. "Semi-arid steppe climate" is indeed redundant, I agree with you here. My describing Edmonton as "semi-arid" was a mistype; I meant semi-humid. As for Calgary, it is not deemed to be semi-arid according to the Koppen system, but its annual precipitation is close to the threshold given by the system, and I think that a broader interpretation of what is a "semi-arid" climate than that of the Koppen system, one that includes areas such as that which Calgary is in, is legitimate so long as one recognises that the prevailing climate system does not classify these regions as such.

User talk:1brettsnyder

 —Preceding

Climate

I know there has been some controversy for the climate classification of Edmonton and Calgary. I am just wondering from your perspective (since you seem to know a lot more than me on this subject) what would you classify the two cities as? Thanks Kyle1278 03:59, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese cities

Tianjin

Should we go by the strict mathematical mean of the 1971-2000 data ([1.8 + (-7.5)] / 2 = -2.85 °C), or by what the CMA says (-3.5 °C), which is the observed mean (i.e. integral of the temperature of the 24-hour period divided by 24). I am Chinese, and can use Chinese-language sources up to a certain level, and the third column of the temperature data, "累年各月平均气温", literally means 'accumulated annual every month average temperature', as opposed to the two columns to its left, which include the characters '最高' and '最低' before '气温', specifying the average high and low. The 0.6 °C difference is small, but according to criteria, highly . However, from an arithmetical (which is all I really care about w.r.t. climate) and practical aspect, I think the station cheats because of the mere 0.15 °C that award it a warmer climate classification; moreover, it is probably located in the city centre, and since the borders of Tianjin extend to the coast as well as further inland, there might be a few locations that are respectively more solidly Cwa or Dwa. But does a 0.15 °C difference really physically matter as long as the difference is far from the freezing point? I say not. 华钢琴49 (TALK) 04:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xi'an

Since most of your work is related to semi-arid climate classification, would you consider Xi'an to be cold or warm/hot semi-arid? according to the infobox in the article: January averages 0.5 °C (32.9 °F), July 27.0 °C (80.6 °F), annual average 14.3 °C (57.7 °F), and annual precipitation 553 millimetres (21.8 in). --- 华钢琴49 (TALK) 13:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ürümqi

Sorry for the continued bothering/'spam', but my questions are actually this uncertain.
Did calculations as follows:

APR-SEP precip: 187.3 millimetres (7.37 in)
Annual precip: 286.2 millimetres (11.27 in)
APR-SEP percentage: 65.44%, thus a little short of 70%
Annual temperature: 7.38 °C (45.3 °F)
Semi-arid threshold: 7.38 * 20 + 140 = 287.6 millimetres (11.32 in)

Based on those calculations, Ürümqi is barely falls within the semi-arid calculation and is thus borderline. However, according to maps, this makes it somewhat of an oasis within a large semi-arid/arid region. Furthermore, given that the percentage is just short of 70%, the true threshold must be much higher than 288 mm, I say. From a linear calculation standpoint, 264.0 mm should be the number added, not 140 (the threshold is now 412 mm instead of 288). This is similar to the rule that many policeman follow: if you are only 1 km/h or 1 mph above the posted speed limit, he is not likely to ticket you. ---华钢琴49 (TALK) 00:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

5, B, E, M and R all have multiple stops of the same name

Hi here's the list... copied from List of New York City Subway stations#Stations with the same name.

The 5 on each of its two northern branches in the Bronx stops at two stations that bear the same name: Gun Hill Road on the Dyre Avenue Line and the White Plains Road Line, and Pelham Parkway on the Dyre Avenue Line and the White Plains Road Line.
The B stops at two stations named Seventh Avenue: Seventh Avenue (BMT Brighton Line) in Brooklyn and Seventh Avenue (IND Sixth Avenue Line) in Manhattan.
The E stops at two stations named 23rd Street: 23rd Street (IND Eighth Avenue Line) in Manhattan and 23rd Street – Ely Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) in Queens.
The M stops at two stations named Myrtle Avenue: Myrtle Avenue – Broadway (BMT Jamaica Line) and Myrtle–Wyckoff Avenues (BMT Myrtle Avenue Line), both in Brooklyn. It also stops at two stations named 23rd Street: 23rd Street (IND Sixth Avenue Line) in Manhattan and 23rd Street – Ely Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) in Queens.
The R stops at two stations named 36th Street: 36th Street (BMT Fourth Avenue Line) in Brooklyn and 36th Street (IND Queens Boulevard Line) in Queens.

Acps110 ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cities Climates

A IP user 82.10.133.227 has been changing the description of some cites climate calcification even though this has all been discussed before I reverted the edits. Just letting you know, you know much more on this topic than I do. I have also left this message with User talk:1brettsnyder. Some examples [1], [2]. Kyle1278 00:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Latakia climate source

Greetings G. Capo! Thanks for adding a helpful climate description in the Latakia article. It looks accurate, but could you also add the source that backs the description? --Al Ameer son (talk) 02:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oceanic climate article slimmed down again

I removed the notable cities section as there was no supporting referencing. The gallery was again removed per wikipedia standards. I'm one of few editors within the meteorology project who is making improvements to articles within it, and willing to take them into and through the GAN process. This is why I keep restructuring the article to conform with wikipedia standards...one day it might get into good enough shape to become a good article. FYI. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because the city list constitutes original research (another wikipedia no-no) without supporting inline references. If the other Koppen pages have been constructed in this manner, then either referencing needs to be added, or those lists will need to be eliminated as well. As it stands, wikipedia standards favor prose over lists anyhow. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Northeast United States". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 17 September 2012.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 03:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Climate section at Nantucket

Dear G. Capo: Thank you for your contribution to the climate section at Nantucket. It would be very helpful, if you could provide one or more references for that contribution. I have posted such a request at the section, rather than deleting your apparently meritorious contribution. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 13:59, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your post at my talk page, citing the Köppen climate classification (KCC) as the method used. We're on our way to a suitable citation for your entry. Is there a map with a weblink or some other citable source that you can suggest? E.g. does the Peel, M. C. and Finlayson, B. L. and McMahon, T. A. (2007) citation in the KCC article support what you contributed? If so we could use that. I note that the Wikipedia article on the KCC system is also unsourced in several sections—a WP "no-no"! Let's continue the conversation at the Talk:Nantucket#Climate section discussion. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 16:09, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Asami Sato pic

Hey, I just wanted to say that I'm not trying to step on you or something. I just really don't think that's a good representative picture (being accurate only to Book 4), and also, it's tiny - it doesn't really enlarge any, which is a bit of a minus. So that's where I'm coming from. BUT! I'm not trying to kick it out - I tagged you on purpose on the fair use orphaning, so you'd know. And now knowing that you really want it in there, I've added more to the caption (for context) and adjusted the position (to make it more illustrative of Book 4, from which it came) with the intent to make having both photos in the article supportable as fair use. I hope that works for you. Solarbird (talk) 07:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 1 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Lin Beifong page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help) and a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:General Iroh.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:General Iroh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Western New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rochester metropolitan area. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Average record highs and lows

Hi! I reverted your edits removing average record highs and lows from Template:Weather box/doc, because this is a feature of the template, and needs to be described in the documentation. The concept may be confusing, but the statistic is present in the NOAA's weather records, and the statistic of average yearly minimum is used to determine USDA hardiness zones for plants, so it is worth including in some cases. It also describes the absolute range of temperature that can be expected in a given month or year. — Eru·tuon 22:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, G. Capo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bolin (The Legend of Korra).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bolin (The Legend of Korra).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mako (The Legend of Korra).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mako (The Legend of Korra).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Khartoum, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To ensure that your recent changes remain in place, please cite the reference as per WP:WHYCITE. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, G. Capo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BRD

Because your edit is disputed, please use the WP:BRD cycle. You added content to a stable version of the article. The onus is on you to show it should be there if it is reverted. Please start a post at the article talk page and get consensus before restoring that content. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but this is absurd. Yes the source is a fan-site, but the source clearly illustrates what's being discussed and is accurate. It quite clearly fits the topic at hand. Also again, it was reverted by anons. The source of the dispute are anons, not a registered user. Unless you're the series of anons, this shouldn't really qualify as a dispute.G. Capo (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks for communicating with me rather than reverting again.

1. The worth of the edit is not my concern.

2. Anons have the same rights as us.

3. I'm not the anon.

4. Simply post at talk asking for objections. If the IP or others do not object, or discuss, then after a week you have the right to make the change and others reverting away from your change will be reverted.

Best,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cajuns

You had it right, I said it wrong in the edit summary; but I think removing one layer of quotes is cleaner in any case. Hope you agree! JohnInDC (talk) 15:53, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Original Barnstar
		For your patience and understanding at Easter egg (media). Well done. If anyone removes that ref, please alert me. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:36, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Much appreciated. I will alert you if necessary G. Capo (talk) 23:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Köppen climate classification

Please address the issues raised on talk:Köppen climate classification.--Vsmith (talk) 01:27, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information

This edit was not vandalism. Rather than reverting with a threatening edit summary you should be initiating discussion on the article talk page to determine consensus (see WP:BRD). I think you'll find, though, that the use of flag icons is regulated by WP:MOSFLAG. Tiderolls 15:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ThoughtsonLiberty

How is ThoughtsonLiberty a legitimate women's magazine? Their website states: "Thoughts on Liberty strives to be the premier blog...". Do they have an issn? They don't seem to be a notable blog for that matter. Bennv3771 (talk) 15:10, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see where they themselves even claim to be a magazine. Their website and social media profiles state they are a private blog. Per MOS:TV: "Be careful when searching for reviews, and make sure they are coming from professional reviewers, and not simply a fan of the series." Are non-notable private bloggers really professional reviewers? Bennv3771 (talk) 15:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Even though I don't agree with the source..."

FYI, agreeing or disagreeing with a source is not grounds for including or removing content on Wikipedia. There is no need to include edit summaries telling others whether or not you personally agree with cited sources... it doesn't (or at least it shouldn't) matter. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I removed the second sentence initially because it is just a paraphrase of the author's point which was already made in the author's quote. I don't see the point in quoting the author, then paraphrasing the same point made by the same author immediately after. Either quote him directly or paraphrase his point, no need for unnecessary repetition with both. Given WP:QUOTEFARM, it's best to just paraphrase the author's criticism of the relationship between Korra and Asami (which boils down to lack of foreshadowing) in our own words. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:05, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mako (The Legend of Korra).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mako (The Legend of Korra).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Lin & Suyin in Toph's office.png

The file File:Lin & Suyin in Toph's office.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free screenshot being used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in Lin Beifong#Book Four: Balance. There is already a non-free screenshot of the character being used in the main infobox for primary indentification purposes, so another one is not needed for that per WP:NFCC#3a. While a non-free screenshot might be allowed if necessary to illustrate a particular technique or other aspect about the animation style used for the character, etc., it's not really allowed just to illustrate a "plot point" about the character per MOS:TV#Images or WP:FILMNFI. There's no critical commentary on the screenshot itself, so the context required by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking; a non-free screenshot is not needed to show a character in its "younger years" unless there is sourced critical commentary describing the change in the character's appearance over the years. Finally, using a non-free image just to "show" the character has a relationship with another character or is not really going to meet WP:NFCC#1 since that plot element can more than easily be understand using only simple text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:58, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mako & Bolin's family Portrait.jpg

The file File:Mako & Bolin's family Portrait.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free image being used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in Mako (The Legend of Korra)#Book Three: Change. There is already a non-free screenshot of the character being used in the main infobox for primary indentification purposes, so another one is not needed for that per WP:NFCC#3a. While a non-free image might be allowed if necessary to illustrate a particular technique or other aspect about the animation style used for the character, etc., it's not really allowed just to illustrate a "plot point" about the character per MOS:TV#Images or WP:FILMNFI. There's no critical commentary on the image itself, so the context required by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking; a non-free image is not needed to show a character in a "family portrait" per WP:NFCC#1 since that plot element can more than easily be understand using only simple text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mako & Bolin's family Portrait.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mako & Bolin's family Portrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lin & Suyin in Toph's office.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lin & Suyin in Toph's office.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, G. Capo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Azula's Blue Flames.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Azula's Blue Flames.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of properly sourced information

Please stop removing properly sourced information from the Voltron Legendary Defender article. It is clear that you are allowing your bias to negatively impact the quality of the content. Please be aware that just because you dislike stated facts does not mean that they are not factual. Jesip lunati (talk) 06:17, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The user Fradio71 is involved with repeated edit warring on the Voltron page. Please feel free to leave a report on this individual https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring Liqunaei (talk) 07:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It was in regards to the anti faction of the fandom, which has perpetrated most of, if not all, of the violence. I had the information sourced and then it disappeared. It seems that it was someone else who may have removed the details and information. It looks like it was Fradio71?

Either way, I hope to continue working with you in the future with constructive future edits. Jesip lunati (talk) 05:49, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Differences between true equatorial climates and other tropical rainforest climates

Hello,

I reverted in part your edit because I think it is important to clearly describe what true equatorial climates are. You can see details in the talk page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tropical_rainforest_climate#Many_tropical_rainforest_climates_AREN%27T_equatorial_climates).

Many notable cities selected as examples haven't an equatorial climate but, to be short, a "trade-wind" climate or a "cyclone" climate (moreover, very often "trade-wind" climates are "cyclone" climates and vice versa, one notable exception being for instance the eastern coast of Brazil where trade winds are predominant while you almost don't have any cyclones (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Atlantic_tropical_cyclone)).

In true equatorial climates, a) the ZCIT is predominant, not the trade winds and b) there is no cyclone.

Consequently in equatorial climates, you don't have much wind (think of the sailor's doldrums) contrary to trade-wind climates which are windy : this is the main climatic difference.

In trade-wind climates, the diversity of the forests are poorer than in equatorial-ZCIT zones because they have to struggle against constant wind which is not the case in the Congo or Amazon basin.

Among the selected cities you have for instance Moroni (Comoros), Port Antonio (Jamaica), West Palm Beach (United States), Suva (Fiji). All these cities have trade winds most of the year which means these cities are windy. Orchid Island (Taiwan) is a little different because the ZCIT is more present than in the other mentioned cities. However in all these cities cyclones are frequent or not rare. Therefore the climate is not equatorial in these cities.

In Davao City (Philippines), Polomolok (Philippines), Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte (Sri Lanka), Tarawa (Kiribati), the ZCIT is often present therefore the climate isn't a trade-wind climate.

Cyclones are also rare in these regions however they are not unknown. In Sri Lanka you have some cyclones but there are not frequent. For instance Fani storm, a few days ago, began to hit Sri Lanka (though the storm was probably not yet a cyclone when it passed over Sri Lanka) before becoming a cyclone which struck Eastern India, Bangladesh and Burma.

So Davao City (Philippines), Polomolok (Philippines), Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte (Sri Lanka), Tarawa (Kiribati) aren't true equatorial climates because cyclones aren't unknown there while in the Congo basin you haven't had any little single cyclone in meteorology history.

In the "Notable cities" part, I indicated all the cities of which I am sure they have an equatorial climate or a subequatorial climate.

When there is no "equatorial climate" or "subequatorial climate" indication then

either the climate is a trade-wind climate (as in Fort Lauderdale, United States)

or I am not sure about the main aerological mechanism as in Kampala (Uganda). I don't know if the ZCIT is predominant over the (continentalized) maritime trade winds in the Kampala region.

Carlo Colussi (talk) 06:53, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Humid Subtropical Climate

Change the content, wording, references, whatever. I don't care, but why did you remove ALL of the conversions?? 216.163.247.3 (talk) 17:02, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I didn't fully realize what I did. I’ll restore the conversions you worked hard to include in the article. There’s been a long-running feud with at least one user, who continually changes info because he/she feels a certain way, not because of the actual weather data. Worse, the user deletes valid sources that doesn't fit his/her view. G. Capo (talk) 17:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'm not entirely sure I did them all right, so feel free to improve/fix any mistakes I made. 216.163.247.3 (talk) 19:25, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pamplona, Spain

Saw your edit of the Pamplona page. Isn't the subtropical highland designation ignoring rainfall levels and patterns at sea level and only focusing on what temperature would be like at sea level? Syphenix (talk) 04:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical rainforest climate ≠ Equatorial climate

Hello,

often tropical rainforest climate and equatorial climate are confused. Tropical rainforest climates are mainly MAM2 or AM2 climates according to Marcel Leroux, French climatologist.

MAM2 and AM2 describe the aerological mechanisms that dominate these climates. The first "M" in MAM2 means "Monsoon" but Monsoon as equivalent of ZITC. AM2 means "Alizé maritime de type 2" (Trade wind of type 2, type 2 meaning the equatorward branch of a trade wind). So MAM2 climates are climates with the alternation "M" and "AM2" that is the alternation of the ZITC ("M") and the trade winds ("AM2") with the ZITC aerological mechanism being dominant. The AM2 climates are climates where the trade winds are dominant and the ZITC minor. Most of the MAM2 climates are found near the equator (Pontianak) while the AM2 climates are usually found at higher latitudes (Santos).

The great difference between MAM2 climates and AM2 climates is that in the former climates there is usually no or rare wind due to the ZITC (doldrums, "pot-au-noir") while in the AM2 climates you have frequent wind (trade wind).

Generally cyclones occur in the AM2 climates but may also be present in some MAM2 climates.

All true equatorial climates are MAM2 climates with no cyclone. All equatorial climates are tropical rainforest climates.

Subequatorial climates are degraded equatorial climates. All true subequatorial climates are MAM2 climates as the equatorial climates.

The difference between subequatorial climates and equatorial climates are either a short dry season (1 to 3 months) or the presence of rare cyclones in the former climates.

In the case of a short dry season, the subequatorial climate is not a tropical rainforest climate but an Aw climate (Tropical monsoon climate) or even an Aw/As—Tropical savanna climate under Köppen classification.

But in the case of no dry season but in presence of rare cyclones, the subequatorial climate is an Af climate (tropical rainforest climate) because there is no dry season. However this is not a true equatorial climate since there are a few cyclones.

A great part of the tropical rainforest climates aren't equatorial climates

but either (1) tropical humid trade-wind climates (with or without cyclones)

or (2) tropical "MAM2" climates with frequent cyclones

or (3) subequatorial climates with no dry season but with rare cyclones.

Among the case (3) were the examples of locations for which I added (subequatorial climate) : Davao City, Philippines / Polomolok, Philippines / Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte, Sri Lanka / Tarawa, Kiribati. These cities have an Af tropical rainforest climate but rare cyclones may occur there so the climate is not a true equatorial climate but "only" a subequatorial climate.

Cayenne (French Guyana) is an example of subequatorial climate not being tropical rainforest climate but tropical monsoon climate (Aw) because there is a short dry season so must not be included in the list of "Notable cities with Tropical rain forest climates".

In conclusion I will put again the mention "(subequatorial climate)" next to the few examples cited above.

When the mention "(equatorial climate)" is noted it means that the climate is Af equatorial,

when the mention "(subequatorial climate)" is noted it means that the climate is Af subequatorial

and when there is no mention it means that the climate is Af but neither equatorial nor subequatorial.

In the last case you can pick up Majuro (Marshall Islands) which is Af but with many cyclones (so neither equatorial nor even subequatorial) or Hilo (United States) which is also Af but once again not (sub-)equatorial because under the trade wind aerological mechanism AM2 during most of the year.

One last word : I explained all that in the talk page of the article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tropical_rainforest_climate#Many_tropical_rainforest_climates_AREN'T_equatorial_climates

--Carlo Colussi (talk) 18:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honduras200010 edits

Hi G. Capo, I wonder if you could help with something maybe? The editor formerly known as Honduras200010 (talk · contribs) and their sockpuppets seem to have made a lot of disruptive edits about climate topics. I noticed your name in several of the articles I was checking, and that you had already reverted some of their edits. If you have time, maybe you could help with fixing and cleaning up things they broke? They are indefinitely blocked since 18 June for disruptive editing and sock puppetry. Their socks are Lasolitudineitaly (talk · contribs), as well as (pending confirmation at the sockpuppet investigation) Noncheitaly (talk · contribs) and most or all of the edits from the IP range 190.92.62.192/26. For example, there is this edit: [3], which I think could be removed as block evasion, but it's hard for me to tell what the changes mean, and I don't want to revert to an older version if the old numbers are incorrect. Anyway, it's up to you if you want to take a look, I thought I'd let you know about it. Thanks... --IamNotU (talk) 03:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IamNotU. I'll see what I can do concerning changes to the climate info. I've been pretty busy lately G. Capo (talk) 20:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Azula's Blue Flames.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Azula's Blue Flames.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]