User talk:Sword313

Hello, Sword313, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Sword313, good luck, and have fun. PamD 07:48, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PamD 07:48, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Baba Samid Mausoleum moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Baba Samid Mausoleum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:55, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Zamina Aslanova) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Zamina Aslanova, Sword313!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please work on this in draftspace and move back when it has WP:INLINECITED sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 05:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm PamD. I noticed that you recently removed content from User talk:Boleyn without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PamD 07:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Beybala Khankishiyev

Hello, Sword313,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Beybala Khankishiyev should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beybala Khankishiyev .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Rosguill^talk 23:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Safi-ad-din Ardabili

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you have posted content to the Safi-ad-din Ardabili article in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 01:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.I can't understand you.I am sorry. He isn't kurdish.Impossible.He is our ancestor.

Yes he was Kurdish, he wasn't a Mongol and neither are you. You are from Aran, you ancestors are Caucasian Tatars (Turkic-speaking Caucasians). There is no link between Caucasian Tatars and Azerbaijan. He doesn't have any relation to you because he was an Iranian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Migboy123 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Sabirabad (city) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Azerbaijani

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hasan Khan Shahseven, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shamkir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history at Atropatene shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC) I understand you.Thank you.If someone change writing it's not my mistake.You must change his writing.[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AA2 advisory

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date. [1]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- LouisAragon (talk) 14:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was an outright violation of WP:OR and WP:TENDENTIOUS. You didn't use an edit summary either. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zamina Aslanova

Hello, Sword313. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zamina Aslanova".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 17:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Baba Samid Mausoleum

Hello, Sword313. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Baba Samid Mausoleum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 15:02, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Javad Khanate, you may be blocked from editing. Source states "Iranian", yet you changed it into "Afsharid" without edit summary/explanation. Another big no-no. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I admit my mistake.Dynasty is the dynasty of Azerbaijan.I think it should be written in Azerbaijani.Its true,they dont use graphic of latin.But today Azeebaijan use it. - Sword313 (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Axerbaijan

Should you include Azerbaijan used to be called axerbaijan? BrendanKennedy (talk) 21:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting help

Hi greetings,

I have been looking for update and expansion support for 2 following articles in draft namespace

Draft:Aurat (word) (article to cover grammar and linguistic part)

and

Draft:Aurat (article to cover cultural women)

Please do have a look at the article, do update, expand, correct inaccuracies, suggest and discuss better article titles

Looking forward to your kind support.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 06:34, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Adurbadagan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 10:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That area starts from the south of the Republic of Azerbaijan, ie from the Kur-Araz junction. Therefore, it is possible to look at the geographical area. Sword313 (talk) 11:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, you didn't answer me. Sword313 (talk) 12:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Erivan Khanate

Help revert my adds. I made a mistake. And i cant revert Seymur06 (talk) 09:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ehtiyac yoxdur artıq Seymur06 (talk) 12:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sağ olun Seymur06 (talk) 12:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding fictional flags

Do do not restore these fictional flags without any reliable source to back it up. Keep it and you will be reported. --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These flags are updated flags. A flag with an outdated image is not good. Sword313 (talk) 12:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What? --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These flags are updated flags. Just like the old flags of the ancient states are not here. Sword313 (talk) 12:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I'm having a hard time understanding your English. Anyhow, either add an actual reliable source to back these supposed flags up or don't add it at all. Thanks. --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The source is the same. Will you accept if I place the source of the old flag in the info of the updated flag? Sword313 (talk) 12:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm Chipmunkdavis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Republic of Artsakh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please stop making the same unsourced change to the article. Firm reliable secondary sources would be helpful for such a strong claim. CMD (talk) 03:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chipmunkdavis. Four UN resolutions on the occupation of Azerbaijani lands by Armenia were mentioned in the "de jure". This is the biggest reference. You have repeatedly stated that it is recognized by three non-UN member states. This is not important, because they are separatist organizations like Arsakh. Two separatist organizations belong to Georgia and one to Moldova. And you mentioned the country to which the status of those separatist organizations belongs. But when it comes to Arsakh's article, the opposite is true. I'm sorry, this is a double standard.

Sword313 (talk) 11:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When did I mention these things? UN resolutions are WP:PRIMARY, we should not interpret them here. CMD (talk) 06:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I explained to you in detail. If a territory is an unrecognized state, then it is the territory of any state. Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria as separatist organizations. However, the two Georgian separatist organizations are recognized by 3-4 states. But no state recognizes Arsakh and recognizes it as an integral part of Azerbaijan. But you are seriously trying not only to equate the three separatist organizations I wrote with Arsakh, but also to show them as a well-known state. Is it so important that two unrecognized separatist organizations recognize Arsakh? There are 4 UN resolutions on the occupation of Armenia. There is also an article on this resolution. Is this article a reference for you?

Sword313 (talk) 13:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I would agree that mentioning the three recognitions in the infobox is quite undue, but that does not mean it can be replaced with personal interpretations of primary sources. Wikipedia articles do not count as references, see WP:Reliable sources. CMD (talk) 08:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If a separatist organization is not recognized, it must have status. Unrecognized and the territory of which country. Should I mention UN documents in status? This article is written with a reference to what it means.

Sword313 (talk) 16:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to be WP:Reliable sources, covering the precise points, without WP:Synthesis. CMD (talk) 10:23, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Was this article created with a reliable source when it was created? Sword313 (talk) 12:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure which article you mean. You cannot cite Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a WP:Reliable source. CMD (talk) 14:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. CMD (talk) 07:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Republic of Artsakh

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am sorry. In the article Republic of Artsakh in the English wikipedia, they showed obvious bias. This means that the status of this so-called state is like "Unrecognized state, recognized by 3 states that are not members of the UN". That is, instead of de jure marking it as the territory of Azerbaijan, it marked the recognition of 3 unrecognized separatist "states" (Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria).

Let's come to the article of 3 unrecognized states except Arsakh. Their status is listed as "Unrecognized and de jure as the territory of the State to which they belong." However, unlike Arsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh), two separatist states belonging to Georgia have been recognized by 4 states.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Artsakh

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abkhazia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Ossetia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria Sword313 (talk) 15:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:19, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your post at WP:ARBAA2

Hello Sword313. I undid your 14 November post at the end of the AA2 arbitration case. If you want to get attention to any imbalance in the current articles, you should post on the talk page of the article you want to be changed. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 23:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Armenia–Azerbaijan border crisis

Please do not change the casualty figure from 9 to 7, seven Azerbaijani servicemen killed on 16 November alone in addition to the two previously killed. Reusekong (talk) 11:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaijan officially says seven people have been killed. And the references you put there say that 7 people died. One reference has nothing to do with November. But you insist on writing 9. On what basis? In fact, I have to reprimand you. What are you trying to do? Sword313 (talk) 13:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article covers the period of clashes starting on 12 May, not just November. Reusekong (talk) 18:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If so, I apologize. Thank you. Sword313 (talk) 18:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haji Shahin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Haji Shahin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 04:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I want to ask you something. If the author of the article has a confirmed (blue-banded) page on social networks, mainly Facebook, can this justify the presence of the article on enwiki? So I tried to write this article. Please answer. Thank you. Sword313 (talk) 02:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The articles in this article are taken from the references I shared. Please answer. Sword313 (talk) 15:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talysh Khanate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Benyamin (talk) 19:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for the information. I'm sorry, the map you posted is incorrect and has no historical basis. It is a map drawn in modern times according to someone's imagination. But the map I posted is of historical significance. Thus, the information you claim is unconstructive. Please compare the two maps and pay attention to the historical map. Sword313 (talk) 21:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. That map is not an "imagination". It shows greatest extent of Talysh Khanate based on the Akhbār Nāmeh and the Javāher Nāmeh-ye Lankarān chronicles. The Russian map only shows Russian-controlled territory during the first Russo-Persian War, neither all of the Khanate, nor the last extent of that. Benyamin (talk) 22:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. Is there a link here about this historical work? Because I knew that the lands to the south belonged to the Gilan khanate. It is true that ethnic talysh lived in the south. But I did not know that it belonged to the Talysh khanate due to the existence of ethnic Talysh. Sword313 (talk) 11:48, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gilan had not a "Khanate" system. Ruler of Gilan Hedayat-Allah Khan tried to seize the Talysh but he can't. In fact, Talish/Talysh was belonged to Gilan in the Safavid era.

For Akhbār Nāmeh, see the az:Əxbarnamə. The matter already described in Secondary sources. For example:

Mammadova, Irada (2002). "Talış (Lenkeran) Hanlığı". In Güzel, Hasan Celal; Çiçek, Kemal; Koca, Salim (eds.). Türkler (in Turkish). Vol. 7. Translated by Sadik Sadikov. Istanbul: Yeni Türkiye. pp. 101–112.

Benyamin (talk) 20:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Javad Khanate, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:23, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Haji Shahin

Hello, Sword313. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Haji Shahin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I want to ask you something. If the author of the article has a confirmed (blue-banded) page on social networks, mainly Facebook, can this justify the presence of the article on enwiki? So I tried to write this article. Please answer. The articles in this article are taken from the references I shared. Sword313 (talk) 14:57, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm HistoryofIran. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Qara Qoyunlu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. What do you mean by a reliable source? Is there no source on wikicommons? Thank you. Sword313 (talk) 15:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Naser Malek Motiei, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Why don't you let us edit the enwiki? What is the reason? How long will this last? How long will this discrimination last? For example, in the article of Cihangir Ghaffari, I mentioned the nationality of the person. Even this person was born in Azerbaijan. But you delete it. Where is the mistake here? Doesn't the fact that you intervene in this way call into question the reliability of Enviki? Please write an answer. Otherwise I will write to you. Sword313 (talk) 14:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who is “us”? Are you working with others? And “Iranian Azerbaijani” is not a nationality, read up its meaning, same goes for “discrimination”, which you so casually use against me. Next time you make the slighest form of disruption, you will be reported. This has been ongoing for years, enough is enough. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I mention in that article that the actor is "Azerbaijani" (not an Iranian Azerbaijani), will I be reported again? Will this error be counted as an edit? How can we do it? Sword313 (talk) 14:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What does nationality mean? And you didn't answer my other question; Are you working with others? --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it wrong to mention nationality in a person's article template? No, I'm alone. Allah is witness. And I want to be friends with you. Sword313 (talk) 15:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't answer my question: What does nationality mean? Cihangir Ghaffari lives in Iran, hasn't even produced a single work in Azerbaijani, was born in the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic, which was part of the Soviet Union, yet you want to replace "Iranian" with "Azerbaijani"? Why not with "Soviet"? And you certainly weren't including Allah earlier when you said "Why don't you let us edit the enwiki?". --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So it is not correct to write the ethnic identity of the people living in Iran? In case this person was born in Azerbaijan. What does writing a work in Azerbaijani have to do with national identity? This person was even born in Azerbaijan and then moved to Iran. So this person is an Azerbaijani. Or am I saying it wrong? I am not even writing about an Azerbaijani born in Iran. Sword313 (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you did it for ethnicity and not nationality? In that case see MOS:ETHNICITY. EDIT: I forgot, MOS:ETHNICITY has stuff regarding use of nationality as well, even better. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is how I understood that such a record should not be taken. Otherwise I will be blocked. I will also show you an article that is not related to Iran. For example, the article on the Republic of Artsakh.

In the article "Republic of Artsakh" in the English wikipedia, they showed obvious bias. This means that the status of this so-called state is like "Unrecognized state, recognized by 3 states that are not members of the UN". That is, instead of de jure marking it as the territory of Azerbaijan, it marked the recognition of 3 unrecognized separatist "states" (Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria).

Let's come to the article of 3 unrecognized states except Arsakh. Their status is listed as "Unrecognized and de jure as the territory of the State to which they belong." However, unlike Arsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh), two separatist states belonging to Georgia have been recognized by 4 states.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Artsakh

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abkhazia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Ossetia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria Sword313 (talk) 15:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I understood zero of that. What does this have to do with anything? See WP:WAX, and if you have concerns about Republic of Artsakh, take it to its talk page, not me. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. And I will not touch any article about Iran. See you later. Sword313 (talk) 15:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Archives908 (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is no need to mention such things. Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast was a province of Azerbaijan SSR. Why are you deleting this? What is your purpose in deleting? Sword313 (talk) 23:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have to point this out to you. Please provide a reasonable and complete reason for removing it. What bothers you? Karabakh was an autonomous province of Azerbaijan, one of the 15 republics that made up the USSR. But you write to me and complain. If the name of the country is USSR, then the name of the allied republic must be written. This is true of all wikipedia articles. But you justify this kind of thing. Sword313 (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE READ Template:Infobox person! Another editor already told you the proper format of places of birth is city, administrative region, country. Your additions are not necessary per guidelines. Archives908 (talk) 12:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 13:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karabakh Governorate General

Hello User:Sphilbrick. Why did you delete the article post? Didn't need a reference? Sword313 (talk) 16:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recognize the term "article post". Perhaps you are referring to the fact that I reverted year sequence of edits. As explained in the edit summary, one of them appears to be a substantial copyright violation. Do you disagree? S Philbrick (Talk) 20:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. I mean the article Karabakh Governorate General. I'm sorry, what do you mean by copyright? Do I have to get permission from the author for using the article as a reference? Aren't users accessing articles by typing the author's name? Sword313 (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Your edit to Karabakh Governorate General has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I understand now. Thanks for the detailed explanation. I will change the sentences and mark them. Sword313 (talk) 11:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About the leaders of the unrecognized NKR

Hello User:Boston Mayflower. In the articles of Samvel Shahramanyan, Gurgen Nersisyan, Davit Ishkhanyan and Arthur Tovmasyan, only Nagorno-Karabakh autonomy is written as their place of birth. They deleted the republic to which this autonomy belongs, and directly wrote the Soviet Union in its place. Logically, the autonomous province should not belong directly to the center of the Soviet Union, but to the republic to which it is subordinate. They deleted it many times while correcting it. Please take a look at it. Sword313 (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Caucasus

Hello User:Archives908. There is no separatist state called "Artsakh" on the territory of Azerbaijan. That's why I deleted it. So why are you restoring the deleted map? Sword313 (talk) 23:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it obvious enough? The map itself could be updated to reflect the territorial changes -or- another, more recent, political map could be used in replacement of the outdated one. You did neither and left no WP:ES. Archives908 (talk) 23:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you. So if the new map is not available, the old map should remain in place. There must be a map no matter what. Sword313 (talk) 23:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the leaders of the unrecognized NKR

Hello User:EdJohnston. In the articles of Samvel Shahramanyan, Gurgen Nersisyan, Davit Ishkhanyan and Arthur Tovmasyan, only Nagorno-Karabakh autonomy is written as their place of birth. They deleted the republic to which this autonomy belongs, and directly wrote the Soviet Union in its place. Logically, the autonomous province should not belong directly to the center of the Soviet Union, but to the republic to which it is subordinate. They deleted it many times while correcting it. Please take a look at it. Sword313 (talk) 00:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a content question which needs discussion on a talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Be it as you wish. I understand that if someone deletes it is not discussed, but when it is added it causes a discussion. Other Armenian leaders were born in Khankendi and Karabakh. And Azerbaijan SSR is written in their article. In the article about Robert Kocharyan, the word Azerbaijan SSR was deleted on March 9, 2022. With whom did the user discuss this deletion? Sword313 (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If a consensus is reached, then anyone who reverts against the consensus can be reported to admins. EdJohnston (talk) 22:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many things have been changed without consensus. Sword313 (talk) 08:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the name of the city of Stepanakert to Khankendi

Hello User:Vanjagenije. This city is now under the control of the state of Azerbaijan. The name of the city is actually and officially Khankendi. Why not change the name? Sword313 (talk) 00:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, discussion about the name change should be at the corresponding talk page (in this case Talk:Stepanakert), so that anyone can comment. Second, what do I have to do with it? Vanjagenije (talk) 08:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the answer. Sword313 (talk) 12:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generally it is not a good idea to mass remove Armenian names. I do not see any consensus to do this. Please start a discussion first. Mellk (talk) 18:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have recently made edits related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. This is a standard message to inform you that Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Mellk (talk) 18:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Qalaqayın has been nominated for merging

Category:People from Qalaqayın has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Villages of Sabirabad district has been nominated for splitting

Category:Villages of Sabirabad district has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wives of Hasan ibn Ali has been nominated for merging

Category:Wives of Hasan ibn Ali has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Churches of Sabirabad district has been nominated for splitting

Category:Churches of Sabirabad district has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hasan ibn Ali has been nominated for merging

Category:Hasan ibn Ali has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Churches under the Baku diocese has been nominated for renaming

Category:Churches under the Baku diocese has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Russian Orthodox Church, Baku diocese has been nominated for deletion

Category:Russian Orthodox Church, Baku diocese has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]