User talk:Swakutty

Welcome!

Hello, Swakutty! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Atlantic306 (talk) 21:13, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Arundhathi (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Arundhathi (TV series), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 13:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't create any more articles without enough references. If you don't have any, create them in draft space (just add Draft: in front of the article name) Ravensfire (talk) 13:46, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil Selvi (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tamil Selvi (TV series), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:28, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tamil Selvi serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tamil Selvi serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 14:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arundhathi serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arundhathi serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 14:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 06:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was requested above that you stop recreating Tamil Selvi (TV series) and Arundhathi (TV series) yet you have ignored this request. The correct action is to edit the drafts to bring them up to an acceptable standard, not to recreate poor articles that fail to meet the expectations of articles in article space. Continually recreating the articles achieves nothing other than making work for other editors who have to redirect your articles to the drafts and then nominate the redirects for speedy deletion. If you continually recreate the drafts it is likely that the pages you are creating will be protect ed so you can't create them anymore or that you will be blocked from editing, or both. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Arundhathi (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 12:07, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Less than 3 hours after the redirects were deleted again, you've recreated both articles. Please stop doing this! --AussieLegend (✉) 12:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 12:16, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the warnings that I've given you above apply to this article too, as well as any other articles that you intend recreating. If you can't properly reference an article, do not create it. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:18, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

needs references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC submissions again

As I indicated above, There is really no point submitting draft articles for review if they are unsourced. All articles require sources. This is the reason that Draft:Tamil Selvi and Draft:Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai were draftified. Since 27 July, only 5 weeks ago, you have made absolutely no attempt to improve Draft:Tamil Selvi and it remains completely unsourced. Why would you think it would be approved when the problems with this article still exist? Submitting it for review now is only wasting the time of reviewers. Please don't do that. Similarly when a submission is declined, as Draft:Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai was,[1] that means it is not ready for article space, it's inappropriate to then copy and paste the rejected draft into article space, as you did at Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai.[2] Copy and paste moves are not permitted (see below). --AussieLegend (✉) 15:07, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 15:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Run 2019 (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Run 2019 (TV series), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 21:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Run serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Run serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 00:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Run (2019 TV series) (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:TVSHOW - requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Run (2019 TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Run (2019 TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:18, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swakutty! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:18, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As Begoon wrote in this edit summary, you've been warned about wasting reviewers' time more than once. Of course you ignored that and resubmitted only a minute later. That, also of course, was rejected. You need to start taking the advice of other editors and stop being disruptive. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:41, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Run (2019 TV series) (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Run (2019 TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Run (2019 TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Run (2019 TV series) (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hugsyrup was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The one additional reference you have added since the previous review is not adequate. Please take the time to substantially improve the sourcing of this article before re-submitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Run (2019 TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Run (2019 TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hug^syrup 11:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I see you have already been warned by AussieLegend above about repeatedly submitting drafts without making any serious attempt to properly source them. In this case, you resubmitted the draft within a few hours of it being declined, and the source you added was to a page that doesn't even mention the article topic. Reviewers are not stupid - we do actually look at the sources in articles. If you continue to submit and resubmit drafts without making a sincere effort to comply with Wikipedia policies, you may be blocked or banned. Hug^syrup 11:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arundhathi (TV series) (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Adding reviews by professional critics in a "Reception" section may be useful in demonstrating notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arundhathi (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arundhathi (TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 07:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pandavar Illam (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pandavar Illam (TV series), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AussieLegend (✉) 12:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is yet another example of an exceptionally poor quality article created by you: Incorrect field names, no prose, no references, no categories etc are things that you know NOT to do and yet you have. It's getting to the point where I believe we need to discuss your continued ability to edit Wikipedia. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And yet, even after the above you went and recreated the article at Pandavar Illam (TV series). Amazing. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AussieLegend, I'm thinking your comment about ANI is right, this needs to go there for additional eyes. I think asking for a topic ban on creating new pages in main space (only in draft) and not allowing moves from Draft to Main space (must go through approval process) would be appropriate and a far better option than a block. Ravensfire (talk) 15:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ravensfire, Yep. I think the rope's run out here. I just reverted a whole bunch of IP sock edits making links from mainspace articles to Swakutty's drafts and removing the AFC tags from the top of the draft pages to try to make them look more like articles. Of course, if they are going to play those sort of games that makes even your idea of letting them create drafts questionable. -- Begoon 08:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oops - sorry, AL, forgot to include you in the ping. -- Begoon 08:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Swakutty - ongoing problems, especially WP:CIR and likely sockpuppetry. AussieLegend (✉) 10:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Begoon and Ravensfire: to the discussion. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (help!) 15:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This block will not automatically stop, but can be lifted by any administrator once you've shown you can engage with those who are trying to help you understand the problems with your edits. Guy (help!) 15:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me the proper reason for blocking me. Guy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swakutty (talk • contribs) 02:47, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guy explained that you were blocked for disruptive editing which is the "proper" reason. If you had bothered to read the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1018#User:Swakutty - ongoing problems, especially WP:CIR and likely sockpuppetry, which is linked to in the section titled "Notice" above, you would have seen some examples of the disruptive editing and you should be aware of that anyway from the many, many warnings on this page. --AussieLegend (✉) 03:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add, Swakutty, you do need to carefully read the linked ANI discussion, and review all the warning messages left for you on this page, and in its history which you removed, because, until you can convince an administrator that you understand and acknowledge the many serious issues there have been with your editing, and explain how things will be different moving forwards, you are not likely to be unblocked.

If you have been editing for, or in the expectation of, any payment or reward - or editing logged out, or in conjunction with anybody else, to avoid scrutiny, then you really need to disclose that now too, because if you are honest it may count in your favour, and if you are not it will be discovered anyway. -- Begoon 04:25, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect the paid editing is by Sun TV, or a related entity, given the history of articles edited and images uploaded. Swakutty, you've been VERY clearly told of the issues others have with your edits. You have been given a rather large number of warning notes and messages on this page, a lot of which you've deleted which means you've read them. The post AussieLegend made on ANI (that they linked to) is a good, concise summary of the issues. Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, that means you have to work with people, not ignore them and shove your way past. You have to communicate with editors. You have to be honest and upfront. And please remember the block is on YOU, the person, not just hte account. Creating a new account or editing as an IP to get around the block will just result in the new account / IP being blocked and would really reduce any chance of this account being unblocked. Ravensfire (talk) 14:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swakutty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me.I need to edit article.I will not make this mistake anymore.

Decline reason:

This doesn't even come close to addressing the problems you have caused. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given that there is conclusive evidence that you've been engaged in sockpuppetry, which has happened since you were blocked, I don't expect any admin to unblock you, especially since you haven't specifically addressd the original reason for your block. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Which "mistake"? Sockpuppetry, deceptive edits, undisclosed paid editing, disruption, wasting of reviewer time...etc...etc...? You speak as though you made one simple "mistake" when in reality you weren't making "mistakes" at all - you were trying every (incompetent) deceptive trick you could think of to get your own way, and ignoring all advice and requests to change your behaviour and be honest. If anything was a "mistake" you made I'd say that was the assumption that other editors were too stupid to see through your obvious deceptions.

I can't speak for potentially reviewing admins, but I'd strongly suspect you'll need to show much more acknowledgement, honesty and understanding of the many reasons why you are blocked and give much clearer guarantees and very convincing reasons why anything would be different if you are unblocked. -- Begoon 07:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not make changes to closed unblock appeals, as you did here and here. Doing so subverts the unblock process, and is (yet another) disruptive behaviour. You are free to post a new unblock appeal if you wish to do so, but if you continue in this vein that option is likely to be removed as well, along with your ability to edit this page. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. What should I do if I have to unlock? Yunshui ^雲

Never sign your comments as another editor. It is evident that you do not have the necessary level of competence to edit here; your talkpage access has now also been revoked for continued disruption. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Valli serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Valli serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tamil Selvi (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more sources about the shows. Please add reviews if you can find them. First one is a WP:ROUTINE announcements, and the rest either seem unreliable, or they are just listings of the show. The last reference doesn't even mention the subject!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tamil Selvi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tamil Selvi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kanmani serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kanmani serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Run (2019 TV series) (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Run (Indian TV series) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Run (2019 TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Run (2019 TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:10, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Minnale serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Minnale serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arundhathi (TV series) has been accepted

Arundhathi (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 20:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pandavar Illam (TV series) has been accepted

Pandavar Illam (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Minnale serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Minnale serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai

Hello, Swakutty. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mr. and Mrs. Chinnathirai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:16, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bharathi Kannamma serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bharathi Kannamma serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Azhagu serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Azhagu serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Astro Vaanavil.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Astro Vaanavil.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Astro Vinmeen HD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Astro Vinmeen HD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bigg Boss Tamil 3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bigg Boss Tamil 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sevanthi serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sevanthi serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sevanthi serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sevanthi serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sevanthi serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sevanthi serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anjali serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anjali serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:47, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wife Kaila Life.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wife Kaila Life.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kadaikutty Singam serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kadaikutty Singam serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pandian Stores serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pandian Stores serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arundhathi (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arundhathi (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arundhathi (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Karnataka (talk) 17:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chandralekha serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chandralekha serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Azhagu serial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Azhagu serial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]