Jump to content

User talk:Superchunk22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2016

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 02:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry about that, I'm still kinda new to this, to be honest. Superchunk22 (talk) 04:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or mess content, as you did at Eddie Murphy filmography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 07:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry about that. I forgot to cite a source, I'll try not to do that again. Superchunk22 (talk) 05:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User talk:216.252.30.100— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shared universe. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Rob13Talk 08:28, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Plainfield, Illinois: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Rollback

[edit]

Hi. Just wondering if you are aware of the so-called rollback tool that lets you revert edits with a single click. It might be helpful to your counter-vandalism work. Cheers, <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 21:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just a tip

[edit]

Hi there, just wanted to give you a tip about a guideline you might not be aware of. Whenever you revert vandalism, be sure to leave a warning on the vandal's talk page. Take a look at that link and familiarize yourself with the templates at your disposal. bibliomaniac15 04:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. 80.221.159.67 (talk) 06:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism reversions

[edit]

Hello, thank you for your efforts to remove vandalism from Wikipedia. However, when you do this, please make sure you follow the instructions at Help:Reverting. I had to fix up your revert at Bread. Also, after reverting vandalism, there should be no difference between the old edit and the new one; This was not the case with your edit to Bill Clinton sexual misconduct allegations. I checked a few more and they seem fine, however. Graham87 07:43, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is just why Rollback is a vandal-fighter's best friend. Or Twinkle, too. The revert functions in that rolls back every single edit made by a user. So much easier, so much quicker. If you want to know more, you can always join the CVUA. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 17:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of 2D animated films

[edit]

I redirected it because the list was empty. Also, since 2D animated films are far more numerous, it would basically be List of animated films minus 3D CGI films. Trivialist (talk) 00:15, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User page creation

[edit]

Hi there, I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia. Why did you create this user's user page? I don't see any indication that they asked you to do that. Editors are allowed to maintain their own user pages and you shouldn't create or edit them without a reason to do so. Some people prefer having a blank user page. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't know about that. It was kind of an accident. I kinda got mixed up and confused there, sorry. Superchunk22 06:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for the reply. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:32, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me

[edit]

My edit to A-1Pictures was correct. Did you not do any research about it? It's real OblivionWingTech (talk) 10:52, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first of all, why don't you cite your sources to prove that your edit is correct? Second, the article Shelter: The Animation doesn't exist, so I had a hard time believing that the edit was true at that point. If you can prove that your edit is correct by citing your sources, then I will leave it alone. Superchunk22 16:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 October

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apaches Entertainment (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chenzw was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chenzw  Talk  10:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Superchunk22, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chenzw  Talk  10:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-vandalism4

[edit]

I have reverted your edit to Template:Uw-vandalism4 as it changed a vandalism warning into an unsourced addition warning. Please take more care when editing templates that are widely used. Thanks. TwoTwoHello (talk) 00:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apaches Entertainment (November 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback invited: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Reconciling_Legality_of_cannabis_by_country_and_Legal_and_medical_status_of_cannabis.3F

Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 02:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Superchunk22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Ernst Haeckel

[edit]

Please check the wp:edit history to make sure that wp:vandalism is fully removed. You got the swastikas, but did not replace deleted content. the vandal's edit Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, dude. I was just about to get that, but then you deleted it instead. Superchunk22 (talk) 09:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The advantage of having a full keyboard and mouse! Jim1138 (talk) 11:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Per WP:YT and general editing principles, please don't provide links to potential copyright violations as you have done here. It's highly questionable that "random stuffs" is the copyright holder of that content. If you don't know, err on the side of "it's probably a copyright violation." As for the article, a previous deletion discussion was held in 2010 and the result was to delete. If you think the article should exist, you will need to adequately demonstrate that the subject has received significant coverage from independent reliable sources. See WP:NOTABILITY and WP:GNG. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I didn't really think about it. Superchunk22 (talk) 08:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reindeer alert

[edit]

Hello! I wanted to give you a friendly heads-up: Santa Claus's reindeer get's hit pretty hard this time of year, and nearly all the edits are either vandalism or violating consensus. The one you accepted yesterday was one of the latter. If you're ever unsure about the accepted spelling of various reindeer, just look at the commented-out text in the code. It includes a reminder of the original spellings (weird as we may find them now).

And welcome to the world of edit-reviewing in the month of December! Cheers —jameslucas (" " / +) 03:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry about that. Thanks for pointing it out. Happy Holidays! Superchunk22 (talk) 06:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 December

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Rabbit (2018 film)

[edit]

There is a draft article in progress at Draft:Peter Rabbit (film). Normal procedure is to work on the draft article then move it to article space once principal photography has been confirmed (not just planned) to have actually started per WP:NFF. Peter Rabbit (2018 film) is the wrong location for the article as well and will be changed to a redirect to proper film article location, the article needs to be at Peter Rabbit (film) when it is created. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Star (2017 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The Star (2017 film). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Star (2017 film) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Star (2017 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Star (2017 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 3 February

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

[edit]

July 2017

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Columbia Pictures films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

[edit]

List of 2D animated films listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of 2D animated films. Since you had some involvement with the List of 2D animated films redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:59, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

[edit]

November 2017

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Columbia Pictures films. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm sorry, I just thought that it would be okay to add that to the article since these films are being released by Sony. And Columbia Pictures is releasing Soldado, so I didn't know that I was doing anything wrong. I'm sorry, and I won't keep doing stuff like this. Superchunk22 (talk) 06:06, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to include a citation a reliable source that says Columbia is producing and/or distributing those films. For example, Variety Insight, which is heavily cited already in the article. Posters, trailers, and other primary sources are generally not considered reliable per this consensus. This is to prevent people from guessing based on logos that appear on promotional material. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

[edit]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Superchunk22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Addams Family (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM. Too soon.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhDv2.0 20:15, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

[edit]

Nomination of The Addams Family (upcoming film) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Addams Family (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Addams Family (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 12:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarah Smith (producer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elisabeth Murdoch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

[edit]

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

[edit]

Hello, Superchunk22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hullabaloo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 12:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

[edit]

Your draft article, Draft:Apaches Entertainment

[edit]

Hello, Superchunk22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apaches Entertainment".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 13:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

[edit]

Your draft article, Draft:Vivo (film)

[edit]

Hello, Superchunk22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vivo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 14:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

[edit]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Superchunk22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

[edit]

Glitch Techs moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Glitch Techs, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AussieLegend () 19:06, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

[edit]

"The Addams Family (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Addams Family (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the The Addams Family (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:01, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Glitch Techs, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

[edit]

Missing

[edit]

Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of adult animated films for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of adult animated films is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of adult animated films until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GedUK  10:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]