Welcome! You are currently at the archive of my talk page for the years 2017 and 2018. In case you want to leave me a message, click here, and don't forget to sign it adding ~~~~.
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! –CaroleHenson (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. I am happy to help if you need anything. There's the Teahouse mentioned above... or you may be interested in joining some of the WikiProjects, both excellent resources for someone new.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andorra–Azerbaijan relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Happy editing and we'll wishes for the New Year 2018
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Super Dromaeosaurus: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 11:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Hi, welcome to the sometimes confusing world of Wikipedia and it's rather illogical treatment of monotypic taxa. Firstly, thank you for your edit in Sasakiopus salebrosus, that's how I would have liked to have created the article. However, Wikipedia has decided that the species title on a monotypic taxon should go no lower than the generic name, unless the English vernacular name is "more notable". So European rabbit but not Oryctolagus cuniculus or Oryctolagus. I am not going to revert the move, because I agree with it personally but it goes not follow the accepted conventions on Wikipedia.Quetzal1964(talk)21:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Unincorporated communities in Marshall County, Minnesota
Hi-I asked one of the administrators to delete the Unincorporated communities in Marshall County, Minnesota that you started. There is a category for the unincorporated communities in Marshall County, Minnesota that is being used. I am not sure why you started the category. Thank you-RFD (talk) 23:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@RFD: Hi, RFD. It was just an error, I saw that that category was not created and I decided to do it, but the category had a point instead of a comma. From this I realized after creating the category. SuperΨDro08:59, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Horseshoe crab. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the testWikipedia. Thank you. Dr.K.23:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there I made a revert on the Jun Wang (scientist) page as I think there was confusion with him and a different scientist. Let me know if you have any questions! PaulWicks (talk) 10:59, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I added E. grandis, but I'm surprised that a poorly preserved species like that would be used for a GA. Has the confusion around it been resolved? This seems to be agianst the advice on previous scale diagrams that I've gotten, so that's why I'm asking. Are things just different for eurypterids? --Slate Weasel (talk | contribs) 16:31, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Super Dromaeosaurus, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have only just noticed this but when you added links to Patagonykinae and Parvicursorinae on the Alvarezsauridae article in February you didn't check where they lead. They were links which lead back to Alvarezsauridae causing them to be circular redirects. Plese can you make sure that the link does not redirect back to the article you are linking from in the future. Lavalizard101 (talk) 17:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know, I did it intentionally. I think all clades in taxoboxes should have links, regardless of whether their page is a redirect. Anyway, that was months ago. SuperΨDro17:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I recently noticed your edits to the page I made which I appreciate. Despite this, I noticed you classified the page Pajanelia longifolia as referring to the genus. I'm slightly confused, as pajanelia longifolia is not a genus but a monotypic species within the genus pajanelia. If you wish to classify the page as referring to the genus, or both the genus and the species as one entity, then that's logical. But there's already a page devoted to the Pajanelia genus which links to our page Pajanelia longifolia, also classifying it as a "species". I'm not sure who's wrong here, although I wish to seek the truth from this matter. Does the page in question need to be separate from the genus page, and consider itself the "species" page, or does the old page need to be removed?
Thanks. That makes sense, it shouldn't have been created as two separate entities in the first place. I just saw that a page was missing and created one. Obviously I'm still new to Wikipedia, and I'm still reading into the fine details. I appreciate your edits to the new page. RussianAfroMan (talk) 08:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, we've all had similar beginnings. And do not feel guilty, the one who did it wrong was the creator of the page of the genus by not fulfilling that convention. SuperΨDro08:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Super Dromaeosaurus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Horseshoe crab. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the testWikipedia. Thank you. Dr. K. 23:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
