User talk:Suonii180/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Suonii180. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Suonii180, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Suonii180! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Naypta (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC) |
hi
Hi Suonii180, i see that you have added your name to Wikipedia:WikiProject Children's literature/Participants, welcome! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
- Here are some pages that i have found to be particularly helpful -
Introduction, The five pillars of Wikipedia, editing pages, How to write an article (especially sourcing an article), Simplified Manual of Style, and Writing an article.
- See you around.
Coolabahapple (talk) 23:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC) - @Coolabahapple: Thanks! I've only created a few articles so far so the guides have been very helpful :-)
Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
Thank you for your recent articles, including Zoe Pilger, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Pppery 00:09, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, and a request
Hello! Thank you for evaluating the Charles Harvey Combe-article. I am glad that this article I created is promoted to start-class. But what I was wondering: could you also take a look at the Barbara Ayrton-Gould and George Dallas (Labour politician)-articles? A lot has happened since they were regarded as a stub, back in 2009. Best regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 08:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Suonii180. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of 2017 in archaeology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 in archaeology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 in archaeology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KAP03 (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| Keep up the good work writing articles like Francesca Segal. We need more people writing about Women Writers. If you haven't see it yet, I highly recommending working with Wikipedia:WikiProject Women writers. Its a great collaboration between different editors, who want to increase the coverage of Women on Wikipedia. Sadads (talk) 01:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC) |
Unreferenced clean-up template
Hi Suonii180, please note that I reverted your inclusion of the "unreferenced" clean-up template at Jemison High School as the article included the official website in the infobox and in the external links section of the article, which is a primary source for verifying information in the article. The template is only to be used on articles with no citations at all. The instructions for use of the unreferenced template can be found at Template:Unreferenced.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Revisions to Talk pages
I notice that when you have revised the headers on Talk pages that there is no historical content. This seems odd. What have you done to removes old discussions? On some of these pages, the discussion has resolved issues, which will only revive if the content can not be found. However, as I can not see the old content, this may have been removed at a different stage? Shipsview (talk)
- @Shipsview: Hi, sorry for the late reply, I've been away for a few weeks and had very limited access to wifi. The only edits I'm aware I've made to talk pages has been to access the quality and importance of unassessed articles for wikiprojects and if I've deleted any sections or old discussions to talk pages it's been completely accidental. If this has happened, please feel free to revert any edits I've made.(Suonii180 (talk) 21:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC))
A page you started (Emma Richter) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Emma Richter, Suonii180!
Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Mduvekot (talk) 15:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Scottish Vintage Bus Museum) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Scottish Vintage Bus Museum, Suonii180!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've added a picture and a link to the Wikimedia Commons category.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Blythwood (talk) 05:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Zulma Carraud) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Zulma Carraud, Suonii180!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've added another source and a link to her published works. Hope that's OK.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Blythwood (talk) 20:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.
A page you started (Eila Campbell) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Eila Campbell, Suonii180!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Looks good. As she is a published author I've added an authority control link which connects to her published works on library catalogues.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Blythwood (talk) 08:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Autopatrolled right
Hello Louise, thanks for all your contributions. I notice that you’ve now written more than 25 articles, which makes you eligible to have your account marked as auto patrolled. This would mean that your articles get automatically marked as reviewed, without needing manual patrol. As I can tell that you know what you’re doing, would you be happy to be nominated for this right? I’m keen to reduce the number of valid articles new page reviewers need to examine.
You can nominate yourself if you want or I’d be very happy to do it for you. Blythwood (talk) 12:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Blythwood: Thank you! If you could nominate me, that would be great Suonii180 (talk) 00:30, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- OK, that's great. I've nominated you. I've patrolled your latest article–if you could add authcon tags to bio articles from authors from now on that would be great, though. Blythwood (talk) 05:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
Hi Suonii180, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Alex Shih (talk) 05:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewing
 |
| Hello, Suonii180.
I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. |
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Suonii180. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
1795 in Russia
Hi! Thank you for your good contribution to "1795 in Russia"! For next time, however: don't remove the sections "Births" and "Deaths" from a Year-page. Those sections are suppose to be there. They may have been empty, but the only thing to do is to fill them, not delete them. And they are very easy to fill: just look in the "Category: 1795 births" and "Deaths" and you will find plenty of Russian names. I have just done so. And if you don't want to fill those empty sections yourself, just leave them there for someone else to do one day, but please do not delete them. Thank you, and keep up the good work!--Aciram (talk) 12:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Suonii180. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Suggestion for wiki page.
Hi there. I was wondering where would I suggest a wikipage for the Hail Mary murder. It was very famous in the 1990's where a group of mafia-like teenagers decided to kill one of their ex members by a range of methods. It is a very interesting case and one I believe is notable for many reasons. One being the fact it was one of the biggest murder trials in the county's history. Uncoveringcelebrityhistory (talk) 01:34, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, you can put up a request on Wikipedia:Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Law as there's a section for crimes on there. You could also see if a related WikiProject, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, has their own requested articles list. --Suonii180 (talk) 12:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Children's Literature Project Relaunch
- Children's Literature Project Relaunch December 2018
Hi, I'm Barkeep49! You're receiving this message because at one time you had signed up for the Children's literature project. While the project has been largely inactive, I'm hoping make the project active once again. I think there are a lot of exciting directions we could take the project and I would love if you would join me by adding your name back to the active members list.
- Recognized Content
Congrats to the following editors for having newly recognized content in November and December:
 The Adventures of Abdi by IndianBio
|
 When Megan Went Away by Collin
|
Have some ideas of activities for the project? Need some help? Join in at the project talk page
Unless you sign-up as a member at the project you will not receive any future newsletters. If you would like to sign-up for just the newsletters or want to be an active member but not get the newsletters you can do that here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:56, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you + invitation
 |
Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks! |
Hmlarson (talk) 20:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Women in Red
Hi there, Suonii180, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have an experienced editor joining the project. I see you have already created many biographies of women. I now look forward to seeing many more. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events with WIR
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July events from Women in Red!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.
You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 14:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December events with WIR
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red
|
Hello Suonii180,
You seem to be doing great work on the days of the year pages. Thank you for your diligence there, adding new entries with solid references. You should consider joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Days of the year. Heck, at this point, you appear to be a de-facto member, but you could still list yourself in the Members section.
Thanks and keep up the great work! Toddst1 (talk) 13:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Barnstar
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
| For your awesome work on the WP:DOY project, specifically bringing March 9 up to a useful, accurate and WP:VERIFIABLE standard. There's a heck of a lot of tedious work there. Awesome job! Toddst1 (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC) |
March 2020 at Women in Red
   Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bell (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alison Bell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
References
Hi! References in January 3: Faisal–Weizmann Agreement; Faisal-Weizmann agreement/Non-UN document and Faisal–Weizmann Agreements Clarice Reis (talk) 15:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 18
My source is on the Wikipedia page for battle of Alesia.
Regards Epicc1235647 (talk) 19:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Epicc1235647 Hi! Any additions to days of the year articles now need to be referenced or they will be reverted, please see Template:DOY page notice or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Days of the year. The guidelines were changed due to the high number of errors and the number of links to articles with no or little reliable sources. Any links added before these guidelines were implemented are currently in the process of being referenced or removed.
--Suonii180 (talk) 20:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for July 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kelly (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kelly Pace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
"1952 disestablishments in Wales" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1952 disestablishments in Wales. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 26#1952 disestablishments in Wales until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DannyS712 (talk) 15:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging