User talk:Suonii180/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Suonii180. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
November 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Laura Woods
Hello Suonii180 Thank you for your message and also for providing information regarding the etiquette requirement for source citation. I have noticed with some Wikipedia entries for persons living that birth dates are included yet exist without source citation. Might such situations be due to editorial lapses? Some clarity would be appreciated. However, following on from the information you have kindly provided, could you please verify whether accredited "Blue Tick" Twitter users verification of their own birth dates are acceptable source citations? Thank you,
Jamie 80.192.112.17 (talk) 10:17, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hi! If there are unreferenced dates of birth on articles then they should be sourced or removed, especially if they are Biographies of living persons. For using Twitter sources please see WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:TWITTER-EL. I usually err on the side of caution when it comes to using Twitter or other social media as a source especially with personal information however if the account is verified and the information looks genuine then it's usually ok to use although alternative sources are preferable. WP:BLPPRIVACY highlights the issues of including personal details like dates of birth that haven't been widely published in secondary sources. Hope that's helped and let me know if you have any other questions. Suonii180 (talk) 12:35, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2021
- From the editor: Different stories, same place
- News and notes: The sockpuppet who ran for adminship and almost succeeded
- Discussion report: Editors brainstorm and propose changes to the Requests for adminship process
- Recent research: Welcome messages fail to improve newbie retention
- Community view: Reflections on the Chinese Wikipedia
- Traffic report: James Bond and the Giant Squid Game
- Technology report: Wikimedia Toolhub, winners of the Coolest Tool Award, and more
- Serendipity: How Wikipedia helped create a Serbian stamp
- Book review: Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality
- WikiProject report: Redirection
- Humour: A very Wiki crossword
Kenneth MacAilpin
The page for Kenneth MacAilpin I King of scots. A pedigree chart link that is to show Kenneth in this chart is not a correct link. The link of pedigree charts are in the 1860’s. Could someone please correct this error, for researchers to find the actual pedigree chart. Thank you so much. Dmac740 2601:805:C700:EF0:532:5882:D78C:F703 (talk) 00:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
December 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 29 November 2021
- In the media: Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2021
- Deletion report: What we lost, what we gained
- From a Wikipedia reader: What's Matt Amodio?
- Arbitration report: ArbCom in 2021
- Discussion report: On the brink of change – RFA reforms appear imminent
- Technology report: What does it take to upload a file?
- WikiProject report: Interview with contributors to WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
- Recent research: Vandalizing Wikipedia as rational behavior
- Humour: A very new very Wiki crossword
Sobada
You reverted my edit to Sobada due to neutrality. However, I did not deviate from a neutral point of view. 122.61.78.36 (talk) 08:44, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Recent edits to Eleven (Stranger Things), you sure?
I noticed your revert [1] (removing "Steve Harrington" as father) on Eleven (Stranger Things) and subsequent note to the editor's talk page [2]. Are you sure it's incorrect? I don't know myself, since I don't follow the show. It's a fictional character, and I thought you might have been prejudiced by ClueBot's earlier revert. So, I just wanted you to reflect. Cheers. signed, Willondon (talk) 20:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Willondon Hi! Yeah, definitely sure, there have been similar edits on Steve Harrington's article. I haven't seen the show in a while so I double checked when I first saw the edits on his article but I couldn't find any sources to back up the info added. Suonii180 (talk) 20:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Pierce Brosnan
He only voiced 007 in ONE game James Bond 007: Everything or Nothing and that was it.81.101.7.190 (talk) 15:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Infobox person edits
Not sure why you are removing parameters like this. These are cosmetic edits that make no difference in the rendered output and should only be done in conjunction with more substantial changes. Also, you are actually making conflicts errors because this infobox can't have other_name and alias at the same time. You apparently aren't doing a Show Preview. MB 22:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
@MB: Apologies, I usually check previews but I must have gotten a little careless, I'll be more careful in future. Usually my edits regarding infobox parameters do include other edits such as spelling errors, removing spaces before or between refs, correcting formatting, links or urls or changing the infobox to a more appropriate one. I mainly started going through maintenance categories for articles with incorrect infobox parameters on bios as I had started noticing inappropriate parameters on female bios regarding dress size, measurements and other similar parameters. While these don't show up on articles, they are not appropriate and shouldn't be included in infoboxes. I figured I would remove other unknown and deprecated parameters so that the Infoboxes would be easier for others to edit as I've found a lot of spelling errors that are easy to overlook. Again, sorry for the repeated parameters, usually if there is an incorrect parameter that I can replace with one that can be formatted correctly on the infobox person template then I try to fix it but again I hadn't realised that I had gotten careless with previewing my edits. Suonii180 (talk) 21:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 Women in Red
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 28 December 2021
- From the editor: Here is the news
- News and notes: Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements
- Serendipity: Born three months before her brother?
- In the media: The past is not even past
- Arbitration report: A new crew for '22
- By the numbers: Four billion words and a few numbers
- Deletion report: We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus"
- Gallery: Wikicommons presents: 2021
- Traffic report: Spider-Man, football and the departed
- Crossword: Another Wiki crossword for one and all
- Humour: Buying Wikipedia
Article need to Published
Hi Soni
How are you hope you are doing well
i need your help regarding the article which is currently pending for review can you please delet the previoues and published the new article ? Article Name Daily Talib Which is Currently in Draft 116.71.42.82 (talk) 06:32, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Steve Kirsch Page
The spike protein IS dangerous. The removed text stated that he "falsely claimed" the spike protein is dangerous. Indeed, the Covid-19 virus isnt the real danger, its the spike proteins that it creates that is the danger — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.125.64.245 (talk) 21:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- When removing content you should provide an explanation in the edit summary and if the information is sourced then it would be better to discuss it on the talk page first. Suonii180 (talk) 21:30, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi
Stop removing my edits because they are correct thanks! 2001:56A:7B14:CC00:DDF2:13F3:4A27:E79D (talk) 17:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not saying it's incorrect, I'm saying that you need to provide sources. Please see WP:CITE and WP:RELIABLE. It is the responsibility of the editor adding information to find a source for it. If you have any questions then feel free to ask me or at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Suonii180 (talk) 17:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Reply
Hi! It is correct and do not say it is not incorrect! They left in 2020 because of COVID and I even work at the zoo and it is true! 2001:56A:7B14:CC00:DDF2:13F3:4A27:E79D (talk) 17:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi
Are you a real person because you can check at zoo website and see they left in 2020 due to COVID! You should trust me! Thanks 2001:56A:7B14:CC00:DDF2:13F3:4A27:E79D (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi
Can you please stop removing it because it is false information and the gibbons and tapir replaced the pandas! This is the truth! Thanks 2001:56A:7B14:CC00:DDF2:13F3:4A27:E79D (talk) 17:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi
I need help to change the info at the zoo and I have a question for you if that is ok with you? 2001:56A:7B14:CC00:DDF2:13F3:4A27:E79D (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
han jieun
hello, i forgot to add the source i just saw on korean internet about han jieun age, here is the link https://namu.wiki/w/%ED%95%9C%EC%A7%80%EC%9D%80(%EB%B0%B0%EC%9A%B0) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.252.110.101 (talk) 21:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deletion of Audio Science Review
Hi, I have a few significant new sources for the article on Audio Science Review and I want to improve the article based on these sources.
The most significant is the Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-apple-amazon-and-spotify-are-embracing-hi-def-music-a-guide-to-lossless-streaming-11624680000
"In that compression, an algorithm strips detail from sounds it calculates you’ll never hear or notice anyway, explained Amir Majidimehr, founder of Audio Science Review, a website focused on the science and engineering of audio."
There are also a number of interviews, two on private websites (Daniel Miesller https://danielmiessler.com/podcast/interview-amir-majidimehr-audiophile-industry-disruptor/ and Merrill Audio https://ckarchive.com/b/lmuehmh78e5o) and several on YouTube.
There are also 5-10 mentions on blogs, and countless mentions on audio fora.
Thank you PozzASR (talk) 17:33, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- @PozzASR: Hi! I don't think the Wall Street Journal article contributes much to the notability of Audio Science Review as the quoted statement only mentions it in passing and does not provide in-depth coverage of the website.
Also most YouTube videos should not be used as references as per WP:RSPYT. Blogs are also often self-published sources and most of the time they shouldn't be used as sources as per WP:SELFPUBLISH.
If you are thinking of creating the article please read Help:Your first article and WP:AFC. For help on sources please see WP:REFBEGIN and
Let me know if you have any questions or alternatively you can ask at WP:TEAHOUSE. Suonii180 (talk) 11:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Suonii180: Thank you. I was one of the people that maintained the ASR wiki article before it was deleted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Audio_Science_Review If I understand you correctly you believe that the assembled sources are not notable and ASR overall does not merit an entry? PozzASR (talk) 15:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- @PozzASR: I don't think the sources provide enough notability although I didn't listen to the interview due to the length but if it provides specific in-depth details about Audio Science Review then it might be useful however the summary of the interview seems to focus more on Amir Majidimehr. Podcasts are also not a source which I generally use and so I'm not familiar with how they're viewed in terms of reliability. It may also be useful to get second opinions from the other editors from the deletion discussion as it was a while ago and I can no longer remember what was included in the article and what sources where available at the time. Suonii180 (talk) 11:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, and FYI
Hi Louise. I spent some time at the Joey Batey article, after a young person in our household mentioned his talent. While reading, I went to the first few sources (as I always do), but found they did not contain his birthplace and DOB. Further looking revealed that even the "Toss a Coin..." for which he is apparently famous, is not accompanied by a citation, likewise for the statement that he sings in the episodes where he is acting. (Such may seem obvious, but there is no guarantee that an actor also sings. If stated, it must be from some source—Varsity.co.uk, The Guardian, Variety, Hollywood Reporter, or some such.)
In any case, I noticed you had done earlier referencing work there, and I wanted to thank you for that work, and then to let you know that even more is needed, if you have the time. Cheers, all the best. 2601:246:C700:558:987E:3974:6BA7:8C8C (talk) 08:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your edits on the article as well. It definitely needs more sourcing and I'm hoping to go back to it at some point but I've not had time to search for other sources yet. Suonii180 (talk) 12:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Quick question
Hi,
I was just curious as to why video games are not notable enough for days of the year Wikipedia pages. I would like further clarification on the policy and not trying to start an argument or anything. I think video game releases can be just as important as other things on that page since they are very relevant to our current times. Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:2921:3900:B50B:9B8D:AC14:F7B8 (talk) 23:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi! Due to the large and ever increasing size of Days of the Year articles, only events that are internationally significant are usually included in the events section. As there are a large amount of video games released each year it would add too much to each of the DOY articles especially as video games have their own year articles such as 2022 in video games and it's more appropriate for them to be placed there. Let me know if you have any other questions, Suonii180 (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2022
- Special report: WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment
- News and notes: Feedback for Board of Trustees election
- Interview: CEO Maryana Iskander "four weeks in"
- Black History Month: What are you doing for Black History Month?
- WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured
- Arbitration report: New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2021
- Obituary: Twofingered Typist
- Essay: The prime directive
- In the media: Fuzzy-headed government editing
- Recent research: Articles with higher quality ratings have fewer "knowledge gaps"
- Crossword: Cross swords with a crossword
February with Women in Red
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
change to visualization article
Hello,
I did make a change, and I had a reason, but I can not remember what it was that I did. Is there any way to see what the change was so I can decide to defend it or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C65:767F:FF41:BC92:D401:7136:8C74 (talk) 01:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
My edits to Havana Syndrome
Havana Syndrome is an alleged illness as there is no conclusive cause for the claimed symptoms. Until more evidence is discovered wikipedia's neutrality policy means it should be described as an alleged illness. 122.151.184.34 (talk) 15:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
2nd message.
Hey my friend. My name is Divine, the HipHop Doctor Lazarus manager. I noticed you change/deleted my add-on’s. Kindly reinstate them, thanks. Divine7i (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Divine7i: Hi, some of the information you added to the infobox is not mentioned anywhere else in the article and no sources were provided so I won't add it back in. As you have a conflict of interest with Lazarus it would be better if you discussed the changes you wish to be made on the talk page first using Template:Request edit, please see WP:ER for more information. Regards, Suonii180 (talk) 17:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Responding
I did adequately leave a reason why. I left an edit summary. Indicating that I was deleting names as they were non-notable. There is zero indicia of notability of them. They do not have wp articles - nor RS refs - and should therefore not be restored without addressing those issues. --2603:7000:2143:8500:8549:D4C9:9252:D878 (talk) 17:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- You left the edit summary "d nn" which does not sufficiently explain why you removed the content. In future, leave clear explanations in edit summaries about the reason that you're removing information. Suonii180 (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- NN is commonly understood as non notable. D as delete. And in any event - you (re)-added information that was uncited, challenged, and deleted .. without providing an article or an RS ref. That is clearly not ok. Under wp rules. Lmk (let me know) if you would like me to provide the source for that assertion. 2603:7000:2143:8500:8549:D4C9:9252:D878 (talk) 17:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Olympic Truce
Hello Suonii80,
The truce lasts until a week after the end of the Paralympics and the Forbes article states that the IOC sees it that way.
- Apologies, I was unaware the truce lasted for a week afterwards. Suonii180 (talk) 17:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 27 February 2022
- From the team: Selection of a new Signpost Editor-in-Chief
- News and notes: Impacts of Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Special report: A presidential candidate's team takes on Wikipedia
- In the media: Wiki-drama in the UK House of Commons
- Technology report: Community Wishlist Survey results
- WikiProject report: 10 years of tea
- Featured content: Featured Content returns
- Deletion report: The 10 most SHOCKING deletion discussions of February
- Recent research: How editors and readers may be emotionally affected by disasters and terrorist attacks
- Arbitration report: Parties remonstrate, arbs contemplate, skeptics coordinate
- Gallery: The vintage exhibit
- Traffic report: Euphoria, Pamela Anderson, lies and Netflix
- News from Diff: The Wikimania 2022 Core Organizing Team
- Crossword: A Crossword, featuring Featured Articles
- Humour: Notability of mailboxes
Changing a photo on my wikipedia page
Suoniii180,
I am Terrence Roberts and I noticed that someone had posted a photo of me on my Wikipedia page. Ignorant of the rules at that time, I changed the photo to one I preferred but was told that I needed to get permission to make such a change. I now request permission to change the photo. Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Signed: Terrence Roberts ^^^^ (My version of a tilde!)ǒ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trob366 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Trob366 Hi! Requesting edits is usually done though edit request templates or on the talk page of the article you want to make changes to. Please see Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard. Suonii180 (talk) 00:00, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 27 March 2022
- From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
- News and notes: Of safety and anonymity
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps
- Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks
- In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
- Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
- Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now
- Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon
- Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors
- Traffic report: War, what is it good for?
- Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
- From the archives: Burn, baby burn
- Essay: Yes, the sky is blue
- Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja
- On the bright side: The bright side of news
The Signpost: 24 April 2022
- News and notes: Double trouble
- In the media: The battlegrounds outside and inside Wikipedia
- Special report: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (Part 2)
- Technology report: 8-year-old attribution issues in Media Viewer
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content from March
- Interview: On a war and a map
- Serendipity: Wikipedia loves photographs, but hates photographers
- Traffic report: Justice Jackson, the Smiths, and an invasion
- News from the WMF: How Smart is the SMART Copyright Act?
- Humour: Really huge message boxes
- From the archives: Wales resigned WMF board chair in 2006 reorganization
May 2022 at Women in Red
Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 29 May 2022
- From the team: A changing of the guard
- News and notes: 2022 Wikimedia Board elections
- Community view: Have your say in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board elections
- In the media: Putin, Jimbo, Musk and more
- Special report: Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Discussion report: Portals, April Fools, admin activity requirements and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19 revisited
- Technology report: A new video player for Wikimedia wikis
- Featured content: Featured content of April
- Interview: Wikipedia's pride
- Serendipity: Those thieving image farms
- Recent research: 35 million Twitter links analysed
- Tips and tricks: The reference desks of Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Strange highs and strange lows
- News from Diff: Winners of the Human rights and Environment special nomination by Wiki Loves Earth announced
- News from the WMF: The EU Digital Services Act: What’s the Deal with the Deal?
- From the archives: The Onion and Wikipedia
- Humour: A new crossword
June events from Women in Red
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 26 June 2022
- News and notes: WMF inks new rules on government-ordered takedowns, blasts Russian feds' censor demands, spends big bucks
- In the media: Editor given three-year sentence, big RfA makes news, Guy Standing takes it sitting down
- Special report: "Wikipedia's independence" or "Wikimedia's pile of dosh"?
- Featured content: Articles on Scots' clash, Yank's tux, Austrian's action flick deemed brilliant prose
- Recent research: Wikipedia versus academia (again), tables' "immortality" probed
- Serendipity: Was she really a Swiss lesbian automobile racer?
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Enterprise signs first deals
- Gallery: Celebration of summer, winter
Women in Red in July 2022
Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for July 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Victor Kiplangat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 August 2022
- From the editors: Rise of the machines, or something
- News and notes: Information considered harmful
- In the media: Censorship, medieval hoaxes, "pathetic supervillains", FB-WMF AI TL bid, dirty duchess deeds done dirt cheap
- Op-Ed: The "recession" affair
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (part 3)
- Community view: Youth culture and notability
- Opinion: Criminals among us
- Arbitration report: Winds of change blow for cyclone editors, deletion dustup draws toward denouement
- Deletion report: This is Gonzo Country
- Discussion report: Notability for train stations, notices for mobile editors, noticeboards for the rest of us
- Featured content: A little list with surprisingly few lists
- Tips and tricks: Cleaning up awful citations with Citation bot
- On the bright side: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war — three (more) stories
- Essay: How to research an image
- Recent research: A century of rulemaking on Wikipedia analyzed
- Serendipity: Don't cite Wikipedia
- Gallery: A backstage pass
- From the archives: 2012 Russian Wikipedia shutdown as it happened
Disambiguation link notification for August 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scotland at the 2022 Commonwealth Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evan Jones.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 31 August 2022
- News and notes: Admins wanted on English Wikipedia, IP editors not wanted on Farsi Wiki, donations wanted everywhere
- Special report: Wikimania 2022: no show, no show up?
- In the media: Truth or consequences? A tough month for truth
- Discussion report: Boarding the Trustees
- News from Wiki Education: 18 years a Wikipedian: what it means to me
- In focus: Thinking inside the box
- Tips and tricks: The unexpected rabbit hole of typo fixing in citations...
- Technology report: Vector (2022) deployment discussions happening now
- Serendipity: Two photos of every library on earth
- Featured content: Our man drills are safe for work, but our Labia is Fausta.
- Recent research: The dollar value of "official" external links
- Traffic report: What dreams (and heavily trafficked articles) may come
- Essay: Delete the junk!
- Humour: CommonsComix No. 1
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago
Patsy Torres edits
Hello. I am Patsy Torres who is being featured in the article. Although I am flattered with the recognition, the information in the article has a plethora of mistakes with dates, events, family, etc. More importantly, there is a derogatory paragraph about my husband that is NOT factual.Unless I cite my biography, how do I site my edits? Please advise. Dr. Patsy Torres www.patsytorres.com Texmex2025 (talk) 07:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Texmex2025: Hi, if you have a WP: Conflict of interest then please do not edit the article yourself and instead use the article's talk page to request changes to be made, please see Template:Request edit for how to do so. For help on reliable sources please see WP:RELIABLE and for help on how edits to biographies of living people should be written please see MOS:BLP and WP:NPOV. Suonii180 (talk) 08:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Are you kiddine me?
The information provided in Kimberly Daniels' page is unfounded, false and without merit. Whomever written it has added a lot of opinion, things that are blatantly false. Wikipedia needs to post information on how a complaint can be made. 74.202.184.5 (talk) 22:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- If you think there is an issue with the content then please discuss it on the talk page to get a WP:Consensus first. Also please be aware of the three revert rule. Suonii180 (talk) 22:55, 6 September 2022 (UTC)