User talk:SunjayDash

Bite of a Mango

Do you have a paid or personal connection to the film? David notMD (talk) 02:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

None of the above 2607:FEA8:C20:AFB0:A82E:6D86:C6E5:8944 (talk) 18:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also just did a page edit for Patricia Jaggernauth. What do you think? SunjayDash (talk) 19:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest reading WP:42 to understand the type of sources that are needed for Wikipedia articles. The standards are particularly high for articles about living people. Spicy (talk) 21:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bite of Mango (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bite of Mango and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to understand why it doesn't qualify and has more articles than the other movie called Golden Delicious that has an approved article, they were apart

of the same festival, both films won awards. This film Bite of a mango had more press articles while Golden Delicious didn't. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Delicious_(film) SunjayDash (talk) 01:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just trying to better understand why it doesn't qualify while another does. SunjayDash (talk) 01:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SunjayDash! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello SunjayDash! Your additions to Reelworld Film Festival have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bite of Mango (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IAmChaos was:

No changes made since previous decline. Please see previous message, address the issues described and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bite of Mango and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 01:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to understand why it doesn't qualify and has more articles than the other movie called Golden Delicious that has an approved article, they were apart

of the same festival, both films won awards. This film Bite of a mango had more press articles while Golden Delicious didn't. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Delicious_(film) I'm just trying to better understand why it doesn't qualify while another does SunjayDash (talk) 01:04, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it says that articles shouldn't be just passing mentions, CBC, CP24, Breakfast Television were all LIVE on TV segments talking about the film. It's just a bit confusing as a writer, when it comes to articles. SunjayDash (talk) 01:07, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joanne Jansen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joanne Jansen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hagennos^Talk 03:20, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joanne Jansen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joanne Jansen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ron Dias (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ron Dias (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Storchy (talk) 00:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm contesting this. This is two notable people one deceased one a director with the same name. I don't understand the speedy deletion. SunjayDash (talk) 06:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Self Made (miniseries), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Dias (director) (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thatguy1987 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ron Dias (director) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thatguy1987 (talk) 13:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BOAM the Toronto star.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BOAM the Toronto star.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BOAM Theatrical release poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BOAM Theatrical release poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bite of a Mango

Please note that firstly, neither Joanne Jansen nor Ron Dias (director) have their own standalone articles about them, but both just have redirects right back to the film, so there's no point in wikilinking either of their names in the film's article -- a person who actually clicked on either of those links would just get taken right back to the same page they're already on, so we have a strict rule that we do not wikilink names that only exist as "recursive" redirects right back to the same page you're trying to add the wikilink to.

And secondly, the article that actually exists at the plain, undisambiguated title Ron Dias is about a completely different person than the director of Bite of a Mango, so it's not correct for the article to wikilink to that other person since he had nothing to do with the film. Bearcat (talk) 15:59, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

based on the new articles that came out in Hollywood reporter and ET Canada can we revisit the separate pages. SunjayDash (talk) 21:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joanne Jansen (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thatguy1987 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joanne Jansen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thatguy1987 (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How could it be rejected? Look at the ET Canada article it has her photo, She's an actress with her face on TUBI as the LEAD in a movie. As soon as you turn TUBI on her face is right there. They are making an important film here in Canada, thats going to impact everyone here. This is not and should not be considered a passing reference. Please look at it accordingly. She is mentioned in the Hollywood Reporter making the film which is a huge publication and thats not a passing reference at all. She's been on national tv speaking on it. Not only that she's an actress that was a notable character in Shadow Hunters, Netflix's Madam C.J. Walker, one whole episode is based on her character she plays and named after her character. Please reconsider this. Thanks. SunjayDash (talk) 14:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fefe Dobson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:46, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I am adding it now. The sources were there im not sure what happened. SunjayDash (talk) 15:42, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

done SunjayDash (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Dias (director) (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unsourced and promotional statements such as "Using YouTube as a platform to hone his skills, while amassing a vast and diverse fan base that continues to grow, he soon developed into a dedicated Director"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ron Dias (director) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you I have reworded and resubmitted. SunjayDash (talk) 13:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Dias (director) (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

You've removed some (not all) of the sources I identified for you yesterday as not acceptable: the blogs and directory entries and affiliated press releases are gone, but the film festival catalogues and the video interviews in which Ron Dias is talking about the film himself are still present.
So you haven't finished cleaning out the unacceptable sources yet, and you haven't added any new sources at all to account for the other thing I said, which is that the sources that were acceptable didn't add up to enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ron Dias (director) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 16:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bite of a Mango, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's on IMDB and theres a world premiere trailer out from AMC//ALLBLK with their LOGO on the movie. It's also being promoted on their ALLBLK channel! It's more than a reliable source. They've also been running ads on social media promoting it on AMC/ ALLBLK. SunjayDash (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bite of a Mango. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please read my edit summary; IMDB is not a reliable source, per WP:IMDB-EL. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bite of Mango

Hello, SunjayDash. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bite of Mango, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bite of Mango

Hello, SunjayDash. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bite of Mango".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joanne Jansen

Hello, SunjayDash. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joanne Jansen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Morningside (2024 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morningside (2024 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morningside (2024 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 04:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ron Dias (disambiguation)

The article Ron Dias (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page containing the primary topic and only one other topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Morningside (2024 film)

Hello, SunjayDash. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morningside (2024 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]