User talk:Sumanch/Archive 2

Archived talk Forever - Dec 2008

Image tagging for File:Clinton-Gore Presidential Inaugural Committee logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Clinton-Gore Presidential Inaugural Committee logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Madhusudan Dutt

Dear Sumanch,

1. Most of the references suggest the spelling Dutt to be used to refer to the poet. The pronunciation is not the issue, the Dutt spelling seems to be the prevailing one, and possibly used by the poet.

2. I deleted the Atul Bose portrait of Madhusudan. For artistic work, the copyright duration is artist's death+60 years. Atul Bose died in 1977 [1], so his paintings are still under copyright in India. --Ragib (talk) 07:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sumanch, thanks for your reply. Now, (1) I will check your comment about the poet's preferred spelling ... but on a quick search, Golam Murshid's recent book on Michael's letters refer to him as Dutt. I'll double check this this weekend ... and get back to you. (2) The painting is not a photograph. The "Unveiling date" rule applies to photographs, not to paintings. (see Chapter V, section 22, 25 of Indian copyright act). For all artistic work other than photographs, per section 23, "Term of copyright in published literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works.-Except as otherwise hereinafter provided, copyright shall subsist in any literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work (other than a photograph) published within the lifetime of the author until [sixty] years from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the author dies. So, definitely, the Atul Bose painting is still under copyright. We can't use it here. --Ragib (talk) 20:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There should be lots of paintings/images of the poet available, so we can easily use one that is in PD. This one, unfortunately, won't be in PD till 2037. Thanks. --Ragib (talk)

Images

I've deleted three of your recent uploads: File:Abronia ameliae.jpg, File:Abronia pogonantha.jpg, and File:Abronia maritima.jpg. According to the source website [2], images marked as "unrestricted" can only be used for noncommercial purposes, which unfortunately prevents them from being used on Wikipedia. --Carnildo (talk) 01:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Abronia fragrans.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Abronia fragrans.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Abronia mellifera.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Abronia mellifera.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:25, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Abronia ameliae.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Abronia ameliae.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 22:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Abronia maritima.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Abronia maritima.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 22:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest image uploads

I've deleted your latest set of uploads, as they don't even come close to being "fair use". Please read up on Wikipedia's rules for fair use before marking any more images as such. --Carnildo (talk) 00:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:JKBank.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:JKBank.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:JKBank.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:JKBank.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template

The new template looks small and did not look good and hence is replaced with the old one.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 12:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Atulprasad Sen

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Atulprasad Sen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:CREATIVE guidelines and doesn't have any references.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Thrane (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:IAF Crest.png}

Thank you for uploading File:IAF Crest.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:IAF Crest.png}

Thank you for uploading File:IAF Crest.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History section of the Indian Air Force

Though I appreciate your intention to reduce the length of the article, please refrain from deleting large amounts of sourced information. In this regard, I'll soon be making changes to the concerned section of the article and summarize the information. Thanks --Nosedown (talk) 14:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:IAF Crest.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:IAF Crest.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Insignia

I don't think I will be able to contribute in such a way for the next few days (2-3 days). You let me know what need to be done (Create Sleeve Insignia just like for the IAF ranks - beyond my current knowledge capability of Graphics.) Anything else, I can help?Chanakyathegreat (talk) 13:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Air Force

Brilliant job! Your edits have greatly improved the article. Cheers --Nosedown (talk) 04:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Loksabha.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Loksabha.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iftikhar muhammad chaudhry.jpg

You said "invalid source. The source provided, was for a PDF file. However Exact image can be found in google search."

It is one of the sources for the file. If you open the PDF file, you will find the image on page 1 (pdf file page 7). You will find in google and on multiple other places because it is the the picture of the supreme court Chief Justice. Rizvisa1 (talk) 21:46, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Air Force

On behalf of Assessment team: WP INDIA, B is the highest, we can give. go for WP:GA or WP:FA. IMO, In terms of GA, an easy pass.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sumanch, I am sorry, I get very few minutes. I will try.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 11:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sumanch, check whether citizens of Nepal and Bhutan are also eligible to apply for IAF jobs. I think they can. Check the UPSC website. You will get the required information there.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 12:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Modzilla [edit] was getting bundled up or edit overlaps some text. So moved the pictures in sections but the net appearance was same. Will participate in PR soon. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have made some questionable changes to the concerned article - for example removing sourced and adding unsourced material. Please use edit summary more often to explain your edits. --Nosedown (talk) 19:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I said before, GA seems to be an easy pass. There are 2 paths: 1. Go directly to FA, if you are confident 2. Go to the longer path: GA, A (Military history A-Class review) and then FA. In each process, you will some input to make the article better. Another way is go to A directly, skipping GA. I would suggest: A then FA path, skipping GA as IMO, it is already GA quality. Also, GA process may take its own time. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the A class review. The article has too many images: More images -> more time to load the page. Eliminate the gallery. Choose the best pictures in terms of encyclopaedic and photographic quality. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:16, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review

		Military history reviewers' award
		By order of the coordinators, for your help with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews April to June 2009, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. Roger Davies ^talk 12:26, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste `{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}}` to your user space

Re: Missing

"Deadlinks — I went through the article. Looks like I am missing them. I will appreciate if you can list them.

Suspicious links — I thought only 3 of them were (Bharat Rakshak, GlobalSecurity and domain-B). Can you please give the other two. I will address issues with each citations individually. Let me know if that will work.

Disambiguous(?) links — I think I completely missed what you meant by that."

I actually get this a lot, so do not feel too bad for being unable to find them :)

On the A-class review page, the actual page you created for the nom, you should see a box to the right side of the screen that contains what look to be three external links. These links are actually automated tools that check the article to determine the status of the external links, the number of editors to an article and the total number of their edits to the article, and a tool that checks for "disambig" links - links like USS Enterprise that go to a "may may be looking for..." page instead of the article the author of the page intended for them to go to.

If after reading this you still can not find the box leave a message on my talk page and I will add it to this section so you can find it. Bon Chance! TomStar81 (Talk • Some say ¥€$, I say NO) 03:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Insignia Talk

Hey! Sumanch, I saw your insignia work in the Indian Navy article. It was quite a neat work. I was wondering if you could help me in making insignia for 'indian police service' and 'indian army'. It would be great! ;)

 Just tell me if you are interested because I really dont know how to do it, and it would be really nice if u could help!

thnxs. ^Talk 14:44, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sorry man, but I dont even have the pictures. I thought they wern't pictures rather u had made them! Could you get it from somewhere? If not that, could we put up the star plates of senior IPS and army officers? Is it possible? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaiddauji (talk • contribs) 11:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I'll surely get back to you when I manage to get the pics for both Police and Army :) Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaiddauji (talk • contribs) 12:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'll try to get the info and pics on both maybe we'll be able to work on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaiddauji (talk • contribs) 12:09, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, once again Sumanch. :)

  I actually wanted to ask you, which software is it that you use to create .png images like you did for Insignia for Air Force & Navy. I am not kind of an image creator, but I would really appreciate if you could help me. Thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaiddauji (talk • contribs) 15:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Buddy One last question, is Adobe Photoshop CS4 ok? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaiddauji (talk • contribs) 07:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaiddauji (talk • contribs) 09:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats Great! How much time would it take to complete? I tried Adobe, but it's difficult for me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaiddauji (talk • contribs) 12:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corps of Indian Amry

Hi ,I noticed that you updated the GOCs of the corps. Do you have a source for these info you can share with me? We are at a loss of sources for List of regiments of the Indian Army (1903). --Vinay84 (talk) 13:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope I dont think I have any thing on IA1903. The GOCs of the corps were updated in Bharat Rakshak recently. I am afraid finding GOCs of regiments will be too deep for material in PD. Sumanch (talk) 13:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Current_IAF_ACM_Assuming_Office.JPG

I have tagged File:Current_IAF_ACM_Assuming_Office.JPG as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Rettetast (talk) 12:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constituent assembly in session.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Constituent assembly in session.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 12:29, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cabine Mission1946 Meeting.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cabine Mission1946 Meeting.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 12:29, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marshal of IAF Current.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marshal of IAF Current.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:AnandabazarFront.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AnandabazarFront.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nabha Sparsham Deeptam

The article Nabha Sparsham Deeptam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Incorrect name, unnecessary page. Everything here is wrong (the absurdity of giving IPA pronunciation for an incorrect phrase!), and covers nothing not already in the IAF article. If there is ever a need for this article, it can be recreated at the correct name; right now this is just spreading misinformation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shreevatsa (talk) 17:25, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Air Force

NAL Saras is being developed as civilian transport, but according to the NAL Saras article, the IAF has placed an order for 15 Saras aircraft for use as light transports. That is why it is included in the "under development" section.

HAL Tejas is not under procurement. It will only get IOC by December.

Sorry about the reporting names. I'm new to wikipedia, so bear with me. I'm just trying to make the article better, I don't have any bad intensions. Won't happen again.

Didn't understand what you meant by "citeweb template".

The "under development" section is badly organised. Do you mind if I make it an entirely new section and classify it based on types of aircraft like the "aircraft inventory" section? Can I delete the "future aircraft" section? The upgrades mentioned in the prose are already mentioned under "aircraft inventory".

Will wait for your opinion before making any more edits... --Gremaldin (talk) 11:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted the new section I suggested in the Indian Air Force talk page. Please comment. --Gremaldin (talk) 14:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I didn't add anything new, I just presented what was already there in a different way. So, should we consider reducing the size of the original section? --Gremaldin (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I finished a prose version of the "future" section in my sandbox according to the recommendation by Kirk (talk). Tell me what you think. --Gremaldin (talk) 10:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I expanded the "aerospace command" section in my sandbox under the section title "Integrated Space Cell". Tell me what you think. --Gremaldin (talk) 13:32, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The changes have been applied to the main page. --Gremaldin (talk) 13:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft inventory

I started on a more concise ansd compehensive version of the "Aircraft Inventory" section in my sandbox. I haven't changed the "Tanker aircraft", "Training aircraft", and "Unmanned aerial vehicles" sections, but I will when I get enough time. Please comment on the edits in my talk page. Will wait for your comments before changing the original article. --Gremaldin (talk) 06:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I finished editing the "Aircraft inventory" section. It's in my sandbox. I wasn't able to find citations for a few sections. If you find any, please add them. --Gremaldin (talk) 04:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I like the edits, though I don't agree with the total number of aircraft. I had provided a citation from bharat-rakshak.com for changing the number to 1409. Do you have any more recent source which states the total number to be 1309? --Gremaldin (talk) 06:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I cited from bharat-rakshak.com because I thought it was a website run by the Indian military. I thought it would be the most authorative source of info. available on the net. Anyway, I went through the websites in the citations you mentioned. Apparently, both have been edited after they were first cited. A page from indianairforce.nic.in (from cite number 4 in the main page) doesn't mention the total number of aircraft operated. However, it does mention about the MiG-23, which has been phased out. It also mentions the MiG-21Bis, but no Bison. It seems the page is outdated. The page from cite number 1 claims that about 1318 aircraft are in service with the IAF including 1 HAL Tejas which is impossible because the Tejas will only get IOC by December (if I am not wrong). The book mentioned in cite number 3 was written in 2006 - many more aircraft (like the Su-30MKI - HAL produces some every year till they reach 140) might have been inducted and many aircraft like the MiG-21 may have been phased out or lost in crashes. So I think we should look for a more recent source. The article in bharat-rakshak was last edited in October 2009. But if it is not considered a neutral source, then we may have to look for other sources. Is it ok if I apply the edits I suggested in the main page? --Gremaldin (talk) 08:28, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So shall I apply the changes to the main page? Meanwhile, we can look for a more reliable source and edit the numbers when needed. Or maybe we should avoid numbers altogether. What is your opinion? --Gremaldin (talk) 06:34, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks great and much more condensed than the one in the main page. But doesn't this format take much more space than the bulleted format I suggested? Also, isn't the bulleted format more easy to follow? What do you think?

About the number of aircraft in service, since it can never be determined with accuracy from open sources and since it is always changing, maybe it will be better not to mention about it. After all, it is better than providing false information. I noticed that the article on United States Air Force does not cite the numbers in service for each and every aircraft. What do you think?

Do you think we should start a section on the Surface to Air Missile systems operated by the IAF? Also, there is no mention of the Prithvi II. --Gremaldin (talk) 13:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, prose looks better. I'll start working on a more short and concise version in my sandbox. I'll let you know when it's ready. I'll leave out the aircraft numbers for now unless I can get sources other than bharat-rakshak. We can check the validity of these numbers with possibly more valid or newer reports before including them in the main page. To make it easier to check the aircraft numbers, I'll post any new aircraft numbers I find with references in my sandbox under a new section. Sorry about the Prithvi II. I read that it was inducted into the IAF. I assumed IAF stood for "Indian Air Force", but actually the article was mentioning about the "Indian Armed Forces". --Gremaldin (talk) 15:34, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I finished a comprehensive and concise version of the "aircraft inventory" section. It's in my sandbox. Please comment. Shall I apply the changes to the main page? --Gremaldin (talk) 14:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I split the history section into subsections following a recommendation by Kirk. By the way, I read the pervious peer review and I didn't see anyone recommending that the "history" section should not have subsections. I will wait for your comments before applying the changes to the main page. --Gremaldin (talk) 11:26, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I completely revamped the "Land-Based Air Defence" section in my sandbox. Please tell me what you think. I didnt include the 9K38 Igla/SA-16 Gimlet as I could find no source that states it is in the IAF inventory. Please add it if you find a credible source. --Gremaldin (talk) 14:36, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Training

About the training section which Kirk suggested, I think it will be better to create a new article like "Training in the Indian Air Force" and then put a "main article" link in the main page. I found a site which could give us a start: http://careerairforce.nic.in/career_opp/trg_flying.html

BTW, are you on a wiki-break? You haven't responded to my messages for a while. --Gremaldin (talk) 09:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History

To tell you the truth, I was considering the same. The History section has become a bit disorganised, and of course I am the one to blame. I started work on the section in my sandbox. Feel free to make any changes there. --Gremaldin (talk) 08:20, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The changes have been made in the main page. Please comment. --Gremaldin (talk) 10:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Badr-1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Badr-1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General Bipin Chandra Joshi

What is your source for his regiment of commission, which you report as 64 CAV? Buckshot06 (talk) 00:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist A-class and Peer Reviews Jul-Dec 2009

		Military history reviewers' award
		By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews during the period July-December 2009, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. TomStar81 (Talk) 02:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste `{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}}` to your user space

Something for you

		Military history reviewers' award
		By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews for the period 1 April-30 September 2010, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. Roger Davies ^talk 08:09, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste `{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}}` to your user space

Wikipedia–Wikimedia Meetup
Kolkata, India

(view · edit · changes)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rajyasabha.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rajyasabha.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:21, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Loksabha.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Loksabha.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Loksabha.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Loksabha.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 20:37, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DAD Troop Flag march.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DAD Troop Flag march.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DAD exodus.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DAD exodus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:25, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nazimuddin Suhrawardy.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nazimuddin Suhrawardy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:26, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dead hindu 1946 DAD.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dead hindu 1946 DAD.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DAD victims.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DAD victims.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 21:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DAD Prowling mob.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DAD Prowling mob.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 21:28, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DAD Food wait.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DAD Food wait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 21:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DAD Clean up.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DAD Clean up.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 21:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Emblem of India color.svg

A tag has been placed on File:Emblem of India color.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 02:44, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:JaduNathSingh.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JaduNathSingh.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:12, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Karam Singh.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Karam Singh.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Baclofen

What are you undoing my edits there? look again! 70.137.157.59 (talk) 01:54, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Indian Air Force, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Dakota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Indian Air Force

I had to rollback your recent edits to the Indian Air Force. The International Institute for Strategic Studies is recognized as a highly authoritative source. You said you cannot find the related material? Yet the publication title is listed, along with the Institutions name, the authors name, and date of its publication.

International Institute for Strategic Studies; Hackett, James (ed.) (2010-02-03). The Military Balance 2010. London: Routledge. ISBN 1857435575. {{cite book}}: |author2= has generic name (help)

If you have any problems discuss the matter here. — Augmented Reality^Woe90i 00:51, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. Yes I remembered adding that book for some reference but I do not remember what we were referencing. However, The personnel strength of 127,000 published in IISS 2010 is an outlier, other sources are consistently quote between 160k and 180K. Therefore, either it can be ignored or it has to be worked into the paragraph.

2. Please use proper citation templates. This article uses citeweb/citebook... and harvnb for referencing. Please use them.

3. The POV issue that you have raised can be resolved List of countries by level of military equipment.

Sumanch (talk) 01:50, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have not raised any POV issue. I suggest you read up on Wikipedia:Verifiability. The IISS is considered both reliable and authoritative and the most up-todate source available on manpower. It remains only your opinion that the IISS source 'is an outlier'. — Augmented Reality^Woe90i 10:12, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The IAF does not publish the personnel or equipment strength like RAF or USAF. That is why any published research or claim has equal authority. The only difference is that some are conservative and others are liberal.

IISS is a reputable and authentic source however they never publish how they deduce the force strength. Because India considers that information a national secret, the weight on it should be significantly less. This issue had come up during a previous peer review. We had agreed that because these numbers cannot be determined with absolute precision, we should use the approximation. Sumanch (talk) 21:09, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correction, India does not protect the strength of its conventional military forces. I am afraid you are just resorting to speculation and own personal opinion. The Indian Ministry of Defense does however keep secret any information regarding it strategic nuclear capabilities.

"The IAF does not publish the personnel or equipment strength......that is why any published research or claim has equal authority", no they do not, even if India did maintain a policy of military secrecy they still do not claim equal authority. Again I suggest you read up on Wikipedia:Verifiability.

However, I do see your point and reasoning behind keeping the 2006 figures along-side the IISS 2010 figures. Retaining both yearly figures is good for reference purposes for those years and is indeed valuable information. — Woe90i^Woe90i 22:04, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hi Sumanch. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for The Climate Corporation, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. The page has quite a number of what look to be independent sources talking about the company, which is plenty of importance to pass WP:CSD#A7. If you think those sources aren't sufficient to establish the company's notability, please take the article to AfD. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

C. Richard Tracy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Glendale

UCC&BM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hyderabad

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Seosan Baseball Park

Just a heads up, when adding proposed deletion tags to articles, it is not necessary to add a tag to the article's talk page as well, as you did with Seosan Baseball Park. If the article is deleted, the deleting administrator will delete the corresponding talk page as well. Cheers! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLove

I just wanted to say thanks for helping on File:YourLove.jpg.HotHat (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.Sumanch (talk) 04:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Files for deletion/03:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/03:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Files for deletion/03:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Files for deletion/03:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Skier Dude's talk page.

Source information needed for File:TheLastLear.jpg

Hello, Sumanch!

It was really helpful of you to upload File:TheLastLear.jpg. However, in order to keep and use new images, we need to know their original source.

If you can edit the description page and add this information, that would be great. If you're not sure how or need help, please ask at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blade Runner Bradbury Building image

Hi. I reverted your change of size to the Blade Runner Bradbury Building image, and I'd like to explain why. With fair-use non-free headshots and film posters, for instance, a width under 300px is generally considered to be a reasonable size, but those images are taller than they are wide. With the Blade Runner image, the opposite is true, it is wider than it is tall, so a reasonably sized image is one where the height is under 300px, not the width. Now, the Blade Runner image is also a little longer than most vertical images are tall, so in reducing it for fair-use, I dropped the height down to 254. This makes the entire image 254 x 504 or 128,000 square pixels. Compare this to a typical filmposter such as this one (which I just happened to have edited a few minutes ago). It's 297 x 455 which is 135,000 square pixels. I'm sure you can see that the Blade Runner images is actually smaller than a completely acceptable vertical image, and this is the reason that I reverted your change. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I understand. Sumanch (talk) 04:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jo Hum Chahein.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jo Hum Chahein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:35, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Will i am-willpower.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Will i am-willpower.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Shintom

Hello Sumanch. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Shintom, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: "supplying the VHS tape transport chassis mechanism, during the 1980s to mid-1990s" is a claim of importance. company appears notable. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New postings

Please, learn how to make a new section in a civilized way. Edits to last talk page sections for the purpose of creating new sections result in bad edit summaries as can be seen at [3][4][5]. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:48, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Skier Dude's talk page.

Speedy deletion declined: Khoun Laboravy

Hello Sumanch. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Khoun Laboravy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: playing for the Cambodian national team is enough to pass NFOOTY, certainly enough for A7. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 09:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...and the same applies to Sam El Nasa. JohnCD (talk) 09:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I had requested CSD on 4-6 articles by this user. Most of them were related. The main reason was the lack of citation. The one reference that was provided for the articles barely contained any info. I do agree with you, but at that time I thought A7 was applicable. Sumanch (talk) 13:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A7 is actually a deliberately low bar, lower than "notability", and doesn't even require a reference - the specification says "...does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines." (Mind you, the important word "credible" is in there!) There is useful advice for speedy taggers from an experienced admin at WP:A7M and WP:10CSD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]