User talk:Sulaymaan114

Hello, Sulaymaan114, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! Steven Walling 16:34, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your appreciate Sulaymaan114 (talk) 11:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

add the Template of Auranzeb to the main articale Auranzeb at the bottom. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 09:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i have been block for editing. i want to know which of my aricle has violated the wikipedia policy. just mention the aritcle i want to know. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 09:22, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear. talk:0xDeadbeef

I hope this message finds you well. My name is Sulaymaan114, and I am writing to request an unblock on my Wikipedia account.

I understand that I have been blocked indefinitely due to disruptive editing. After carefully reviewing the situation, I acknowledge that my actions may have violated Wikipedia's policies, and I would like to express my sincere apologies for any disruption caused.

Since the block, I have taken the time to reflect on my contributions and understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines. I am committed to ensuring that my future edits comply with Wikipedia's policies, and I am willing to engage in constructive and collaborative editing.

In order to address the concerns raised by the blocking administrator, I would like to provide the following assurances:

I am member of Wikipedia from 2009 and I have contributed many articles to this platform and I want to the member of this organization, as I love to learn new thing.

I understand the seriousness of the situation, and I am eager to rectify my past mistakes. I kindly request that you consider lifting the indefinite block on my account, allowing me the opportunity to contribute constructively to Wikipedia once again.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I am open to any feedback or guidance you may have regarding my unblock request.

Sincerely,

[Sulaymaan114] Sulaymaan114 (talk) 09:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am waiting for my unblocking of my account. I want to be the part of Wikipedia. and I want to contribute my knowledge to this astonishing platform. what every article I have contributed does not comes under any false information, disinformation, or misinformation. as per my knowledge. so, I request the administrators to unblock my account. and give me one final chance. If I uploaded any wrong information. or any article which is unbiased just give me the name of that article. So, I can know where I have gone wrong.(Sulaymaan114 (talk)) Sulaymaan114 (talk) 12:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal For Unblocking

User Account – Sulaymaan114

Date – 10 – 12 - 2023

Dear Wikipedia community this is request for Unblocking.

Block Details

Blocking Administrator: 0xDEADBEEF

Block Reason: disruptive editing

Block Duration: 01 – 12 – 2023 (12 days)

I am contributing for Wikipedia from 2009, I love the platform, it was fault on my side with respect to disruptive editing, I am fully aware of my lack of knowledge with respect to the police of the Wikipedia. Know I have gone through the policy. I request other administrators to review and give me one change, so I cane be a part of this great world of knowledge.

Evidence and Explanation:

My last contribution to Wikipedia which leads to by blocked indefinitely. Are mentioned below.

1. Template:United Nation Resolution on Israel – Palestinian Conflict.

This template contained all the Security council resolution, security council assemble resolution and the resolution which was vetoed with respect to Israel – Palestinian conflict. From past to present. All the number of resolutions what I have mention are accurate and true. I was very important template to understand. The role of united nation with respect to Israel – Palestinian conflict. The administrator just told me not to edit anything with respect to Arab Israel conflict. He did not tell me which article come under disruptive Editing.

2. Draft:Crucifixion or cruci-fiction?

This article was a book writing by Ahmed Deedat. Who is a famous Muslim apologetic. It was deleted by mention G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion

3. Draft:The Qur'an & Modern Science: Compatible or Incompatible?

This article was a book writing by Zakir Naik. It was deleted by mentioning. G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion

4. Template:Dawah

This template was first accepted and then deleted.

Community Input:

I invite to the member and administrator with respect to dialogue and have and healthy discussion on this matter. I request other administrators who have the privilege to unblock my Account to do so after reviewing with all administrators and with their consensuses.

Contacting the Blocking Administrator:

I have also left a message on the talk page of the blocking administrator, 0xDEADBEEF (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:0xDeadbeef).

to notify them of this appeal. I am eager to engage in a constructive dialogue to address any remaining issues.

I appreciate the community's consideration of my appeal and welcome any guidance or suggestions for improvement. Thank you for your time and understanding.

if the administrator who have privilege to unblock my account think that I have indulge in any vandalism, edit warring, disruptive behaviour, sock puppetry, violations of policies, I am sincerely sorry for it and this is my unconditional apology. Please consider my appeal and unblock my account. Thank you.

Sulaymaan114

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sulaymaan114 Sulaymaan114 (talk) 08:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i was block on 1 december for disrective editing. i appologies for doing so. i was given assurence that after six month my accout will be unblock. i have edited many pages, i am great fan of wikipedia. and i am learning wekipedia. so i request you to unblock my account, so that i may contribute to wikipedia as member. thank you. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 11:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't use an AI to assist in writing these, since those don't help with showing that you actually understood why you were blocked for. If you are interested in hearing what ChatGPT has to say about your request, see:

Extended content

Using artificial intelligence to request the unblocking of an account on Wikipedia may not be advisable for several reasons. Firstly, AI lacks the contextual understanding and nuanced communication skills that are often crucial in addressing the unique circumstances surrounding a block. Wikipedia's policies and guidelines are complex, and a human touch is necessary to provide a detailed and personalized explanation for the request.

Secondly, AI may inadvertently generate requests that appear robotic or insincere, potentially exacerbating the situation. Engaging with human moderators requires a level of empathy and flexibility that AI systems currently struggle to emulate. Personalized appeals that convey understanding of the specific issues involved are more likely to be positively received.

0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 09:58, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok

after study the policy of wikipedia i acknowlge the i have doen disruptive editing after first warning. so know my mistake in violating the wikipeida editing policy. so i request to unblock my account sulaymaan114 Sulaymaan114 (talk) 10:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Administrator

Respected Administrator, hope you are good and doing well.

I have made you to convince that I have done disruptive editing. after your warning. at that time, I have not read all the polices of Wikipedia. I am unconditionally accepting my mistake from my side, and I am apologetic for my editing methods. I will assure you i will not make this same mistake or any other mistake which violate the Wikipedia editing policies. so, I humbly request you do Unblock my Account. if you are still unsatisfied with my request, tell me what I have to do to convince you. please by humble and hole hearted. Allow my request and unblock my account.

Thank you. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 14:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

request for unblock my account. its six month when my account was block for disreptive editing. i admit my mistake and i apologies for it. consider my request Sulaymaan114 (talk) 11:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Zakir-Bhatt-memon 02.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Zakir-Bhatt-memon 02.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 20:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Zakir Naik. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Book:World of Anti Islam

Hi! In light of the Murder of Shaima Alawadi news (husband arrested, accused of killing her), would you be interested in modifying Book:World of Anti Islam? WhisperToMe (talk) 23:59, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social psychology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Obedience (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Timeline of primeministership of Narendra Modi

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Timeline of primeministership of Narendra Modi. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Timeline of prime ministership of Narendra Modi. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Timeline of prime ministership of Narendra Modi – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. George Ho (talk) 07:36, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karnataka Legislative Assembly election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sulaymaan114. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United Nation Resolution on Israel – Palestinian Conflict (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:

Page is empty aside the template, which seems to have been copy-pasted into the draft. Did you mean to create a page on United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES-10/21? In any case, you cannot edit the Palestine-Israel topic area at the moment, per the decision of the Arbitration Committee in view of past disruption in the topic area.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:United Nation Resolution on Israel – Palestinian Conflict and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Java Hurricane 10:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sulaymaan114! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Java Hurricane 10:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:United Nation resolutions on Israeli–Palestinian conflict has been accepted

Template:United Nation resolutions on Israeli–Palestinian conflict, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 13:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, United Nations Security Council Resolution 773 (2023), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 16:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Templates for discussion notices from templates, or remove other people's comments in Templates for discussion debates, as you did with Template:Dawah. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion or merging of a template, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 11:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:United Nation resolutions on Israeli–Palestinian conflict

Template:United Nation resolutions on Israeli–Palestinian conflict has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:35, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Resolution which is vetoed on Israel – Palestinian Conflict by The United Nation Security Council

Template:Resolution which is vetoed on Israel – Palestinian Conflict by The United Nation Security Council has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:United Nations resolution on Israeli–Palestinian conflict

Template:United Nations resolution on Israeli–Palestinian conflict has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crucifixion or Cruci-Fiction moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Crucifixion or Cruci-Fiction. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 10:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crucifixion or Cruci-Fiction (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crucifixion or Cruci-Fiction and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Resolution which is vetoed on Israel – Palestinian Conflict by The United Nation Security Council

A tag has been placed on Template:Resolution which is vetoed on Israel – Palestinian Conflict by The United Nation Security Council requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_9#Template:Resolution_which_is_vetoed_on_Israel_–_Palestinian_Conflict_by_The_United_Nation_Security_Council. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it an important topic, and it has to be there i cant undustant the logic behind deleting such information. it information is acurate, only thing is veto resolution article has to be created. as per my reasoning it is very crucial and important templete. which has to be remaing and it shoud be improve. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims

The article Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims

A tag has been placed on Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://islamicevents.my/khidmah/51. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 10:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dawah

Template:Dawah has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fram (talk) 10:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i dont see any logical mand behind delete this template. it covern all the aspect work and people who are infolve in Dawah work. it is a tamplate which covers an helthy interfaith dialoge and study of comparative religion. so it shoud remain. the purpose of wikipedia is to alow to know the people of comparative religion they prespective. so the miscinpection about every religion can be clear. i strongly recomend not to delete this template. thank you. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 11:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims

A tag has been placed on Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://darussalam.com/most-common-questions-asked-by-non-muslims/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 12:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims

A tag has been placed on Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fermiboson (talk) 04:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Qur'an & Modern Science: Compatible or Incompatible?

A tag has been placed on The Qur'an & Modern Science: Compatible or Incompatible?, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fermiboson (talk) 04:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Sulaymaan114. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Please indicate if you have any association with Zakir Naik. Fermiboson (talk) 04:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crucifixion or cruci-fiction?

A tag has been placed on Crucifixion or cruci-fiction?, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fermiboson (talk) 07:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sulaymaan114 Please stop mass creating promotional articles. Failure to respond and communicate with other editors, and instead persistently recreating deleted articles, may lead to sanctions. Fermiboson (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 05:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Qur'an & Modern Science: Compatible or Incompatible? moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Qur'an & Modern Science: Compatible or Incompatible?, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 05:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims

A tag has been placed on Draft:Most Common Questions Asked by Non-Muslims requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://darussalam.com/most-common-questions-asked-by-non-muslims/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 07:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crucifixion or cruci-fiction? moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Crucifixion or cruci-fiction?. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 07:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Qur'an & Modern Science: Compatible or Incompatible?

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Qur'an & Modern Science: Compatible or Incompatible?, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fermiboson (talk) 08:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 08:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Crucifixion or cruci-fiction?

A tag has been placed on Draft:Crucifixion or cruci-fiction?, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 08:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:United Nation Resolution on Israel – Palestinian Conflict

A tag has been placed on Template:United Nation Resolution on Israel – Palestinian Conflict requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 16:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

they is no any logicla reson to delete such an informatic tamplate.Sulaymaan114 (talk) 03:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal For Unblocking

User Account – Sulaymaan114

Date – 10 – 12 - 2023

Dear Wikipedia community this is request for Unblocking.

Block Details

Blocking Administrator: 0xDEADBEEF

Block Reason: disruptive editing

Block Duration: 01 – 12 – 2023 (12 days)

I am contributing for Wikipedia from 2009, I love the platform, it was fault on my side with respect to disruptive editing, I am fully aware of my lack of knowledge with respect to the police of the Wikipedia. Know I have gone through the policy. I request other administrators to review and give me one change, so I cane be a part of this great world of knowledge.

Evidence and Explanation:

My last contribution to Wikipedia which leads to by blocked indefinitely. Are mentioned below.

1. Template:United Nation Resolution on Israel – Palestinian Conflict.

This template contained all the Security council resolution, security council assemble resolution and the resolution which was vetoed with respect to Israel – Palestinian conflict. From past to present. All the number of resolutions what I have mention are accurate and true. I was very important template to understand. The role of united nation with respect to Israel – Palestinian conflict. The administrator just told me not to edit anything with respect to Arab Israel conflict. He did not tell me which article come under disruptive Editing.

2. Draft:Crucifixion or cruci-fiction?

This article was a book writing by Ahmed Deedat. Who is a famous Muslim apologetic. It was deleted by mention G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion

3. Draft:The Qur'an & Modern Science: Compatible or Incompatible?

This article was a book writing by Zakir Naik. It was deleted by mentioning. G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion

4. Template:Dawah

This template was first accepted and then deleted.

Community Input:

I invite to the member and administrator with respect to dialogue and have and healthy discussion on this matter. I request other administrators who have the privilege to unblock my Account to do so after reviewing with all administrators and with their consensuses.

Contacting the Blocking Administrator:

I have also left a message on the talk page of the blocking administrator, 0xDEADBEEF (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:0xDeadbeef).

to notify them of this appeal. I am eager to engage in a constructive dialogue to address any remaining issues.

I appreciate the community's consideration of my appeal and welcome any guidance or suggestions for improvement. Thank you for your time and understanding.

if the administrator who have privilege to unblock my account think that I have indulge in any vandalism, edit warring, disruptive behaviour, sock puppetry, violations of policies, I am sincerely sorry for it and this is my unconditional apology. Please consider my appeal and unblock my account. Thank you.

Sulaymaan114

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sulaymaan114 Sulaymaan114 (talk) 08:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please don't repeatedly recreate articles on non-notable books, and do not edit anything related to the Arab-Israeli conflict while you are not extended confirmed. More disruptive behavior like these after your temporary block expires will most definitely be hit with sanctions like an indefinite block. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 13:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Sulaymaan114 (talk) 03:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok(Sulaymaan114 (talk) 03:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC))[reply]

@0xDeadbeef Draft:United Nation Resolution on Israel and Palestinian Conflict. in violation of ARBPIA. Fermiboson (talk) 10:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for ECR violations and disruptive editing, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 10:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

i send to review my aricle. and did not publish it directily. if this is isrputive editing i am sorry for theat. i will not do it any more. this is my unconditional apology. so please unblocke me from indefinityely blcked.(Sulaymaan114 (talk) 12:53, 1 December 2023 (UTC))[reply]

I believe I have been quite clear to you when I wrote do not edit anything related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. I'm not seeing anything that suggests you understood what led to your block. Please read the guide to appeal above. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 14:31, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok as i tole i will not do any editing relating to arab israeli conflict or israel palestine conflict. consider by request for unblocking by account. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 15:25, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The problem isn't just with this specific area, the problem is with your understanding of Wikipedia's policy and guidelines. Besides your clear violation of restrictions by creating a draft despite my warning, you still haven't addressed your history of disruptive editing, including repeatedly creating drafts with copyright violations (and attempting to remove the CSD tag), recreation of a template previously deleted through a discussion. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 15:39, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok. i apolgies i am not an expert in wikipedia. just allow me to learn. i will not edit in future. without proper knowledge. i will not add or edit any articel ok. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 15:43, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to address the concerns specifically. I invite you to read the guide to appeal, otherwise WP:CIR applies here. I will not make further replies until you show to us that you understand why you were blocked. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 15:50, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i dont know how to appeal. please guide me doing this. thank you. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 04:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In short: You need to show that you understand what you were blocked for (not just a singular event, but all problematic behaviour leading up to that point) and detail why we should believe that you will not repeat said behaviour again. A more detailed guide is at WP:Guide to appealing blocks. You also need to be able to learn and follow Wikipedia policies by reading the relevant policy pages when directed to them, instead of having others clean up after you repeatedly. Fermiboson (talk) 05:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

as by account has been block for Disruptive editing, what evere articel have edited or contributaed my intention is bona fide and not mala fide. i have made several templates which confent usefull information, and it make easy to undustant the complex topic easy.

Disruptive diting.

1. Vandalism: Deliberate destruction or defacement of content.

2. Adding False Information: Introducing inaccurate or misleading information.

3. Removing Valid Content: Deleting accurate and relevant information without justification.

4. Edit Wars: Repeatedly undoing or changing someone else's edits without reaching a consensus.

as per my Acknowlege i have done noting which come under the above 4 catogary. if i have don so it must be unintentional. i am new in eding wikipedia, i love wikipedia and want to lear more whith respect to editing and making wikipedia more accurate and informative to all. so i request to unblock me account. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 15:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I am not an administrator, copying what the policy page says is unlikely to get you any favours among the administrators. "Disruptive editing" means, broadly construed, that we have to spend unnecessary time cleaning up after you. This includes repeatedly recreating pages that were previously deleted, being unable to follow instructions about contentious topic sanctions (in this case anything relating to the Israel/Palestinian conflict) which applies no matter whether you think the contribution is informative or not, and being unable to comprehend key content policies such as WP:PROMO and WP:COI even after being repeatedly reminded of them.

Moreover, it is fairly clear that your native language is not English. WP:Competence is required states that as Wikipedia editors, we require not only good faith from contributors (which we generally assume), but also competence in the English language, in understanding instructions, in being able to discuss and collaborate with others, etc. If you find yourself struggling to achieve this, may I suggest that you edit the version of Wikipedia in your native language instead. Fermiboson (talk) 06:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sulaymaan114 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I fully understand the reason for blocking and will not do any disruptive editing in future. I have read the policy of Wikipedia. So am I completely aware of my mistake. This will not be repeated again. I request you to unblock me.

Sulaymaan114 (talk) 06:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you are aware of your mistake, you need to demonstrate that awareness by explaining what your mistake was and what you will do differently. As this is an arbitration enforcement block, this block can only be lifted with the consent of the blocking administrator, or as the result of a community discussion. Please read the post below. 331dot (talk) 10:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks and use {{Arbitration enforcement appeal}} if you can. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 06:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal For Unblocking

Appeal For Unblocking

User Account – Sulaymaan114

Date – 10 – 12 - 2023

Dear Wikipedia community this is request for Unblocking.

Block Details

Blocking Administrator: 0xDEADBEEF

Block Reason: disruptive editing

Block Duration: 01 – 12 – 2023 (12 days)

I am contributing for Wikipedia from 2009, I love the platform, it was fault on my side with respect to disruptive editing, I am fully aware of my lack of knowledge with respect to the police of the Wikipedia. Know I have gone through the policy. I request other administrators to review and give me one change, so I cane be a part of this great world of knowledge.

Evidence and Explanation:

My last contribution to Wikipedia which leads to by blocked indefinitely. Are mentioned below.

1. Template:United Nation Resolution on Israel – Palestinian Conflict.

This template contained all the Security council resolution, security council assemble resolution and the resolution which was vetoed with respect to Israel – Palestinian conflict. From past to present. All the number of resolutions what I have mention are accurate and true. I was very important template to understand. The role of united nation with respect to Israel – Palestinian conflict. The administrator just told me not to edit anything with respect to Arab Israel conflict. He did not tell me which article come under disruptive Editing.

2. Draft:Crucifixion or cruci-fiction?

This article was a book writing by Ahmed Deedat. Who is a famous Muslim apologetic. It was deleted by mention G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion

3. Draft:The Qur'an & Modern Science: Compatible or Incompatible?

This article was a book writing by Zakir Naik. It was deleted by mentioning. G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion

4. Template:Dawah

This template was first accepted and then deleted.

Community Input:

I invite to the member and administrator with respect to dialogue and have and healthy discussion on this matter. I request other administrators who have the privilege to unblock my Account to do so after reviewing with all administrators and with their consensuses.

Contacting the Blocking Administrator:

I have also left a message on the talk page of the blocking administrator, 0xDEADBEEF (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:0xDeadbeef).

to notify them of this appeal. I am eager to engage in a constructive dialogue to address any remaining issues.

I appreciate the community's consideration of my appeal and welcome any guidance or suggestions for improvement. Thank you for your time and understanding.

if the administrator who have privilege to unblock my account think that I have indulge in any vandalism, edit warring, disruptive behaviour, sock puppetry, violations of policies, I am sincerely sorry for it and this is my unconditional apology. Please consider my appeal and unblock my account. Thank you.

Sulaymaan114

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sulaymaan114 Sulaymaan114 (talk) 08:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this seems to be an AI hallucinating events that have happened when they actually have not? 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 09:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. this is my reques to appeal. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 10:01, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what is this Hallucinating event can you explaine me. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 10:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this appeal has a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding. I'm (personally) not going to copy the appeal to AN or AE. If anyone feels this is necessary, they can. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 10:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

as you which. good luck for Arab israel conflict. thank you. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 10:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Administrator

Respected Administrator, hope you are good and doing well.

I have made you to convince that I have done disruptive editing. after your warning. at that time, I have not read all the polices of Wikipedia. I am unconditionally accepting my mistake from my side, and I am apologetic for my editing methods. I will assure you i will not make this same mistake or any other mistake which violate the Wikipedia editing policies. so, I humbly request you do Unblock my Account. if you are still unsatisfied with my request, tell me what I have to do to convince you. please by humble and hole hearted. Allow my request and unblock my account.

Thank you. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 14:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My IP address has been block last year, for disruptive editing. know i am requesting to you for unblock my IP address. i have read and understood the wikipedia editing guidlines so i will not repeat this mistake again. i furture request you to unblok my account. Sulaymaan114 (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:United Nation Resolution on Israel – Palestinian Conflict

Hello, Sulaymaan114. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United Nation Resolution on Israel – Palestinian Conflict, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:United Nations Security Council Resolution 773 (2023)

Hello, Sulaymaan114. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United Nations Security Council Resolution 773 (2023), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Resolution which is vetoed on Israel – Palestinian Conflict by The United Nation Security Council

Hello, Sulaymaan114. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Resolution which is vetoed on Israel – Palestinian Conflict by The United Nation Security Council, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dawah

Hello, Sulaymaan114. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dawah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:United Nations Security Council Resolution 773 (2023)

Hello, Sulaymaan114. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "United Nations Security Council Resolution 773".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Resolution which is vetoed on Israel – Palestinian Conflict by The United Nation Security Council

Hello, Sulaymaan114. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Resolution which is vetoed on Israel – Palestinian Conflict by The United Nation Security Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Dawah

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Dawah, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]