User talk:Sufur222/Archive 2

Beatles

I had been considering the "Other charted songs" idea but ultimately decided that such a change would be too major to carry out without some consensus and left them as they were (it appears almost all of the B-sides are listed with the single infobox in their respective articles). It's not exactly something I would do for the standard discography article, but I suppose a special exception could made for a discography for an artist as prolific as The Beatles. Airplay was indeed a large factor in the B-sides' chart positions, with stations usually playing both sides of the single upon release; Billboard almost certainly counted sales of the physical single, however, for both the A-side and B-side when formulating chart rankings – singles didn't get to chart based on airplay alone until 1998.

It would also seem rather odd to have an other charted songs table almost as large (if not larger) than the singles table, with one B-side corresponding to each single release (a separate B-sides table would probably be more appropriate). It's a rather complicated discography, but for now I see no problem with leaving the B-sides in the table. But that's just my take on the listing. Holiday56 (talk) 09:24, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robbie Williams discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Candy (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hey Ya!

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Hey Ya! you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of 11JORN -- 11JORN (talk) 23:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Metallica discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

ARIA Charts – Accreditations – 2010 Albums | publisher=[Australian Recording Industry Association]] | accessdate=August 4, 2013}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ke$ha discography

Yeah but this is a proper indication of updated sales in the US - which is pretty much her core. And if we're going to abide by the RIAA certifications, then TiK ToK would be 5xPlatinum, Blah Blah Blah would be Platinum, Your Love Is My Drug would be 2xPlatinum, Take it OFf would be Platinum, but those certs were updated by Wikipedia users based on actual sales and that's what I did, so unless you're going to change those certs, I'd think those certifications that I put up are a reliable indication and a substitute for the RIAA's certs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SayaamRulz (talk • contribs) 17:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Busta Rhymes discography

Hi, On 26 Jan 2012 you added several Ref labels to some of the singles but I cannot see the notes the labels refer to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scaz (talk • contribs) 12:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ya

I am really sorry. I am going to review. Jorn ^talk 17:07, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hey Ya!

The article Hey Ya! you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Hey Ya! for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of 11JORN -- 11JORN (talk) 19:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hey Ya!

The article Hey Ya! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hey Ya! for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of 11JORN -- 11JORN (talk) 20:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GAN comment

Hi there, Sufur222! I was asking if you could review my GAN for "Fighter (song)"? Thanks a lot, and Cheers! — HĐ (talk) 11:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, buddy! Cheers! — HĐ (talk) 15:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I award you this brownie for taking up the review for "Fighter (song)" and reviewing it so quickly! Thanks a bunch! — HĐ (talk) 15:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Talk Dirty (song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BMI and Acoustic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sufur222. You have new messages at STATicVerseatide's talk page.
Message added 15:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

STATic message me! 15:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help, if you have the Recovery booklet

Hey, Rufus. I was just wondering in case you still have the Recovery album booklet, would you know which page the lyrics to "Love the Way You Lie" are in? Thanks in advance. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 22:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help! —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 08:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Control (Big Sean song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

]<ref>http://www.fasterlouder.com.au/news/36618/Ur-Boy-Bangs-puts-Kendrick-Lamar-back-in-his-place}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Birdman discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Meyers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A personal RfC

Hey Sufur222, how is it going? If you have a chance, I would really appreciate it if you commented at Talk: Venus (Lady Gaga song)#Single?, and help me explain that a song does not need to be released to radio to be a single, and songs that are just released for official digital download prior to the album's release (as long as it comes with their own download page) are still singles, even if the artist wants to call it a promotional single. I guess I just made the mistake of deciding to get involved with editing a pop album, maybe I will just stick to hip hop albums after this is over lol. Again, I would really appreciate it because I know there were many discussions about this at the WikiProjects. STATic message me! 05:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: A barnstar for you!

Thank you! I appreciate the kind words. You have also done a great job on a number of discographies. Metallica was one I thought would never happen. It used to be a complete mess. I tend to follow the edits that have been made by Holiday56, but pretty much all of the discographies I've cleaned up need additional work. It's usually the guest appearances and lead sections. Have either you or Holiday thought about cleaning up the Linkin Park and Pearl Jam discographies? I'd love to help out. I took this semester off so I have a little bit more free time than usual. Anyway, I'll talk to you soon. Infex (talk) 20:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A strange one

Hi Sufur222, hope you're well. If you're not too busy, would you be able to look in at User talk:Quadell#mirror images? A very odd situation, regarding a new Harrison biography, which … well, it basically rips off Wikipedia's Harrison album and song articles. Strange but true.

What I'm hoping is, you might want to follow the link from Quadell's page and hit "helpful" on my Amazon review for the book – which I've signed as "HariG". In the interests of drawing attention to this issue, I'd simply like to ensure that the review is helpful/popular enough to register in the listing's main space. Quite understand if you'd rather not of course. Many thanks. Best, JG66 (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It has been well-reviewed – and it gives me the chills just looking at the cover! Thanks for your support. Got to get back to rallying the troops now … Cheers, JG66 (talk) 18:31, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tupac Shakur

Hey are you trying to get Tupac Shakur discography up to FLC status? If you are i'm definitely down to help. I just nominated Hit 'em Up and Temptations (song) for GAN and Mack 10 discography for FLC. I've been meaning to get around to Pac's discography too but i'm also trying to get Me Against the World to good topic. CrowzRSA 17:53, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Trophies" editing

Hello Sufur222. I just want to point out that even though the song is credited to "Young Money featuring Drake", Drake is a part of Young Money, which makes him a primary artist as well. That's why I put (with Young Money). But if your right and im wrong, shouldn't "Every Girl" and "BedRock" be on the featured artist table too? Those songs should be in one place with "Trophies". If im wrong, please reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drizzy010 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I mean I guess, Speaking of Trophies, why isn't there a page for it. It has plenty of history behind it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drizzy010 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Graeme Smith/archive1

Hi, can you spare some time reviewing this one if you're interested? —Vensatry _(Ping) 04:59, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soliciting comment...

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 02:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soliciting comment

Hi, I've currently got a featured list nomination up for the article List of Billboard number-one rap songs of the 2010s, and was wondering if you'd care to perhaps leave any comments. If not, feel free to ignore this. Thanks! Holiday56 (talk) 07:07, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

Hello!I am U990467.Thank you for your reminder on my talk page! There is one user reverted my edit on Ariana Grande discography but left the broken table.I fix it,but she reverted it AGAIN.I left the message on her talk page (see here) ,but she didn't see that.She said my edit is "disruptive edit".I don't know how to do it!Please help! —U990467(talk) 14:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tupac Shakur discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scarface. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi Sufur, Can you edit Ariana Grande discography explained "One Last Time" is a promotional single because this is free?. Thanks. Regards. Eliluu (talk) 02:06, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA article you passed being considered for deletion

Sufur222, an article you passed as meeting Good Article criteria is being considered for deletion for lack of notability and poor sources. The GA process is being called into question. Please see this discussion. Prhartcom (talk) 23:14, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

50 Cent audio samples

Hey there Sufur. I've created a category of Category:50 Cent audio samples. I might be missing some, so if you know/find anything that fits there, please add it. I also wanted to know if you're available to upload new versions on the current audios because it seems that some of them are broken. Regards, Retrohead (talk) 10:20, 8 December 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Reference Errors on 24 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Jeremih discography page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Salsoul Nugget (If U Wanna)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Salsoul Nugget (If U Wanna) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:14, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Salsoul Nugget (If U Wanna)

The article Salsoul Nugget (If U Wanna) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song, no info found on performer, who does not have article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FL removal

I have nominated Birdman discography for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Azealia911 _talk 23:15, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Australian chart peaks outside the top 50

Hi, back in November 2012, you added an Australian chart peak to the Ain't Talkin' 'bout Dub page, cited from one of David Kent's chart books, but listed as an ARIA Chart peak. Just so you know, David Kent's books are based on his Kent Music Report chart, which ARIA licensed between mid 1983 and 19 June 1988 inclusive. From the chart dated week ending 26 June 1988, ARIA commenced producing the chart themselves, and so Australia had two different charts until the Kent/Australian Music Report chart ceased publication in the late 1990's. ARIA, being the music industry body for Australia, declared its chart Australia's 'official' chart following commencement; and since the Kent-produced chart ceased publication, it has been Australia's only chart. Sometimes there were large differences between the ARIA and Kent Report charts, particularly in the lower half of the top 100.

I've replaced the peak you listed with "Ain't Talkin' 'bout Dub"'s ARIA chart peak, and added a new reference for this. Admittedly, Australian chart data outside the top 50 pre-2001 (when Pandora commenced archiving the weekly electronic ARIA Reports online) is not easy to find online, but Gavin Ryan's "Australia's Music Charts 1988-2010" book collates ARIA top 100 peaks from January 1990 to December 2010 inclusive.Nqr9 (talk) 08:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussants needed at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4

Since you are among the editors who made at least 10 edits to "Blurred Lines", I was hoping you might take the time to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sufur222. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sufur222. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of number-one songs in Norway

Hi. Can you please work on List of number-one songs in Norway in your sandbox first, then copypaste it over to the article? Just copypaste what you did already and work on it in your sandbox. As I said in my edit summary, you're making the page quite inconsistent by working on it there. You're using mdy date formats in the references then insisting on dmy in the table—this should be consistent throughout. You're using publisher as a parameter in references where work is defined when we don't need Hung Medien listed for every ref, and we definitely don't need to un-italicise "norwegiancharts.com". Websites are italicised, it's just the done thing. You're also missing out the weeks that VG-lista, the official chart provider, actually uses, and instead relying on norwegiancharts.com, which does not show the weeks, has a lot of issues and doesn't even archive songs properly. Norwegiancharts.com is full of issues so until you can incorporate the actual week the official site uses, I don't think it's right to be worked on there. Your table was also left under the heading "2015", which is not correct. There's just a lot of issues as is. Until it's complete, it's best to make it a WIP in your own space. Thanks. Ss112 04:11, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please consider changing the column header "Single" to "Song". It used to be the case that everything that reached number one was a single, but not every song that reaches number one now is technically a single—for instance, the latest number one, "Better Now" by Post Malone, is not a single. This also goes along with the fact that the page is titled "list of number-one songs". Ss112 04:30, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sufur222. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Also, the "colour" parameter does not work, but "color" does.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Sufur222|<font color="Green">'''I Am Rufus'''</font>]]  • [[User talk:Sufur222|<font colour="Blue" face="Garamond"><small>Conversation is a beautiful thing.</small></font>]]

: I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing.

if you don't want the blue color/colour, to

[[User:Sufur222|<b style="color:Green">I Am Rufus</b>]] • [[User talk:Sufur222|<small style="font-family:Garamond">Conversation is a beautiful thing.</small>]]

: I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing.

if you want the blue color/colour, to

[[User:Sufur222|<b style="color:Green">I Am Rufus</b>]] • [[User talk:Sufur222|<small style="color:Blue; font-family:Garamond">Conversation is a beautiful thing.</small>]]

: I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing.

—Anomalocaris (talk) 05:36, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Funny Bidness: Da Abum" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Funny Bidness: Da Abum. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 2#Funny Bidness: Da Abum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 13:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:Record charts#Charts with more than 200 positions and Template:Single chart

Hi. Regarding your recent edits, please be advised that chart positions lower than 200 should not be added. This was decided by consensus and is now a chart guideline at WP:Record charts#Charts with more than 200 positions. Also, there is no need to add the song= parameter to Billboard charts (Canada, US, and the US R&B/Hip-Hop and Rap charts) as it is not a supported parameter per Template:Single chart#Billboard charts. Thanks. Ss112 00:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah wasn't aware of this, thanks for letting me know - will bear in mind in the future. I've generally added the song= parameter for Billboard stuff as a precaution in case they change the site structure again in the future, but if that's advised against I'll stop doing it. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 08:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Start date

Hello. Regarding this edit, it is considered a misuse of Template:Start date to use it outside of an infobox. Thanks. Ss112 15:51, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Singlechart usages for Portugaldigitalsongs has been nominated for renaming

Category:Singlechart usages for Portugaldigitalsongs has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 22:40, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]