Jump to content

User talk:Jon Palacios

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Infex)

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Cathartica! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Akerans (talk) 02:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Linkin Park discography

[edit]

Hey, thanks for your edit to Linkin Park discography. It's really hard to find those types of sources that are dead on the original site. Good work! One thing, try to use the cite web template when citing sources from websites. Check out my diff. Also I removed the 31 from Irish charts because on the current refence it doesn't say It's Goin' Down charted. If you find a reference that says that, we add it again. Thanks again! --Neo139 (talk) 01:34, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you have source for this edit? I saw you changed the peaks of the Belgium charts where ultratop.be said "Tip: " at the left of the chart position. I don't know what Tip means in chart terminology, so I'm ignoring it. Meanwhile I have undone your edit, if find other source that says the numbers you added, revert my revert and add that source. Also if you know more about this "Tip: " thing tell me.--Neo139 (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ultratip acts like a Bubbling Under chart for Flanders and Wallonia. "New Divide" peaked at #1 on the Ultratip chart, which translates to #51. Cathartica (talk) 01:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I reverted my revert. --Neo139 (talk) 02:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jon Palacios. You have new messages at Neo139's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hinder

[edit]

Hi, just letting you know I removed the bit you added about singles there because it didn't have a reference. If you could find a reference for it, it'd be more than welcome to be re-added, but until then, I'm afraid it'll have to stay out. Best wishes, C628 (talk) 23:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weezer

[edit]

Please, don't add Death to False Metal in a compilation album section. We're currently discussing the matter in an RfC. Thank you. WereWolf (talk) 20:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Taking Back Sunday discography

[edit]

Hello, I've noticed you added "Where My Mouth Is" to the Singles section on the Taking Back Sunday discography. I've looked everywhere for a source concerning this matter, but I cannot find one. Could you please provide a reliable source for that song being released as a single? As far as I know, only "Sink Into Me" was released as a single from New Again. Thank you. WereWolf (talk) 23:38, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was released to the Alternative/Modern Rock radio format on August 31st/September 1st of 2009.[1] Cathartica (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Staind

[edit]

Please don't add singles that haven't been officially released to the single list and don't red ink them until they are notable to have separate articles (have charted). Also, Eyes Wide Open is the official first single.--Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 21:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't start edit wars by not communicating. Use edit summaries to communicate and discuss things on the talk page or user talk page. Yes you were right about the single, but that's not the important thing you undid edits without communicating and explaining things. This will lead to edit wars and this isn't the way to get things done right on wikipedia, especially when a user is trying to communicate with you and you just ignore them.--Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 07:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improper synthesis of chart positions

[edit]

Please stop making this edit. The Billboard Hot 100 only goes to position 100, and the Bubbling Under chart is not an extension of the Hot 100. Because the rules prevent a song from dropping off the Hot 100 onto the Bubbling Under chart, there is no fixed relationship between the positions on the Bubbling Under chart and the positions where the songs would appear on an extended Hot 100 chart. Labeling a song has being position 106 is both inaccurate, and, even it was accurate, would violate WP:SYNTH.—Kww(talk) 23:07, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Twin Atlantic song names

[edit]

Hi,

I know that a lot of bands do not use capital letters for words such as 'and', 'a', 'of', etc. in song titles, but Twin Atlantic do. Sorry to seem as if I am nitpicking by changing it, but the band website lists all words in all songs as starting with capital letters. I know it is a minor thing and is somewhat debatable, I changed it back to capital letters for the sake of being correct. http://free.twinatlantic.com/music/

OttersMeow (talk) 16:38, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sugar Ray - "Aim for Me"

[edit]

Was "Aim for Me" released as a separate single or just a B-side of "Every Morning"? Wikkitywack (talk) 07:12, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Megadeth discography. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 14:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foster the Peeps

[edit]

Do u have access to billboard.biz? I see you updated Dont Stop's bubbling under position NYSMtalk page 02:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, unfortunately I don't. The latest Bubbling Under chart was posted on UK Mix and ATRL. Cathartica (talk) 02:49, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative

[edit]

Hi Cathartica,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Belgian chart positions for M.I.A.

[edit]

If "XXXO" got to 7 on the Ultratip chart and that equates to 57 overall, then surely "Bad Girls" (no 81 on Ultratip according to the source) equates to 131 overall, not 181........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It must be a mistake. I've never seen 81 on Ultratip for any artist. Cathartica (talk) 00:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How is this single position for XXXO being calculated based on the TIP chart? Just adding 50? Lifebonzza (talk) 14:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This page on the Ultratop website shows "TIP: 81" for "Bad Girls", and this page on the same site shows what appears to be the full Ultratip top 100, with the song indeed at number 81..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide a reliable source as to how either of you are extrapolating from the Belgian TIP chart to the Belgian Flanders chart overall. Currently, XXXO is listed as 57 (7 on TIP chart) and Bad Girls as 81 (81 on TIP chart). This is confusing, surely this should be resolved before adding these positions on the discography page....Lifebonzza (talk) 16:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's clearly some sort of Bubbling Under chart, which would imply that you just add 50 to TIP positions, but I can't find any official source for that. Bizarrely, another user claimed on my talk page that the TOP represents 1-50 and the TIP 101-200, but that 51-100 aren't published anywhere..........!?!?!?!? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's very strange. Ah! Here's what Ultatip (also known as Tipperade) is on the charts source:
It's also mentioned as such on the wiki page for it. While it is an official chart, there doesnt seem to be a method available presently to subtract the airplay from the commercial sales to get the ultratop? If not, it can be listed as a separate chart on the discog page, as Ultratip instead? Lifebonzza (talk) 01:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

[edit]
The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.2.110 (talk) 18:17, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Owl City discography does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:18, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Flyleaf discography does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Please start using edit summaries. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Killbot Billboard Charts

[edit]

Thank you for adding the Billboard charing to the Killbot article. Do you have access to see where it is on the charts now by chance? I am not a subscriber and would like to know if it moved up in the charts or if #13 and #19 were its peak position. Thank you much! Josie Borisow 15:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC) User: Nbcwd

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank you for updating the Killbot page with Billboard Charting! Very much appreciated! Josie Borisow 15:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Corey Taylor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Reeder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unding my edit

[edit]

Good afternoon! You've recently canceled my edit in Hoobastank discography. I added two music videos, but you've erased it. Why? I saw this videos in Hoobastank official channel in Youtube. Could you please add it in a box again? With respect --93.72.76.168 (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You! --93.72.76.168 (talk) 15:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tool discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Love and Death (band). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You removed failed verification tags without changing the reference or explaining why they were removed. That's not acceptable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Korn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Issues (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Korn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Meyers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blue October Discography

[edit]

Good job on the Blue October discography page. However, I noticed that you didn't carry "The Scar" over as a single, which is what it was released as. Perhaps it should be added. Lyons24000 (talk) 02:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Band of Horses (unexplained deletion of selected album chart stats)

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your improvements to the BOH page, but I was wondering what your reason for deleting so many album chart statistcs was? I took a long time getting all those into the article. Chart positions for France, Austria, Canada, Finland, Greece, New Zealand, Switzerland , Ireland and Spain were all properly researched and cited. If you have a good reason for their non inclusion please let me know, otherwise I think they should be included, thanks. Thegraciousfew (talk) 10:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have now expanded the table you created to include the 9 charts that were deleted, so hopefully thats the best of both worlds! Regards, Ian. Thegraciousfew (talk) 13:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for formatting the citations I added and well done for finding that Irish Chart website, I've never seen that before and it certainly makes things easier. However, I have 2 issues with your changes... 1)The references for USA and CAN via Billboard simply do not work. The chart positions in the grid are correct, but the chart positions on the Billboard website are wrong. BOH US album chart positions are - / 35 / 7 /13 but Billboard shows - / 169 / 64 / 65. Canada should be - / - / 7 / 23 but Billboard shows - / - / - / 23. Allmusic provides a much simpler and more accurate reference for the US chart. The individual weekly chart pages on Billboard for the Canadian chart ARE correct so I used those in the absence of one single source. Please let me know if you disagree but I'll need to amend those 2 references later when I have time. And... 2)Why is USA 1st in the table when everything else is in alphabetical order? Perhaps you could let me have your thoughts on these two matters? Regards, Ian. Thegraciousfew (talk) 06:24, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Korn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comatose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonathan Davis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thai and Hear Me Now (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

30 Seconds to Mars discography

[edit]

MTV Unplugged charted in the Austrian singles chart. Mainstream Rock chart positions are used for songs charted before the establishment of the Rock Songs chart, introduced in 2009. Please read WP:CHARTS and WP:DISCOGSTYLE.--Earthh (talk) 11:39, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Korn album name (The Paradigm Shift)

[edit]

I noticed that you changed the name of Korn's new album from "Paradigm Shift" to "The Paradigm Shift". Thanks! I wanted to do it myself but wasn't sure how. I was going to try to "move" the page to a new name but wasn't sure if that was the correct way and didn't want to screw it up. So, thanks again for doing that. --Jimv1983 (talk) 23:58, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Label Society discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Queensryche Discography

[edit]

Hi Infex

Re: Silent Lucidity. It had 2 seperate releases in the UK that's the point I guess (and it is a discography detailing their releases huh?). The way it was originally worded I think it also misleads readers into thinking the song peaked on first release. The Goo Goo Dolls discography relating to Iris is a prime example of this hence why I "followed the trend" so to speak.

Cheers

Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonclay (talk • contribs) 09:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm restoring my last revision (which also included some references for the single releases of "I'm American", "The Hands" and "Man Down!") and adding a note clarifying the UK reissue of "Silent Lucidity". Infex (talk) 22:33, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metallica discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elektra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SOiL

[edit]

I am in the band SOiL and first off I want to say that I appreciate you cleaning up our page. That was very cool of you. There is however some non accurate information. 1. "Surrounded" was never released as a radio single 2. "let go" from the true self album was a single which you did not include 3. The album "Whole" charted in the UK at 158. I have this information directly from our UK label with access to the charts. 4. You did not include the independent charts to the albums. The link to billboard I had up is accurate. "true self" at 21 and "whole" at 32

Neither of us have time to go back and forth changing the page every 5 minutes, so if you could update the page with the accurate info I'd really appreciate it. Also Thanks again for cleaning it up!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.59.225.226 (talk) 00:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your wonderful contributions

[edit]

c: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.115.63 (talk) 23:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thought I'd give you this - the number of discographies you have cleaned up and improved from dire to excellent is remarkable, and whenever a style guideline changes you apply the change to all of them, whereas the rest of us are struggling to find the motivation to sort out just a few. Rock groups worldwide can sleep better knowing you've got their discography sorted (indeed, one's already thanked you!). If I could summon up your motivation, I'd get far more done on here than I actually do. Keep up the good work! I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 15:37, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Evil discography

[edit]

Is there a source at Billboard.com that says that Deal with the Devil reached #1? --Jax 0677 (talk) 06:10, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar
For Matisyahu discography. Bearian (talk) 21:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steel Panther discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 9 April

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Extent of wrong

[edit]

Sorry you feel I'm wrong. I agree that I probably reverted too many of your changes. However, the list of charts doesn't include the ones you added. If you think that list is wrong, bring it up on the talk page. I don't know enough about all of the valid and recognized charts around the world to speak intelligently. If there are any that are missing they should be added and experts on the subject, such as you, should be consulted. Please offer the information you have there. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Spike in My Veins does not have an edit summary. Sorry for reverting your unexplained change earlier. When you used the edit summary, it was more clearly understood. So, really, I reverted you because I had no clue why you were removing content. Thanks for explaining it the second time. Please continue to use the edit summary when editing.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day

[edit]
Happy First Edit Day, Jon Palacios, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! ~ Anastasia (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to P.O.D. discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[P.O.D.]] | year=2008 | type=album | publisher=[[Rhapsody (online music service)|Rhapsody]]}}</ref>
  • |}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:07, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vampire Weekend discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • UK: V – Vybe | work=zobbel.de | accessdate=June 15, 2014}} | author=Zywietz, Tobias}}
  • |}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Always - Saliva

[edit]

Apologies for the incorrect info. Was looking at http://acharts.us/uk_singles_top_75 and at time of writing they had the entry listed as the Saliva record rather than MK / Alana record. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonclay (talk • contribs) 11:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sevendust

[edit]

Care to explain why you undone my Sevendust edit? Time Travelers & Bonfires is not a studio album. It consists of their old songs recorded acoustically. I know that in the article there's no statement that it is the 10th studio album by them (which isn't), but why not keep it in a separate category to avoid confusion? Sabbatino (talk) 22:19, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soil 2015 corrections

[edit]

Great job on the soil discography. You've cleaned it up to look awesome. I'm in the band and noticed a charting error that I researched to verify and corrected. You keep changing it. SOiL "The Hate Song". Active Rock: peak week: 4-13-2014, peak chart: 40............ You keep taking off the 40. This is direct from MEDIABASE. Please leave it at 40.

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Zonyx. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Correction from 2011

[edit]

Hi, you may not even remember making the edit now, but looking through the editing history of Marilyn Manson discography, back in January 2011 you added an Australian chart peak for 'Torniquet' of #73. This is incorrect; it actually peaked at #52 in Australia. Maybe you sourced this peak from one of David Kent's (who published the Kent Music Report) books, as there were 2 separate charts published in Australia between June 1988 and early 1998; but the ARIA chart (which continues to this day) was considered the 'official' one, and it peaked at #52 on their chart. I've fixed this up now.Nqr9 (talk) 11:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Depeche Mode discography

[edit]

Hi, on 3 April in this edit - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Depeche_Mode_discography&oldid=773548141 - you changed the reference for Australian Depeche Mode peaks from a single reference list covering albums and singles, to a new singles-only reference, deleting some of the references for Australia album chart peaks. This removed the 'aus' reference (the name I gave to the combined reference list) altogether from the article. I've now fixed this up, but please don't alter this reference in such a way again. Also, there is no need to add quotation marks to reference names you add; this merely adds unnecessary characters to the page (it makes no difference to how the reference appears in layout on the page).Nqr9 (talk) 02:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Zonyx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jon Palacios. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ [1]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jon_Palacios&oldid=1089968389"