User talk:Steph 270

Nude Skincare
Company type	Private
Industry	Cosmetics
Founded	United Kingdom (2007)
Products	Cosmetics, Skin Care
Website	[1]

Welcome!

Hello, Steph 270, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like NUDE SKINCARE, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tim Ross (talk) 10:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NUDE SKINCARE

A tag has been placed on NUDE SKINCARE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tim Ross (talk) 10:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NUDE SKINCARE

NUDE SKINCARE has been tagged for speedy deletion, a process through which unacceptable articles are summarily removed. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 14:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as NUDE SKINCARE, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Wikipedia is not to be used for promotional purposes. DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Starting a new NUDE SKINCARE article

I wrote what is essentially this response to your request, Steph, on my talk page. I don't know if you saw it there. Tim Ross (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid, Steph, that I no longer recall much about the article, although I note that it's been deleted twice, once as "unambiguous advertising or promotion" and the second time as an "article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". Do you still have the text? If you do, go ahead and enter it on my talk page, and I'll try to offer some advice. Or, if you have another version that you think may be more likely to work, you can let me see that one. Tim Ross (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a draft of a possible new article for your consideration, Steph (between the double lines). I think that this version will prove to be acceptable. Feel free to use this to start the article, which should be named, I believe, "Nude Skincare". Tim Ross (talk) 10:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nude Skincare is a British brand of probiotic and natural skincare products, founded in June 2007 by Bryan Meehan, who also founded the U.K. organic stores Fresh and Wild.

Company history

The brand name Nude was decided after discussing concepts with good friend, muse and inspiration to the brand, Ali Hewson. ^[1] Hewson suggested using the brand name Nude, which is the name of her ethical clothing brand, Edun, spelt backwards. ^[2]

Product line

The Nude Skincare product line includes:

face moisturizers (including cleansers, masks, scrubs, and balms)
body creams, washes, and scrubs
supplements for hydration, anti-aging, and detox, as well as vitamin supplements

References

External links

Nude Skincare website

That looks great, thanks Tim. I've just posted it so I look forward to finding out what happens next!

Thanks again, your help is much appreciated. Steph.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roussillon, London

A tag has been placed on Roussillon, London, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mark nutley (talk) 12:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roussillon is a Michelin-starred, London French restaurant. The restaurant is named after the village in the Lubéron rather than the Catalan region. [1]

Roussillon’s trademark is the exquisite blend of French cuisine with the finest of British seasonal vegetables. Roussillon’s menu changes twice a season, led by the best British produce on offer. A favourite includes Blue Bembridge Lobster, Colchester Oysters, wild rabbit from the North Downs and Scottish venison. Herbs and vegetables are freshly picked each morning in Surrey. The cheeseboard is more patriotic with some twenty ripe French cheeses.[2]

Alexis Gauthier was the Chef Patron of Roussillon. On the 2nd of April 2010, Roussillon announced that, following twelve years of successful collaboration, Alexis Gauthier had decided to move on to devote more time to his other projects. [3]

Gauthier is due to launch a new restaurant at Lindsay House with Roberto della Pietra, the previous head sommelier at Roussillon. Gauthier will retain his share of ownership in Roussillon. [4] [edit] References

  1. ^ http://www.jancisrobinson.com/articles/nick1030.html
  2. ^ http://www.roussillon.co.uk/home.php
  3. ^ http://www.roussillon.co.uk/statement.php
  4. ^ http://www.roussillon.co.uk/statement.php

[edit] External links

   * Roussillon official UK website
   * Lindsay House official UK website

Hello Steph 270. You used the {{helpme}} tag but you did not post a question. Please write out your question and when you are done, place back the tag. I or someone else will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the new contributors help desk, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.

Thanks for letting me know. I posted the following:

Both are up for speedy deletion, what can I do to keep these posts up on Wikipedia?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks {{helpme}}

Personally, I don't see either as being notable, and are borderline WP:PROMO ... but others may disagree. As such, I won't remove the helpme. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further to discussions, the problems were neutrality and a lack of reliable sources - see user:chzz/vrs.

Note, you may wish to create a userspace draft. Chzz ► 13:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~==Speedy deletion nomination of Solange Azagury-Partridge==~~

A tag has been placed on Solange Azagury-Partridge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 09:39, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:SAP-PortraitB&W.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:SAP-PortraitB&W.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:SAP Necklace-v2010.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:SAP Necklace-v2010.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Hot-lips-red.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hot-lips-red.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:56, 26 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:56, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SAP-PortraitB&W.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SAP-PortraitB&W.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Nude skincare

I have nominated Nude skincare, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nude skincare. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:SAP-PortraitB&W.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SAP-PortraitB&W.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -MJH (talk) 00:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Greenemerald.png

The file File:Greenemerald.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/relationships/article5568514.ece

[2] ttp://beautyinterviews.com/interviews/nude-skincare/

[1]

[2]