User talk:Status/2010

August

Old account

I must inform you that operating two accounts is against wikipedia rules. If you are genuinly not intending to use your old account you need to notify administrators and have your old account deactivated. I suspect that you wish to forget your old account and you're starting over that's why you've created a new account? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 23:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

No problem. I'm not sure where the best place is to inform administrators. If you can't find a place you can let User talk:Explicit know. He is an experienced administrator who I've worked with in the past and if he can't fix it he will be able to advise you more accordingly. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 23:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Undoing redirects

Please stop undoing redirects without explanation, as you did here, here, and enough other places that you attracted my attention. [{WP:NSONGS]] explains the times that an article should be created about a song. In short, to have an article, the song needs to have

1. Charted (and not on Radio Disney, iTunes or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS)
2. Been recorded by multiple notable artists
3. or have won an award.

The songs you keep undoing redirects for have been redirected because they don't meet any of these criteria. Additionally, you should never revert another editor without leaving an edit summary. Simply reverting the other editor says that his work is worthless, and is only suitable for dealing with vandals.—Kww(talk) 00:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

According to WP:NALBUMS albums which have not been released are not usually notable for their own article. They are notable if there is a confirmed track-listing, release date and suitabley detailed information (WP:HAMMER), for Sale El Sol there is not. Also there is a distinct lack of clear information about the album from WP:reliable sources which means it is inappropriate for you to create the article. If you wish to work on the article that's fine but do it in you're own sandbox. If you don't know what or how to make your a sandbox, ask me and I will make one for you. The point is that you can edit it their at your own leisure and then when the album is notable a page will be created. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 21:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Jonas Brothers Live In Concert

Why did you remove the "unsourced section" tag from Jonas Brothers Live In Concert without providing sources? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 18:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

OK, thanks for replying. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 18:36, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

September

Vandalism?

Not at all My edits to We Sing. We Dance. We Steal Things. do not constitute vandalism as they were not "addition[s], removal[s], or change[es] of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia" and it's honestly a ridiculous claim. This album compiles previously-released material, making it a compilation album. If you want to talk about that on the article's talk page, that's fine and well, but your notice on my talk is ridiculous. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

EPs I was under the impression that the material from this album was also on the previously-released EPs. If I am mistaken, you could be civil about it and not maek the slanderous allegation that I was vandalizing Wikipedia. It's easy to be nice. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:40, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

All's well This is a simple misunderstanding then, and no harm is done. In the future, I would advise you to be judicious about placing a template on someone's talk page that claims that their edits appear to constitute vandalism, as that is a serious allegation on Wikipedia. Thanks for posting to my talk to discuss this. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

You might like this essay. Cheers. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:53, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Woohoo

Well we've already had one discussion and the fact is Xtina promoted the song with a live performance and sent it to radio. In the US you send songs to radio but its up to individual stations if they add them. If stations choose not to add a song then obviously its airplay will be lower. The song was made to download and it was sent to radio. Obviously radio didnt add it and hence it had a short-shelf life. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 02:17, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Per WP:Other things exist it isn't wise to get into an argument of But "Go Girl" is a promo single... etc. But since you've brought it up, "Go Girl" as her first official single. Then she herself and her label denounced the song saying it was a promo release and its only included on some versions of the album as a bonus track. "Woohoo" is actually included on Bionic it was released and coverage from MTV even calls it a single. Both "Go Girl" and "Woohoo" are singles the difference is that because "Go Girl" is not included on all versions of the album and because of the artist/label's comments its a promo single. If you wish to open a discussion about "Woohoo" on the discussion page please do. But I'm not sure what you want? Do you want the article to be deleted? Do you want it to be downgraded to promotional single? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 15:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Well just start a new discussion on the talk page like you did mine. The only reason it leaked was because Aggie posted it on her youtube page. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 17:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Roommate (Korean band)

Don't redirect non-existant band articles, let them be deleted. The articles need to be written to prove that they meet WP:BAND, or else anybody could just put their non-notable band onto Wikipedia and then redirect them somewhere. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 05:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article I Hate Boys, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. "The song was described by Aguilera as a feminist anthem to the men who discriminate or hinder women's work." comment is unsourced. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 19:25, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Candyo32 02:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

After I posted the message I noticed some user (probably an IP) removed RedOne from production, and by using writers real names in their first track listing mention, you more than likely didn't recognize Nadir Khayat as RedOne, so no problem ! :) Candyo32 03:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Also, although all promotion ceased, similar to Woohoo (song), Put it in a Love Song still gets single template because of the radio date. Candyo32 06:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:BDC

Welcome, Status/2010, to the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! You have met all of the membership requirements. Any concerns should be directed to Steveo2. See the Birthday Committee Project Page to see our userbox and the Birthday Message Templates. Go to the bulletin board to see any new announcements concerning the committee. Remember, Be Bold!

Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 19:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Only Girl

Please note that there is a policy in wikipedia called WP:CRYSTAL. It basically states that without confirmed release dates from reliable sources any information is subject to change. Until event x happens on date y information a, b and c is never 100% true. If event x never happens then information a, b and c must be scrutinized and if its sources are reliable it is accepted as truth but there will always be a degree of error/margin of non-confidence. Does that make sense? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 01:36, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Sincerely Yours (EP) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Sincerely Yours (EP), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sincerely Yours (EP) until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 01:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Sale el Sol

Because the two different versions of the album have different names it is appropriate to have the seperate headings. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 16:22, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Despite me explaining the above to you, you still went and removed this? why? Whilst the article is in the size it is the level 3 headings are appropriate. This is explained at WP:ALBUMS. Additionally I'm trying to make the article more accessible so please stop removing them. In future please discuss such edits. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 09:20, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Fefe Dobson discography among other articles

Hello. Please complete the project that you start[ed] at Fefe Dobson discography, so that it will have an Ending :D Get it? Start-Ending. Please note and correct the orphaned refs and Thank You. I have no dispute over those sections being moved there and had thought to do it some day perhaps. Thank You, again.—Iknow23 (talk) 01:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Ok, you can refuse to talk to me if you wish, but just to let you know...now you also need to correct the infobox linkage.—Iknow23 (talk) 06:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I have no dispute to the removal of the questionable Amazon material at Sunday Love. But you then use Amazon as your source for Joy? So obviously Amazon is UNreliable regarding FUTURE release dates, but PAST dates there is no problem as in the singles "Watch Me Move" and "I Want You" as the release has already occurred.—Iknow23 (talk) 00:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

I fixed the discog infobox. EnJOY :) —Iknow23 (talk) 04:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Miley Cyrus

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Miley Cyrus, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 08:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Template:Lady Gaga

Care to explain the fancrufty addition to template {{Lady Gaga}}? Please be prepared to explain the additions in terms of WP:RECENTISM and WP:RS. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lights

Your Afd-nomination was closed as speedy keep as wrong venue. Redirects are discussed at WP:RFD. If you think the move is uncontroversial, then you should use {{db-move|page to be moved|reason}}. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 02:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Akonic for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Akonic, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akonic until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 14:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Hi Zach, How are you? I just wanted to say well done! You've been making a conscious effort to be a better editor and its paying off!

Wanted to point a few things out:

• On Sale El Sol, I agree with you completely, so I've removed all but the one tracklisting sourced from her official website!
• On Louboutins, Using a border is always preferred.
• On "Love?", she is actually signed to Def Jam records which is itself part of the Island/Def Jam record label group. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 22:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm not bad thanks. Labels are a strange thing cus you have production labels (with producers/writers) who actually make the records and then you have marketing labels who actually promote the artist and then distribution labels who actually get the record out. E.g. Rihanna is signed to Def Jam who market her. Yet Island/Def Jam is her distributor and SRC Records actually pays the writers/producers. So in the US Def Jam release Rihanna records, in the UK is done by Mercury Records and then internationally by Universal Music. Confused? LOL -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 22:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Its probably because all the writers and producers who work on the album are signed to or are associates of SRC. SRC will appear on the back of the CD case with Def Jam. Its cause labels operate exchange partnerships. another way of explaining it is: Taio Cruz is signed to Island in the UK. So Island records pays for all his recording etc. They release him in the UK but Mercury releases him in the US even though they paid nothing towards the production. In return Mariah Carey is signed to Island in the US so Island pays for her recording. But Mercury agrees to release her stuff in the UK. So by doing this both Island and Mercury artists get sold around the world and because they're both owned by Universal Music, one company makes the money. =)

File:Publicaffair1.jpg

You uploaded a new image because it was higher resolution, or as you said "better quality". Don't do that please. Non-free images like album covers should be low resolution, see here, point 3b. Regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I Hate Boys

It was redirected by an AfD discussion which is present on the talk page. That means there is a concensus to not create the page. If you wish to do so you need to create it in a WP:SANDBOX or at you're user page and then ask other editors to decide whether it is notable or not. Then an administrator would merge the pages. Do not recreate the page again. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 21:28, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mariahcarey -1's.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mariahcarey -1's.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:52, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

October

License tagging for File:SoYesterday.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SoYesterday.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Yvesnimmo (talk) 21:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Haha it's okay. Just please try to remember. :) Yvesnimmo (talk) 21:37, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Strip Me

Hello Zach, In future it would be appreciated if you were to ask me first, before copying one of my sandboxes to create Strip Me (or any other article for that matter). I had deliberately not created the article because I didnt think it was notable hence my sandbox's existance. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 18:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Never create an article by cutting and pasting another one. It causes licensing problems. I've deleted the result. Feel free to talk with Lil-unique1 about any changes you think should be made to his sandbox version, but you should probably leave it to him to move the article when it's appropriate.—Kww(talk) 19:25, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Greatest Hits... So Far!!!

Hi, IK was wondering if you can please stop adding the track listing to Greatest Hits... So Far!. It has not yet been confirmed on a major music retailer of the LaFace or pink's website. Im sure itll be released soon. :) Thanks PinkFunhouse13 (talk) 22:56, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Or please point out the link on her website that confirms it :) Thanks PinkFunhouse13 (talk) 22:57, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Nicole Scherzinger

You should definitely know by now that Twitter is not an appropriate source. Until there is more information "Poison" cannot be listed. Also there is a discussion at Talk:Nicole Scherzinger that "Puakenikini" and "Supervillain" were singles. They were released but because they failed to appear on the iTunes 100 both were cancelled. It is difficult to source more verifiably than already done because we're talking about a retrospect event. But all the sources provided, none say the latter two were promo singles. So nope they're staying. "Poison" is going until officially confirmed. Remember what happened to "Nobody Can Change Me"? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 22:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Becauser Twitter accounts are often hacked etc. Its the same reason Facebook and Myspace accounts are not reliable sources, also there are copyright violation issues. Well you can't make an objective judgment and say oh because they were not sent to radio they should be promo singles, that's WP:OR. We only have archives for airplay for Rhythm Crossover and Mainstream Airplay not for Urban, Urban AC etc. so its too much of a bold statement. All the sources say that both songs were released as the third and fourth singles. What happens afterwards is not our concern because effectively we dont have a source saying their release was cancelled but its obvious that it was in that videos were not made, and the singles were not promoted. Unless you have a source saying that they were specifically promo singles you can't claim so. They were released just like any other singles. As for "Nobody Can Change Me" that was premiered on radio by Nicole, she even called it her new single. But it was never sent for airplay or released for download. The point I'm trying to make is wait for something concrete. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 22:42, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Lights

• Lights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This page is not appropriate for speedy deletion, as you have been informed multiple times. Please stop tagging it, as any further tagging of it will be interpreted only as disruption. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Discographies

To bring a long discussion into a short summary is quite difficult. But basically in that long discussion we've fought tooth and nail to hammer out new guidelines which satisfy the ever changing rules and manual of style. They new format agreed and now in use can be seen at WP:DISCOGSTYLE. All discographies will eventually look like this but its going to be a slow process. In the mean time you'll see that I've started sorting out Kelly Rowland discography while another user has completed Rihanna discography. Whilst it is correct for you to convert other discogs if you edit them please be aware that not a lot of people are aware of the changes and so they might revert or resent your edits. You have to kindly explain to them about WP:DISCOGSTYLE and as well point out that discussions have taken place on the talk page for months. It would probably be best for popular artists to mention it on the talk page first and try and get some support from others who edit the articles regularly. With regards to tables see WP:Wikitable and all will be clear! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 11:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Other charting songs are now officially allowed per the talk page as long as they have a seperate heading: === Other charting songs ===. I've converted Nicole Scherzinger#Discography to the new format but I'm not entirely satisfied with the results. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 00:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Cannibal (EP)

You've been here awhile, I shouldn't have to warn you about making unsourced edits. Please don't do it again. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 23:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Okay, now you adding a source which doesnt way what you said. Please revert your edit. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 23:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Never mind, it will do for now. But for future reference, its not a race, next time wait till a 3rd party ref publishes it please. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 23:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Kesha discography

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Kesha discography, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Yves (talk) 23:52, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

And pleasee use the preview button to avoid mistakes. Thanks. Yves (talk) 23:52, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Are you going to covert Other Charted Songs as well? - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 00:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Kesha

Re. Template:Kesha and the possible addition of "We R Who We R"

Please discuss this on the talk page, Template talk:Kesha#We R Who We R.

Thanks,  Chzz  ►  16:26, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Taylor Swift discography

What are you planning to do with the Taylor Swift discography article? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

All discographies will have to be updated to the approved version of something like what is currently Rihanna discography and Kesha discography. Yves (talk) 22:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

When were these changes discussed? I think the prior version is 900 times better. In the guidelines, it gives Nirvana discography as an example and they're are not following it. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 15:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Loud (Rihanna album)

Hi there. I recommend you please revert this edit. Just because the single release is different doesn't mean it will be on the album as a regular track; your source does not support such claims and your edit is then considered WP:OR. There are reliable sources there that confirmed the remixed version of the song as a bonus track, which should not have been removed. Thank you. Yves (talk) 07:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Nelly Furtado discography

I'm going to have to ask you to stop reverting my edits on Nelly Furtado discography section. As you can see, on Beyoncé's discog section, it shows more than just studio albums...and it is a good article. Another example in a good article is the discography of Justin Timberlake. The discography sections show the phonograph recordings of a particular artist. This includes EPs, compilation albums, videos and anything an artist has released that's been recorded. There is no discography section guideline that states that it must "only show the studio albums". The point of an article is to show information and link other relevant articles to it and by removing those other albums, you are excluding information. So again, please stop reverting my edits. If you do not feel my edits are constructive, please give me a rational explanation. Thanks, Garry says OK (talk) 05:47, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Alright, I'll revert my edit. However, you should have shown me that in the first place lol. I tried searching all over Wikipedia for an article long ago for those kinds of guidelines and I couldn't find any of them so I just went with the Manual of Style rule. Well sorry, for the nonsense. Garry says OK (talk) 06:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Lol, I agree...it sure was. By the way, I found a site that said October 26 was the release of Fuerte (song), which sounds reasonable considering Nelly's been talking about it more recently. But the site also stated that it will be released off her "Best of" album.. so do you happen to know of a reliable source that can show that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gariseiro (talk • contribs) 11:33, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangladesh production discography

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bangladesh production discography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nolelover ^{It's football season!} 04:51, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: the above, I declined the speedy. But next time, Ending-start, please don't forget to add an introductory paragraph when you create a new article, even if it's just a discography. -- œ^™ 05:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Speak Now genre

Usually with controversial edits to genre(s) on album articles, a consensus is the best way of sorting it out. For example, the one reached for the Rated R (Rihanna album) article, in which musical elements and genre were discussed and distinguished. To support any such consensus or genre edit, genre content for articles about recently released albums should be based mostly on sources/references such as the majority of critics' reviews on the album. For instance, if most critics noted an album's genre/style as R&B and pop (not individual songs), those genres should probably be included. With regards to the use of the digital store iTunes as a source, articles/reviews as sources are preferred for WP articles in general. Dan56 (talk) 19:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Pink Friday

You need a source to back your claim that "Roman's Revenge" is a promo single. –Chase (talk / contribs) 03:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

There is a source that shows release, and that is more than enough. Stop reverting immediately or you will be reported for disruption. –Chase (talk / contribs) 03:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

A source has been added showing release. You need a source calling it a promo single. –Chase (talk / contribs) 03:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Frankly, your opinion on what something seems like does not matter. This is not a promotional "Countdown to Pink Friday" campaign so you can't assume it's a promo single without sources. If it's been released as an individual single on iTunes, it should be treated as an official single until we get official word otherwise. –Chase (talk / contribs) 04:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia works based on verifiability. What is verifiable right now is that the song is a single on iTunes. –Chase (talk / contribs) 04:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pink Friday. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yves (talk) 03:51, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

The Black Eyed Peas articles

Thank for helping out with The Black Eyed Peas articles! I see you around editing some of their pages. There are just so many articles that I would like to help out with, and would be quite easy to reference properly, write solid paragraphs about, etc., but I have just been so busy with school, as well. Plus, there are all these IP users not liking the usage of prose instead of bullets in "Singles" sections of articles, when it is clearly what is to be used. So thank you for your contributions! :) Yves (talk) 23:04, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

That's what Jordin Sparks tells me. :) Who knows, maybe we could work to bring them up to GA status or higher sometime? Yves (talk) 23:08, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

I don't know if a WikiProject would be the best thing at this point; personally, I think it's an overcomplication, and they can get abandoned really easily. I prefer to just edit whichever articles I'm interested in whenever I feel like, and collaborate with primary contributors on either their talk page or that of the article. Works for me, and I don't have to be actively editing those pages for fear of being moved to the "inactive users" list haha, and can take my time. Yves (talk) 23:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

November

Promotional singles

Anticipating and That's Where You Take Me are NOT promotional singles.

As I have said before, promo singles

• Are not released to the public (Only for DJs and Radio)
• Do not have album artwork

--Cprice1000talk2me 20:50, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

On the contrary: many, many promotional singles are released to the public with album artwork. Examples: "Dance in the Dark", "Today Was a Fairytale". Yves (talk) 20:56, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

No, never as CD singles. --Cprice1000talk2me 21:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Promotional single: "A promotional recording, or promo (recently known as a radio single), is a recording issued on Vinyl, 8-track, Cassette, CD, MP3, VHS, DVD, or Blu-ray. and distributed free in order to promote a commercial recording." ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (Talk) 22:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes, and was Unusual You, That's Where You Take Me, or Anticipating free? No. --Cprice1000talk2me 23:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Regardless, the best title for them is promotional singles, what even is "other singles"? That doesn't even make sense. It really doesn't matter if it was free or not, they were used to promotional purposes. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (Talk) 23:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

All singles are used to promote albums (besides non-album singles). Just because they had a small release does not make them promotional. --Cprice1000talk2me 23:21, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Honestly, whatever. Call it what you wish. But "other songs" makes no sense at all. I'd suggest maybe minor releases maybe. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (Talk) 23:34, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicolepoison.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nicolepoison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:52, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Fergie discography

What in the world is going on? The Dutchess only had five singles; the ones you added (i.e. "Finally" and "Labels or Love") were only promotional releases, with no physical releases. And why did you remove the other charted songs? Yves (talk) 23:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Ughhhhhh I have no idea; everyone seems to be doing things differently, and I've been told different things. The CD single argument was made when I tried moving "Today Was a Fairytale" to the regular singles section of the discog way back. I honestly don't know. :( Yves (talk) 23:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Great, but pleaseeee don't delete other charted songs. You're removed at least two (I think?) already. Yves (talk) 23:58, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

But it is; she is on the track. Featured singles and appearance belong in discographies (examples Rihanna discography, Lady Gaga discography). You also got rid of "Beat It 2008". Yves (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Sure, but just to let you know: if a song that was not released as a single charted, it belongs in the other charted songs table, regardless of featured status. Yves (talk) 00:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Your use of caps

Please do not use caps (or exclamation/question marks) in the manner that you did here, and in countless other edits. It is very rude, hard to read, and in no way will it increase your chance of getting the point across. Nymf _hideliho! 16:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Loud (Rihanna album)

Per WP:ALBUMS, covers should be no more than 300 x 300 px in size AND of low quality as they are non-free media items. Per WP:NFCC that means we have to use a low resolution that demonstrates what the image illustrates without being of a high enough quality that someone could replicate and used the image, e.g. for an illegal CD, because wikipedia is borrowing the image under US and international copyright laws. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 21:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

SWITCH BACK TO HIGH QUALITY AND SET UP THE PIC 2 NOT BE COPYED!!!!!! JUST LIKE ON RATED R —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.10.192.113 (talk) 09:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Per WP:ALBUMS album covers must be no larger than 300 x 300 px and of LOW QUALITY. Per the guidelines governed by international copyright laws which can be seen at WP:NFCC:

• WP:NFCC#3b: Minimal extent of use. An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used (especially where the original could be used for deliberate copyright infringement). This rule also applies to the copy in the File: namespace.

Now please stop edit warring over this. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 02:30, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

The Time (Dirty Bit)

Why did you remove the second "The"? Yves (talk) 15:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

It's still "The Time (The Dirty Bit)" on Billboard charts, though. :S Yves (talk) 20:43, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

No, if you check the references of the chart performance section, it's listed as "The Time (The Dirty Bit)". I'm so confused, because the press release calls it "The Time (The Dirty Bit)". :| P.S. you forgot to sign. Yves (talk) 20:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Haha wait until you get to uni. :P From what it looks like, it does seem like the second "The" was removed; I'm just wondering why it charting and is still charting with it. Yves (talk) 20:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Billboard still calls it "The Time (The Dirty Bit)" (article published today). Yves (talk) 23:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Jeffree Star concert tours

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Jeffree Star concert tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ESMcL 22:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Avril Lavigne Canadian dates

Hi Ending-start. Instead of reverting my revert, as you did here, you should get in the habit of starting a discussion on the article's talk page so you can see where I (and the majority of editors on the Avril Lavigne article) are coming from. If you will take a gander at WP:STRONGNAT, you will see that Canadian dates are acceptable in both formats; it's the consistency that is important (and since Avril Lavigne is a Good Article, it needs to remain so). By reverting my edits, you have made the entire article inconsistent because all of the dates, including all those in the Reference section, use the Day-Month-Year format. I will revert your date changes again. If you feel the dates on the article need to be changed, please start a discussion on the Avril Lavigne talk page and reach a consensus as to which format should be used. (For the record, this discussion already took place earlier this year, I believe, and may be found somewhere in the archives. But consensus can always be changed). Please do not revert my edits because this would be considered starting an edit war. Your help is appreciated on the article, though. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 06:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Avril Lavigne reference

Hello again. I noticed you had cited avrillavigne.com; please be aware that her website is constantly updated and anything cited from the main page of her website will eventually disappear or become difficult to locate and double-check. In a case like this, it is best to use a secondary source. There is already a reference in use that mentions these dates in the text, and I also placed the link to another, probably better source (MTV) on the talk page. These sources are easily archived (to avoid WP:LINKROT) and make information easy to find since they are in the format of an article instead of an artist's news page. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 06:21, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm With You

And finally, I reverted your edit to correct the preposition "with" in the title. This debate has taken place on the "I'm With You" talk page and no consensus was reached. In order to maintain consistency within the Avril Lavigne articles, "I'm With You" should continue to have a capital W. This cannot be debated here; if you feel this title should be changed (and therefore every occurrence of the title and the article's title), I recommend starting a discussion on the AL talk page or the I'm With You talk page. One last thing, as well: you only changed one of three examples in the Avril Lavigne article. Please note that we are trying very hard to keep this article a Good Article, and consistency must always be performed when making your edits. Sorry for filling up your talk page, but I felt I should keep you in the know with the rationales behind my reversions. Please do continue to contribute to the Avril Lavigne article(s). Thanks! – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 06:31, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

The Best Damn Thing

Hi! I noticed that you're unhappy with the way the genres are set out on The Best Damn Thing article. If you want the genre formatting to change, start a new discussion (as you have done) and then changes can be discussed and a consensus can be reached. Until then, the current genre format should still be used as that is the current consensus we have. It's much better to talk about things first and act later, instead of disrupting an article due to the way genres are listed. Thank you! :) Zylo1994 (talk) 17:49, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Merging years

I noticed you reverted the edit I did in Ashley Tisdale. Is there any rule saying we can't merge years I don't know? If there are, please, show me and I'll do it in other articles, but if there is not, I think it's much better having years merged... Decodet (talk) 01:30, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

I see... thanks for showing me that! :] Decodet (talk) 15:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello

No, I don't mind at all. Feel free to make editions to the article; I will need the help because I will not be on too often in the coming weeks, so thank you for the assistance :) Garry says OK (talk) 04:09, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Body Talk Series

Hello, thank you for inquiring. I do remember that, prior to the release of Body Talk Pt. 1, Robyn stated each part was an album. In saying that, it seems as though the plans have changed since Body Talk includes tracks from all three parts. I think it's probably best to label each respective part as a studio album and have Body Talk be a compilation album. Cazxiro (talk) 23:16, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Found and interview with her where she basically confirms Body Talk (or the third part) would be a compilation. I think, considering there will be a separate release for the new tracks as Body Talk Pt. 3, that it should have a section on the Body Talk compilation page (with tracklist and cover) but not it's own page. Cazxiro (talk) 23:21, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Fine by me. Honestly, I do think Body Talk Pt. 3 should be accounted for even though it is a limited release. Cazxiro (talk) 00:04, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

That format is actually what I had in mind regarding the Body Talk page. Cazxiro (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Kesha

Dude I started a discussion on your edits in the Kesha talk page, please reply. To me none of your edits make any sense, please clarify. I'm the only reason your rationales don't make sense (they really don't) are because of the limited character limit for edit summaries. Fixer23 (talk) 22:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Kesha discography

Can you please revert your edits. You are not allowed to add unreleased music videos especially if they do not have a director. Kesha discography is an FL and this is not allowed. Please revert it now. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 21:08, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

And to top if off its unsourced. You should know better. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 21:08, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Raven-Symoné

I don't think anyone called your edits vandalism. It seems that an anonymous editor backed out your changes, without comment. It seems you've restored an old version of the article; you may want to pick through recent history to see if there were any more edits that are worth rescuing. Elizium23 (talk) 23:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

The Black Eyed Peas articles

By the way, are you still interested to work on improving The Black Eyed Peas articles, or have other things risen on your priorities list? Yves (talk) 23:32, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Awesome! Do you have MSN, then? It'll be easier to communicate. E-mail me if you do! Yves (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Well you don't have to; I can just reply and you'll know mine. Yves (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

You still around? Yves (talk) 02:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

You're not online...? Yves (talk) 02:31, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: The Black Eyed Peas Template

Something went wrong with the move. Currently investigating. P.S. I don't know if you're watching my page or not, but I just assumed you were and responded on it; you have talkback (if you want to respond). Yves (talk) 21:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. :) Yves (talk) 21:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Dream in Color

Simple answer: No!. Per WP:NALBUMS unreleased projects are rarely given their own independent articles. The fact is... "Dream in Color" never existed as a body of work. Neither did "Elope". Milian began recording her fourth studio album under the titled Dream in Color, then moved to Elope when she moved from Myspace to Radio Killa records and now it has no title. The fact is that under either of the names there was never a completed body of work to receive notability. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 18:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Strip Me

Once again you've created a page but instead of writing the section/article yourself you have stolen half of the contents from my sandbox. Not only is it rude and disrespectful its also plagerism. And by directly copying the information and sources you've created a copy edit violation as you did previously. *sighs* if you thought it was time the article should have been created you should have asked me and I would have then got an admin to correctly move the article in the userspace from my sandbox so everyone could contribute to it. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 14:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

I've reverted the plagiarism and edited the page history.—Kww(talk) 15:08, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

It counts as plagarism because you didn't write or compose the information. I did in my sandbox and when i click 'save' i publish the work "I irrevocably agree to release my contributions under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL." However because its my personal sandbox its my own personal contribution that has not been released publicly. I'm sorry if it came across as harsh. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 21:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

If he had pointed to your sandbox as the source, it wouldn't have been plagiarism. Still probably not the best thing to do without your permission, but it would have been legal under the license.—Kww(talk) 21:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

I am going to review the information and once I've double checked it ... i'll move it over. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 23:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

I knew you mean well... If you look at Strip Me, I've been able to add quite a lot of information to it. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 23:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks so much for understanding and such. :) ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (talk · contribs) 01:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Its ok. We all have things to learn.... (BOY dont i know) -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 01:31, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

December

Peer Review

Hello, I have opened So Yesterday for a Peer Review. Please leave your comments here. Thank you. Novice7 Talk 14:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Hilary Duff articles

Hello. Can you help me find sources for So Yesterday's music video section? It needs an expansion. Also, live performances also need an expansion. Thanks. Novice7 Talk 05:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks... Novice7 Talk 05:24, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Of course we can use that. Wow, I didn't think of that before :O Novice7 Talk 05:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

How is Little Voice gonna be expanded? There is this info about Sahlene and we don't know anything about her (at least I don't LOL). Novice7 Talk

You mean about Our Lips are Sealed? Well, I found a MTV News file on it that's all. I'll find more soon. Novice7 Talk 06:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh! Sorry :D I fixed Fly. I use Allmusic. What do you use? iTunes? Novice7 Talk 06:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

I will use iTunes too. I guess Allmusic is not that reliable for release dates. UK, Aus and US all have the same release date for some pressings. Novice7 Talk 06:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Yup! I saw that too. Btw, the Hilary Duff album page has information on the song. It shouldn't be difficult. Novice7 Talk 06:15, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

So does iTunes See this. Novice7 Talk 06:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes. We should. Novice7 Talk 06:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

LOL. I'll try to find out some. Novice7 Talk 06:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

What about musicstack.com? Is the covers there enough? Novice7 Talk 06:35, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

OK. I'll also add information to it once you finish your work. Novice7 Talk 06:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Okay then. Let's start with a small "Composition" section that we can expand later. Novice7 Talk 06:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

No luck :( I could not find any composition information, critical reviews or credits. I'll try my best. Btw, Weird has a page on Discogs. Novice7 Talk 07:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh I tried my friend. Still no reviews. All reviews are on the standard edition. Novice7 Talk 07:43, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes... I was like "what just happened..". LOL! I thought it was me who did that.. :P Novice7 Talk 15:02, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Her you go [1] Novice7 Talk 15:58, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

May I ask, what's the use of the tag? Novice7 Talk 16:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Okay. Let me check. Novice7 Talk 16:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

First, we need a background section, composition, critical reception, video, remixes and live then charts. Also, tracklist and credits. Novice7 Talk 16:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Wow, now I don't know where to start.. Background section... ?? Novice7 Talk 16:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Right then... Should I go the same way like So Yesterday or write something different. It's kinda difficult you know. Coz we're short of sources. Novice7 Talk 16:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

I remember Hilary saying something about mature audience. I'll try. Novice7 Talk 16:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

What if background and composition are merged into one? Novice7 Talk 17:05, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Naa.. What about merging Composition and release like Better in Time? I think that way Come Clean has a chance.. Novice7 Talk 09:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Did you check out Someone's Watching Over Me? Novice7 Talk 11:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Not Myself Tonight

I see you've opened the peer review for Not Myself Tonight. I've written most of the article, and have been meaning to work on the article for sometime. Collaborate? Candyo32 23:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok, great! The music video section should be ready, I had some large quotes in there and they need to be paraphrased a bit but that's all. If you could acquire information about its Background,, chart performance and/or live performances, I've already begun work on the composition and critical reception. Candyo32 23:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Alright good :) And I don't mean all of this ASAP, I just wanted to bring it up since you had begun the peer review & stuff! Candyo32 23:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

		Cookies!
		Thanks for reverting all that vandalism on my talk page. (NawlinWiki had protected my userpage just before the third IP showed up.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Be Careful...

Not all IPs are here to vandalize (∆). Skarebo (talk) 01:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Warning

You have been edit-warring on Michael (album). If it wasn't an apparently "first offence" for a relatively new editor, you would have been blocked for it. So please consider this a warning not to edit war again. Because you were edit-warring with the rollback tool, which was only given to you a few days ago with clear instructions, I am removing the tool from you at this time. --Mkativerata (talk) 02:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:So Yesterday 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:So Yesterday 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 06:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Michael (album)

Using rollback in that way will get it removed from you. It is only to be used for WP:VANDALISM. Please do not revert Chelo61 any more even though we all agree on this occasion he's incorrect. he's breached WP:3RR for which action will need to be taken but we don't need anyone else getting blocked in the process. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 01:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Try not to get tangled in someone else's mess. The last thing anyone wants is an innocent bystander to be blocked too. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 01:47, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

LMAO... Kayne makes me gag cus he's so full of himself. But that's another story.... -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 01:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Took a bit of time but its sorted for bout 2 weeks lol. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 17:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Hilary Duff articles (2)

Hello! Congrats on your new "Reviewer" and "Rollback" rights. I wanna have them too. But, first I have to clean some pages up. I'll complete the lead of Come Clean soon and did you find any info on release dates? Novice7 Talk 03:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Hope you can get it back :) Also, I got it from iTunes. What abt Someone's Watching Over Me? I expanded it a bit.. :D Novice7 Talk 03:16, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

LOL. I have the album, so I did not purchase the single. I got it off some blog (hope its okay LOL)!.. Btw, can anyone request for Reviewer and Rollback rights? Novice7 Talk 03:19, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Here it is link. I did some tweaking on the cover myself to get it to this quality (just simple brightness & contrast adjust). Novice7 Talk 03:23, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Ummm... I guess its okay... Novice7 Talk 12:38, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Duff_ComeClean.jpg - the best I could do [I'm not good in Editing pics :(] Novice7 Talk 12:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The one you've already uploaded is better in my opinion. Novice7 Talk 12:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Ah... Thank you. Also, I'm gonna nominate So Yesterday for a GA :) Hope it passes. Sorry, I will correct Come Clean soon. Btw, you play guitar. Right? So you should know about these composition sections? Novice7 Talk 14:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Yay!!! I'm now a reviewer in Wikipedia (LOL, I did not mean to copy you..). What do you think of collaborating on Jessica Simpson articles too? Novice7 Talk 15:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok then. Shall I nominate So Yesterday for a GA now? Novice7 Talk 15:25, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

You want me to include you as a nominator too? Novice7 Talk 15:29, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

OK :D Novice7 Talk 15:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

OOPS.... I'm sorry, but I couldn't add your name (there is no option for that). I sware I saw something with two nominators, but... Sorry... Hope you're not mad at me :( Novice7 Talk 15:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Damn Me... I should've enquired about it before. Sorry again. Novice7 Talk 15:36, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Good! Also, when you start working on Stripped, let me know.. We can work together on that :) Novice7 Talk 03:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

My First Kiss

All issues have been addressed, not all have been changed but i left responses and a "done" or "not done" tag on each section. Thank you for conducting the review. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:41, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Done - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 22:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Dirty Picture

Everything is done on Dirty Picture - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 23:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Bionic

Hello - thanks for the message. It's fine to add discussion to anything reported to an admin board, but I still would decline the request. Today's activity came from one user who has been warned. Prior to that, there were between two and four edits per day. That's not enough for me to protect. I'll let another admin reconsider the request. Thanks again. :-) - KrakatoaKatie 23:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case

I suspected too but wanted to give benefit of doubt. Now that you've filed the report I've made clear my opinion at the SPI report. (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chelo61). -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 03:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Checkuser was endorsed. That means someone will use the tool and confirm whether it is or is not our suspected user. If its not the behavioural evidence does speak strongly. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 03:44, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Stay Cool

Film festivals are public releases, although very limited, as the showing is open to the public. I'm confused why you don't consider it a public release. BOVINEBOY2008 04:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

Hello. Please leave your comments here. Novice7 Talk 12:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Bionic (Christina Aguilera album)

I have started reviewing Bionic. There are initial problems with the quick-fail criteria, please revert. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Jennifer Lopez discography format

Per WP:BRD, I have started a discussion about the discography format at Talk:Jennifer Lopez#Discography format. Please join the discussion there, instead of continuing the edit war, so that a consensus can be reached. Aspects (talk) 14:43, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Hey..

Hey, when you start working on Stripped, let me know... :) Novice7 Talk 16:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

As you're reviewing Ego (Beyonce song), I have something to ask. Don't you feel that the prose needs some Copy editing? Novice7 Talk 03:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Never mind about Ego. It's been copy-edited. About Bionic, some links were dead. I've fixed them. Hope it becomes a GA soon :) Novice7 Talk 04:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello. I see you're busy. Just let me know when you're free and we can start working on Hilary articles again. I am kinda busy too. Doing GA reviews, expanding articles.. Loads of work to do... Hope to work again soon :) Novice7 (talk) 17:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Do you happen to know any chart archives for Canadian Country albums? Novice7 | Talk 09:57, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Beyoncé

I have created the WikiProject, if you want to join add your name at Wikipedia:WikiProject Beyoncé Knowles. Thanks, Adabow (talk · contribs) 21:40, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Broken-Hearted Girl

I see that you will review "Broken-Hearted Girl". I will be going to the beach on Thursday, so if you don't get the review done by then, will it be alright to wait a week for the fixes? Thanks, Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:44, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Reflinks

Hi when using WP:REFLINKS... please can you be sure you use the Interactive version. What I mean is when you click onto reflinks above the search box it says something like "automatic" or "interactive". The interactive one is it better option because then it uses the {{citeweb}} and also allows you to make modifications along the way if required. It doesn't add any time to the process or make it more complicated. But per wikipedia standards al referencing should be of a consistent style and {{cite web}} is the most consistently used one as opposed to <ref>[url website name]</ref> that the automatic reflink does. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 01:42, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

If you like MC

Check this out :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 19:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Rihanna tours

The article List of Rihanna tours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A really unnecessary list of 4 tours, all of which are already chained together through infobox links as well as via the Rihanna template on the tour pages and multiple other Rihanna-related articles. There's also already a Category:Rihanna concert tours. Article is totally unreferenced at the moment (fairly easily curable by copying from the four tour articles), but the small amount of info here just doesn't need its own page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Keri Hilson

Hi there, I've noticed you've edited Keri Hilson articles before. Feel free to edit and help out on her new album's article No Boys Allowed and the single Pretty Girl Rock. ozurbanmusic (talk) 10:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Mariah Carey

The Mariah Carey WikiProject is now initiated! If you want, you can join here. Thank you. Novice7 | Talk 06:27, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Rihanna tours for deletion

The article List of Rihanna tours is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rihanna tours until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- (Lil_℧niquℇ №1) | (talk) 17:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi!

Hi Ending-start! I'd be glad to work with you again. Why don't we start with Duff albums for a change? Also, would you like to work on Xtina's Stripped and its singles? Novice7 | Talk 08:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Yep. Me too. I also have school "for three days". I've some extra school work to complete, so I'm going in for an extra day. Anyways, about Stripped, I had actually developed something, but then deleted it all, as I felt something missing. The "recording and production" section! Lol, how will anyone do that? Novice7 | Talk 12:28, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, uh.. actually I did this and did not save it. I just previewed and exit. That's it! We can bring it back, don't worry. Lemme check Bionic. Novice7 | Talk 12:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

LOL yeah! How dumb am I? I'm checking Bionic, and found very few ref errors. Novice7 | Talk 12:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

It starts from Critical reception. I'm tagging with "cite web and cite news" from there. Novice7 | Talk 12:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

I've fixed many. Ping me if you need any help. Novice7 | Talk 13:14, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Take a look here

Take a look here. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 08:18, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Oversectionalising

where information is sparse, the use of masses of sections is impropper as it breaks up prose quality too much. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Basic_Instinct_(album)&action=historysubmit&diff=403616241&oldid=403453642 This edit] was undone for that reason. =) hope your well. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:48, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm ok thanks. I've come home from University for the holidays but tbh I don't like it that much. I prefer having routine and structure when I'm at home I'm a lazy bum LOL. oh not you too... the weather in the UK is horrific. Thanks for the comment about the userpage. I though since i've hit 2 years as an editor a new page was required. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 00:05, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Omg lol I didnt have the old Userpage for 2 years LOL. i meant since I reached by 2nd birthday as an editor on wikipedia i decided a change was in order and so as a present I gave myself upto 1 hour to design a new user page. That's a shame about school. *wink*. you're right though.. its the holidays. Spread the cheer!!! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!!

Hi Ending-start! Happy Holidays and a "Merry Christmas". Just two more days for me... Then, yay!!! Btw, sorry I could not start on Stripped, I was working on some Whitney articles. Soon, I'll have time to complete that! Would you like to join Mariah Carey project? Novice7 | Talk 16:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, my way of getting art from iTunes can be tiring. I log in, take any file and change its name to the one, for which I would like to get an art. Then select Download album art, you'll get the cover art. Then select Get info for this file -> album art -> copy that. Woo, then go to %temp% folder, and it would be there, correctly tagged. It's kinda difficult. You could use this. Hope it helps ;) Novice7 | Talk 01:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

I told ya.. Hahahaha.. Huh..It's tiring. Just use the website I gave. It's much better! Novice7 | Talk 01:47, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

NMT

I took a look at the peer review. The reviewer brought up alot of good concerns, but I believe they went a bit too far in depth, such as considering removing her performance on Oprah from the lead, so they must not know how music articles are arranged around Wikipedia. Anyway, I'll begin to work on some fixes because I'm ready to go ahead and get it doneeeeee. Candyo32 - Merry CHRISTmas :) 18:14, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Fly (Hilary Duff song)

OMG!! I was just about to contact you, and tell you about this live performane :O Anyways, this is it. Novice7 | Talk 07:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes, we have to mention the live performances on the tour. I'm searching Ew.com, Billboard.com, Google News Archive and Mtv.com for any information. Hopefully, we can complete this article. I'm planning on doing Hilary articles. Xtina's should wait, in my opinion. What do you say? How's your first GA? I've nominated two, and need to review three. "A Very Merry Christmas to You". Novice7 | Talk 08:03, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh, got one source! Maybe we can use it! Novice7 | Talk 08:08, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

It's an interview with MTV, check out here. I have a section for Fly (collecting source, that is). Novice7 | Talk 08:23, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

WOW! Your edit-notice is great! Btw, thanks for reverting that 2010 thingy in Whitney's article. IPs are getting on my nerve, I've asked for a protection. Did you check the MTV source out? Novice7 | Talk 08:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Bye... See ya later! Novice7 | Talk 08:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Let this Christmas bring you the gift of peace and joy! Merry Christmas :) Novice7 | Talk 04:03, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Ego (Beyoncé Knowles song)

Hi. Thank you very much, i have finished. Jivesh • Talk2Me 04:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Are you going to review Broken-Hearted Girl? Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Okay, please i hope you have forgiven me for my rude behaviour. I look forward to work with you more often. but for that, i have to ask you first.... Are you a fan of Beyonce? Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

It is even better if you do not remember. Bye, see you later. I have to go now. Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Shakira

Wow... I'm really impressed. Good work sir! What exactly do you need help with? (we'll focus on the discog first). At quick glance it seems to be in good shape. I'm guess you want to make it a FL? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 17:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

One thing that needs to be done... is that any certificates need to be removed if the chart is not listed. E.g. Mexican single certificates need to be removed because no mexican single charts are listed. (per WP:INDISCRIMINATE) -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Ending the Michael Jackson edit War

Unfortunately the current edit war over the album type is rather sad but it is most certainly intolerable. Please visit Talk:Michael (album)#End the Edit War - Studio vs Compilation and part-take in the attempt to find a final resolution. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 18:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Hey!

Oh, I had a great Christmas! We can surely work on Hilary articles. The Dignity era singles will have more information, I guess. So we'll start on them first. Novice7 | Talk 06:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Broken-Hearted Girl/GA1

Thanks for the review. Everything has been addressed. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:BADCHARTS

Please do not add information from the United World Chart (www.mediatraffic.de) or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles.—Kww(talk) 03:35, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Hilary Duff articles

Maybe it's me, but are we short on Hilary sources? What do you sayd about starting on Dignity era articles. They have more information from what I've seen :) Novice7 | Talk 17:22, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Yep.. I figured it out some days ago. It's easy to do Dignity articles. See Play with Fire. Almost everything is already there. Btw, in Single Ladies, there is a Pandora reference, which Candy said has issues on reliability. I've notified Adabow of it. Novice7 | Talk 17:27, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Okay then. We'll start soon (unlike other singles, lol). Novice7 | Talk 17:30, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for being late. I uploaded a new cover. I hope it's fine. Novice7 | Talk 04:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

If you're free, please take a look at here. I asked the user to fix many things. He did that and reverted back :O Novice7 | Talk 04:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

I asked him to correct it, he did and now it's restored. I guess I should fail it. Oh, I've started working on PWF :) Novice7 | Talk 04:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

We still need to fix the lead and add Live performances. Then it's ready :) Novice7 | Talk 03:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Mean (song)/GA1

I've revamped and fixed the issues in the article according to your GA review. Thanks. — MyDecember ^(talk) 11:34, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Bionic FP

I decided to request the page for temporary full protection, following the edits by Chronis. Hope this will help. --Cprice1000talk2me 19:37, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

I know! I've noticed all these "nonsensical" and fancruft edits to her articles. --Cprice1000talk2me 19:46, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh, wow. I actually got it protected for a week. This has been a good week for me! I've gotten Bionic, The Fame, Circus, and Gwen Stefani's protection levels changed. --Cprice1000talk2me 19:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

IKR. I think it's the feeling that you're making a difference XD And, also you sorta got something to brag about, even if nobody cares! --Cprice1000talk2me 19:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh, cool! Didn't even know Fucking Perfect had a page, yet! Also, hope Aqua gets protected, I love them too much for them to be vandalized. I'm gonna try and add some stuff to Fucking Perfect. Too bad we can't get it fully protected, as most edits are by registered users , but it's just too small to not allow anyone to edit it. --Cprice1000talk2me 19:56, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Nooooo! They declined it :( --Cprice1000talk2me 20:04, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

lol Yeah, me too! --Cprice1000talk2me 20:08, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh yeah! I have all of Shak's albums. Not right now though, I have such a bad headache! O'll help you later, though! Great idea for a Shakira page. --Cprice1000talk2me 21:01, 31 December 2010 (UTC)