User talk:StaringAtTheStars

Welcome!

Hello, StaringAtTheStars, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 21:42, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi StaringAtTheStars! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:39, Wednesday, May 2, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tu volverás (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Ferro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Burns (songwriter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi StaringAtTheStars! You created a thread called Past/present tense? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OnePlus 6T

Sorry for removing all your work cleaning it up. When a problem is too big, sometimes the best option is to delete it. ~ Araratic | talk 03:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's no problem, I believe the undo was for the better. StaringAtTheStars (talk) 16:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Subak.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Subak, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Seoul Bob (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Seoul Bob: I removed the lead section to only include "Subak is a Korean martial art." because it wasn't sourced and read poorly. You may add it back, but it needs to be sourced (talking to experts in Subak and related is not enough for Wikipedia) or it will WP:LIKELY get removed. You may also want to see WP:ORIGINAL as well. I apologize if this has caused any inconvenience. StaringAtTheStars (talk) 21:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

I just wanted to thank you for approval and especially correcting my first wikipedia article (Eco (2018 video game)) in terms of grammar and spelling. Great occasion to learn! I will surely try to improve on it :) D3nnis3n (talk) 01:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The pleasure is mine! I based my grammatical corrections on American English since the article seems to be based mostly on American stuff (and American English is the main English that I speak). I think it's a good article, congratulations on making it to mainspace. StaringAtTheStars (talk) 05:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, StaringAtTheStars. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi StaringAtTheStars! You created a thread called Reporting a copyvio at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vox Maris (musical instrument) has been accepted

Vox Maris (musical instrument), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 11:01, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on the article JR Hokkaido#Lines and key stations

Can you put the information in a table to make it more clear? SCRATCH1234 (talk) 12:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SCRATCH1234:, sadly I have not messed around with table formats yet so I am unaware of how to do that. Sorry! I'm also unaware of how the tables should be set up on those specific articles. Perhaps we can both take a look at this together? :P StaringAtTheStars (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply by SCRATCH1234: you can visit the article Help:Table#Using the toolbar. SCRATCH1234 (talk) 04:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, even though I linked the same thing above in a much more user-friendly format (Help:Introduction to tables with Wiki Markup/1). I don't really use the toolbar that much at the top; I prefer doing everything by hand (since I want to try and memorize everything as much as I can). Tables are currently not my forte, so why not be WP:BOLD and do it yourself? I don't know why you would ask me to do it when all I did was remove a duplicate maintenance tag. I am not an expert in rail lines so I would not know how you (or other editors interested in rail lines) would like the tables to be formatted as. Sorry, enjoy your day. StaringAtTheStars (talk) 04:40, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eaten!

ImmortalWizard has eaten your {{subst:cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{subst:cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Your thread has been archived

Hi StaringAtTheStars! You created a thread called PolicyPitch/IJCSN Journal at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

91,000,000

Thank you very much for your contributions. It means a lot that you would put that much effort in to help me. I appreciate it. To be honest, I've been so busy, it never even occurred to me to google 91,000,000. When I get the time, I'll incorporate your contributions into the article. Thank you! Another irate man (talk) 11:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome Another irate man. I really don't think those would be enough to make the number notable enough though. StaringAtTheStars^✉Talk 15:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

it's a good starting point. I'll do some more research and find more references. Another irate man (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like, I can send you some more:

Also, it seems like Inside Out grossed 91 million upon opening day (week? can't check atm) while the article says 90.4 million. StaringAtTheStars^✉Talk

Wow! This is very helpful! Thank you so much! The number of articles and references you found pertaining to the number 91,000,000 is very impressive, and I want to thank you very much for all the help you've been. Another irate man (talk) 17:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad this is helpful! Still, I believe it isn't enough to establish notability for the number. Most of it is just passing mentions and there doesn't seem to be anything specifically focusing on the number itself. But good luck with the draft :) StaringAtTheStars^✉Talk 18:20, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi StaringAtTheStars! You created a thread called Signature issues at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi StaringAtTheStars! You created a thread called Disputed information in sources at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgia Burke has been accepted

Georgia Burke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:16, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nathaniel Bartlett

Hi there - re that draft: I hope we can give Connecticut Puritan a chance to clean this up, or if they are actually the author of the original, to release that under a suitable license if they prefer. You may have seen the various bits and pieces in that regard on their talk page. They are probably not the most whizz-bang WP artist, so if we could let this sit in draft in an un-eviscerated state for some time, it might be the collegial thing to do :) Cheers! --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:09, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry! I'll avoid it then. Thanks for letting me know StaringAtTheStars^✉Talk 18:24, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've actually restored the previous version for the time being. If you had content related, as opposed to COPYVIO related, edits please feel free to restore those. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:11, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Joystick (magazine) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joystick (magazine). Thanks! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:27, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joystick (magazine) (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joystick (magazine) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joystick (magazine), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 10:52, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StaringAtTheStars! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mjs1991 (talk) 10:52, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Joystick (magazine) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joystick (magazine), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]