User talk:Spino-Soar-Us

Welcome!

Hi Spino-Soar-Us! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:08, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arch of Charents moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Arch of Charents. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 07:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Annh07, I would like to ask you how many more sources I need to establish notability. I also have to ask you about translations, because this article is based on a place that has been written in German and Western Armenian. I would like to know how I would be able to possibly link them up after my page is ready to be published. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please read Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features), which are the criteria for determining the notability of this article's subject. If you have reliable and in-depth sources, 3-4 sources are enough (WP:THREE). Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified (you may cite German or Armenian sources). The sources you provided in the article are not reliable sources so I have removed them per WP:UGC and WP:ELNO. Annh07 (talk) 09:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Annh07, but you misunderstood me. I wasn't talking about the sources when I said the German and Western Armenian article but the pages like this link

https://hy.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D5%89%D5%A1%D6%80%D5%A5%D5%B6%D6%81%D5%AB_%D5%AF%D5%A1%D5%B4%D5%A1%D6%80_%D5%B0%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%B7%D5%A1%D6%80%D5%B1%D5%A1%D5%B6_(%D5%88%D5%B2%D5%BB%D5%A1%D5%A2%D5%A5%D6%80%D5%A4).

I was asking about how I could connect these articles with the different types of languages that are above for the view history and edit source. I also want to mention that use of the YouTube video " Ռաֆայել Իսրայելյան" was used in the Western Armenian version (same link above) of the website and is the only reason why I used it. Unless you again say that it's unreliable, I am going to add it, but thank you for suggesting improvements on my page. But thank you for suggesting improvements on my page and thank you for telling me as much as you have on my talk page. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 12:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:INTERWIKI, I hope it will help you.

Also you need to know that Wikipedia projects are independent, some sources may be acceptable for Armenian Wikipedia but may not be acceptable for English Wikipedia. Youtube is not a reliable source, per WP:RSPYT. Annh07 (talk) 14:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arch of Charents (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Edward-Woodrow were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All claims need to be sourced. Where is the information coming from? Also, some of the language is promotional or emotionally manipulative.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arch of Charents and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edawrd-Woodrow. on the 5th of November, you declined the article called Draft:Arch of Charents. One of the reasons you listed was reliable sourcing, and I wondered which one of the sources was unreliable. Also, I am also asking if the sources that I found would be reliable (they are written in Armenian but if you need the translation button is still there for the entire page). The sources are [1], [2] and [3]. Also, I would like to thank you for helping me with this article and for the feedback that you presented I will try to use in correcting the article. Thank You Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 22:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spino-Soar-Us! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trollhunters

Excuse me, but Trollhunters: Rise of the Titans was produced under DreamWorks Animation Television. Not the main company itself. Could you remove the film from the List of DreamWorks Animation productions and leave it in the DreamWorks Animation Television page please? 107.77.198.83 (talk) 00:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Dreamworks Animation characters (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bungle was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lead indicates this is a list of major characters but many do not even have their own character article. Very few links are to specific character articles. No indication the list of characters is notable and no sourcing discussing it. Essentially WP:LISTCRUFT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Dreamworks Animation characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arch of Charents (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Suitskvarts was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Verification of the Stalin part by the provided source failed: the source doesn't claim anything of the sort.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arch of Charents and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Suitskvarts (talk) 08:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crood Awakening

I noticed you placed Crood Awakening back on the List of unproduced DreamWorks Animation projects article after I had removed it. I provided an explanation since it was repurposed into The Croods. When the film was first announced in 2005, this was the general synopsis:

Set in the Stone Age, "Crood Awakening" is a comedy about a big man in a small village called Crood. His position as Leader of the Hunt is threatened by the arrival of a prehistoric genius who comes up with revolutionary new inventions like fire.

I'm sure you are fully aware that animated films constantly go through various cycles of development, but the general idea of the film stayed the same. I am advocating its removal based on this. PrinceArchelaus (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of extinct languages of Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akkad. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charents Arch has been accepted

Charents Arch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 18:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Spino-Soar-Us. Thank you for your work on Charents Arch. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Armenia in the Early Bronze Age (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some parts still evidently read like an essay.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Armenia in the Early Bronze Age and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 18:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian Crusade

Hi Spino-Soar-Us! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Norwegian Crusade that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. See also WP:CATSPECIFIC before adding duplicate categories. TylerBurden (talk) 18:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TylerBurden! First of all, thank you for explaining what minor edits are for. Although I have been editing articles for two years now, I still am learning stuff and didn't know before you told me what minor articles specifically meant. But, I just want to clarify my point on the category of crusades as I have seen you reverting my edits on it. I saw the reason why you were removing the category was because it article already had a specific category that went to the Norwegian Crusade. This category had a problem where it wasn't connected to the Crusades category itself, so I have made it a subcategory. But I still believe that the Norwegian Crusade article should have the category specifically on Category:Crusades because it is a major crusade and crusades like the Albigensian Crusade and the Nicaean–Latin wars. I won't change it anymore and I would like to know your opinions on why the category shouldn't specifically be on the article. Thank You Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 01:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, the reason is WP:CATSPECIFIC. The Norwegian Crusade subcategory itself is part of the Crusades category. If you look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Crusades you will see it listed there. TylerBurden (talk) 19:57, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All great! I just want to say that I added that recently but prior to that when I was editing on the article itself, they weren't connected. But thank you for clearing this up. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 05:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Okjeo language has been accepted

Okjeo language, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahan language has been accepted

Mahan language, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 18:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of extinct languages of Oceania has been accepted

List of extinct languages of Oceania, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Spino-Soar-Us. Thank you for your work on Gasgu language. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please mention this at the target page with a good reference.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824:Hi and thank you for your message. The reason why I did add Gasgu language onto the Kaskian language page is because the Kaskians article has a source and mentions Gasgu as one of the names for the Kaskians. I do not have a specific source for the Kaskian language also being named the Gasgu language, so I am asking you what should I do? Thank You Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 02:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That page says 'Gasga' (as one of the names of the Kaska people. Should we change the language redirect accordingly? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe the language redirect should be changed as the article Kaskians doesn't mention the language as the Kaskian language article exists to talk about the language. I believe that we could assume the Gasgu language is the same as the Kaskian language, which is why I believe the redirect should remain the same. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 06:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Araks, Armavir (east). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Temple of Charents

Hello, Spino-Soar-Us

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Temple of Charents, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 13 § Temple of Charents.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824:Hi, I understand your discussion on deleting the page. I do not have sources for it and I do believe that it should be deleted with the Arch of Charents' and Charent's Arch as they also fall under the same category. Thank You. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 07:13, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I understood you: Why should those redirects be deleted? They seems like acceptable variants of the article Charents Arch to me. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: The redirects should be deleted as they have not been used and they are incorrect as the apostrophes make it so that the name changes to be incorrect. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 07:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They seem ok to me. But feel free to start an RFD if you wish. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, if you can please add it into the discussion of Temple of Charents thanks. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 07:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I don't think the criteria for deletion matches with that RFD. Additionally, Like I indicated above, I would oppose the deletion of these redirects, as they seem fine to me. There is a step-by-step procedure to start an RFD on the page that I've to above, which you can follow if you'd like. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]