User talk:Spiderone/Archive 92
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Spiderone. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 85 | ← | Archive 90 | Archive 91 | Archive 92 | Archive 93 | Archive 94 | Archive 95 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:57, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Maged Essam page
I do not promote a person or make this information for a real person and it is documented by reliable sources by Wikipedia. For you, please cancel the quick deletion and return the page Maged3sam (talk) 20:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Please read WP:COI Spiderone 20:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Keyvan Ansari
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Keyvan Ansari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 11:08, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Draft te is
Miért draftoltad tetű pók, te rovar fagyott tosz, te bojler fejű pikszeles fallosz. Jageroi (talk) 20:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Please refrain from abuse. Your article was sent to draft because it lacked appropriate sourcing to demonstrate notability. See WP:DRAFT and WP:N. Spiderone 20:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Wow, that's um...I see they were blocked indefinitely, probably a good thing. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 18:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Tsistunagiska: it was a real shame to see that behaviour to be honest. I get into a lot of disagreements here but this is the first time that I've actually had verbal abuse in my almost 14 years of editing Spiderone 21:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Verbal abuse should never be allowed, whether you agree with what is being said or not. No one here knows what I have went through or do go through in life every day. Likewise, I don't know what you have went through or do go through in life every day. What I do know is what I see here. People who can't see past the end of their own noses and at least try to project some empathy on others are a waste of my time and energy and I'd rather not deal with them. It's part of the reason why I have been close to leaving for the past few weeks. Wikipedia can be frustrating as hell. But who wins in that scenario? No one. So I suit up and buckle the chin strap down tighter and fight on. It is an absolute shame, as you have stated. Reality or not, targeted attacks upon others by keyboard warriors illicit a visceral response from me, generally. I really can't stand giant egos with unrealistic perceptions of their own grandeur. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 21:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- It's okay to be angry. It's okay to have strong opinions. It's okay to express strong opinions in an angry way. It's not okay to go out of one's way to be abusive. I will probably still be editing Wikipedia in 50 years' time but what I'm beginning to realise is that no user is above the law here. No one is bigger than the project itself. Those that behave in such a way tend to find themselves ejected sooner rather than later. Spiderone 22:06, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Getting angry and having strong opinions about anything here is really pointless though. Anything you write can be edited out with the click of the button and any "rule" can be manipulated to make it happen. To say no user is above the "law" is denying the fact that the "law" was created by flawed humans with an opinion which means an immediate conflict of interest with other humans who see things differently. Those who see things differently either have to conform to the "law" or go somewhere else or just develop an "I don't care" attitude and realize that what they write will probably be removed at some point but it was fun while it lasted. Wikipedia is not about being neutral. It is just as biased, just as discriminatory and just as exclusive as society. Wikipedia is neutral on sources it considers reliable. The sources themselves can be biased as hell. Doesn't matter. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 15:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- It's okay to be angry. It's okay to have strong opinions. It's okay to express strong opinions in an angry way. It's not okay to go out of one's way to be abusive. I will probably still be editing Wikipedia in 50 years' time but what I'm beginning to realise is that no user is above the law here. No one is bigger than the project itself. Those that behave in such a way tend to find themselves ejected sooner rather than later. Spiderone 22:06, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Verbal abuse should never be allowed, whether you agree with what is being said or not. No one here knows what I have went through or do go through in life every day. Likewise, I don't know what you have went through or do go through in life every day. What I do know is what I see here. People who can't see past the end of their own noses and at least try to project some empathy on others are a waste of my time and energy and I'd rather not deal with them. It's part of the reason why I have been close to leaving for the past few weeks. Wikipedia can be frustrating as hell. But who wins in that scenario? No one. So I suit up and buckle the chin strap down tighter and fight on. It is an absolute shame, as you have stated. Reality or not, targeted attacks upon others by keyboard warriors illicit a visceral response from me, generally. I really can't stand giant egos with unrealistic perceptions of their own grandeur. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 21:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Tsistunagiska: it was a real shame to see that behaviour to be honest. I get into a lot of disagreements here but this is the first time that I've actually had verbal abuse in my almost 14 years of editing Spiderone 21:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Wow, that's um...I see they were blocked indefinitely, probably a good thing. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 18:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Well this is shameful. This user is shame for me, and i were suspected by Spiderone, I am a suckpuppet, because my name is containing jageroi, which means I am a hero in russian. Can anyone help me to change my name Tepeş român?
Jageroi român (talk) 22:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Are you a sockpuppet?
Dear Spiderone, The name Jageroi român was created, because я герой means I am a hero in russian, and first i want to use this name, but it was reserved by Jageroi, so because I am romanian, I added the român adjectiv. I mostly editing romanian theme pages. Please do not suspect me with irreal things, such us I am a sockpuppet, but I can also ask you, are you the sockpuppet of Spider? Jageroi român Jageroi român (talk) 22:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I can confirm that Spiderone is not a sockpuppet. Thank you. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 01:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Endtroducing EP tagged for speedy deletion
Thank you for your efforts in patrolling new pages. I wanted to let you know that I have applied a speedy deletion tag to the article Endtroducing EP, which you proposed for deletion, because I believe it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion. In cases where it applies, speedy deletion is preferable to proposed deletion; in the future, please tag blatantly inappropriate pages for speedy deletion first if they meet the criteria. I have left the {{prod}} tag in place, so that if speedy deletion is rejected, your proposed deletion will remain in place. Thanks! JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 01:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Would you consider helping out?
Hey, what do you think of NPP? Having you considered applying for the right and helping us out? Celestina007 (talk) 19:31, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Celestina007: thank you for the suggestion, it's something I've been thinking about actually! I've applied now. Spiderone 22:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Welcome to the family. Celestina007 (talk) 15:42, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Damilola Odufuwa, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Barkeep49 (talk) 21:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello!
Please check what I wrote on the article you proposed for deletion. Dante4786 (talk) 23:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Please take this controversial nomination to WP:AfD. Statewide officials, especially secretaries of state, are usually notable. Bearian (talk) 17:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- To be fair, I was only repairing the PROD as someone attached an undated PROD onto the article. I now understand that the official is notable so there's no point in AfD. Thanks Spiderone 18:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐!~ メリークリスマス!~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Hello, Spiderone! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:56, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
In appreciation for your efforts dealing with all the issues related to Corey Johnson (music producer). S0091 (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2020 (UTC) |
Hi my friends
Hello my friend Please check in link https://www.instagram.com/p/B6eHtW1ltrG/?igshid=1816rat9fy0d6 Is link radio tell avive Koohsarmcc He is iranian raper ، thanks Ramin farvahar (talk) 20:10, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
KoohsarMCc Ramin farvahar (talk) 20:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- Instagram is not a reliable source; please read WP:RS Spiderone 21:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Yes i do . Radio tell avive music koohsar mc play to raido ، link check please ، thank you mr Ramin farvahar (talk) 22:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Plaese check to google in text SALOME MC FEAT KOOHSAR MERC Ramin farvahar (talk) 22:07, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Gazal world. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Yousfia Islamic English Medium School Dangiwacha, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Gazal world (talk) 17:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Spicy. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Friday Night Funkin', and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Spicy (talk) 05:03, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Fahad Hassan
Hello friend, can you take a look at Fahd Hassan's article after the improvements. محمد أمين الطرابلسي (talk) 09:32, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
ISP+PSTN subscriber in Bangladesh tagged for speedy deletion
Thank you for your efforts in patrolling new pages. I wanted to let you know that I have applied a speedy deletion tag to the article ISP+PSTN subscriber in Bangladesh, which you proposed for deletion, because I believe it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion. In cases where it applies, speedy deletion is preferable to proposed deletion; in the future, please tag blatantly inappropriate pages for speedy deletion first if they meet the criteria. I have left the {{prod}} tag in place, so that if speedy deletion is rejected, your proposed deletion will remain in place. Thanks! It's weird how whenever you PROD an article, I am usually the guy who speedies it after your PROD. Hmm... JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 16:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- @JJPMaster: yeah thought I made the wrong call here as well; I thought A10 could only be used if it was a blatant copy paste of another page. Can now see how A1 would apply here. Thanks. Spiderone 16:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Spiderone, in case you haven't noticed, we accidentally posted these messages on the template itself instead of this talk page because I forgot to subst it. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 17:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Happy New Year! | |
Hello Spiderone: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. |
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message
Happy New Year
Happy New Year 2021 I hope your New Year holiday is enjoyable and the coming year is much better than the one we are leaving behind. Best wishes from Los Angeles. // Timothy :: talk |
Pratyush.shrivastava (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! -- Pratyush.shrivastava (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Thank you redirecting to my new article. F.Blaubiget (talk) 13:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC) |
Nomination of Fateh Singh Ahluwalia for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fateh Singh Ahluwalia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Walrus Ji (talk) 17:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm GB fan. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Within Seconds, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
~ GB fan 19:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chic le frique
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chic le frique requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 10:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Simon Davies
I will try to find some resource but the problem is that it is a quite recent constructed language so there won't be fairly any publications about him besides websites or Youtube (nowadays, most of the stuff is on the Internet, not published in paper).
Regarding notability, besides the author, he is the main speaker and the main writer in that language. How come this is nor relevant? --Caro de Segeda (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Caro de Segeda at Wikipedia we have guidelines listed at WP:BIO and WP:GNG that articles need to meet. If he is the main speaker and main writer in that language then that is a strong claim to notability but we need independent sources to back up that claim. Websites are fine as there is no requirement for the sources to be available offline but the websites should be from organisations or companies independent to him. I hope this helps. Spiderone 12:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- That is what I mean, regarding constructed languages, it is quite a small world so there won't be any publications from "organisations or companies". Finding references that are not from the movement itself it is almost impossible, specially if we cannot take Youtube or other modern means of communication.I have added a couple more references but I don't think there will be much more. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 12:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Why are you keep adding deletion tag to my created articles
You know it comes under notability but still add the tag of deletion to my created articles Shivsa008 (talk) 13:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- It says on the tag that you are not allowed to remove the AfD notice. You are more than welcome to contribute to the discussion but removing the tag will not stop the discussion from taking place. Spiderone 13:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Spiderone! You have move my recent article(with name :Muhammad Safi) to draft. which I have written about an Afghan Journalist. I know source may not be reliable but I will improve it as me I'm also new in wiki, and it's better known to you that in Afghanistan the internet world is not that much improve, it's taking long time to find references to actual organization in internet it's possible physically but in digital world and internet most of the administration don't have any information. kindly help in part. Regards. Abdul Aziz Yousufzai. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdul Aziz Yousufzai (talk • contribs) 06:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Praewa Patcharee moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Praewa Patcharee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone 08:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Kat Rattikarn moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kat Rattikarn, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone 08:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Repeated draftifications and cut-&-paste moves
Please do not repeatedly draftify pages. If a page creator moves a previously draftified page to Mainspace, that should be taken as a sign that the draftification is disputed, and the page should remain as an article while further deletion options are explored.
The histories of some of the pages created by ธนภัทร สุดชีแสง also suggest that you've been performing cut-&-paste moves, which must not be done since they break proper attribution in the article history. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but otherwise please be more careful with such edits. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC) PS This is probably the reason the above two draftification notices were given to yourself instead of the articles' author. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Spiderone, just bring them up for speedy deletion next time, especially since they have no sources. I'll support that. We may not agree on whether the AfC process is really all that beneficial, unless you get a good reviewer the responses can be quite demoralizing, but if you choose that option then you should follow through with it. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 15:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Paul 012 and Tsistunagiska very fair points and I'll bear this in mind in future. It was my opinion at the time that they didn't meet CSD as they weren't hoaxes and had some sort of claim to notability, even though none of it was sourced. I considered BLPPROD but wasn't sure whether the external link to their personal Facebook page would be considered a 'source' even though it essentially confirms none of the article information. I would argue that the Facebook links for Draft:Kat Rattikarn and Draft:Praewa Patcharee are incorrect as well. I had done a brief search in Thai for all of them and all of them come up with some news sources but I have no idea whether there is enough to pass notability or not. I have left messages for the creator where appropriate but I would assume that they don't speak any English given that they haven't responded to any of them in any way. My main worry is that these articles will just sit there as unsourced BLPs with potentially incorrect information for years. For example Atittaya Bunyalieang, created today. I have no idea what's going on. I'm trying to verify the Hinduism claim but the source doesn't work. Most of the info is copied from Kratae R-Siam which is based upon the same dead refs. I will of course WP:AGF and work on the basis that the info is correct but, sometimes, I'd rather not have an article on a BLP at all than an unsourced one. Spiderone 17:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I understand the concerns. I agree that the CSD criteria don't quite apply here, but BLPPROD is probably the only undisputable process that can be used. If an article isn't eligible, and draftifications are reverted, then AfD is likely required. (Or, if a subject is possibly notable and one is willing to do the work, trimming the content down to a stub is also an option.) --Paul_012 (talk) 19:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Paul 012 and Tsistunagiska very fair points and I'll bear this in mind in future. It was my opinion at the time that they didn't meet CSD as they weren't hoaxes and had some sort of claim to notability, even though none of it was sourced. I considered BLPPROD but wasn't sure whether the external link to their personal Facebook page would be considered a 'source' even though it essentially confirms none of the article information. I would argue that the Facebook links for Draft:Kat Rattikarn and Draft:Praewa Patcharee are incorrect as well. I had done a brief search in Thai for all of them and all of them come up with some news sources but I have no idea whether there is enough to pass notability or not. I have left messages for the creator where appropriate but I would assume that they don't speak any English given that they haven't responded to any of them in any way. My main worry is that these articles will just sit there as unsourced BLPs with potentially incorrect information for years. For example Atittaya Bunyalieang, created today. I have no idea what's going on. I'm trying to verify the Hinduism claim but the source doesn't work. Most of the info is copied from Kratae R-Siam which is based upon the same dead refs. I will of course WP:AGF and work on the basis that the info is correct but, sometimes, I'd rather not have an article on a BLP at all than an unsourced one. Spiderone 17:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Spiderone, just bring them up for speedy deletion next time, especially since they have no sources. I'll support that. We may not agree on whether the AfC process is really all that beneficial, unless you get a good reviewer the responses can be quite demoralizing, but if you choose that option then you should follow through with it. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 15:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Please undo deletion on my Article
I apologise if i had made any bad edit and i tell you that it wasn't intentionally if i had done so. You tagged my article Manzoor Ahmad Bhat for deletion please restore it. Rasik99009 (talk) 20:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Rasik99009 - the main issue with that article is that it is entirely copied and pasted from a website. Since we do not have permission to do that, this in breach of copyright law. If the subject is notable, you are more than welcome to write the article in your own words and reference them to reliable sources. Spiderone 21:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
I apologise once again i wasn't of this thing. Can you please remove the deletion tag. Rasik99009 (talk) 21:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Rasik99009 - the deletion tag will need to remain as an administrator will need to remove the copyrighted content from the article history. After that is done, the article can be created again but please be careful not to copy and paste even one sentence when you create the article a second time. Spiderone 21:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Rasik99009 Please feel free to consult the Teahouse if you need help or tips on creating articles. :-) --ARoseWolf (Talk) 22:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Rasik99009 - you have done some very good work in the other article that you created so please don't let this one incident discourage you from contributing here Spiderone 22:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Rasik99009 Please feel free to consult the Teahouse if you need help or tips on creating articles. :-) --ARoseWolf (Talk) 22:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)