Jump to content

Talk:Nashat Akram

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Errors

[edit]

Surly, if born in 84, he couldn't have won the Iraqi league at 10 and played in the U17 at 12 or something??

Nahsat Akram was 16y in the 2000 AFC u-17 Champiosnhip. Mussav (talk) 02:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester City

[edit]

Nashat has not yet completed a transfer to Manchester City. It is still rumour and yet to be confirmed by Manchester City, until it is it should not be reported here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbradbury (talkcontribs) 23:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester City has confirmed that they are trying to sign Akram. But yes, he's not actually on City's payroll yet, so yes, he shouldn't be listed as playing for City on here yet. Falastur2 (talk) 04:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Now confirmed work permit has been denied, so he is not moving to Man City Pbradbury (talk) 16:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akram2009nashat.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Akram2009nashat.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Malaga 2012

[edit]

Proof that Nashat plays for Malaga not al-shaheed

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/feedarticle/10271375 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Playbox1 (talkcontribs) 00:35, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nashat Akram. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nashat Akram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]