User talk:Speedfish

Welcome!

Hello, Speedfish, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 12:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC) RadioFan (talk) 12:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template changes

Do not change anymore Navagation boxes such as Template:Wiz Khalifa and Template:Waka Flocka Flame unless you read and understand WP:NAVBOX. Navagation boxes are to "navagate" wikipedia so everything added there must have an internal link. Such as "Roll Up" not "The Race (Wiz Khalifa song)". STATic message me! 01:27, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from Flockaveli. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nor Cal Red Hawks

The article Nor Cal Red Hawks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sports team

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. St Anselm (talk) 10:44, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Respect My Hustle. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamsburgland (talk • contribs) 15:38, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your final warning

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Appeal: Georgia's Most Wanted, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The fact that you tried to hide one of your edits indicates that you're aware what you're doing is wrong but doing it anyway. This is your final warning before I seek moderator intervention. --Williamsburgland (talk) 19:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for continuing to violate the policy that Wikipedia is not censored, despite warnings and a previous block. Please do not continue to do this when the block expires, or you will be blocked for much longer, which would be a great pity, as you do much useful work for Wikipedia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:48, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked you, as the disruptive editing seems to have been a mistake. I suggest you try to see if something can be done about the filter. In any case, now that you know there is a problem it is up to you to make sure it doesn't happen again. At the very least you should click on "Show changes" before saving any edit, and if the problem is about to happen don't save it. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- I suspect part of what's caused this is that it wouldn't always be obvious what the parental filters done so as well as clicking "show changes" it may then be worth also using your browsers find function (usually Edit...Find) to see if the page contains any *s. Dpmuk (talk) 22:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again....

I simply cannot wrap my head around why you would make two dozen helpful edits to Wikipedia, and bury yet ANOTHER attempt at censorship right in the middle. You've been warned and blocked repeatedly, and the first thing you do is wipe out all the objectionable language in an article covering a genre of music that typically contains objectionable language. I've yet to see any attempt on your part to explain you actions or address this via the proper channels as has been suggested to you in the past. In light of this, I'm not even going to bother with another warning; I'm just going to notify for a longer block. I'm sure we'll go through this all over again when you return.--Williamsburgland (talk) 20:57, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am very reluctant to block you indefinitely, but that is the way you are heading. There are Wikipedia policies which I don't agree with, but I try to stick to them. Either you do the same, or there is no place for you in Wikipedia. When I saw that you had yet again been defying the policy on censorship, I was considering whether to block you for one week or two. However, I then noticed your edit summary, in which you made a totally misleading statement about what your edit was doing, pretending you were just "adding a link". If you not only deliberately flout Wikipedia policy, but also take steps to hide the fact that you are doing so, then there is really no justification. I have blocked you for one month, but I warn you that if you continue in the same way you will be blocked indefinitely. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:14, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Speedfish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I 'm able to notice many things on Wikipedia pages that are missing, such as links. I really want to help and update the pages.

Decline reason:

Yes, you are able to do those things. However, you appear hell-bent on eventual destruction of articles. You have failed to respond to the concerns above, and I'm quite surprised this is not an indefinite block. Read WP:GAB. Answer to the discussions above (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:40, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Technical f...up?

Speedfish, do you realise that you've been blocked not for those link-related edits, but for replacing words like fuck with asterisks in process? Maybe, there is some kind of parental filter on your computer? 212.233.112.10 (talk) 11:02, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Parental filter"

I've been editing Wikipedia on my iMac, which has a parental filter. If I use Safari on there, censors out stuff with asterisks. I'm not censoring out things, I'm not erasing anything questionable, my Apple computer just does it when I use Safari. I've also been editing on an old Dell computer, just in case this might be causing the problem. If I've edited on the Dell, I'm not censoring out anything, I'm just trying to add important information to pages. - Speedfish

I don't think Safari has that wordfilter by default. Anyway, I'll start a discussion at the proper venue. 46.44.46.91 (talk) 16:40, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedfish: The solution here is pretty simple. If an article contains anything questionable, don't use your iMac to edit it. Either just don't edit it, or use your Dell. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 17:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry guys!! I knew the iMac censors out stuff, but I didn't know that if I edited a page on there, it would save the asterisks put up by the iMac for the whole world to look at. I'm really sorry.:( - Speedfish

Speedfish: So, what are you going to do to prevent this from happening again? Are you going to just use your Dell? Or only use the iMac when you are absolutely sure this is nothing questionable? A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 17:52, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll only use the Dell, it's just that I didn't know that the iMac could put asterisks on pages. I really didn't know. Please forgive me. I thought I was only adding important stuff and fixing mistakes and erasing unnecessary things, not censoring out stuff.- Speedfish

Can I suggest you add another unblock request. I can't unblock you (as I'm not an admin) but I believe your explanation above and believe you should be unblock as I explain in more detail at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#****ed up? No, fucked up!. For the reason I suggest you just point to this discussion. Given this discussion and my suggestion adding another unblock request won't be seen as a bad thing so I wouldn't worry there. Dpmuk (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedfish: You can add another unblock request as Dpmuk suggests. If you do, you need to explain 2 things:

That you understand what you did wrong. (Basically, explain the whole filtering thing.)
That it won't happen again. (Basically, explain that you will only edit on your Dell which doesn't have the filter.)

Or if you like, I can ask the blocking admin to undo his block. Keep in mind that if it happens again - even if on accident - your next block will almost certainly be indefinite. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 18:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I think they explain that well enough in this conversation, but it can't do any harm to repeat it. Dpmuk (talk) 18:40, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Speedfish, you said that the parental feature works when you use safari, what if you used Firefox instead, does it do the same thing? N^oformation ^Talk 18:48, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've been unblocked! Thanks guys, but me filtering out words, I didn't do it on purpose, it was something I didn't know about. I had no clue, and I'm really sorry. Can I ask you something though? Someone on Wiki criticized me for making 24 helpful edits at one time. Should I limit the amount of edits I make at a certain time? Because I'm REALLY good at noticing things and try to fix them. When it comes to music articles, there are redirect song pages that I like to try to add to artists' lists. Should I limit the amount of redirect songs I add to the lists at certain times, though? I know I've been here for a over a year and 10 months, but I just don't know some things, you know? I don't know if the Firefox on the iMac wouldn't censor out things randomly, but I promised I would use the Dell only. What do you think about all of what I said? Wait, I don't think I've been unblocked...I thought I was, but apparently, it says it will expire on Nov 3...which do I believe? Am I unblocked, or still blocked?

You should be unblocked now - I've lifted the autoblock. Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try installing Firefox or Opera, then make some edits to your userpage, drop in a couple swear words. If it works, then the issue is probably with Safari settings and you can just use another browser. Night Ranger (talk) 02:00, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether you saw the message I posted above when I unblocked you. By mistake I put it below an old block notice instead of the latest one. If you didn't see it then I suggest reading it now. (It starts "I have unblocked you...") I hope you can now edit usefully, and put this unfortunate problem behind you. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:33, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why

are you adding categories to re-directed articles? Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 16:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I first saw that a few redirects were on Rick Ross' songs category, so I began adding more. I add these songs so others will see that I added them and mabye they'll want to make an article on them. On the article, they could talk about the song's composition, critical reception and/or charting, if it ever did. A few of the redirect songs are also singles. - Speedfish

Hmm okay. I just didn't get why you added ones to A Million Miles Away (Rihanna song), Farewell (Rihanna song), We All Want Love and Birthday Cake (song) as they re-direct back to their respective parent articles. Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 18:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

	Happy new year!
	we wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year! Pass a Method talk 18:58, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Song redirects.

There is no problem with you adding WP:Song|class=redirect when you create redirects. Although I wonder at creating redirects in the first place. I assume they are likely search terms.--Richhoncho (talk) 12:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the songs that I make redirect pages for might have either made the Hot 100 top 40, got certified gold, or topped the Rap or R&B/Hip-Hop charts. - Speedfish 5:14, 8 January 2012.

What if...

I'm just wondering, what if there were Wikipedia's such as a medieval one or a Constitution-like one? It'd be like: "The New England Patriots are hath a club in the town of Foxborough, Massachusetts. It was hath starteth in the year of Our Lord one-thousand, nine-hundred and fifty nine..."

Unblocked issue

Ok, about the blocking incident, the Safari has the parental filter but I noticed that Google Chrome or Firefox don't have it, but just for Safari, so I was using both programs and not Safari to edit on wikipedia. Sometimes on Google Chrome it says that I'm blocked but the block log entry is the entry where I got unblocked. Other times, I'm not blocked. What's going on here? It doesn't do that on the Dell at all, just as it doesn't on Google Chrome & Firefox.- Speedfish May 11 2012 17:38 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gladys Landaverde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chalatenango

Jayme Mata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Oranjestad

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Keak da Sneak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Alchemist and Richie Rich

Back n da Hood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Richie Rich

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wizard Video, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kiss the Ring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scarface (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Southside (producer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bow Wow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited T.R.U. REALigion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birdman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited J-Diggs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BET and Schuylkill, Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:33, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Missouri Rhythm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kansas City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your logo uploads

Hey, apparently you recently uploaded File:FresnoFlight.jpeg and File:AlbanyShockwave.jpg. These had fur templates stating they were for Missouri Rhythm. You also created two pages with correctly filled fur templates at File:FresnoFlight.jpg (note the jpg) and File:AlbanyShockwave.jpeg (note the jpeg). I have fixed this, but I thought I'd just let you know so you can watch out for this in the future. — daranz [ t ] 22:37, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing categories

Please always make sure that inline citations are present to support categories that you add. Thank you Span (talk) 21:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yo Gotti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hot 107.9 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moongod Allah

Hi. You gotta know that Moongod was born in Holland not USA :) Tashivana (talk) 03:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IWFL

I randomly came across a page transcluding this template, which, as you can see, is now a complete wreck.

You seem to have accidentally done this with this edit. I don't want to revert it, since you seem to have changed the content there. Can you try to fix it?

Thank you,

הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) (formerly R——bo) 01:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ampichino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Dean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Song redirects

Hi can you please stop adding redirects to navboxes it's against the guidelines, navboxes are for real articles not redirects. Thanks Koala15 (talk) 02:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of social nudity places in North America, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nassau, Bourg and Playa Grande (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Roonghan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Baloch

The Game Is Thick, Vol. 2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kansas City

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mavado (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scarface (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jae Millz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Hamakouladji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tilemsi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note regarding reverted edit

Please note that I undid your most recent edit to Rich Homie Quan as it added a paragraph of personal information (including possibly contentious material) that was not supported by any reliable sources as is required by BLP policy. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:46, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Cathedral Catholic High School, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 01:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kafani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Delinquents (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Da Bidness 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jagged Edge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Smigg Dirtee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Smigg Dirtee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. STATic message me! 06:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Trip'n 4 Life.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Trip'n 4 Life.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:03, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Thizz City.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Thizz City.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Azia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uchhala, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Awan and Mian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Jacka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:59, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to J-Diggs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| ''[[Revenue Retrievin': Night Shift]]'' <small>[bonus track])</small>
| [[Droop-E]], Cousin Fik, [[Turf Talk], Willie Joe

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:40, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lil Rue

Hello, Speedfish, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Lil Rue, appears to be directly copied from http://lilrue.wordpress.com/about/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Lil Rue if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 20:32, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hata -e- Sheikhan

Hi! Thanks a lot for your category addition for the article Hata -e- Sheikhan (diff). But I am sorry I had to revert it because Hata -e- Sheikhan is not a village, it is a prominent locality in Lucknow. Thanks a lot again! :) Have a nice day! Martinian ^{Leave a message!} 18:04, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Marshall Tucker Band, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Need You Now (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Unity (Uzbekistan) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{reflist]}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:37, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Osman Kamara

Hello, Speedfish. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Osman Kamara, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:13, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

K Camp listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect K Camp. Since you had some involvement with the K Camp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. STATic message me! 06:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Southwest Florida Spartans

The article Southwest Florida Spartans has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sports team. Failed to play any games in a notable league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LionMans Account (talk) 02:39, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of baseball players

Please take a moment to read WP:WPBB/N. Baseball players are notable after they play in a major league game. They are not notable just because they have been drafted.Jacona (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Uzbek and Wazir. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Siccness Records

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Siccness Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:38, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Whig Party

You added a couple of people as running as a Modern Whig for the 2014 elections. However, the source you provided is a WP:PRIMARY source from the Modern Whig party and only says that they endorsed the candidate. You need a third party source to say that these people have declared themselves part of this party. Also, you put Orman into the SD election page, but he is running in Kansas. Arzel (talk) 05:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Orman

As an editor that recently edit Greg Orman, could you please weigh in at Talk:Greg_Orman#UNDUE. Thanks. - Cwobeel (talk) 21:55, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Burkinabé uprising

Can you please clarify their role? Also if you add to the infobox then please add to prose. And repetitive use of refs can use ref name instead.Lihaas (talk) 09:52, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cuthbert, Texas

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cuthbert, Texas, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/hrcba.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:15, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lajitas, Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boquillas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chivington, Colorado

added a link pointing to Kiowa County

Liberal Party (Philippines)

added a link pointing to Center

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violations

Hello Speedfish. That message above from CorenSearchBot has called attention to some of your edits where you have copied text in directly from other websites. This is in violation of our policy on copyright. All content here must be written in your own words. You can use those sources for getting the ideas you want to write about, but the actual text must be in your own words. I picked the most recent 5 of your large adds, and found them all to have been laregly copied in from the Internet: Perico, Texas, Lajitas, Texas, Whitney, West Virginia, Fire Creek, West Virginia, and Michigan, West Virginia.

Now, there's several ways to proceed. The best is for you to go back through your edits and identify the ones where you copied in text like that, and remove the copied parts. The other way is that we open an official Copyright Investigation where others essentially do the same thing. The first way demonstrates that you are willing to help us clean up what could be a legal mess for Wikipedia, so is of course preferred all around.

Most importantly, moving forward, be sure you do not copy any text from any internet site (or even from a book), but rather write out those ideas and fact in your own words. I'm glad to help out if I can. Please reply back here regarding the above, thanks. Crow^Caw 01:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Speedfish. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Crow^Caw 19:24, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the significant issues above and the lack of any response, I have blocked you for the time being. If you want to be unblocked, make sure you actually understand our copyright policy first. Wizardman 15:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Speedfish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't know the link I had posted on that ghost town page was copyrighted. I took it down once I found out it was. - Speedfish

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 03:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Speedfish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked cause you had seen I had posted something that was copyrighted. Well, I didn't know it was. I understand now why I've been blocked. I'll try not to continue doing that sort of damage. I know it was an accident, but I'll try not to do it again. - Speedfish

Decline reason:

The investigative work done by Crow indicates there was a pattern of copyright infringement, and not a singular, one off, accident as you imply. PhilKnight (talk) 17:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To make sure that you understand the issue, can you answer a couple of questions for me? How can one tell if some content on the Internet is copyrighted and what kind of copyrighted content can be used on Wikipedia? Max Semenik (talk) 07:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Show me where. I haven't been paying attention. - Speedfish

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Speedfish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, so I haven't been paying attention to what is copyrighted and what isn't. I don't keep track of my notifications as much as I should, so that's why I didn't really know what the warnings were all about. I can't even tell if I even received some of the warnings prior to my blocking. Can you tell me how long I'll be blocked at the least? - Speedfish

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but your responses below are simply underwhelming and do not give any indication that you understand the problem. You are not blocked for "posting links", you are blocked for wholesale cut&pastes from copyrighted sources, and then completely ignoring warnings and patient pleas to stop this problematic behavior. You will need to explicitly pledge to stop this, and show some indication that you understand the problem. Kuru (talk) 14:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Indefinitely, as you can see in your block log. And to see if the warning were received before your block, look at the date and time at the end of each one. Frankly, given your history of copyright infringement, I don't see much hope for an unblock. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 16:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I really haven't paid much attention to any of those things, as I have tried to tell you. Had I known about these infringements, I would'nt've have continued doing it - Speedfish — Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedfish (talk • contribs) 17:21, 16 January 2015‎

For now, I am leaving your unblock request open, and any other administrator is free to assess it and either accept it or reject it. However, your previous blocks were also a result of the fact that you hadn't "paid much attention" to things you were doing. That was a long time ago, and I am concerned that you are still editing without paying enough attention to what is going on. For that reason, I am not likely to unblock you unless you can give a clear indication that your approach to editing will be very different from now on. I am sure you are a good faith editor, and I do believe you when you say that you "would'nt've" done what you did if you had realised what you were doing. That applies both to this block and in to the previous block. However, the point is that you need to make sure that you do realise what you are doing. If you are to have a reasonable chance of being unblocked, I think you will need to convince either me or another administrator that from now on you will take far more care to check things. What differences will there be in what you do from now on, if you are unblocked? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know what was copyrighted and what wasn't. I promise it will be different from now on. I'll read what links I can post and what ones I can't. - Speedfish

I haven't even been blocked in 2 years, and it wasn't even the result of being copyrighted. - Speedfish - Speedfish — Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedfish (talk • contribs) 23:06, 16 January 2015‎

You are right. In fact I lifted your last block well over three years ago, not just two, and it had nothing to do with copyright. However, my point is that both of the times you have been blocked, it has been because you were not taking enough notice. The last time, you were apparently editing with some kind of "parental" filter running, which replaced text in articles you edited with asterisks, as for example in these edits: [1] [2] [3]. To make an odd mistake like that once or twice is perhaps an understandable mistake, but you kept on doing it, which suggests that you were not checking the effect of your edits before clicking on "save page". You received several messages about the problem, but you carried on doing the same thing. You should have been prompted by those messages to look back at the edits they referred to and check to see what was being objected to, in which case you would have seen what the problem was, but you didn't. Alternatively, you could have asked the editors what they meant by the messages, but you just ignored them instead. You were blocked, and given a block notice which explicitly mentioned replacing text by asterisks, but you still didn't check the edits to see what was wrong. After the block, you simply removed all messages about the problem, and continued as before. You got more messages about the problem, and another block, but it was only when another editor suggested that it might be a parental filter that you took any notice. I have no doubt at all that you were a ting in good faith, and honestly did not realise what you were doing, but the point is that it was your fault that you did not realise, as took no notice of messages, and did not look back at the edits in question, which you should have done. (For example, one second looking at this edit would have been enough for you to have seen the problem.) OK, eventually, following the help of other editors, you seemed to understand, so I unblocked you, moved on to other things, and pretty well forgot your existence until, rather more than three years later, I find you have been blocked again. This time it is for copyright infringements, which is very different, but the point is that once again you were ignoring messages from other editors, and failing to make any attempt to check what the problems with your editing were. Looking at this talk page, I also see 23 disambiguation link notifications, sent over a period ranging from August 2012 to November 2014. The idea is that you read the notification, realise what you mistake was, and make sure you never make the same mistake again, not that you just let them pile up on your talk page and ignore them. You say " I haven't been paying attention", and that is really the whole cause of both this block and the blocks on the previous occasion: anyone who regularly edits Wikipedia must pay attention. Everything you have written here shows not only that you haven't been paying attention, but also that you don't realise how much of a serious problem not paying attention is. I certainly won't block you unless you can persuade me that you are going to dramatically change, and I doubt that any other administrator will either. Simply saying "I didn't bother to know about copyright, but now I do know" is nowhere near enough. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FresnoFlight.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FresnoFlight.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AlbanyShockwave.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AlbanyShockwave.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:ThizzCity.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ThizzCity.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Trip'n4Life.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Trip'n4Life.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JacksonShowboats.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JacksonShowboats.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NYCThunder.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NYCThunder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of J-Diggs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J-Diggs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J-Diggs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What Kind of Man Would I Be? (song) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What Kind of Man Would I Be? (song). Since you had some involvement with the What Kind of Man Would I Be? (song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MissouriRhythm.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MissouriRhythm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Trip'n4Life.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trip'n4Life.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Felicity Passon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Felicity Passon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicity Passon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DesertFireCats.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DesertFireCats.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Equipto

The article Equipto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of Notability, appears to be a non-notable supporting artist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A Guy into Books (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Albums produced by StreetRunner has been nominated for discussion

Category:Albums produced by StreetRunner, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 23:28, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yannick Mitoumba

The article Yannick Mitoumba has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cake & Ice Cream 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cake & Ice Cream 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wars involving Cape Verde

A tag has been placed on Category:Wars involving Cape Verde indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Hemoglobin (My Flag Red)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hemoglobin (My Flag Red) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 19 § Hemoglobin (My Flag Red) until a consensus is reached. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]